1-20 OF 126 RESULTS FOR

Jiuzhaigou earthquake 2017

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 30 May 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (4): 1354–1365.
...Yefei Ren; Hongwei Wang; Peibin Xu; Yadab P. Dhakal; Ruizhi Wen; Qiang Ma; Peng Jiang ABSTRACT Strong‐motion recordings observed during the M s 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, which occurred on 8 August 2017 in western China, were used to reveal the underlying source, propagation path, and site effects...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 11 August 2021
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (6): 3386–3397.
...Yong Zhang; Wanpeng Feng; Xingxing Li; Yajing Liu; Jieyuan Ning; Qinghua Huang Abstract The 8 August 2017 M w 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake occurred in a tectonically fractured region in southwest China. We investigate the multifault coseismic rupture process by jointly analyzing teleseismic, strong...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 14 April 2021
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (5): 2927–2942.
...Xu Zhang; Li‐Sheng Xu; Lei Yi; Wanpeng Feng Abstract On 8 August 2017, an M s 7.0 earthquake struck the Jiuzhaigou town, Sichuan Province, China, rupturing an unmapped fault, which is adjacent to the Maqu seismic gap in the Min Shan uplift zone in the easternmost part of the Bayan Har block. Having...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 14 January 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (1): 154–165.
...Yuexin Li; Roland Bürgmann; Bin Zhao ABSTRACT The M w 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake occurred on 8 August 2017 36 km west‐southwest of Yongle, Sichuan, China. We use both ascending and descending Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data from Sentinel‐1 and coseismic offsets of four Global...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 17 July 2019
Seismological Research Letters (2019) 90 (5): 1859–1875.
...Sui Tung; Kurt Katzenstein; Timothy Masterlark; Jianshe Lei; Christelle Wauthier; Dave Petley ABSTRACT The 2017 M w 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake (JE) struck a rugged area of the Jiuzhaigou Valley in eastern Tibet that has experienced frequent seismic activity over the last few decades. We use finite...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 25 July 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (5): 1671–1679.
... algorithms. High‐sensitivity networks generally require dense station coverage, high deployment effort, special field environment, and high funding cost, which are not suitable for rapid response for aftershock monitoring. To investigate aftershock activities of the 2017 M w 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, we...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 16 May 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (4): 1345–1353.
...Yingfeng Zhang; Guohong Zhang; Eric A. Hetland; Xinjian Shan; Huiping Zhang; Dezheng Zhao; Wenyu Gong; Chunyan Qu ABSTRACT The 2017 M w 6.5 Jiuzhaigou, China, earthquake occurred in the very northeastern corner of the Bayanhar block, in a region of a complex confluence of several faults. There were...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 17 January 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (2A): 557–569.
...Libo Han; Jia Cheng; Yanru An; Lihua Fang; Changsheng Jiang; Bo Chen; Zhongliang Wu; Jie Liu; Xiwei Xu; Ruifeng Liu; Zhixiang Yao; Changzai Wang; Yushi Wang ABSTRACT The 8 August 2017 M s 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake was the largest event in continental China in the recent 3 yrs. It occurred...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Inverted results of the 2017 Ms 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake. (a) Seismic moment rate function (gray‐shaded region). The solid‐red curve shows the release process of the scalar seismic moment in percentage. (b) Coseismic slip pattern. Black arrows indicate slip directions. Blue curves denote the slip contours of 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 m, respectively. (c) Snapshots of the slip rate. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 14 April 2021
Figure 3. Inverted results of the 2017 M s  7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake. (a) Seismic moment rate function (gray‐shaded region). The solid‐red curve shows the release process of the scalar seismic moment in percentage. (b) Coseismic slip pattern. Black arrows indicate slip directions. Blue
Image
Setting of the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and playback results (follows Fig. 2). Final FinDer line‐source parameters are L∼33  km, Θ=130°, and MFD 6.6. Green triangles in (a) show stations, where strong‐motion data were simulated in this study to constrain FinDer results. Slip distribution in (a) and source time function in (b) and (c) are from Zhang et al. (Yong Zhang, written comm., 2018). The thin black lines show the isoseismals released by the CEA (see Data and Resources).
