1-20 OF 92 RESULTS FOR

Illinois Basin Decatur Project

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 28 March 2024
Interpretation (2024) 12 (2): SB19–SB27.
... and costs while ensuring robust and reproducible results. We demonstrated the efficacy of our approach by applying the workflow to the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project site. The automated workflow successfully identified major fractured zones, multiple baffles, and an interbedded layer with a high resolution...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Advancing subsurface analysis: Integrating compute...
Second thumbnail for: Advancing subsurface analysis: Integrating compute...
Third thumbnail for: Advancing subsurface analysis: Integrating compute...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2022
The Journal of Geology (2022) 130 (5): 335–355.
...Jared T. Freiburg; Markus Peltz; Donna C. Willette; Georg H. Grathoff Abstract At the Illinois BasinDecatur Project, a large-scale CO 2 capture and geologic storage demonstration project in the saline Mount Simon Sandstone in central Illinois, three overlying and laterally continuous shale...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: High-Resolution Pore Space Imaging, Mineralogical ...
Second thumbnail for: High-Resolution Pore Space Imaging, Mineralogical ...
Third thumbnail for: High-Resolution Pore Space Imaging, Mineralogical ...
Image
Illinois Basin–Decatur Project (IBDP) location, CO2 injection rate and earthquake locations. (a) Location of the IBDP. (b) Injection rate (blue solid line), carbon capture and storage (CCS1) bottomhole pressure (BHP) (red solid line), and earthquake frequency (black histogram). The injection rate and BHP are weekly averages. (c) Plan view of the microseismicity locations with respect to the injection well (CCS1) and the monitoring well (VW1). Events are color coded by occurrence time. The maximum horizontal stress direction is indicated by the black arrows. Example of focal mechanisms calculated by Dichiarante et al. (2021) are shown for clusters 2 and 4. (d) Cross section from south to north showing the microseismicity variation with depth. Cross‐section location is shown by the black dashed line in panel (c). The black solid lines are the different stratigraphic horizons included in our model. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 07 May 2024
Figure 1. Illinois BasinDecatur Project (IBDP) location, CO 2 injection rate and earthquake locations. (a) Location of the IBDP. (b) Injection rate (blue solid line), carbon capture and storage (CCS1) bottomhole pressure (BHP) (red solid line), and earthquake frequency (black histogram
Journal Article
Published: 18 August 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (5): 2188–2204.
...Sherilyn Williams‐Stroud; Robert Bauer; Hannes Leetaru; Volker Oye; Frantisek Stanek; Sallie Greenberg; Nadege Langet ABSTRACT The results of monitoring of carbon dioxide ( CO 2 ) injection at the Illinois BasinDecatur Project (IBDP) and the companion Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Analysis of Microseismicity and Reactivated Fault ...
Second thumbnail for: Analysis of Microseismicity and Reactivated Fault ...
Third thumbnail for: Analysis of Microseismicity and Reactivated Fault ...
Journal Article
Published: 18 March 2025
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2025)
... injection in the Illinois BasinDecatur Project (for the period 2011–2014) reveals that 11% of the earthquakes were directly triggered by injection, 89% were due to previous earthquakes, whereas the contribution from tectonic loading was negligible (<1%). The earthquake interaction kernels in both cases...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Inferring the Causal Structure Among Injection‐Ind...
Second thumbnail for: Inferring the Causal Structure Among Injection‐Ind...
Third thumbnail for: Inferring the Causal Structure Among Injection‐Ind...
Journal Article
Published: 14 July 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (5): 2168–2187.
...Nadège Langet; Bettina Goertz‐Allmann; Volker Oye; Robert A. Bauer; Sherilyn Williams‐Stroud; Anna Maria Dichiarante; Sallie E. Greenberg ABSTRACT The three‐year CO 2 injection period at the Illinois BasinDecatur Project site (Decatur, Illinois, United States) produced a number of microseismic...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Joint Focal Mechanism Inversion Using Downhole and...
Second thumbnail for: Joint Focal Mechanism Inversion Using Downhole and...
Third thumbnail for: Joint Focal Mechanism Inversion Using Downhole and...
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 February 2024
The Leading Edge (2024) 43 (2): 125–131.
