1-20 OF 3523 RESULTS FOR

Kai Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Time-structure maps of the (A) top Kai Formation, (B) bottom glide plane, and (C) seafloor, accompanied by their corresponding variance maps (D–F), highlighting the influence of faults on landslide location and the formation of headwall scarps and blocks. The “L”-shaped pathways in F suggest southwestward movement of the last landsliding event before turning to the northwest.
Published: 06 April 2020
Figure 7. Time-structure maps of the (A) top Kai Formation, (B) bottom glide plane, and (C) seafloor, accompanied by their corresponding variance maps (D–F), highlighting the influence of faults on landslide location and the formation of headwall scarps and blocks. The “L”-shaped pathways in F
Image
 Seismic profile CD produced from the 3D seismic dataset. The Kai Formation throughout the Vøring Basin is characterized by numerous polygonal faults with small offsets (5–20 m) and an average spacing of 100–500 m. The polygonal faults affect an interval with an average thickness of 500 ms TWT (from Horizon C to Horizon D). Although the base of the Naust Formation (below the debris-flow interval and over Horizon C) does not seem affected by such faulting on the seismic profile, polygonal faults have been clearly identified on Horizons A and B, using curvature maps.
Published: 01 January 2007
Fig. 5.  Seismic profile CD produced from the 3D seismic dataset. The Kai Formation throughout the Vøring Basin is characterized by numerous polygonal faults with small offsets (5–20 m) and an average spacing of 100–500 m. The polygonal faults affect an interval with an average thickness of 500
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2007
Journal of the Geological Society (2007) 164 (1): 129–141.
...Fig. 5.  Seismic profile CD produced from the 3D seismic dataset. The Kai Formation throughout the Vøring Basin is characterized by numerous polygonal faults with small offsets (5–20 m) and an average spacing of 100–500 m. The polygonal faults affect an interval with an average thickness of 500...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Series: Geological Society, London, Petroleum Geology Conference Series
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.1144/0060845
EISBN: 9781862394124
... regression forced the coastline of the syn-tectonic Kai Formation 50–150 km west of the present coastline and a genetic link between the regression and the smaller-scale contraction structures is observed. Long wavelength (200–300 km) lithospheric bulging is suggested to explain the coastline regression...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 2004
DOI: 10.1306/M80924C17
EISBN: 9781629810478
... for each grid. Two simulation case studies were conducted using a depositional and diagenetic model for the Pleistocene Ryukyu Group in Irabu Island of the southern Ryukyus, southwest Japan, and another model of carbonate reservoirs of the upper Miocene Kais Formation in the Walio oil field of Irian Jaya...
FIGURES | View All (25)
Image
—Regional structure map on top of Kais Formation in Salawati basin.
Published: 01 September 1976
Fig. 7 —Regional structure map on top of Kais Formation in Salawati basin.
Series: SEPM Short Course Notes
Publisher: SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology)
Published: 01 January 1991
DOI: 10.2110/scn.91.25.0097
EISBN: 9781565761063
... to determine the timing of geological events and constrain models of diagenesis, oil migration, and reservoir prediction. This method is applied to studies of reservoir diagenesis and petroleum maturation, migration, and correlation for the Mishrif Formation, Dubai, the Kais Formation, Indonesia...
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2003
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.216.01.18
EISBN: 9781862394643
... Abstract 2D and 3D seismic data from the mid-Norwegian margin show that polygonal fault systems are widespread within the fine-grained, Miocene sediments of the Kai Formation that overlie the Mesozoic/Early Cenozoic rift basins. Outcropping polygonal faults show that de-watering and development...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 15 March 2024
DOI: 10.1144/SP525-2023-25
EISBN: 9781786209573
... margin (e.g. Helland Hansen and Ormen Lange), continued seafloor spreading and margin subsidence ( Brekke 2000 ; Rundberg and Eidvin 2005 ). The deposition of fine-grained muddy oozes continued into the period of the Kai Formation, which is dominated by claystones dating from the Middle Miocene...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Image
 Schematic model summarizing the processes of formation and reactivation of polygonal faults. The lower interval is affected by a continuous process of compaction by volumetric contraction of smectite-rich Kai Formation sediments at shallow depths. The deformation is progressively accommodated along faults during burial and the throws increase both upward and downward (Berndt et al. 2003; Gay et al. 2004). The upper interval is affected by instantaneous compaction as a result of the sudden loading by debris-flow deposits, creating a new polygonal faults interval with constant offsets along the faults. The deposition of the debris-flow deposit is also responsible for partial reactivation of polygonal faults within the underlying Kai Formation, and some of them propagate upward within the base of the Naust Formation. This helps fluids to ascend from deeper levels through these interconnected polygonal fault intervals, forming pipes and sea-floor pockmarks.
