1-20 OF 166 RESULTS FOR

Joli Fou Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1985
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1985) 22 (9): 1299–1313.
...Kory R. Koke; C. R. Stelck Abstract The discovery of the arenaceous foraminifer Haplophragmoides gigas Cushman in the Hudson Hope area of northeastern British Columbia indicates that the Early Cretaceous (Albian) Joli Fou Sea flooded around the north side of the Peace River Arch, making...
Image
Cross section using the Joli Fou Formation downlap surface as the datum. This cross section is skeletonized from the A-Aʹ section of Figure 2. The transgressive surfaces in the Viking Formation are highlighted to demonstrate the variations that occur along strike. Wells are distributed at approximately the same distance. (A) Joli Fou Formation datum. (B) Third sequence (3S) datum. (C) Top of the Viking Formation datum. (D) Westgate flooding surface datum. (E) Base of Fish Scales Marker datum.
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 6. Cross section using the Joli Fou Formation downlap surface as the datum. This cross section is skeletonized from the A-Aʹ section of Figure 2 . The transgressive surfaces in the Viking Formation are highlighted to demonstrate the variations that occur along strike. Wells
Image
Published: 01 June 2016
Appendix Table 1.02 Geochemical characteristics of stratigraphic levels (Joli Fou Formation, depositional sequences, parasequence sets or members, fluvial bodies).
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1959
AAPG Bulletin (1959) 43 (3): 590–640.
... is divided into four major lithologic units, in ascending order: Mannville group, Joli Fou formation, Viking formation, and an unnamed unit above the Viking formation and below the base of the “Fish Scale” sandstone. The Mannville group is dominantly non-marine but contains some marine strata in central...
FIGURES | View All (24)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2005
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2005) 53 (2): 165–188.
... allowing for the northward transport of these coarser deposits. In the southeast, as a result of erosion between the Paddy and Cadotte members, deposits of the Joli Fou Formation are not well preserved. In the north and west, however, an equivalent conformable suite of mudstones is thinning in an easterly...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1989
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1989) 37 (1): 1–17.
... the offshore marine shales of the Joli Fou Formation (Upper Albian). The sandstone unit occurs as a northwest-trending thin sheet with a maximum thickness of 13 m, covering an area 68 km long and 27 km wide. Reconstruction of the pre-Basal Colorado paleotopography from a second-order residual map...
Series: SEPM Special Publication
Published: 01 January 2010
DOI: 10.2110/sepmsp.094.093
EISBN: 9781565762985
... demonstrate the sequence stratigraphic architecture of the Upper Mannville Formation, the Basal Colorado Sandstone (informal unit), and the Joli Fou Formation, modified from Walker (2002) . No vertical scale is implied on this cartoon; furthermore, this figure is to be viewed as a generalized E–W transect...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1954
AAPG Bulletin (1954) 38 (11): 2269–2289.
... (containing Placenticeras ?) and the Joli Fou formation are correlated with the Placenticeras liardense zone and the underlying shale in the Liard River west of Nelson Forks locality. The Sikanni and Dunvegan formations are correlated with the Fort Nelson formation on the basis of field work and air...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2000
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2000) 48 (1): 30–42.
... lithostratigraphy and foraminiferal content, is threefold. This outcrop, which can be considered as a reference section, is the first documented occurrence of the Viking Formation. The Viking Formation at this locality is not underlain by the early late Albian Joli Fou Formation, such as in the central plains...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1971
AAPG Bulletin (1971) 55 (3): 541–542.
...). The sequence exhibits pronounced lateral variation and locally discernible diachronism of sandstone bodies; both the lowermost Joli Fou Formation and the uppermost Big River Formation display a northerly increase in sand content, whereas the lenticular sandstone bodies of the Viking Formation, which separates...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1973
AAPG Bulletin (1973) 57 (5): 961.
... conglomerate and sandstone. The transgressive Joli Fou Formation is represented on the east by the Spinney Hill Sandstone, comprising cosets of planar sandy foresets and subordinate mudstone intercalations (proximal fluviomarine deposits). These grade westward into a succession of vertically repeated, sandy...
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 1999
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1999) 69 (4): 862–875.
.... Cyclic units embedded in the upper Albian Westgate and Joli Fou formations are almost periodic with 11 and 10 repetitions, respectively. Accumulation rates at ot = 100 kyr vary from 5-7 cm/kyr in mudstone successions to 29 cm/kyr in sandstone successions of the Rocky Mountains Foothills. These 100 kyr...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1965
AAPG Bulletin (1965) 49 (1): 81–87.
