1-20 OF 1598 RESULTS FOR

Irving Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Series: GSA Special Papers
Published: 01 January 1989
DOI: 10.1130/SPE235-p65
... to low grade; and (3) weakly foliated to unfoliated plutonic rocks. Although many important questions remain unresolved, work by a number of individuals suggests the following history. Mafic and silicic volcanics, sediments, and intrusives of the Irving Formation and Twilight Gneiss accumulated at least...
Image
Tectonic cartoons of our proposed models. Model 1 depicts southward-dipping subduction and “soft” accretion at ca. 1780 Ma followed by slab breakoff–related magmatism and related passive extension at ca. 1763 Ma. Model 2 depicts northward-dipping subduction associated with a fringing arc at ca. 1780 Ma, possibly a product of the same subduction system as the Irving Formation (Fig. 1A). Rifting and extension of the arc (now a backarc or remnant arc) at ca. 1763 account for extensional magmatism, while active subduction is associated with the Dubois succession. In either model, the impetus for the ca. 1750 Ma accretion event comes from the south. We have depicted this as a result of slab shallowing; however, nothing in the geology of the Big Creek Gneiss would rule out another shortening mechanism (e.g., subduction of an oceanic plateau or subduction-related collision). Abbreviations: BBLB—Barber Lake block, GMa—Green Mountain arc, SMG—Sierra Madre Granite.
Published: 01 November 2010
arc at ca. 1780 Ma, possibly a product of the same subduction system as the Irving Formation ( Fig. 1A ). Rifting and extension of the arc (now a backarc or remnant arc) at ca. 1763 account for extensional magmatism, while active subduction is associated with the Dubois succession. In either model
Image
—Plot of hydrogen index (HI) vs. oxygen index (OI) of Albert Formation fine-grained sediments (from surface to total drilled depth) to characterize kerogen type. Cross-plots of HI vs. OI show a large variation in kerogen types in the different wells and areas of the subbasin. I, II, III = type of organic matter, 7 = Irving Chevron East Stoney Creek 1, 8 = Irving Chevron Stoney Creek 1, 9 = Irving Chevron Hillsborough 1, 15 = Irving Chevron Lee Brook 1.
Published: 01 September 1992
Figure 14 —Plot of hydrogen index (HI) vs. oxygen index (OI) of Albert Formation fine-grained sediments (from surface to total drilled depth) to characterize kerogen type. Cross-plots of HI vs. OI show a large variation in kerogen types in the different wells and areas of the subbasin. I, II, III
Journal Article
Published: 10 April 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (3A): 1124–1132.
... the overlying Ellenburger limestone unit, which is the primary wastewater disposal formation used in the basin. Using data recorded by local seismic networks, we generate 240 focal mechanisms for the Azle–Reno, Irving–Dallas, and Venus sequences using P ‐wave first‐motion and S ‐ to P ‐wave ( S / P ) amplitude...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Series: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series
Published: 01 January 1990
DOI: 10.5382/GB.07
EISBN: 9781934969601
Image
Photograph of the Pleasant Mills Formation at the eastern wall, northeast corner of the Irving Materials quarry, Bluffton, Indiana; July 2016.
Published: 29 March 2019
Figure 10. Photograph of the Pleasant Mills Formation at the eastern wall, northeast corner of the Irving Materials quarry, Bluffton, Indiana; July 2016.
Series: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series
Published: 01 January 1990
EISBN: 9781934969601
... Abstract Tertiary gold-silver deposits in the Lead-Deadwood area have been exploited almost as long as the Precambrian Homestake gold deposit. The deposits were first described by Irving (1904) who was able to visit and map many of the mines. Recent papers by Shapiro and Gries (1970), Norton...
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 1982
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (1982) 15 (4): 327–328.
...S. Puri Abstract S. Puri writes: In his studies Irving (1982) has used chemical analyses obtained from pumped wells over a period 1883 to mid 1970's to suggest that the chloride ion concentration is an aid to estimating recharge derived from rainfall or via leakage through rivers. He has applied...
