1-20 OF 43 RESULTS FOR

Iniskin earthquake 2016

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 11 April 2018
Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (3): 1040–1048.
..., or instavels, as the primary product for the 24 January 2016 M w  7.1 Iniskin, Alaska, intraslab earthquake (Fig.  1 ) without further integration to displacements. This estimation uses ultrarapid orbits (low quality, available in real time) and approximate receiver positions from the Receiver...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Image
(a) PGA observations (red) for the <span class="search-highlight">2016</span>    M    7.1 <span class="search-highlight">Iniskin</span> <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> with...
Published: 11 December 2019
Figure 5. (a) PGA observations (red) for the 2016 M  7.1 Iniskin earthquake with stations to the northeast (possible rupture direction) asterisked in black. GMMs and colors are the same as in Figure  4 . (b) A16 fore‐arc residual map with warm colors showing higher attenuation and cooler
Image
(a) Comparison of the final relocation results in this study with the tempe...
Published: 05 July 2022
of the profile location in (a) and seismicity within 100 km distance from the profile and deeper than 25 km depth. The white dashed box shows the location of the inset map and the boxes in (c) near the 2016 Iniskin earthquake in southwest Anchorage. The color scale for earthquake depths is the same as in Figure
Journal Article
Published: 30 October 2019
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (1): 85–93.
...Michael Everett Mann; Geoffrey A. Abers Abstract The 24 January 2016 Iniskin, Alaska earthquake, at M w 7.1 and 111 km depth, is the largest intermediate‐depth earthquake felt in Alaska, with recorded accelerations reaching 0.2 g near Anchorage. Ground motion from the Iniskin earthquake...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 20 June 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (4): 1883–1890.
... 1‐Hz Global Positioning System (GPS) data from the 24 January 2016 M w 7.1 Iniskin earthquake, which ruptured 125 km under Cook Inlet in Alaska, to motivate the inclusion of GNSS‐derived S ‐wave measurements into the trigger algorithms of EEW systems in regions lacking dense early‐warning...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 05 July 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2022) 93 (5): 2753–2769.
... of the profile location in (a) and seismicity within 100 km distance from the profile and deeper than 25 km depth. The white dashed box shows the location of the inset map and the boxes in (c) near the 2016 Iniskin earthquake in southwest Anchorage. The color scale for earthquake depths is the same as in Figure...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 02 January 2020
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (3): 1367–1376.
...Diane I. Doser Abstract I compare intensity data from 17 predigital intraslab earthquakes in south‐central Alaska and digitized waveforms for nine of these events to similar data for the 24 January 2016 Iniskin and 30 November 2018 Anchorage intraslab events. Both the 2016 and 2018 events were...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 11 December 2019
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (1): 174–182.
...Figure 5. (a) PGA observations (red) for the 2016 M  7.1 Iniskin earthquake with stations to the northeast (possible rupture direction) asterisked in black. GMMs and colors are the same as in Figure  4 . (b) A16 fore‐arc residual map with warm colors showing higher attenuation and cooler...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
(a–c) Residual PSAs of the <span class="search-highlight">Iniskin</span> <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> from  Abrahamson  et al.  (20...
Published: 30 October 2019
Figure 3. (a–c) Residual PSAs of the Iniskin earthquake from Abrahamson et al. (2016) . The empty symbols are residuals calculated assuming hard‐rock sites, that is, V S 30 = 1000    m / s . The solid symbols are residuals calculated assuming site‐specific V S 30
Image
(a) Pseudospectral acceleration (PSA) spatial variability for the <span class="search-highlight">2016</span> Inis...
Published: 30 October 2019
Figure 2. (a) Pseudospectral acceleration (PSA) spatial variability for the 2016 Iniskin mainshock at Alaska Transportable Array (TA) accelerometers, at 1 Hz for 5% damping. Colors show log 10 ( PSA ) relative to 1.0 g . (b) Residual PSA for the Iniskin earthquake at 1 Hz
Image
Location of recording stations for (a,b) the 2018    M    7.1 Anchorage, (c...