...F. A. Campbell; G. D. Williams ABSTRACT The X-ray fluorescence method was used to analyze 113 shales; seven from the Upper Devonian Calmar Formation, 98 from the Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group and 8 from the Lower Cretaceous Joli Fou Formation. The average composition of the shales studied...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (5): 642–643.
...) and also contains dicotyledonous tricolpate pollen grains. The presence of this type of pollen grain means that, at least locally, the disconformity that is supposed to occur at the base of the overlying Joli Fou Formation occurs instead within the sandstones at the top of the Mannville, as suggested...
Image
Schematic diagram relating stratigraphy of outcrop to subsurface to the east. The basal Joli Fou unconformity possibly truncated the Hulcross Formation. The basal Viking Formation subsequently truncated Hulcross and Joli Fou strata, although the Joli Fou Formation may not have persisted that far west.
Published: 01 March 2000
Fig. 8. Schematic diagram relating stratigraphy of outcrop to subsurface to the east. The basal Joli Fou unconformity possibly truncated the Hulcross Formation. The basal Viking Formation subsequently truncated Hulcross and Joli Fou strata, although the Joli Fou Formation may not have persisted
Image
Correlation chart of molluscan zones and foraminiferal zones and subzones within the Albian, and their relationships to the Mannville Group, Joli Fou Formation, Viking Formation, and Westgate Formation of west-central Alberta. In the United States, all of the Neogastroplites zones shown are within the Mowry shale (modified from MacEachern 1994).
Published: 21 September 2000
Fig. 5. Correlation chart of molluscan zones and foraminiferal zones and subzones within the Albian, and their relationships to the Mannville Group, Joli Fou Formation, Viking Formation, and Westgate Formation of west-central Alberta. In the United States, all of the Neogastroplites zones shown
Image
—Reference gamma-ray and resistivity log showing the stratigraphy of the Viking Formation in west-central Saskatchewan. Within the Viking Formation there are no diagnostic foraminifers, and hence the exact limits of the Haplophragmoides gigas and Miliammina manitobensis zones are unknown. Letters K and M-N are the bentonites of Evans (1970), and E1, E2, and E4 indicate erosion surfaces discussed in the text. LM1 refers to log marker 1 within the Joli Fou Formation.
Published: 01 August 1990
are unknown. Letters K and M-N are the bentonites of Evans (1970 ), and E1, E2, and E4 indicate erosion surfaces discussed in the text. LM1 refers to log marker 1 within the Joli Fou Formation.
Image
North to south regional cross-section N-N′, illustrating the northward change from sandstone to shale of the Falher Member. The surfaces TS1–TS11 represent trangressive surfaces used for correlation, see text for further description. S1 to S4 mark four transgressive-regressive sequences. The zoomed section illustrates the relationship between the Joli Fou Formation and Hulcross/Harmon deposits. Note the maximum flooding surface (MFS) above TS11.
Published: 01 June 2005
. The zoomed section illustrates the relationship between the Joli Fou Formation and Hulcross/Harmon deposits. Note the maximum flooding surface (MFS) above TS11.
Image
Schematic summary cross section illustrating the nine Paddy-Walton Creek allomembers. The lower six are wedge-shaped, thinning and onlapping the basal unconformity, whereas the upper three are more tabular. The uppermost allomember, allomember I, can be correlated southward where it becomes the Joli Fou Formation. Also, the VE3 surface, which forms the top of allomember I, and hence the top of the Paddy-Walton Creek member, can be correlated southward where it becomes the top of the regional Viking Formation.
Published: 01 June 2008
it becomes the Joli Fou Formation. Also, the VE3 surface, which forms the top of allomember I, and hence the top of the Paddy-Walton Creek member, can be correlated southward where it becomes the top of the regional Viking Formation.
Image
Mannville Group detailed core cross-section (selected cores from the northwestern half of A–A′ regional cross-section; Fig. 4). Gamma log is shown. Datum 1 is the flooding surface on the uppermost Ostracod parasequence; Datum 2 is the flooding surface on an underlying Ostracod parasequence. This provides a different perspective of the stratigraphy than if the more traditionally-used base of Joli Fou Formation datum had been used, particularly in regards to the geometry of the Hoadley complex. Gl Fm is Glauconite Formation.
Published: 01 December 2002
parasequence. This provides a different perspective of the stratigraphy than if the more traditionally-used base of Joli Fou Formation datum had been used, particularly in regards to the geometry of the Hoadley complex. Gl Fm is Glauconite Formation.