Series: AAPG Studies in Geology
Published: 01 January 2000
DOI: 10.1306/St46706C33
EISBN: 9781629810713
..., whereas to the north, dips are shallow in low-amplitude folds. At the beginning of Paleogene time, the British area was some 12 south of its present position (Irving,1967) and considerably warmer than at present (Reidand Chandler, 1933; Daley, 1972). Britain lay on the western margins of what has been...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1980
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (1980) 17 (9): 1210–1228.
...R. W. Yole; E. Irving Abstract New paleomagnetic results from the Karmutsen Formation (Late Triassic) of Vancouver Island confirm the presence of two families of magnetizations ( X and Y ), both of which are inconsistent with known Mesozoic and Cenozoic geomagnetic fields of cratonic North America...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1968
GSA Bulletin (1968) 79 (4): 417–428.
... magnetic division were located on the western slope of the southern Rocky Mountains and are separated by 4000 feet of Stratigraphic section. The base of the division seems to be Des Moinesian (Upper Pennsylvanian), and the top, Lower Scythian (Lower Triassic), in substantial agreement with Irving...
Image
Photographs of the Cedarville Member of the Laurel Formation overlain by the Limberlost and “Waldron” members of the Pleasant Mills Formation at the Irving Materials quarry, Huntington, Indiana; July 2016. (A and B) North-northwest quarry wall south and center of the railroad tracks that cross the quarry. Photograph A taken a few meters east of photograph B. (C) Close-up on the Laurel–Pleasant Mills contact showing rust staining and erosional topography; same location as photograph A.
Published: 29 March 2019
Figure 8. Photographs of the Cedarville Member of the Laurel Formation overlain by the Limberlost and “Waldron” members of the Pleasant Mills Formation at the Irving Materials quarry, Huntington, Indiana; July 2016. (A and B) North-northwest quarry wall south and center of the railroad tracks
Image
—Porosity vs. permeability cross-plot from core data of the Albert Formation reservoir sandstones in Irving Chevron Stoney Creek 1. Permeability is not lithofacies controlled. Completely filled circles = massive sandstones, half-filled circles = pebbly sandstones, open circles = planar-tabular/trough-cross-bedded sandstones.
Published: 01 September 1992
Figure 11 —Porosity vs. permeability cross-plot from core data of the Albert Formation reservoir sandstones in Irving Chevron Stoney Creek 1. Permeability is not lithofacies controlled. Completely filled circles = massive sandstones, half-filled circles = pebbly sandstones, open circles = planar
Image
P-T evolution of the dark anorthosite suite of the Kunene Intrusive Complex. The results of conventional geothermometry and geobarometry (see text) are indicated with error bars. (arrows suggested subsolidus P-T path for the dark anorthosite suite, solid lines experimentally determined reaction curves for plagioclase-olivine reaction and garnet-formation by Irving & Green (1970)).
Published: 01 March 2001
determined reaction curves for plagioclase-olivine reaction and garnet-formation by Irving & Green (1970) ).
Image
Published: 29 May 2008
, and their directions inverted by 180° are shown in comparison with the results from the sheeted dikes and East Sooke Stock in the Metchosin volcanics ( Irving and Massey, 1990 ). This shows that the directions are antipodal and the primary remanence has been obtained and overprinting removed. Fm., Formation.
Image
A) Cenomanian paleogeography of North America showing delta complexes of the Dunvegan Formation in Alberta and the Frontier Formation in Wyoming, and B) Turonian paleogeography showing delta complexes of the Ferron Sandstone Member of the Mancos Shale Formation (Notom, Last Chance, and Vernal deltas) in Utah, the Kaiparowits delta (K) in southern Utah, the Frontier Formation of Wyoming, the Cardium Formation in Alberta, and the Gallup Sandstone in New Mexico. Figure based on Williams and Stelck (1975), Bhattacharya (1993), Gardner (1995), Umhoefer and Blakely (2006), Plint and Wadsworth (2003, 2006), and Johnston (2008). Paleolatitudes are from Varban and Plint (2008), after Irving et al. (1993).
