1-20 OF 178 RESULTS FOR

Judea

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Save search
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Structural map of the Late Cretaceous top Judea Group interface (base of Fig. 3) in northern Israel, NW Jordan and SW Syria (values in metres above present-day sea level). Data were compiled from Segev et al. (2014), Rosenthal et al. (2015) and references therein. Faults in the Dead Sea Transform (DST) valley (Kinneret–Kinarot–Bet She’an – KKB) and Hula basins are marked after Schattner et al. (2019 and references therein). The Lower Galilee fault system is marked after Wald et al. (2019). The extent of basaltic units is marked according to their age (see colour key); solid lines indicate exposed basalt; dashed lines indicate the inferred subsurface presence of these basaltic units (after, e.g. Heimann, 1990; Trifonov et al. 2011; Weinstein & Garfunkel, 2014). IAR – Irbid–Azraq rift; MH – Mt Hermon; BS – Bet She’an; YV – Yizre’el valley; R – Revaya; MF – Marma Faiad; YF – Yarmouk Fault; MG – Mt Gilboa; MC – Mt Carmel; EMF – Eastern Marginal Fault; WMF – Western Marginal Fault. Israel Transverse Mercator (ITM) coordinates divided by 1000.

Structural map of the Late Cretaceous top Judea Group interface (base of Fi... Available to Purchase

Published: 25 November 2021
Fig. 4. Structural map of the Late Cretaceous top Judea Group interface (base of Fig.  3 ) in northern Israel, NW Jordan and SW Syria (values in metres above present-day sea level). Data were compiled from Segev et al . ( 2014 ), Rosenthal et al . ( 2015 ) and references therein. Faults
Image
(a) Elevation of top crystalline basement and (b) elevation of Judea Fm. surface along and near the DST depression. Redrawn using the data of Rosenthal et al. (2019). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.

(a) Elevation of top crystalline basement and (b) elevation of Judea Fm. su... Available to Purchase

Published: 17 November 2020
Figure 3. (a) Elevation of top crystalline basement and (b) elevation of Judea Fm. surface along and near the DST depression. Redrawn using the data of Rosenthal et al. (2019) . The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
δ18O of secondary calcite deposits in the Negev and Judea Deserts. (A) Location of caves (detailed in B) with fault traces of the Negev–Sinai shear zone. (B) Ranges of δ18O values for phreatic vs. vadose (solid lines) calcite and lacustrine carbonates in three subregions: a—phreatic calcite spar in karstic voids breached by Zarnik (14, see part A) and Abu-Treifi (15) Caves, northern Judean Desert (present study), compared with vadose speleothems from Jerusalem (Frumkin et al., 1999); b—phreatic calcite veins filling faults in north-central Negev (after Avigour et al., 1992, numbers 3–13), compared with vadose speleothems from Tzavoa’ (16), Holl-Zakh (17), Ashalim (18), Even-Sid (19), and Ma’ale-ha-Meyshar (20) Caves (Vaks et al., 2006, 2010, 2013); c—phreatic calcite veins filling of Shelomo (1) and Thamed (2) faults in southern Negev (Avigour et al., 1992), compared with vadose speleothems from Shizafon Cave (21) (Vaks et al., 2010). Ashalim (22) and Marzeva (23) Caves are also shown; d—Lacustrine or wetland carbonates of the Pleistocene Zehiha Formation (Ginat et al., 2003); Pliocene Arava Formation (Calvo, 2002); and early Miocene Hazeva Formation (Calvo, 2002). PDB—Peedee belemnite reference.

