1-20 OF 25 RESULTS FOR

Karchiga Deposit

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2012
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2012) 53 (1): 77–91.
...K.V. Lobanov; I.V. Gaskov Abstract The Karchiga copper massive sulfide deposit is located in the Kurchum block of high-grade metamorphosed rocks. This block is part of the Irtysh shear zone, which belongs to the largest transregional fault in Central Asia. The deposit is associated with the gneiss...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
Trace and REE elements for amphibolites (basalts) of the Karchiga deposit (N-MORB, E-MORB, and OIB after Sun and McDonough, 1989). The Karchiga samples are collected from the footwall (D-6, D-8) and hanging wall (U-4, U-9) of the Central lode as well as from amphibolites within the massive sulfide (M-1, M-3). The analytical results are normalized to primitive mantle (a) and chondrite (b). Chondrite values are from Boynton (1984).
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 8 Trace and REE elements for amphibolites (basalts) of the Karchiga deposit (N-MORB, E-MORB, and OIB after Sun and McDonough, 1989 ). The Karchiga samples are collected from the footwall (D-6, D-8) and hanging wall (U-4, U-9) of the Central lode as well as from amphibolites within
Image
Histogram of δ34S for sulfides from the Karchiga deposit based on the data presented in Table 6.
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 9 Histogram of δ 34 S for sulfides from the Karchiga deposit based on the data presented in Table 6 .
Image
Metamorphosed ores of the Karchiga deposit (drill core of exploration holes). a) Minor fold in banded pyrite-chalcopyrite ore. b) Microfolding in chalcopyrite-pyrite ore. c) Massive pyrite-chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite ore from the Central lode with “durchbewegung” textures—inclusions of host rocks and nonmetallic minerals (quartz) with a chalcopyrite rim. d) Banded pyrite-chalcopyrite ore with metamorphogenic pucking. e) Massive chalcopyrite ore with relic bedding formed by quartz and biotite in the Northeast lode. f) Massive chalcopyrite-pyrite-pyrrhotite ore with cataclased phenocrysts of late metamorphogenic pyrite and inclusions of host rocks and quartz grains in the Central lode. Abbreviations: Chp = chalcopyrite, Ep = epidote, Po = pyrrhotite, Pyr = pyrite, Qtz = quartz.
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 11 Metamorphosed ores of the Karchiga deposit (drill core of exploration holes). a) Minor fold in banded pyrite-chalcopyrite ore. b) Microfolding in chalcopyrite-pyrite ore. c) Massive pyrite-chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite ore from the Central lode with “durchbewegung” textures—inclusions of host
Image
Comparison of the δ34S values of the Karchiga deposit with the other Besshi-type deposits (data from Huston, 1999; Peter and Scott, 1999; Vikentiev et al., 2008; Bailie et al., 2010) and modern ocean floor sulfide systems including those in back-arc basins and on sedimented and unsedimented ocean ridges (modified after Bailie et al., 2010).
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 17 Comparison of the δ 34 S values of the Karchiga deposit with the other Besshi-type deposits (data from Huston, 1999 ; Peter and Scott, 1999 ; Vikentiev et al., 2008 ; Bailie et al., 2010 ) and modern ocean floor sulfide systems including those in back-arc basins and on sedimented
Image
Geological sketch map and section of the Karchiga deposit. 1, loose Quaternary sediments; 2, gneisses; 3, amphibolites; 4, orebody (cutoff grade >0.5% Cu); 5, faults; 6, axis of syncline; 7, Central (I) and Northeastern (II) lodes; 8, outline of commercial reserves (projection on a horizontal plane); 9, structural elements; 10, cross-section line; 11, 12, drillholes (11, in plan; 12, in section, with number).
Published: 01 January 2012
Fig. 4. Geological sketch map and section of the Karchiga deposit. 1 , loose Quaternary sediments; 2 , gneisses; 3 , amphibolites; 4 , orebody (cutoff grade >0.5% Cu); 5 , faults; 6 , axis of syncline; 7 , Central (I) and Northeastern (II) lodes; 8 , outline of commercial reserves
Image
Mg-rich anthophyllite-containing altered rocks of the Karchiga deposit.
