1-20 OF 124 RESULTS FOR

Hungry Bay

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
FIGURE 5. Montage of trackway views in Hungry Bay Formation at Charles Island, Bermuda, St. Georges Parish, south side (mouth) of Castle Harbour located at 32° 20.312′ N; 64° 40.306′ W. A) exposure on north side of Charles Island showing eolianite slab with the bird trackways. Oval indicates standing person partially hidden by rock. Thin black arrow in A indicates approximate stratigraphic level of the slab before collapse. Apparent tree molds are indicated by larger arrows. B–D) General and more detailed views of the trackway (2003 photos).
Published: 01 July 2011
FIGURE 5. Montage of trackway views in Hungry Bay Formation at Charles Island, Bermuda, St. Georges Parish, south side (mouth) of Castle Harbour located at 32° 20.312′ N; 64° 40.306′ W. A) exposure on north side of Charles Island showing eolianite slab with the bird trackways. Oval indicates
Image
FIGURE 8. Preservation of a forest of trees at Hungry Bay. A) photograph showing several hollow and refilled casts of suspected buried Sabal bermudana forest. B) Sketch interpreting the above photograph showing standing and fallen trunks and a large number of frond molds and rhizomorphs.
Published: 01 July 2011
FIGURE 8. Preservation of a forest of trees at Hungry Bay. A) photograph showing several hollow and refilled casts of suspected buried Sabal bermudana forest. B) Sketch interpreting the above photograph showing standing and fallen trunks and a large number of frond molds and rhizomorphs.
Image
FIGURE 3. Stratigraphic correlation of study sites along the south shore of Bermuda. The Hungry Bay Formation (HBF; former Pembroke Member) is identified across the South Shore sections with thick dashed lines. Site abbreviations are defined in Figure 1. Stratigraphic abbreviations: SG.s  =  St. Georges soil; S  =  Southampton Formation; HBF  =  Hungry Bay Formation; Hp  =  Harrington protosol; Dm  =  Devonshire Member (marine); De  =  Devonshire Member (eolianite); GBm  =  Grape Bay Member (marine).
Published: 01 July 2011
FIGURE 3. Stratigraphic correlation of study sites along the south shore of Bermuda. The Hungry Bay Formation (HBF; former Pembroke Member) is identified across the South Shore sections with thick dashed lines. Site abbreviations are defined in Figure 1 . Stratigraphic abbreviations: SG.s  =  St
Image
FIGURE 7. Plant impressions and modern counterparts in rocks correlated with the Hungry Bay Formation of mid last interglacial age (MIS 5c). A) corrugated impression of a frond with arching petiole at Southcourt Avenue (Feb 2005 photo; hand for scale); B and D) The modern endemic palm Sabal bermudana. The trunk in view D is approximately 40 cm in diameter. C) Hollow tree mold with fronds (arrows), many pointing downward from apex of the trunk (at Hungry Bay, 10 May 1989 photo).
Published: 01 July 2011
FIGURE 7. Plant impressions and modern counterparts in rocks correlated with the Hungry Bay Formation of mid last interglacial age (MIS 5c). A) corrugated impression of a frond with arching petiole at Southcourt Avenue (Feb 2005 photo; hand for scale); B and D) The modern endemic palm Sabal
Image
FIGURE 1. Located 1040 km ESE of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (inset), Bermuda has a current land area of 56 km2. Study sites along the South Shore of Bermuda (individual sections in Fig. 3) are as follows: GB  =  Grape Bay; SC  =  Southcourt Ave., HB  =  Hungry Bay, AS  =  Ariel Sands; RB  =  Rocky Bay (type section), SH  =  Saucos Hill, SP  =  Spittal Pond, and CH  =  Charles Island.
