1-20 OF 29 RESULTS FOR

Huttenberg Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2018
South African Journal of Geology (2018) 121 (1): 23–42.
... is a prelude to the Pan African Orogeny in Central Africa. In this paper, we present new descriptions of these carbonate rocks and a sedimentological study from key cores and outcrops in the Otavi Mountainland (Namibia) and West Congo belt (DRC) of the Hüttenberg Formation and the C5 Formation, respectively...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
Carbonate ramp geometry and facies distribution of the Hüttenberg Formation in Namibia and the C5 Formation in DRC. (A to C) Middle- to inner carbonate ramp of the Hüttenberg Formation. (A) Middle carbonate ramp of the Hüttenberg Formation with (dolo)mudstone (MF1-2) overlain by mounds and pinnacles of microbial and SH/LLH-type stromatolitic buildups (MF3-5). High-energy oolitic (dolo)packstone-grainstone (MF6) form barrier shoals. (B) Inner carbonate ramp of the Hüttenberg Formation exhibits a temporary emerged hypersaline lagoon with desiccation cracks and breccias (see MF10). (C-D) Inner carbonate-evaporite ramp of the C5 Formation. (C) Shoal-barrier and lagoonal ramp settings of the C5a Member (MF7-9). (D) Nearshore carbonate-evaporite ramp setting with beach and coastalsabkhaplain (MF10-12).
Published: 01 March 2018
Figure 8. Carbonate ramp geometry and facies distribution of the Hüttenberg Formation in Namibia and the C5 Formation in DRC. (A to C) Middle- to inner carbonate ramp of the Hüttenberg Formation. ( A ) Middle carbonate ramp of the Hüttenberg Formation with (dolo)mudstone (MF1-2) overlain
Image
Attempt at carbon-isotope correlation between the C5 carbonate rocks and the high-resolution δ13C data from the Tsumeb core S86A drilled in the Hüttenberg Formation (data after Kaufman et al., 2010).
Published: 01 March 2018
Figure 9. Attempt at carbon-isotope correlation between the C5 carbonate rocks and the high-resolution δ 13 C data from the Tsumeb core S86A drilled in the Hüttenberg Formation (data after Kaufman et al., 2010 ).
Image
Lateral variation in stratigraphic thickness of post-rift Otavi Group formations (Figure 2b) in directions (a) normal to NZ and the south-southeast-facing rifted margin of CC (Figure 9), and (b) normal to CKZ (Figure 1b) and the west-southwest-facing CC margin. Abbreviations: Ab=Ombaatjie Formation; Tm=Maieberg Formation; Te= Elandshoek Formation; Th=Hüttenberg Formation. Coordinates are approximate section locations (see Figure 1b). The arched subsidence pattern in (a) suggests a flexural component of passive-margin subsidence (Watts et al., 1982), possibly related to volcanic loading in NZ (Figure 9). Weak and reversing lateral subsidence variability in (b) is consistent with a strong, non-volcanic (transform) type margin (Sapin et al., 2021).
Published: 01 June 2021
: Ab=Ombaatjie Formation; Tm=Maieberg Formation; Te= Elandshoek Formation; Th=Hüttenberg Formation. Coordinates are approximate section locations (see Figure 1b ). The arched subsidence pattern in (a) suggests a flexural component of passive-margin subsidence ( Watts et al., 1982 ), possibly related
Image
(A) Satellite image of outcrop belt of the Fransfontein homocline in north-central Namibia with locations of sections (see Fig. 1C for location). Locations of low-altitude oblique photos are given as Figures 5–8 and 10, as indicated. Stratigraphic units: B—basement; R—Rasthof Formation; N—Narachaams Member; F—Franni-aus Member; G—Ghaub Formation; M—Maieberg Formation; E—Elandshoek Formation; H—Huttenberg Formation. (B) Perspective of western end of Fransfontein homocline as viewed eastward, above route C35 (white arrow to right in Fig. 2A) with contacts of major stratigraphic divisions. (C) Stratigraphic-paleogeographic restoration of the Otavi platform and foreslope after deposition of the Maieberg cap-carbonate sequence. Marinoan glacial erosion surface features a raised outer platform and preferentially eroded inner platform and upper foreslope. The Franni-aus falling-stand wedge and Ghaub ice grounding-line wedge (in red) are situated on the distal foreslope at reconstructed elevations >1.2 km below the rim of the platform (wrt—with respect to). The Keilberg cap dolostone is a transgressive peloidal grainstone deposited diachronously above wave base in all areas during terminal glacioeustatic flooding.
