Figure 2. (a) Magnitude versus Joyner–Boore distance scatter plot of NESS2 data and (b) breakdown of records within the NESS2 dataset by bins of Joyner–Boore distance.

Figure 6. Evaluation of the possible influence of Joyner–Boore distance on the angular difference between the epicentral transverse orientation and the orientation of RotD100 for oscillators with periods of T  = 7 s and T  = 10 s. The dashed line represents locally weighted scatterplot

Figure 8. Influence of Joyner-Boore distance on the level of polarization, as measured by RotD00/RotD100, for 5%-damped linear elastic oscillators with periods of 3 s, 5 s, 7 s, and 10 s. The dashed line represents locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) considering both the M w 7.5

Figure 15. Peak ground motions as a function of Joyner–Boore distance for the FLAT and TOPO models (yellow circles): peak ground acceleration (PGA); peak ground velocity (PGV); and RotD50 spectral acceleration (SA) at periods 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 s for V S 30 = 760    m / s . Red

Figure 9. Ground motion versus Joyner–Boore distance ( R JB ) for an (a, b) M7.5 and an (c, d) M5 event considering the weighted average of GMM medians used in 2001 (dashed lines) and 2021 (solid lines) for 0.2-s (a, c) and 1-s SA (b, d). Earthquakes are modeled at depths of 10 and 40 km

Figure 1. Histogram of (a)  M , (b) Joyner–Boore distance ( R JB ), and (c)  V S 30 for records used for this study. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.

Figure 6. Distribution of records with respect to (a) Joyner–Boore distance and magnitude, (b)  V S 30 and PGA, and (c) back azimuth.

Figure C3. Disaggregation by magnitude M w , Joyner–Boore distance, and epsilon ϵ for two pairs of 0.2 s SA values and return periods: (a)  0.48 ± 0.17 g and 132 ± 75    yr and (b)  1.11 ± 0.44 g and 588 ± 509    yr .The color version

Figure 9. Disaggregation by magnitude M w , Joyner–Boore distance, and epsilon ϵ for two pairs of PGA values and return periods: (a)  0.23 ± 0.08 g and 139 ± 81    yr and (b)  0.49 ± 0.19 g and 588 ± 514    yr .The color version of this figure

Figure C5. Disaggregation by magnitude M w , Joyner–Boore distance, and epsilon ϵ for Medvedev–Sponheuer–Karnik‐64 (MSK‐64) intensity VIII ± I and the return period of 161 ± 483    yr .The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.

Figure C4. Disaggregation by magnitude M w , Joyner–Boore distance, and epsilon ϵ for two pairs of 1.0 s SA values and return periods: (a)  0.17 ± 0.07 g and 167 ± 108    yr and (b)  0.32 ± 0.14 g and 500 ± 409    yr .The color version

Figure 6. Total residuals of ln S di as a function of Joyner-Boore distance, R jb . Binned means and their 95% confidence intervals are also included.

Figure 3. Joyner–Boore distance ( R JB ) distributions of the 42 and 91 recordings obtained in the Jiuzhaigou and Lushan earthquakes, respectively, considered in this study. The cross on the vertical axis ( R JB = 5    km ) represents the four recordings obtained at stations

Figure 9. The geometry for calculating R epi and Joyner–Boore distance ( R JB ) for vertical strike‐slip faults.

Figure 8. Magnitude and Joyner–Boore distance disaggregation for the Los Angeles site using the Boore and Atkinson (2008) and Chiou and Youngs (2008) models, for ground‐motion values corresponding to the 0.02 probability level.

Figure 7. Magnitude and Joyner–Boore distance disaggregation for the Los Angeles and San Francisco sites, using the Boore and Atkinson (2008) model, for ground‐motion values corresponding to the 0.02 probability of exceedance.

Figure 5. Magnitude ( M w ) versus Joyner–Boore distance ( R JB ) scatter plots of the considered database in terms of (a) country, (b) rupture mechanism, and (c) site class distributions. Eurocode 8 (EC8; CEN, 2004 ) site classification is adopted for soil definitions: site classes A, B, C

Figure 8. Left: Joyner-–Boore distance R JB (black contours) and areas used for comparison with BA08, where 200 m · s -1 ≤ V S 30 ≤300 m · s -1 (highlighted areas). Right: Geometric mean of 3-s SA s and 2-s SA s obtained from the ensemble of rupture models including the geometric standard

Figure 3. PGA (top panel) and PGV (bottom panel) versus Joyner–Boore distance for two magnitudes (4.5 and 6.9) and three components of motion: maximum horizontal (black line), average horizontal (gray line), and vertical (dashed line).

Figure 1. Predictions of peak horizontal ground velocity versus Joyner–Boore distance at (a) rock and (b) soil sites from earthquakes of moment magnitude 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0. The solid lines are from this study and the dashed lines are from Joyner and Boore ( 1988 ). The dotted lines were obtained