Published: 01 July 2011
FIGURE 1. Located 1040 km ESE of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (inset), Bermuda has a current land area of 56 km 2 . Study sites along the South Shore of Bermuda (individual sections in Fig. 3 ) are as follows: GB  =  Grape Bay; SC  =  Southcourt Ave., HB  =  Hungry Bay, AS  =  Ariel Sands; RB
Image
The progression of facies development in the (1) ravinement infill facies assemblage and (2) Belmont Formation facies assemblage, respectively. The distal (landward) portions of each of these assemblages are preserved at several localities along Bermuda’s south shore. Parts of the two assemblages may be preserved together at Hungry Bay west and Devonshire Bay, although there is insufficient exposure to demonstrate this. The ravinement infill facies assemblage is thought to have developed concomitant with early flooding of the Bermuda Platform at the beginning of an interglacial period. Preserved assemblages consist of coarse transgressive marine deposits, a protocol, and small advancing dune, but no prograding beach. The Belmont Formation facies assemblage incorporates progradational and aggradational shoreface and foreshore deposits (succession 1), which accumulated during a rising relative sea level (RSL). Terrestrial deposits (succession 2), including expansive advancing dunes, are interpreted as the product of a falling RSL.
Published: 01 November 2015
assemblages may be preserved together at Hungry Bay west and Devonshire Bay, although there is insufficient exposure to demonstrate this. The ravinement infill facies assemblage is thought to have developed concomitant with early flooding of the Bermuda Platform at the beginning of an interglacial period
Image
FIGURE 9. Successive stages of evolution of mold and cast tree forms. A) Stage I: unfilled mold of palmetto in 100 ka eolianite at Hungry Bay, Bermuda. B) Stage II: mostly filled cast of a large tree mold and cast in Nassau, Bahamas, 125 ka dune (note large void and rhizomorphs at top of cast). C) Stage III/IV: horizontally filled cast at Nambung National Park (NNP, Western Australia) showing tapered upward trunk morphology—pinnacle molds and casting are estimated to have been initiated ca. 400 ka (Hearty and O'Leary, 2008). D) Stage III/IV: field of pinnacles at NNP with conical or cylindrical morphology that have weathered out of softer sediments—millennia of subsequent exposure to wind abrasion and sand-blasting have sculpted the Pinnacles at NNP into a myriad of unique shapes.
Published: 01 July 2011
FIGURE 9. Successive stages of evolution of mold and cast tree forms. A) Stage I: unfilled mold of palmetto in 100 ka eolianite at Hungry Bay, Bermuda. B) Stage II: mostly filled cast of a large tree mold and cast in Nassau, Bahamas, 125 ka dune (note large void and rhizomorphs at top of cast). C
Image
Examples of Bermuda’s coastal facies and their associations. (A) A ravinement infill facies assemblage in the Rocky Bay Formation at Rocky Bay, featuring Sof, Rof, and Hapl facies. Interpretation: Burrowed shoreface sediments superposed by a protosol and advancing-dune deposits. (B) The Belmont Formation at Devonshire Bay featuring Lapl and Lal facies with an intervening bounding surface. Interpretation: Truncated reflective beach-face deposits superposed by a foredune. (C) The Belmont Formation at Hungry Bay east, featuring Lapl, Trm, and Flp facies with intervening bounding surfaces. Interpretation: Truncated reflective beach-face deposits superposed by trough cross-stratified overwash deposits and laminated shelly lagoonal deposits. (D) The Belmont Formation at Doe Bay, featuring Lapl and Bof facies. Interpretation: Beach-face and berm strata superposed by upper beach deposits, which were intensively burrowed by land crabs (Gecarcinus lateralis). (E) The Belmont Formation at Spittal Pond west, featuring Laws and Hapm facies. Interpretation: Shoreface symmetrical wave-ripple strata over which upper shoreface beach-step deposits prograded. (F) The Belmont Formation at Devonshire Bay featuring Hapl (landward dipping) and Lapl and Hapl (seaward dipping) facies. Interpretation: Advancing-dune strata (from an earlier depositional cycle) truncated and scarped by a transgressive marine erosion surface, which is superposed by a beach and the avalanching foreslope of a foredune. (Measurements in meters, e.g., +3.2 m, indicate the elevation above present sea level).