Published: 01 January 2012
Fig. 5. Mg-rich anthophyllite-containing altered rocks of the Karchiga deposit.
Image
Photographs of representative host rocks and alteration types at the Karchiga deposit. a) Southeastern flank of the Karchiga deposit (looking southeast) with typical outcrops of the Middle package (b) of alternating gneiss and amphibolite (dark), with the latter forming positive topographic features. b) Deformed biotite-quartz-plagioclase gneiss with fine banding and linear distribution of dark minerals as well as lepidogranoblastic and granoblastic structures. c) An outcrop of amphibolites in the footwall of the Central lode. Amphibolites also reveal numerous parasitic folds. d) Epidotized amphibolite from the core of drill hole KGDD11-202 in the Northeast lode. e) Quartz-chlorite-anthophyllite rock with disseminated pyrite and veinlets of pyrite and chalcopyrite. This highly magnesian rock occurs in the immediate vicinity of the orebodies. f) Contact (in red dashed line) between quartz-chlorite-anthophyllite rock and gneiss in the Central lode. g) Radial aggregates of anthophyllite, often occurring near quartz and chalcopyrite segregations in the core of hole KGDD08-64 in the Central lode.
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 6 Photographs of representative host rocks and alteration types at the Karchiga deposit. a) Southeastern flank of the Karchiga deposit (looking southeast) with typical outcrops of the Middle package (b) of alternating gneiss and amphibolite (dark), with the latter forming positive
Image
(a–c) 39Ar/40Ar ages of biotite collected from pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-quartz-biotite aggregate in the Central lode of the Karchiga deposit.
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 14 (a–c) 39 Ar/ 40 Ar ages of biotite collected from pyrrhotite-chalcopyrite-quartz-biotite aggregate in the Central lode of the Karchiga deposit.
Image
Concordia diagram for zircon U-Pb ages from amphibolite in the hanging wall of the Northeastern lode of the Karchiga deposit (dating points, see Table 7).
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 13 Concordia diagram for zircon U-Pb ages from amphibolite in the hanging wall of the Northeastern lode of the Karchiga deposit (dating points, see Table 7 ).
Image
Re-Os ages for pyrite from samples KG11-01 (a) and KG11-03 (b). Model Re-Os ages for pyrites from the Karchiga deposit (c).
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 15 Re-Os ages for pyrite from samples KG11-01 (a) and KG11-03 (b). Model Re-Os ages for pyrites from the Karchiga deposit (c).
Image
Scanning electron microscope microphotographs of zircon crystals recovered from a 20-kg sample of amphibolite in the hanging wall of the Karchiga deposit. Dating points correspond to those in Table 7.
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 12 Scanning electron microscope microphotographs of zircon crystals recovered from a 20-kg sample of amphibolite in the hanging wall of the Karchiga deposit. Dating points correspond to those in Table 7 .
Image
Ore-hosting middle unit of the complex of high-grade metamorphosed rocks and the position of the Karchiga deposit and other VMS occurrences in the geochemical fields (soil). 1, boundaries between the units of the gneiss–amphibolite metamorphic complex; 2, faults. Units of the metamorphic complex (A, lower; B, middle; C, upper). VMS deposits and occurrences (1, Central lode; 2, Northeastern lode; occurrences: 3, Shandybulak; 4, Spasovka; 5, Yuzhnaya Antiklinal’). Decrease in grade: red → green → blue.
Published: 01 January 2012
Fig. 3. Ore-hosting middle unit of the complex of high-grade metamorphosed rocks and the position of the Karchiga deposit and other VMS occurrences in the geochemical fields (soil). 1 , boundaries between the units of the gneiss–amphibolite metamorphic complex; 2 , faults. Units
Image
Discrimination diagrams showing composition of amphibolites (basalts) from the Middle package at the Karchiga deposit. (A) Zr/4-Nb*2-Y (Meschede, 1986), (B) Th-Hf/3-Ta (Wood, 1980), (C) Zr-Zr/Y (Pearce and Norry, 1979), (D) La/10-Y/15-Nb/8 (Cabanis and Lecolle, 1989), (E) Th-Hf/3-Nb/16 (Wood, 1980), (F) Zr-Zr/Y (Pearce, 1983), (G) Th-Zr/117-Nb/16 (Wood, 1980), (H) Ce-Sr-Sm (Ikeda, 1990), (I) Ta/Yb-Th/Yb (Pearce, 1983).