Published: 11 December 2019
Figure 3. Location of recording stations for (a,b) the 2018 M  7.1 Anchorage, (c) 2016 M  7.1 Iniskin, and (d) 2015 M  6.3 Redoubt earthquakes. Station map (b) is for the Anchorage area. Dashed line is the Chugach Mountains range front faults.
Image
Amplitude spectra of accelerations recorded during three <span class="search-highlight">earthquakes</span> (2005 ...
Published: 23 October 2019
Figure 7. Amplitude spectra of accelerations recorded during three earthquakes (2005 Tazlina Glacier, black line; 2016 Iniskin, blue line; and 2018 Anchorage, red line) depict clear changes of the NS and EW frequencies. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
(a) Seismicity of <span class="search-highlight">2016</span> in the study area from the U.S. Geological Survey (U...
Published: 05 July 2022
used in this study. The yellow star is the USGS location of the 24 January 2016 M w  7.1 Iniskin earthquake, southwest of Anchorage. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
Comparisons of the waveforms (top seismograms for each station) of (a–i) ni...
Published: 02 January 2020
Figure 5. Comparisons of the waveforms (top seismograms for each station) of (a–i) nine predigital events to waveforms of the 24 January 2016 Iniskin (middle seismograms) and 30 November 2018 Anchorage (lower seismograms) earthquakes. See the Methods section for explanation of how stations were
Journal Article
Published: 23 October 2019
Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (1): 56–65.
...Figure 7. Amplitude spectra of accelerations recorded during three earthquakes (2005 Tazlina Glacier, black line; 2016 Iniskin, blue line; and 2018 Anchorage, red line) depict clear changes of the NS and EW frequencies. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition. ...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Variation in median distance versus intensity for events of this study (see...
Published: 02 January 2020
of Doser (2009) , and the bold gray line is the relationship predicted for an M w  6.8 earthquake. Earthquakes exceeding the predicted relationships are labeled with the exception of the 24 January 2016 Iniskin earthquake (indicated by plus symbols) and the crustal 27 April 1933 upper Cook Inlet
Journal Article
Published: 31 May 2017
Seismological Research Letters (2017) 88 (4): 1185–1202.
... approximately north–south, marks the western lateral extent of intraslab seismicity. The source mechanism is plotted for the 24 January 2016 M w  7.1 Iniskin earthquake, which occurred within the Pacific slab at a depth of about 110 km ( Ekström et al. , 2012 ). Kodiak Island, which hosts stations...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
PSA for four     M  w     5.0–6.4 <span class="search-highlight">earthquakes</span> within the subducting Pacific...
Published: 30 October 2019
Figure 4. PSA for four M w  5.0–6.4 earthquakes within the subducting Pacific plate near the Iniskin mainshock at (a) 0.33, (b) 1.0, and (c) 3.33 Hz as labeled. Colors correspond to regions as in Figure  1 , and symbols to earthquakes in Table  1 as follows: triangles, 9 March 2018
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 26 October 2017
Geosphere (2017) 13 (6): 1806–1833.
... Cook Inlet, Alaska , in Herriott , T.M. , ed., Petroleum-Related Geologic Studies in Lower Cook Inlet during 2015, Iniskin-Tuxedni Region, South-Central Alaska: Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Preliminary Interpretive Report 2016-1-7 , p. 51 – 58 , https://doi.org...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 22 November 2017
Geosphere (2018) 14 (1): 23–49.
..., Iniskin-Tuxedni Region, South-Central Alaska : Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Preliminary Interpretive Report 2016-1-7 , p. 51 – 58 , http://doi.org/10.14509/29541 . Gillis , R.J. , Swenson , R.F. , Wartes , M.A. , and Frohman , R.A. , 2013...
FIGURES | View All (13)