...Debasis Chaudhuri; Ankur Roy Abstract The Illinois Basin Decatur Project, a carbon capture and sequestration task, was undertaken to sequester 1 million tonnes of CO 2 into a sandstone reservoir. A 3D seismic survey was conducted to characterize the reservoir. A geomodel was developed from seismic...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Quantitative seismic fracture characterization of ...
Second thumbnail for: Quantitative seismic fracture characterization of ...
Third thumbnail for: Quantitative seismic fracture characterization of ...
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 June 2025
The Leading Edge (2025) 44 (6): 451–464.
...Mayra D. L. Carrasquilla; Joseph McNease; Min Sun; Yingcai Zheng Abstract The Illinois BasinDecatur Project is important for its carbon capture and storage (CCS) effort in the Mount Simon Formation. Characterizing the rock mechanical properties and quantifying the fluid effect are important...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Characterization of seal and reservoir units at th...
Second thumbnail for: Characterization of seal and reservoir units at th...
Third thumbnail for: Characterization of seal and reservoir units at th...
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 April 2025
The Leading Edge (2025) 44 (4): 276–287.
... aberrancy and multispectral coherence to (1) delineate faults that exhibit little to no offsets on a seismic volume acquired for carbon capture and storage in the Illinois BasinDecatur Project and (2) correlate them with the microseismic activity during supercritical CO 2 injection. We first apply...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Detection of small-offset faults in seismic data: ...
Second thumbnail for: Detection of small-offset faults in seismic data: ...
Third thumbnail for: Detection of small-offset faults in seismic data: ...
Journal Article
Published: 07 May 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (5): 2424–2445.
...Figure 1. Illinois BasinDecatur Project (IBDP) location, CO 2 injection rate and earthquake locations. (a) Location of the IBDP. (b) Injection rate (blue solid line), carbon capture and storage (CCS1) bottomhole pressure (BHP) (red solid line), and earthquake frequency (black histogram...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Mechanisms for Microseismicity Occurrence Due to C...
Second thumbnail for: Mechanisms for Microseismicity Occurrence Due to C...
Third thumbnail for: Mechanisms for Microseismicity Occurrence Due to C...
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 09 February 2018
Interpretation (2018) 6 (2): T257–T270.
... visualization and attribute analysis to a 3D seismic volume of the basement complex that underlies the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project CCS site. The most successful interpretative techniques used include geobody analysis, x (east–west, crossline)-directed amplitude change, and corendering (e.g., amplitude...
Image
Location of the samples from the wells at the Illinois Basin–Decatur Project (IBDP) in Decatur, Illinois, and detailed stratigraphic column at the IBDP with target reservoir and major sealing units identified. GM2 = Geophysical Monitoring Well 2; VW1 = Verification Well 1; USDW = underground source of drinking water.
Published: 01 September 2022
Figure 1.  Location of the samples from the wells at the Illinois BasinDecatur Project (IBDP) in Decatur, Illinois, and detailed stratigraphic column at the IBDP with target reservoir and major sealing units identified. GM2 = Geophysical Monitoring Well 2; VW1 = Verification Well 1; USDW
Image
Location map of the Illinois basin in the north‐central United States. The inset map shows the depth to Precambrian basement in the states Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana. The green polygon is the outline of the Illinois basin. The map on the left shows historical seismicity in Illinois from the Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS) catalog of earthquakes reported and detected from 1795 to 2017. The four largest earthquakes within 100 km of the Decatur site are displayed as boxed circles. Source mechanisms determined by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for some earthquakes are shown near their epicenters. The area in the south labeled New Madrid seismic zone (NMSZ) corresponds to the northern part of the NMSZ. The small black box in the central part of the state indicates the approximate location of the Illinois Basin–Decatur Project (IBDP), shown with intersecting 2D seismic acquisition lines. Fault lines (light gray) include faults from all depths as mapped from surface and subsurface information. LE, Lake Erie; LM, Lake Michigan. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 18 August 2020
are shown near their epicenters. The area in the south labeled New Madrid seismic zone (NMSZ) corresponds to the northern part of the NMSZ. The small black box in the central part of the state indicates the approximate location of the Illinois BasinDecatur Project (IBDP), shown with intersecting 2D seismic
Image
Location map of the Illinois Basin and Decatur project area. Modified from SINTEFblog.