δ 18 O of secondary calcite deposits in the Negev and Judea Deserts. (A) Lo... Available to Purchase

Published: 06 July 2017
Figure 13. δ 18 O of secondary calcite deposits in the Negev and Judea Deserts. (A) Location of caves (detailed in B) with fault traces of the Negev–Sinai shear zone. (B) Ranges of δ 18 O values for phreatic vs. vadose (solid lines) calcite and lacustrine carbonates in three subregions
Image
Figure 2

Location map of the studied sections projected on the Top Judea Group horiz... Available to Purchase

Published: 26 October 2015
Figure 2 Location map of the studied sections projected on the Top Judea Group horizon structural map (Fleischer and Gafsou 2003 ). Black arrows represent the Syrian Arc structural pattern.
Image
Schematic geological map of the Judean Desert and eastern part of the Judean mountains (modified after Sneh et al. 1998). The Hatrurim Complex: (a) Nabi Musa; (b) Jabel Harmun; (c) Hyrcania; (d) Ma’ale Adummim.

Schematic geological map of the Judean Desert and eastern part of the Judea... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 May 2014
Figure 1 Schematic geological map of the Judean Desert and eastern part of the Judean mountains (modified after Sneh et al. 1998 ). The Hatrurim Complex: ( a ) Nabi Musa; ( b ) Jabel Harmun; ( c ) Hyrcania; ( d ) Ma’ale Adummim.
Image
Digital elevation model (DEM) of the Judea Hills and the Soreq drainage system (Hall, 1993). White dots indicate the location of bedrock samples. Dashed black lines indicate interfluves (I) and hillslope (H) transects and correspond to the profiles in Figure 8. Black triangles indicate locations where sediment samples were collected. Blue stars indicate the locations of springs: En Chabis (C), En Kerem (K), En Sataf (S), En Bikura (B), and En Chashmonai (M). Soil pCO2 was measured at site UB2 (indicated on the map). Dashed areas in the main frame and the left inset indicate the estimated recharge area for perched springs and the Western Mountain Aquifer (WMA), respectively. Mean annual precipitation (MAP) contours for the years 1970–2000 are indicated by purple lines. Green dots on the left inset indicate the location of wells from which Western Mountain Aquifer groundwater was collected.

Digital elevation model (DEM) of the Judea Hills and the Soreq drainage sys... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 March 2014
Figure 1. Digital elevation model (DEM) of the Judea Hills and the Soreq drainage system ( Hall, 1993 ). White dots indicate the location of bedrock samples. Dashed black lines indicate interfluves (I) and hillslope (H) transects and correspond to the profiles in Figure 8 . Black triangles
Image
Composite stratigraphy of Judea and Negev sedimentary section, compiled with reference to (Gardosh et al., 1996; Hall et al., 2005; Möller et al., 2007). 1, basement; 2, Nubian sandstone; 3, limestone; 4, clay and shale; 5, marl; 6, gypsum-bearing beds; 7, dolomite; 8, chalk; 9, bituminous rocks; 10, phosphorite beds; 11, chert; 12, noneconomic (a) and subeconomic (b) gas fileds; 13, light oil; 14, subeconomic oil fileds; 15, asphalt; 16, producing formations.

Composite stratigraphy of Judea and Negev sedimentary section, compiled wit... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 August 2012
Fig. 3. Composite stratigraphy of Judea and Negev sedimentary section, compiled with reference to ( Gardosh et al., 1996 ; Hall et al., 2005 ; Möller et al., 2007 ). 1 , basement; 2 , Nubian sandstone; 3 , limestone; 4 , clay and shale; 5 , marl; 6 , gypsum-bearing beds; 7 , dolomite; 8
Image
Top Judea Group structural map of the Hadera syncline and the study area following Fleischer and Gafsou (2003) and the location of studied boreholes, outcrops, and seismic sections.

Top Judea Group structural map of the Hadera syncline and the study area fo... Open Access

Published: 01 April 2011
Figure 5. Top Judea Group structural map of the Hadera syncline and the study area following Fleischer and Gafsou (2003) and the location of studied boreholes, outcrops, and seismic sections.
Image
Structural map of the top of the Judea group in the study area (from Fleischer and Gafsou, 2003) showing active or potentially active faults from Bartov et al. (2002).