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 7 Discrimination diagrams showing composition of amphibolites (basalts) from the Middle package at the Karchiga deposit. (A) Zr/4-Nb*2-Y ( Meschede, 1986 ), (B) Th-Hf/3-Ta ( Wood, 1980 ), (C) Zr-Zr/Y ( Pearce and Norry, 1979 ), (D) La/10-Y/15-Nb/8 ( Cabanis and Lecolle, 1989 ), (E) Th-Hf/3
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 August 2014
Economic Geology (2014) 109 (5): 1403–1430.
...Fig. 8 Trace and REE elements for amphibolites (basalts) of the Karchiga deposit (N-MORB, E-MORB, and OIB after Sun and McDonough, 1989 ). The Karchiga samples are collected from the footwall (D-6, D-8) and hanging wall (U-4, U-9) of the Central lode as well as from amphibolites within...
FIGURES | View All (22)
Image
Geological and structural sketch map of the Kurchum block of high-grade metamorphosed rocks, based on (Bespaev et al., 1997; Khoreva, 1963; Shcherba et al., 1998). 1, undifferentiated Pg–QIV sediments; 2, D2–C1 sedimentary and volcaniclastic deposits; 3, S2–D1 terrigenous sediments (Teken’ Formation); 4, undifferentiated gneiss–amphibolite complex; 5, amphibolite beds; 6, P1 granites (Kalba complex); 7, C3–P1 Kalguty volcanic complex; 8, syntectonic granite-gneisses; 9–11, D3–C1 Irtysh complex: 9, granodiorites, plagiogranites; 10, gabbros; 11, diabases; 12, Maralikha serpentinite complex; 13, faults; 14–17, mineral types of deposits and occurrences: 14, Cu VMS; 15, Cu–Zn VMS; 16, gold–quartz; 17, Cu–Ni magmatic; 18: a, occurrence, b, deposit (the Karchiga deposit is shown in green).
Published: 01 January 2012
, gabbros; 11 , diabases; 12 , Maralikha serpentinite complex; 13 , faults; 14–17 , mineral types of deposits and occurrences: 14 , Cu VMS; 15 , Cu–Zn VMS; 16 , gold–quartz; 17 , Cu–Ni magmatic; 18 : a , occurrence, b , deposit (the Karchiga deposit is shown in green).
Image
Copper grade and tonnage for the Karchiga and Vavilonskoye deposits, as compared with other Besshi-type deposits (modified after Peter and Scott, 1999).
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 19 Copper grade and tonnage for the Karchiga and Vavilonskoye deposits, as compared with other Besshi-type deposits (modified after Peter and Scott, 1999 ).
Image
Geological map of the Karchiga ore field. 1, loose Quaternary sediments; 2, Paleocene sediments; 3–5, rocks of the metamorphic complex: 3, upper unit (C); 4, middle unit (B); 5, lower unit (A); 6–9, undifferentiated dike series: 6, plagiogranite-porphyry; 7, dioritic porphyrites; 8, diabasic porphyrites; 9, granite-porphyry; 10, gabbro-diorites of the Irtysh complex; 11, amphibolite bodies; 12, outline of the Karchiga VMS deposit (C, Central lode; NE, Northeastern lode); 13, VMS occurrences (1, Yuzhnaya Antiklinal’; 2, Shandybulak; 3, Spasovka); 14, Groza (G) gold–quartz occurrence; 15, possible zone of a paleotransform fault; 16, axis of syncline; 17, ellipsoid and kinematics of strike-slip faulting (fissure systems: 1, 290–310°; 2, 230–260°; 3, 190–210°); 18, faults; 19, structural elements.