Published: 01 February 2024
Figure 1.  Location map of the Illinois Basin and Decatur project area. Modified from SINTEFblog.
Image
Sampled cores (4 inches [10 cm] in diameter) from the Illinois Basin–Decatur Project. A, Mudstone sample (depth: 6863 feet [2092 m]) interbedded within the Mount Simon Sandstone. B, Eau Claire Formation sample (depth: 5465 feet [1666 m]). C, Maquoketa Shale Group sample (depth: 2816 feet [858 m]). D, New Albany Shale Group sample (depth: 2157 feet [657 m]).
Published: 01 September 2022
Figure 2.  Sampled cores (4 inches [10 cm] in diameter) from the Illinois BasinDecatur Project. A , Mudstone sample (depth: 6863 feet [2092 m]) interbedded within the Mount Simon Sandstone. B , Eau Claire Formation sample (depth: 5465 feet [1666 m]). C , Maquoketa Shale Group sample (depth
Image
(a,d) Cross sections and (c) map view of the Illinois Basin ‐ Decatur Project (IBDP) site showing the seismic network and the overall seismicity (gray dots) detected and located with the downhole sensors (GM1, PS3, and VW2). Black filled dots correspond to events that were also clearly visible on the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) surface stations (DEC) and Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS) surface stations. Stars represent the injection wells. In this article, we particularly focus on 23 events belonging to the north cluster (black rectangle in map view). Seismic station names are indicated in bold; other geophysical and verification wells without seismic instrumentation are in italic. (b) Map of the midwest region of the United States. The shaded area represents the Illinois basin, and the star shows the location of the IBDP site (from Freiburg et al., 2014). m.b.s.l., meters below sea level; N, north. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 14 July 2020
Figure 1. (a,d) Cross sections and (c) map view of the Illinois BasinDecatur Project (IBDP) site showing the seismic network and the overall seismicity (gray dots) detected and located with the downhole sensors (GM1, PS3, and VW2). Black filled dots correspond to events that were also clearly
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 23 August 2023
DOI: 10.1144/SP528-2022-85
EISBN: 9781786209603
...-year unconformity on top of the Precambrian surface. At the Decatur site, the topographical relief on the Precambrian surface was 76.2 m (250 ft). Fig. 7. North–South seismic inversion profile across the Illinois Basin Decatur Project showing the four deep wells. The surface showing...
Journal Article
Published: 10 June 2015
Seismological Research Letters (2015) 86 (4): 1096–1101.
..., respectively. The ISGS managed the Illinois BasinDecatur Project (IBDP), a three‐year project beginning in November 2011, during which carbon dioxide was injected at a rate of ∼1000 metric tons per day until November 2014 ( Finley et al. , 2011 , 2013 ). ADM manages the Illinois Industrial CCS (ICCS...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Surface Monitoring of Microseismicity at the <span...
Second thumbnail for: Surface Monitoring of Microseismicity at the <span...
Third thumbnail for: Surface Monitoring of Microseismicity at the <span...
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 November 2021
The Leading Edge (2021) 40 (11): 823–830.
... of the Illinois Basin Decatur Project (IBDP) indicated that the induced microseismic events occurred primarily in the crystalline basement ( Goertz-Allmann et al., 2017 ; Bauer et al., 2019 ). Additional analysis showed that many events are located in an area where seismic reflection data suggest a low...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Geomechanical aspects of induced microseismicity d...
Second thumbnail for: Geomechanical aspects of induced microseismicity d...
Third thumbnail for: Geomechanical aspects of induced microseismicity d...
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 17 May 2022
Interpretation (2022) 10 (3): SG1–SG9.
... of years The Illinois Basin-Decatur Project is the world’s first large-scale carbon capture and storage demonstration project from a biofuel source in which 1.1 million tons of CO 2 are sequestered over a three-year period from 2011 to 2014 at an injection rate of 1000 tons per day...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Velocity modeling of supercritical pore fluids thr...
Second thumbnail for: Velocity modeling of supercritical pore fluids thr...
Third thumbnail for: Velocity modeling of supercritical pore fluids thr...