Published: 01 November 2015
) The Belmont Formation at Devonshire Bay featuring Lapl and Lal facies with an intervening bounding surface. Interpretation: Truncated reflective beach-face deposits superposed by a foredune. (C) The Belmont Formation at Hungry Bay east, featuring Lapl, Trm, and Flp facies with intervening bounding surfaces
Image
Belmont Formation facies assemblage as seen in a shore-normal exposure at Devonshire Bay. A weakly cemented dune of an earlier depositional cycle (T) is transgressed by a rising sea level. Prograded upper beach and foredune deposits (P) are onlapped by foreshore deposits (early A). Littoral aggradation, as sea level peaks, is represented by a small low-profile foredune superposed on thickened foreshore deposits (A). Development of a protosol marks emergence of the backshore, which had previously been prone to flooding and deflation, as evidenced by a flat bounding surface and shelly lag. Exposure of nearshore deposits as sea level fell provided a source of sand for an advancing dune (T), which overstepped the foredune. Note the absence of subtidal shoreface deposits above present sea level at this locality, unlike at Hungry Bay (Fig. 4). Also, the truncation/deflation surface and superposed protosol are at a low elevation relative to those at other localities (Figs. 4 and 6). A sea level that peaked at ∼+3 m above present sea level (ASL) is implied by this assemblage. Succession 1 (developed during a rising relative sea level [RSL]) = P + A. Succession 2 (developed during a falling RSL) = T.
Published: 01 November 2015
lag. Exposure of nearshore deposits as sea level fell provided a source of sand for an advancing dune (T), which overstepped the foredune. Note the absence of subtidal shoreface deposits above present sea level at this locality, unlike at Hungry Bay ( Fig. 4 ). Also, the truncation/deflation surface
Image
Belmont Formation facies assemblage as seen in a shore-normal exposure at Hungry Bay west. A weakly cemented dune from an earlier depositional cycle (T) is transgressed by a readvancing sea. Prograded foreshore and shoreface deposits (P) are fronted on the seaward side by an aggradational sequence of coarse trough cross-bedded calcarenites (dipping alongshore), as well as landward-directed washover deposits and flat laminated lagoonal deposits (L). The inferred development of a barrier/spit seaward of the former foreshore is corroborated by the appearance of a second, proximal beach and associated foredune (A) as sea level peaked. Emergence of the infilled back-barrier lagoon, on a falling relative sea level (RSL), preceded accumulation of a protosol. Exposure of the nearshore deposits, as RSL regressed, provided a source of sand for an advancing dune (T), which overtopped the foredune. A RSL that peaked at ∼+4.2 m above present sea level (ASL) is implied by this assemblage. Succession 1 (developed during a rising RSL) = P + L + A. Succession 2 (developed during a falling RSL) = T.
Published: 01 November 2015
Figure 4. Belmont Formation facies assemblage as seen in a shore-normal exposure at Hungry Bay west. A weakly cemented dune from an earlier depositional cycle (T) is transgressed by a readvancing sea. Prograded foreshore and shoreface deposits (P) are fronted on the seaward side
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 01 July 2011
PALAIOS (2011) 26 (7): 394–405.
...FIGURE 5. Montage of trackway views in Hungry Bay Formation at Charles Island, Bermuda, St. Georges Parish, south side (mouth) of Castle Harbour located at 32° 20.312′ N; 64° 40.306′ W. A) exposure on north side of Charles Island showing eolianite slab with the bird trackways. Oval indicates...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 November 2015
GSA Bulletin (2015) 127 (11-12): 1645–1665.