Published: 01 January 2012
, dioritic porphyrites; 8 , diabasic porphyrites; 9 , granite-porphyry; 10 , gabbro-diorites of the Irtysh complex; 11 , amphibolite bodies; 12 , outline of the Karchiga VMS deposit (C, Central lode; NE, Northeastern lode); 13 , VMS occurrences (1, Yuzhnaya Antiklinal’; 2, Shandybulak; 3, Spasovka
Image
Besshi-type and Kuroko-type deposits in the Rudny Altai. A model of (a) Besshi-type (pelitic-mafic) and (b) Kuroko-type (bimodal-felsic) deposits (after Galley et al., 2007; numeric data after Dergachev, 2010). Geologic sections typical of Karchiga (c) and Novo-Leninogorskoye polymetallic (d) deposits in the Rudny Altai belt. Note morphology of the orebodies and host rock lithology. See additional comments in Table 9.
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 16 Besshi-type and Kuroko-type deposits in the Rudny Altai. A model of (a) Besshi-type (pelitic-mafic) and (b) Kuroko-type (bimodal-felsic) deposits (after Galley et al., 2007 ; numeric data after Dergachev, 2010 ). Geologic sections typical of Karchiga (c) and Novo-Leninogorskoye
Image
Classification of Rudny Altay VMS deposits based on their relative base metal (Cu + Zn + Pb) concentrations. The VMS/SEDEX boundary is after Franklin et al. (1981). Symbols represent the following deposits in respective deposit types: Cyprus type (mafic): Agrokipia, Apliki, Kalavasos-Mousoulos, Kokkinopezoula, Kokkinoyia, Limni, Mathiati, Mavrovouni, Skouriotissa, Lasail, Mauk, Aarja, Bayda; Besshi type (mafic-siliciclastic): Windy Craggy, Outokumpu, Vuonos, Besshi, Hitachi, Sazare, Shimokawa, Otjihase, Duchess, Ducktown, Mainskoye, Altin-Tepe, Granduc; Urals type (bimodal-mafic): Sibai, Uchaly, Yubileinoe, Chebachie, Molodezhnoe, Ozernoye, Talgan, Uzel’ga, Blyava, Avangard, Limannoye, Priorskoye, Makan, Maysk, Oktyabrskoye, Ozernoye West, Podolsk, Podolsk East, Podolsk North, Semenov East, Dzhusinskoye, Gai, Komsomolskoye, Britannia, Ecstall, Point Leamington, Lockport, Shasta King, Mammoth, Crandon, Lynne, Pelican River; Kuroko type (bimodal-felsic, bimodal-siliciclastic): Fukazawa, Hanaoka mine (total), Hanawa, Kosaka Group (total), Kosaka-Ezuri, Kosaka-Motoyama, Kosaka-Uchinotai E, Kosaka-Uchinotai W, Kosaka-Uwamuki, Furutobe, Kurosawa, Iwame and Iwame West, Francisco I Madero, Hellyer, Xiaotieshan; Kuroko-type Rudny Altay: Artemievskoye, Belousovka, Chekmar, Grekhovskoye, Kamyshinskoye, Maleevskoye, Nikolayevskoye, Novo-Leninogorskoye, Orlovskoye, Ridder-Sokolnoye, Shemonaikha, Tishinskoye, Zyryanovskoye, Korbalikhinskoye, Novo-Zolotushinskoye, Rubtsovskoye, Stepnoye, Talovskoye, Yubileinoye, Zakharovskoye, Zarechenskoye, Zmeinogorskoye; Besshi-type Rudny Altay: Karchiga, Vavilonskoye.
Published: 01 August 2014
Fig. 18 Classification of Rudny Altay VMS deposits based on their relative base metal (Cu + Zn + Pb) concentrations. The VMS/SEDEX boundary is after Franklin et al. (1981) . Symbols represent the following deposits in respective deposit types: Cyprus type (mafic): Agrokipia, Apliki, Kalavasos