Published: 28 January 2020
Figure 4. Setting of the 2017 M w  6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and playback results (follows Fig.  2 ). Final FinDer line‐source parameters are L ∼ 33    km , Θ = 130 ° , and M FD  6.6. Green triangles in (a) show stations, where strong‐motion data were simulated
Image
Tectonic settings and velocity profiles near the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake (JE). (a) JE took place near the block boundary (transparent black lines) between Abba and Hezuo block. Nearby fault locations are plotted after Burchfiel et al. (1995). Coseismic displacements are constrained by Sentinel‐1 Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar data (footprint outlined by white dashed line in panels a,d) of (b) ascending‐track and (c) descending‐track observations, in which blue regions refer to range increase and red regions represent range decrease. (d–r) Near‐field velocity structures (Lei and Zhao, 2009) at various depths (1, 8, 18, 30, and 45 km) are used to configure the finite‐element model (FEM; Fig. 2). LE, Lushan earthquake; WE, Wenchuan earthquake.
Published: 17 July 2019
Figure 1. Tectonic settings and velocity profiles near the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake (JE). (a) JE took place near the block boundary (transparent black lines) between Abba and Hezuo block. Nearby fault locations are plotted after Burchfiel et al. (1995) . Coseismic displacements
Image
Fault‐slip distributions of the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake.
Published: 16 May 2018
Figure 3. Fault‐slip distributions of the 2017 M w  6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake.
Image
The gCAPjoint solution for the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquakes. (a) The earthquake (star) and local broadband stations (triangles). (b) Teleseismic broadband stations (inverted triangles). Black open triangles and inverted triangles indicate available stations, whereas red triangles and inverted triangles represent the stations actually used in inversion. (c) Summary of inversion at optimal depth. The black and red lines denote the observed and synthetic waveforms, respectively. Numbers to the left of the seismograms are time shifts (lower, first line numbers) and cross‐correlation coefficient in percent (lower, second line numbers). Positive time shifts indicate that synthetic waveforms are delayed. The triangles on the focal sphere show the projection of P waves.
Published: 19 August 2020
Figure 3. The gCAPjoint solution for the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquakes. (a) The earthquake (star) and local broadband stations (triangles). (b) Teleseismic broadband stations (inverted triangles). Black open triangles and inverted triangles indicate available stations, whereas red triangles
Image
Waveform mismatch versus centroid depth for the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquakes. Red focal sphere indicates the focal mechanism at optimal depth.
Published: 19 August 2020
Figure 4. Waveform mismatch versus centroid depth for the 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquakes. Red focal sphere indicates the focal mechanism at optimal depth.
Journal Article
Published: 18 May 2021
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (4): 2195–2208.
...Wen Yang; Zhifeng Ding; Jie Liu; Jia Cheng; Xuemei Zhang; Peng Wu; Qi Yao ABSTRACT The 2017 M w 6.5 Jiuzhaigou mainshock hit the northeastern end of the Bayan Har block, which has experienced many historical earthquakes, including the 1976 M 7.2 Songpan‐Pingwu earthquake swarm. We used the double...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 10 July 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (4): 2221–2236.
...Jin Jia‐Liang; Wang Yin; Gao Dan; Yuan Ren‐Mao; Yang Xiao‐Yan Abstract In this article, the authors aim to establish the suitable Newmark displacement models of the coseismic displacements for southwest China, where the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, the 2013 Lushan earthquake, and the 2017 Jiuzhaigou...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 28 January 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (2): 920–936.
...Figure 4. Setting of the 2017 M w  6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and playback results (follows Fig.  2 ). Final FinDer line‐source parameters are L ∼ 33    km , Θ = 130 ° , and M FD  6.6. Green triangles in (a) show stations, where strong‐motion data were simulated...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 24 February 2022
Lithosphere (2021) 2021 (Special 2): 6678652.
... slope angle and average slope angle show obvious differences, which means that the region has sharp changes in relief and slope. In comparison with the coseismic landslides triggered by the 2017 Jiuzhaigou, Sichuan, China, Ms7.0 earthquakes, preliminary analyses infer that the distribution of coseismic...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 23 September 2020
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (1): 275–286.
...Ke Jia Abstract In the past two decades, three major earthquakes have occurred near the Longmen Shan fault zone, Sichuan, China (the 2008 M w 7.9 Wenchuan, 2013 M w 6.6 Lushan, and 2017 M w 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquakes), in response to the continuous collision of the Indian and Eurasian plates...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 24 September 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (6): 2470–2490.
..., Jiuzhaigou, and Songyuan earthquakes (28 May 2018) were between VII and IX. The highest intensity of the Wulong, Rongchang, Ningqiang, and Songyuan earthquakes (23 July 2017) was only VI, and no obvious range of the meizoseismal area was observed. We considered the areas with the highest intensity...
FIGURES | View All (12)