... assemblages may be preserved together at Hungry Bay west and Devonshire Bay, although there is insufficient exposure to demonstrate this. The ravinement infill facies assemblage is thought to have developed concomitant with early flooding of the Bermuda Platform at the beginning of an interglacial period...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Simplified geology of the Baie Verte Peninsula with major tectonostratigraphic zones that form the Appalachian orogenic belt in Newfoundland (modified from Castonguay et al., 2014, and references therein). Past- and currently producing VMS deposits are also shown. AAT = Annieopsquotch accretionary tract, BPS = Burlington plutonic suite, BVBL = Baie Verte-Brompton line, BVL = Baie Verte line, CB = Cape Brulé, DBL = Dog Bay line, DF = Dover fault, DG = Dunamagon Granite, GRUB = Gander River ultramafic belt, HMT = Hungry Mountain thrust, RIL = Red Indian line, TPP = Trap Pond pluton.
Published: 01 September 2017
accretionary tract, BPS = Burlington plutonic suite, BVBL = Baie Verte-Brompton line, BVL = Baie Verte line, CB = Cape Brulé, DBL = Dog Bay line, DF = Dover fault, DG = Dunamagon Granite, GRUB = Gander River ultramafic belt, HMT = Hungry Mountain thrust, RIL = Red Indian line, TPP = Trap Pond pluton.
Image
Composite structural cross section interpretation modified from the composite seismic reflection line in van der Velden et al. (2004). Here, the proposed relic subduction zone below Notre Dame Bay is shown with a gradational colour to emphasize the ambiguity in the original seismic reflection data used to image this possible structure, unlike in van der Velden et al. (2004). The proposed magma pathways for the Notre Dame Bay Magmatic Province melts exploiting crustal-scale pre-existing structures at depth are shown in pink. The figure is shown with an approximate 1:1 aspect ratio (the same as van der Velden et al. (2004)) based on an average velocity of 6 km/s. Abbreviations: BVL = Baie Verte line; CBLT = Corner Brook Lake thrust; CMB = Central Mobile belt; DCT = Day Cove thrust; GBLF = Great Burnt Lake fault; GRUB = Gander River ultrabasic belt; HBF = Hermitage Bay fault; HMT = Hungry Mountain thrust; MM = Mount Cormack window; PT = Powerline thrust; ML = Mekwe’jit Line; SRF = Salmon River fault; VRT = Victoria River thrust; WBF = Wood Brook fault; WHF = Whitehorse fault.
Published: 07 September 2023
Fig. 7. Composite structural cross section interpretation modified from the composite seismic reflection line in van der Velden et al. (2004) . Here, the proposed relic subduction zone below Notre Dame Bay is shown with a gradational colour to emphasize the ambiguity in the original seismic
Image
Geology of Newfoundland Appalachians, modified from van Staal et al. (2014). Geological features discussed in text are indicated. The Floian–Katian, sediment-dominated Davidsville and Bay d'Espoir Groups form part of the passive margin of the Tetagouche–Exploits back-arc basin. GRUB, Gander River Ultrabasic Belt; PF, Pine Falls Formation; RIL, Red Indian Line. Salinic and Acadian in legend refer to the orogenic cycles associated with the accretion of the Gander margin of Ganderia and Avalonia respectively (van Staal et al. 2014). MN, Meelpaeg Nappe; OBSZ, Otter Brook shear zone; PAV, Port Albert volcanic unit; PF, Pine Falls Formation; RF, Reach Fault; SL, Stony Lake volcanic unit; RIL, Red Indian Line; SLD, Star Lake Dam; VLSZ, Victoria Lake shear Zone; BVBL, Baie Verte Brompton Line; CB, Cape Brule porphyry; CF, Cabot Fault; CLV, Charles Lake volcanic unit; CRF, Cape Ray Fault; DBL, Dog Bay Line; DC, Duder Complex; DF, Dover Fault; GBF, Green Bay Fault; GHF, Gunflap Hills Fault; GRUB, Gander River Ultrabasic Belt; HBF, Hermitage Bay Fault, HMT, Hungry Mountain thrust; HR, Harry's River; IIG, Indian Islands Group; LB, Loon Bay pluton; LCF, Lobster Cove Fault; LPG, La Poile Group; LRF, Lloyds River Fault; LV, Lawrenceton volcanic unit.