Published: 01 January 2007
Fig. 11.  Schematic model summarizing the processes of formation and reactivation of polygonal faults. The lower interval is affected by a continuous process of compaction by volumetric contraction of smectite-rich Kai Formation sediments at shallow depths. The deformation is progressively
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1962
AAPG Bulletin (1962) 46 (9): 1734–1735.
... form prominent cliffs while at other places they form low flat-topped ridges along canyon floors. These distinctive shoestring lenses were named the Karla Kay Conglomerate Member and were assigned by Ekren and Houser (1959, p. 195) to the Burro Canyon Formation. Young (1960, p. 169) subsequently...
Image
—Isopach map in Sele peninsula from top of Textularia “2” Limestone to top of Kais Formation. Thin isopach values are over tops of reefs. Contour interval: 500 ft (152 m).
Published: 01 September 1976
Fig. 9 —Isopach map in Sele peninsula from top of Textularia “2” Limestone to top of Kais Formation. Thin isopach values are over tops of reefs. Contour interval: 500 ft (152 m).
Image
Section through 10 wells. The line of section is shown in Figure 7. N, Naust Formation; K, Kvitnos Formation; L, Lange Formation. The unlabelled interval between the Kvitnos and Naust formations comprises the whole sequence from the Late Cretaceous Nise Formation to the Miocene–Pliocene Kai Formation. Density porosity values (%) on the best-fitting exponential trends for the Kvitnos and Lange mudstones at 2700 m depth below seafloor are given along the bottom of the figure.
Published: 18 December 2014
Kai Formation. Density porosity values (%) on the best-fitting exponential trends for the Kvitnos and Lange mudstones at 2700 m depth below seafloor are given along the bottom of the figure.
Image
Geology of the Big Gossan and Wanagon Gold deposits (modified with permission from unpub. PT Freeport Indonesia geologic maps). A. Local surface geology at Big Gossan and Wanagon Gold (Map projection: WGS84, UTM zone 53). B. Cross section of the Wanagon Gold deposit (XX′ in (A)), showing interpreted geology adapted with permission from unpublished PT Freeport Indonesia geologic section and the distribution of hydrothermal systems based on the indicated drill holes. The Wanagon Gold skarn Cu-Au deposit is open to depth. C. 2,930-m elevation level geologic map of the Big Gossan deposit from underground mapping and drill holes and location of underground drives and drill sections (modified with permission from unpub PT Freeport Indonesia drawing and R.G. Taylor, G.W. Clarke, and P.J. Pollard, unpub. report for PT Freeport International, 1999). Stratigraphic abbreviations for the Kembelangan Group and New Guinea Limestone Group are from Quarles Van Ufford (1996) and Dow et al. (1988): Kay = Kay intrusion, Kkeh = Kembelangan shale; Kkel = Kembelangan limestone; Kkes = Kembelangan sandstone; TE = Ertsberg intrusion; TF = Faumai formation; TK = Kais formation; Tip = Wanagon sill; Tw = Waripi formation dolostone.
Published: 01 August 2005
for the Kembelangan Group and New Guinea Limestone Group are from Quarles Van Ufford (1996) and Dow et al. (1988) : Kay = Kay intrusion, Kkeh = Kembelangan shale; Kkel = Kembelangan limestone; Kkes = Kembelangan sandstone; TE = Ertsberg intrusion; TF = Faumai formation; TK = Kais formation; Tip = Wanagon sill; Tw
Image
Plan of the Grasberg Igneous Complex at the Amole Drift level (3,040 m), showing simplified geology and the location of samples used in this study. Note that drill hole AM96-36-04 was drilled steeply upward and the sample came from skarn apparently developed in the Kais Formation limestone (plan courtesy of P.T. Freeport Indonesia Inc.).