Structural map of the top of the Judea group in the study area (from Fleis... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 April 2010
Figure 2. Structural map of the top of the Judea group in the study area (from Fleischer and Gafsou, 2003 ) showing active or potentially active faults from Bartov et al. (2002) .
Image
 The top Judea Group structural map (Fleischer & Gafsou 2003). Bold lines represent major faults; fine lines represent minor faults. Red, faults defined as active or potentially active (Bartov et al. 2002). Blue, reverse faults associated with Syrian Arc folds. Black, normal faults. The grey area at the eastern rim of the Jaffa Basin represents a truncation band where the top of the Judea Group is truncated by the base Saqiye Group. West of that band the Saqiye Group unconformably covers the Talme Yafe Formation. 1, Pardes Hanna water well; 2, Netanya 1 oilwell; 3, Hadera 1 oilwell; 4, Caesarea 1 oilwell; 5, Ashdod 3 oilwell; 6, Netanya 2 oilwell; 7, Hof Asdod 1 oilwell. BR is the Bet Rosh outcrop referred to in Figure 10.

The top Judea Group structural map ( Fleischer & Gafsou 2003 ). Bold li... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 March 2008
Fig. 6.  The top Judea Group structural map ( Fleischer & Gafsou 2003 ). Bold lines represent major faults; fine lines represent minor faults. Red, faults defined as active or potentially active ( Bartov et al . 2002 ). Blue, reverse faults associated with Syrian Arc folds. Black, normal
Image
Isopach map of the Cenomanian deposits (Judea Formation) in the Euphrates basin.

Isopach map of the Cenomanian deposits (Judea Formation) in the Euphrates b... Open Access

Published: 01 April 2007
Figure 12: Isopach map of the Cenomanian deposits (Judea Formation) in the Euphrates basin.
Image
Structural contour map near top Judea Group (Marcus and Kaptsan, 1978; Gardosh and Bruner, 1998) outlining high terrains deduced in this study.

Structural contour map near top Judea Group ( Marcus and Kaptsan, 1978 ; G... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 July 2000
Figure 9 Structural contour map near top Judea Group ( Marcus and Kaptsan, 1978 ; Gardosh and Bruner, 1998 ) outlining high terrains deduced in this study.
Image
—Location map of western Israel indicating areal extent of Judea Limestone and Talme Yafe Formation. Line between these two formations marks eastern boundary of interfingering zone several kilometers wide.

—Location map of western Israel indicating areal extent of Judea Limestone ... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 February 1976
Fig. 1 —Location map of western Israel indicating areal extent of Judea Limestone and Talme Yafe Formation. Line between these two formations marks eastern boundary of interfingering zone several kilometers wide.
Image
—Central Judea; Beit Guvrin foothills area.

—Central Judea; Beit Guvrin foothills area. Available to Purchase

Published: 01 January 1953
COL. SEC. 7. —Central Judea; Beit Guvrin foothills area.
Image
—Geologic cross section in southern Judea foothills.

—Geologic cross section in southern Judea foothills. Available to Purchase

Published: 01 January 1953
CROSS SEC. 7. —Geologic cross section in southern Judea foothills.
Image
Morphostratigraphy. (A) Topographic profiles of this study (location in Fig. 2) along the Samaria-Carmel foothills showing remnants of two surfaces continuing the lower and upper foothills surfaces west of the Judea mountain stage. (B) Distinction between the lower and upper foothills surfaces west of the Judea region and south of latitude 32°N from Bar (2009) and references therein.