Published: 01 April 2009
Figure 3 A) Cenomanian paleogeography of North America showing delta complexes of the Dunvegan Formation in Alberta and the Frontier Formation in Wyoming, and B) Turonian paleogeography showing delta complexes of the Ferron Sandstone Member of the Mancos Shale Formation (Notom, Last Chance
Image
A) Map of the study area showing locations of data used in this study and a key to differentiate between types of data. B) Map showing location of Cretaceous outcrop areas relative to the state of Utah, highlighting the areas relevant to this study. Overall paleocurrent measurements for the Masuk Formation are shown to indicate dominant sediment dispersal direction. C) Paleogeographic reconstruction of western North America during the Late Cretaceous (Campanian stage, ∼ 80 Ma). The inset boxes represent the location of formations of interest highlighted in Figure 2. Modified from Blakey (2013). Paleolatitudes are after Irving et al. (1993).
Published: 30 November 2020
for the Masuk Formation are shown to indicate dominant sediment dispersal direction. C) Paleogeographic reconstruction of western North America during the Late Cretaceous (Campanian stage, ∼ 80 Ma). The inset boxes represent the location of formations of interest highlighted in Figure 2 . Modified from
Image
Location of the San Juan Basin relative to the Western Interior seaway. The San Juan Basin during the interval of deposition of the Lewis Shale to the Fruitland Formation (approximately 76–73.5 Ma; Fassett, 2000) was located northeastward of the Mogollon Highlands and eastward of the Sevier thrust belt. A northeast-trending fluvial system supplied sediments to a wave-dominated shoreline in the San Juan Basin. Modified from Williams and Stelck (1975), Irving (1979), Palmer and Scott (1984), Blakey and Umhoefer (2003), and DeCelles (2004).
Published: 01 August 2007
Figure 1 Location of the San Juan Basin relative to the Western Interior seaway. The San Juan Basin during the interval of deposition of the Lewis Shale to the Fruitland Formation (approximately 76–73.5 Ma; Fassett, 2000 ) was located northeastward of the Mogollon Highlands and eastward
Image
Published: 29 May 2008
Fig. 1. Geology and sample sites for the Sooke Formation on the southern tip of Vancouver Island. Geology based on Geological Survey of Canada Map No.1553A by J. E. Muller. Q, Quaternary; S, Sooke Fm; M1, Sooke Gabbro; M2, Metchosin Volcanics; M3, Catface intrusions. Sample sites this report, 1
Image
A) Outline of Cenomanian paleogeography of the Western Interior Seaway, after Williams and Stelck (1975) with paleolatitude data from Irving et al. (1993). D = location of the Dunvegan Formation deltas which formed during this time interval; F = relative location in the state of Utah, U.S.A., of the Turonian deltas of the Ferron Sandstone Member of the Mancos Shale Formation (shown in more detail in Fig. 4). Diagram is modified from Plint and Wadsworth (2006, their fig. 1a). B) Paleovalley system of Dunvegan Formation sequence E as mapped by Plint and Wadsworth (2006) across the province of Alberta, Canada. This river system flowed southeastward across a series of Precambrian basement terranes: Ki = Kiskatinaw, Ks = Ksituan, Chin = Chinchaga. The orientation appears to have been strongly controlled by the strike of the inferred position of the forebulge crest.
Published: 01 October 2009
Figure 3 A) Outline of Cenomanian paleogeography of the Western Interior Seaway, after Williams and Stelck (1975) with paleolatitude data from Irving et al. (1993) . D = location of the Dunvegan Formation deltas which formed during this time interval; F = relative location in the state