Published: 01 August 2005
F ig . 5. Plan of the Grasberg Igneous Complex at the Amole Drift level (3,040 m), showing simplified geology and the location of samples used in this study. Note that drill hole AM96-36-04 was drilled steeply upward and the sample came from skarn apparently developed in the Kais Formation
Image
Summary diagram showing the positions of seismic stratigraphic horizons H1 to H11 and a synthesis of wireline data from well 6403/6-1. The ages of horizons were taken from Forsberg and Locat (2005), Løseth and Henriksen (2005), Rise et al. (2006), and Kjoberg et al. (2017). H1—Seafloor; H3—top Kai Formation; H7—top Brygge Formation; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; GP—Group; GR—Gamma Ray; FM—Formation; MD—Measured Depth. Age scale is given in Ma; TWT—two-way traveltime.
Published: 06 April 2020
—Seafloor; H3—top Kai Formation; H7—top Brygge Formation; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; GP—Group; GR—Gamma Ray; FM—Formation; MD—Measured Depth. Age scale is given in Ma; TWT—two-way traveltime.
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted east-west seismic profile across the study area. Its location is shown in Figure 1B. Magma intrusions that formed during the breakup of the northeast Atlantic gave rise to the migration of fluid via faults and pipes. Trapped fluid is revealed as high-amplitude reflections above pipes and around faults. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H5—unconformity 2; H6—unconformity 3; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT transition; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; TWT—two-way traveltime; MTD—mass-transport deposit.
Published: 06 April 2020
as high-amplitude reflections above pipes and around faults. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H5—unconformity 2; H6—unconformity 3; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT transition; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare
Image
 Seismic profile IJ produced from the 3D seismic dataset. The number of faults, particularly between Horizons C and B, is higher where the debris-flow interval is thicker (to the north). This suggests that the emplacement of debris flows might play a role in the development and reactivation of polygonal faults. The enlarged view shows clearly that real fault throws develop within the interval between Horizon C (top of Kai Formation and top of lower interval of polygonal faults) and the base of the debris-flow interval.
Published: 01 January 2007
and reactivation of polygonal faults. The enlarged view shows clearly that real fault throws develop within the interval between Horizon C (top of Kai Formation and top of lower interval of polygonal faults) and the base of the debris-flow interval.
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted east-west seismic profile across the Modgunn arch. The location of the seismic profile is shown in Figure 1B. This profile images a pipe structure located on the northern flank of the south Modgunn arch that ends up as an eye-shaped hydrothermal vent at its top, revealing the pathway of released overpressured fluid from heated organic carbon around the magmatic intrusions below. Polygonal faults, radial faults, and high-amplitude reflections are also visible on this seismic profile. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT transition; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; TWT—two-way traveltime.
Published: 06 April 2020
vent at its top, revealing the pathway of released overpressured fluid from heated organic carbon around the magmatic intrusions below. Polygonal faults, radial faults, and high-amplitude reflections are also visible on this seismic profile. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai
Image
(A) Uninterpreted and (B) interpreted east-west seismic profile across the southern flank of the south Modgunn arch. Its location is shown in Figure 1B. The control of faults on landslide scarps is revealed by F1, F2, F3, and other faults, including polygonal faults, radial faults, and strike-slip faults. The radial faults occur above intrusion-related structures, including local folds and vents. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H5—unconformity 2; H6—unconformity 3; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT; H9—mid–Brygge Formation; H10—top Tare Formation; H11—top Tang Formation; TWT—two-way traveltime; MTD—mass-transport deposit.
Published: 06 April 2020
, and strike-slip faults. The radial faults occur above intrusion-related structures, including local folds and vents. H1—seafloor; H2—bottom glide plane of landslides; H3—top Kai Formation; H4—unconformity 1; H5—unconformity 2; H6—unconformity 3; H7—top Brygge Formation; H8—boundary of opal-A to opal-CT; H9