Morphostratigraphy. (A) Topographic profiles of this study (location in Fi... Open Access

Published: 01 April 2011
Figure 12. Morphostratigraphy. (A) Topographic profiles of this study (location in Fig. 2 ) along the Samaria-Carmel foothills showing remnants of two surfaces continuing the lower and upper foothills surfaces west of the Judea mountain stage. (B) Distinction between the lower and upper
Image
(A) Present groundwater flow regime in the NW Negev, associated with Ashalim Cave region. (B) Percentage of deep groundwater rising from Nubian Sandstone into the modern Judea Group aquifer near Ashalim. The deep water rising near Nitzana 1 well is diluted toward the NE, where Judea Group groundwater dominates (modified after Rosenthal et al., 1998). (C) Structural map (contours in m) of top Judea Group with axes of major anticlines around Ashalim Cave. Structure is based on Geophysical Institute of Israel map (Gross and Eyal, 2007). (D) Schematic cross section of the Syrian arc structures near Ashalim Cave and their relation to deep reverse faults, allowing upward flow of deep groundwater (modified after Flexer et al., 2005). Gray arrows indicate possible paleo-upwelling route to Ashalim Cave. Gr.—Group.

(A) Present groundwater flow regime in the NW Negev, associated with Ashali... Available to Purchase

Published: 06 July 2017
Figure 10. (A) Present groundwater flow regime in the NW Negev, associated with Ashalim Cave region. (B) Percentage of deep groundwater rising from Nubian Sandstone into the modern Judea Group aquifer near Ashalim. The deep water rising near Nitzana 1 well is diluted toward the NE, where Judea
Image
A: Published denudation rate data (Ryb et al., 2014a, 2014b) limited to interfluve sites across the Judea Range correlate with local S-T (elevation difference between a stratigraphic datum and the present topography; see text) values (Item DR2 [see footnote 1]). B: Mean annual precipitation (MAP) values are plotted against S-T values of major interfluves across the Judea Range. Nonlinear increase in S-T values with MAP occurs across the windward flank of the range. The spatial extent of both calculations is shown in Figure 1C.

A: Published denudation rate data ( Ryb et al., 2014a , 2014b ) limited to... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 June 2015
Figure 3. A: Published denudation rate data ( Ryb et al., 2014a , 2014b ) limited to interfluve sites across the Judea Range correlate with local S-T (elevation difference between a stratigraphic datum and the present topography; see text) values (Item DR2 [see footnote 1 ]). B: Mean annual
Image
Figure 5. (A) Schematic cross section (not to scale) between the Dead Sea coast and the rift margin (modified after Yechieli et al., 1995). The section displays the field relations between the local alluvial subaquifers (I, II, and III) of the rift valley and the adjacent regional Judea aquifer to the west. The geological section below the salt layer belongs to the Lisan Formation, and from the salt layer and upward, it belongs to the Ze'elim Formation. (B) A block diagram of the main hydrological features of the studied system, showing the recharge zone above the Judea aquifer and the discharge zone in the Dead Sea area.

Figure 5. (A) Schematic cross section (not to scale) between the Dead Sea c... Available to Purchase

Published: 01 September 2006
Figure 5. (A) Schematic cross section (not to scale) between the Dead Sea coast and the rift margin (modified after Yechieli et al., 1995 ). The section displays the field relations between the local alluvial subaquifers (I, II, and III) of the rift valley and the adjacent regional Judea aquifer
Journal Article

Exhumation and uplift coupled with precipitation along the western Dead Sea Rift margin Available to Purchase

U. Ryb, A. Matmon, I. Haviv, L. Benedetti
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 June 2015
Geology (2015) 43 (6): 483–486.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/G36331.1
...Figure 3. A: Published denudation rate data ( Ryb et al., 2014a , 2014b ) limited to interfluve sites across the Judea Range correlate with local S-T (elevation difference between a stratigraphic datum and the present topography; see text) values (Item DR2 [see footnote 1 ]). B: Mean annual...
FIGURES | View All (4)
View PDF for article title, Exhumation and uplift coupled with precipitation along the western Dead Sea Rift margin
Purchase
Add to Citation Manager for Exhumation and uplift coupled with precipitation along the western Dead Sea Rift margin