Published: 21 March 2017
Fault; DBL, Dog Bay Line; DC, Duder Complex; DF, Dover Fault; GBF, Green Bay Fault; GHF, Gunflap Hills Fault; GRUB, Gander River Ultrabasic Belt; HBF, Hermitage Bay Fault, HMT, Hungry Mountain thrust; HR, Harry's River; IIG, Indian Islands Group; LB, Loon Bay pluton; LCF, Lobster Cove Fault; LPG, La
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1949
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1949) 39 (4): 325–332.
..., and Dorothy Stanley Voigt--The Intensity of Earthquakes as Rated from Questionnaires 21 Carder, D. S., and F. H. Werner--Seismograph Station near Hungry Horse Dam, Montana 27 Chakrabarty, S. KResponse Characteristics of Electromagnetic Seismographs and their Dependence on the Instrumental Constants 205...
Journal Article
Published: 20 November 2007
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2007) 44 (11): 1567–1585.
... and Krogh ( 1985 ), Dunning et al. ( 1987 ), Zagorevski et al. ( 2006 , 2007 a ). Inset: Lithostratigraphic subdivisions of Newfoundland (after Williams 1995 ). HMC, Hungry Mountain Complex; HMT, Hungry Mountain thrust; RIL, Red Indian Line. The deformation history of the central mobile belt...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Image
Regional setting and tectonic composition of the Annieopsquotch Accretionary Tract. (a) Simplified geological map of Newfoundland Appalachians showing tectonic relationships between geological zones and subzones (modified from Hibbard et al. 2006). The Annieopsquotch Accretionary Tract is the easternmost tectonostratigraphic unit in the Notre Dame Subzone (b) Simplified tectonostratigraphy of Newfoundland Appalachians (modified from Hibbard et al. 2006). The Annieopsquotch Accretionary Tract is the structurally lowest tectonostratigraphic unit above the Red Indian Line suture zone. (c) Schematic representation of the relationships between the various tectonostratigraphic units of the Annieopsquotch Accretionary Tract in the context of a single peri-Laurentian arc system (modified from Zagorevski et al. 2009). Tremadocian to Floian components of the Annieopsquotch Accretionary Tract comprise remnant arc and back-arc and were generally already accreted to the composite Laurentian margin prior to development of the Darriwilian arc system (Lissenberg et al. 2005b). Darriwilian arc magmatism was characterized by development of constructive and rift sectors along-strike and in stratigraphic contact with each other (Table 2). This suggests that an organized back-arc spreading centre did not develop. Rather, Darriwilian arc underwent disorganized spreading with short strike-length rifts separating constructive volcanic centres. AAT, Annieopsquotch Accretionary Tract; BVBL, Baie Verte -Brompton Line; DBL, Dog Bay Line; DF, Dover fault; GRUB, Gander River ultrabasic belt; HMT, Hungry Mountain thrust; RIL, Red Indian Line.
Published: 27 October 2015
Tract; BVBL, Baie Verte -Brompton Line; DBL, Dog Bay Line; DF, Dover fault; GRUB, Gander River ultrabasic belt; HMT, Hungry Mountain thrust; RIL, Red Indian Line.
Journal Article
Published: 27 October 2015
Journal of the Geological Society (2016) 173 (1): 76–93.
... Tract; BVBL, Baie Verte -Brompton Line; DBL, Dog Bay Line; DF, Dover fault; GRUB, Gander River ultrabasic belt; HMT, Hungry Mountain thrust; RIL, Red Indian Line. ...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2011
Journal of Paleontology (2011) 85 (1): 106–110.
... is partially tucked beneath the posteriormost thoracic segment. Figure 1. Greenops widderensis Lieberman and Kloc, 1997 , (SM X.50159), from the Middle Devonian Widder Formation, Hungry Hollow, southwestern Ontario, Canada. 1 , exoskeleton showing molt configuration, ×3.5; 2 , close up of pygidium...
FIGURES