Published: 01 July 2011
Formation; N—Narachaams Member; F—Franni-aus Member; G—Ghaub Formation; M—Maieberg Formation; E—Elandshoek Formation; H—Huttenberg Formation. (B) Perspective of western end of Fransfontein homocline as viewed eastward, above route C35 (white arrow to right in Fig. 2A ) with contacts of major stratigraphic
Image
Composite carbon-isotope profiles and simplified stratigraphic columns spanning the inferred Marinoan and Pan African deformation events in northwestern Namibia, west central DRC, and central east Brazil. The three sedimentary successions are marked by two marine transgressions, after the Marinoan-age glaciation. Two carbon-isotope trends show (i) a very negative anomaly, directly after the Marinoan glaciation, marked by the deposition of the Ghaub Formation in Namibia, Upper Diamictite Formation in DRC, and Carrancas/Jequitaí formations in Brazil, (ii) a negative to positive excursion in δ13C values in the Maieberg Formation in Namibia, comparable to the C1-C3 formations in DRC, and the lower part of the Sete Lagoas in Brazil, and (iii) a second negative to strong positive excursion in δ13C values in the Elandshoek-Huttenberg formations in Namibia, comparable to the C4-C5 formations in DRC, and the upper part of the Sete Lagoas Formation to the Lagoa do Jacaré Formation in Brazil. The87Sr/86Sr ratios are here indicative.87Sr/86Sr ratios from – Namibia: Frimmel et al. (1996) and Halverson et al. (2007); DRC: Frimmel et al. (2006), Poidevin (2007), and Delpomdor and Préat (2013); Brazil: Caxito et al. (2012) and Paula-Santos et al. (2015, 2017).
Published: 01 March 2018
13 C values in the Maieberg Formation in Namibia, comparable to the C1-C3 formations in DRC, and the lower part of the Sete Lagoas in Brazil, and (iii) a second negative to strong positive excursion in δ 13 C values in the Elandshoek-Huttenberg formations in Namibia, comparable to the C4-C5
Image
Cartoon illustrating the Neoproterozoic palaeogeographic reconstruction of the Congo-São Francisco (C-SF) cratons (modified after Stanistreet et al., 1991; Alkmim et al., 2006). (A) Reworked 1.1 Ga-950 Ma Rodinia Supercontinent centered on the present-day Africa and South America continents. (B) Continental rifting at ~1 Ga. (C) Opening of the Khomas Ocean separating shelves on the C-SF and Kalahari continental margins. (D) Initial closure of the Adamastor Ocean, at ~720 Ma, as a consequence of the C-SF, Rio de la Plata, Kalahari interaction. (E) Pan African-Brasiliano orogen on the Gondwana Supercontinent at ~540 Ma. Abbreviations: Craton - Am, Amazonia; RP, Rio de la Plata; WA, West Africa; Co, Congo; SF, São-Francisco; Ka, Kalahari, Ta, Tanzania block (Congo craton); AR, Arequipa; Ho, Hoggar; In, India; EAn, East Antarctica; Was, West Australia; NAs, North Australia; Ga, Gawler. Pan African-Brasiliano orogens – RP, Rio Preto, BR, Brasiliano; SP, Sierra Pampeanas; WC, West Congo; KK, Kaoko; DA, Damara; GA, Gariep; LF, Lufilian; ZB, Zambezi; MO, Mozambique; SA, Saldania; CF, Cape Fold; RO, Ross; KA, Kanmatoo. Stars: C5 Formation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Hüttenberg Formation in Namibia.
Published: 01 March 2018
. Pan African-Brasiliano orogens – RP, Rio Preto, BR, Brasiliano; SP, Sierra Pampeanas; WC, West Congo; KK, Kaoko; DA, Damara; GA, Gariep; LF, Lufilian; ZB, Zambezi; MO, Mozambique; SA, Saldania; CF, Cape Fold; RO, Ross; KA, Kanmatoo. Stars: C5 Formation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Hüttenberg
Journal Article
Published: 21 July 2021
Journal of the Geological Society (2022) 179 (1): jgs2021-036.
... of the Tsagaan Oloom Formation in Mongolia ( Macdonald et al. 2009 ; Bold et al. 2016 ) and Etina Formation in Australia ( Rose et al. 2012 ), Ediacaran Hüttenberg Formation in Namibia ( Cui et al. 2018 ), end-Ordovician Hirnantian strata ( Jones et al. 2020 ) and Silurian Ireviken and Lau Events...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 19 October 2022
Journal of the Geological Society (2023) 180 (1): jgs2022-064.
... ). The deposits from the older Rieden and Wehr centres are less well preserved than those of the Laacher See volcano. The Wehr complex ( Fig. 2 ) has erupted two major tephras, the Hüttenberg and Glees tephras ( 40 Ar/ 39 Ar sanidine ages of 215 ± 8 and 151 ± 22 ka, respectively; 2 s; van den Bogaard et al...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2016
American Mineralogist (2016) 101 (11): 2539–2543.
... by Innes and Chaplin (1986) . The Kombat mine, located in the Otavi Valley, 37 km east of Otavi and 49 km south of Tsumeb, is in a sequence of weakly metamorphosed, thin to massive bedded, shallow-water dolostones of the Upper Proterozoic Hüttenberg Formation. Six discrete bodies of brecciated...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 28 February 2022
Journal of the Geological Society (2022) 179 (4): jgs2021-091.
... and subsequent geochemical models to explain both the Sr and C isotope records are intriguing, but competing models posit deposition of the Bambuí Group in open-marine environments (discussed in detail by Kaufman et al. 2009 ). One possible analogue of the MIBE is the Neoproterozoic Hüttenberg Formation...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2011
GSA Bulletin (2011) 123 (7-8): 1317–1336.
... this. The Mahogany Flats Member and the uppermost Elandshoek Formation and overlying Huttenberg Formation in Namibia share similar facies, including stromatolites, enterolithic bedding, and tepee structures. However, there is no apparent equivalent in Death Valley of the strongly positive δ 13 C values (up to +10...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2023
Earth Sciences History (2023) 42 (2): 385–415.
...−550 Ma. The limestone that Rogers reported as defining its ridges are mapped today as part of the Hüttenberg Formation within the Tsumeb Subgroup of the Otavi Group ( Kamona and Günzel 2007 , p. 399). From Otavifontein, Rogers traveled east through the Otavi Syncline to what had been reported...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2019
European Journal of Mineralogy (2019) 31 (3): 637–646.
... of dolostones of the Upper Proterozoic Hüttenberg Formation by polymineralic aggregates consisting of Mn-rich spinels, calcite, dolomite, baryte, as well as various subordinate components including several lead oxychlorides ( Innes & Chaplin, 1986 ). According to the author’s data based on the statistics...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2011
GSA Bulletin (2011) 123 (7-8): 1448–1477.
... Formation; N—Narachaams Member; F—Franni-aus Member; G—Ghaub Formation; M—Maieberg Formation; E—Elandshoek Formation; H—Huttenberg Formation. (B) Perspective of western end of Fransfontein homocline as viewed eastward, above route C35 (white arrow to right in Fig. 2A ) with contacts of major stratigraphic...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2009
DOI: 10.1144/SP326.15
EISBN: 9781862395749
... ( Frimmel 2004 ; Hoffmann et al. 2004 ). The group is subdivided into the underlying Abenab Subgroup (Berg Aukas, Gauss and Auros formations) and the overlying Tsumeb Subgroup (Ghaub, Maieberg, Elandshoek and Hüttenberg formations) (Fig. 2 ) (see Kamona & Günzel 2007 ). Cap carbonates...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 13 January 2021
DOI: 10.1144/SP503-2019-253
EISBN: 9781786209917
..., which were placed in the Swakop Group based on falsely inferred correlations with the Hüttenberg Formation. Rift-to-shelf (R-S) and shelf-to-foredeep (S-F) transitions are indicated, the former being older (pre-Marinoan) on the platform than in the basin ( Hoffman et al. 2018 ). The tectonic...
FIGURES | View All (24)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2014
American Mineralogist (2014) 99 (1): 225–234.
...) of the regolith, respectively. Formation of siderite, an uncommon mineral species in such oxidized environments, is attributed to the development of swampy conditions in organic-rich lateritic materials that accumulated at the bottom of dolines. These results thus show the importance of siderite as a host...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2021
South African Journal of Geology (2021) 124 (2): 401–420.
...: Ab=Ombaatjie Formation; Tm=Maieberg Formation; Te= Elandshoek Formation; Th=Hüttenberg Formation. Coordinates are approximate section locations (see Figure 1b ). The arched subsidence pattern in (a) suggests a flexural component of passive-margin subsidence ( Watts et al., 1982 ), possibly related...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 November 2010
Economic Geology (2010) 105 (7): 1301–1319.
... brines to ascend and cover the banks of the modern river drainage system with sinter terraces. In the study area northeast of the Dead Sea, Fe accumulated in subaquatic lacustrine settings. Neotectonic uplift of these anticlines and the formation of raised platforms caused part of the hanging-wall rocks...
FIGURES | View All (8)