1-20 OF 1982 RESULTS FOR

Hf-177/Lu-176

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 03 January 2023
Geology (2023) 51 (3): 233–237.
... to track changes in Earth’s dominant tectonic regimes through time. We therefore developed a new “pressure of crystallization” proxy based on the variation of the 176 Lu/ 177 Hf ratio in zircon. This ratio is controlled by zircon fractionation and residual garnet, and it can be used to monitor...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Image
T – <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> ( a ) and  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>– <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> ( b ) diagrams...
Published: 01 July 2016
Fig. 5. T – 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ( a ) and 176 Lu/ 177 Hf176 Hf/ 177 Hf ( b ) diagrams for zircon cores from paragneisses. Zircons from: 1 , garnet–cordierite–biotite paragneiss, 2 , hypersthene–biotite paragneiss; 3 , altered zircon cores.
Image
(A) Plots of  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> versus  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> and (B) U-Pb age versus...
Published: 06 May 2024
Figure 6. (A) Plots of 176 Lu/ 177 Hf versus 176 Hf/ 177 Hf and (B) U-Pb age versus ε Hf (t) for zircons from samples in the Chachahe unit of NW China, plus comparison of Hf T DM2 for (C) magmatic zircons from gneisses in the Chachahe unit and (D) the Delingha Complex of NW China. Zircon Lu-Hf
Image
( a ) Measured  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> versus  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> and ( b ) Ɛ <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>(t)  ve...
Published: 01 December 2022
Figure 7. ( a ) Measured 176 Hf/ 177 Hf versus 176 Lu/ 177 Hf and ( b ) Ɛ Hf(t) versus U-Pb ages for Epembe zircons. Initial Ɛ Hf was calculated using CHUR parameters of Bouvier et al. (2008) : 176 Hf/ 177 Hf = 0.282785 and 176 Lu/ 177 Hf = 0.0336, and a decay constant of 176 Lu of λ
Image
( a ) Plots of zircon  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> ratios vs.  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> ratios. ( ...
Published: 01 February 2021
Figure 8. ( a ) Plots of zircon 176 Lu/ 177 Hf ratios vs. 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ratios. ( b ) Plots of zircon e Hf (t) values vs. d 18 O values. ( c and d ) Histograms of zircon Hf model ages for the granite and pegmatite, respectively. (Color online.)
Image
Plots of initial  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> v.  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> ( a ) and εHf v. appare...
Published: 01 May 2011
Fig. 11. Plots of initial 176 Hf/ 177 Hf v. 176 Lu/ 177 Hf ( a ) and εHf v. apparent age ( b ) showing the results of LuHf spot analyses of zircons from samples G03-8, G07-1 and G07-2. Filled symbols correspond to concordant U–Pb analyses; open symbols are discordant. Error bars are 2σ
Image
Relationship between  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> and  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> (t) , and  206 Pb&#x2F;...
Published: 01 November 2009
Fig. 9. Relationship between 176 Lu/ 177 Hf and 176 Hf/ 177 Hf (t) , and 206 Pb/ 238 U age and εHf (t) values for the different domains in zircon from allanite-bearing paragneiss S27 and orthogneiss S28 in drill hole CCSD-PP2. (a) and (b) 176 Lu/ 177 Hf vs. 176 Hf/ 177 Hf(t) for zircon
Image
<span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>  versus initial   <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>  ( top ) and histogram of s...
Published: 01 January 2009
Figure 7.  176 Lu/ 177 Hf versus initial 176 Hf/ 177 Hf ( top ) and histogram of single-stage model Hf ages ( bottom ) for rocks from the Tianpinghe pluton in the Hannan region, South China.
Image
Figure 5. (A)  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> versus  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> isochron diagram for Z...
Published: 01 July 2006
Figure 5. (A) 176 Lu/ 177 Hf versus 176 Hf/ 177 Hf isochron diagram for Zunhua peridotites, yielding an isochron age of 2528 ± 130 Ma. (B) Hf isotopic evolution of the depleted mantle through time (modified from Bennett, 2004 ). The initial ϵ Hf data for Zunhua peridotites plot well above
Image
Figure 3.  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> versus  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> for northern French Massif...
Published: 01 April 2006
Figure 3. 176 Hf/ 177 Hf versus 176 Lu/ 177 Hf for northern French Massif Central mantle clinopyroxenes (cpx). Inset graph provides magnified view of Montboissier and Fraisse samples. Also shown is a 360 Ma reference isochron (dashed line)
Image
(A) Garnet  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>- <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> diagram. (B, C) Rutile  238 U&#x2F; 2...
Published: 31 July 2024
Figure 6. (A) Garnet 176 Lu/ 176 Hf- 177 Hf/ 176 Hf diagram. (B, C) Rutile 238 U/ 206 Pb- 207 Pb/ 206 Pb diagrams. (D) Thermal-related geological age records in southern Tibet at the Miocene. Age data represented by rectangles is from Chung et al. (2003) , Hou et al. (2015) , Wang et al
Image
<span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> plotted against relative proportion of  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> (Yb + <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>)&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">176</span> H...
Published: 01 August 2011
Figure 4. 176 Hf/ 177 Hf plotted against relative proportion of 176 (Yb + Lu)/ 176 Hf (shown as a percentage), for all solution analyses performed over the course of this study. Data were normalized to 179 Hf/ 177 Hf = 0.72350 ( Patchett and Tatsumoto, 1980 ; Patchett, 1983 ), and 173 Yb
Image
( 230 Th&#x2F; 238 U) vs. δ (Sm&#x2F;Nd) , δ (<span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F;<span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>) , and  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>. δ (<span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F;<span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>)...
Published: 01 January 2003
Figure 4. ( 230 Th/ 238 U) vs. δ (Sm/Nd) , δ (Lu/Hf) , and 176 Hf/ 177 Hf. δ (Lu/Hf) is an indicator of the amount of residual garnet, whereas δ (Sm/Nd) is an indicator of the degree of melting. For the Hawaiian basalts, the highest degree melts (low δ (Sm/Nd) ) with the least prominent
Image
<span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>–<span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> systematics in metamorphic zircon. A)  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> isotopic evolut...
Published: 01 August 2017
Figure 7. LuHf systematics in metamorphic zircon. A) 176 Hf/ 177 Hf isotopic evolution over time for different components of a gabbroic rock that crystallized magmatic zircon at time 0 and metamorphic zircon 100 Ma later, in a garnet bearing assemblage. Because zircon is the main host of Hf
Image
Zircon <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>-<span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> isotope plots for rocks from the study area. (A)  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> ...
Published: 01 July 2017
Figure 15. Zircon Lu-Hf isotope plots for rocks from the study area. (A) 176 Hf/ 177 Hf i vs. age (Ma). (B) ε Hf ( t ) vs. age (Ma). CHUR—chondritic uniform reservoir.
Image
Plots of zircon  ɛ  <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> ( t ) versus the  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> ratio. Core-to-rim ...
Published: 18 October 2013
Figure 6. Plots of zircon ɛ Hf ( t ) versus the 176 Lu/ 177 Hf ratio. Core-to-rim variation is shown by arrowed tie lines connecting data from the same grain. Error bars indicate 2 σ standard error. The closed and open symbols represent zircon
Image
Secular variations of  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> and δ 18 O isotopes in zircons. Each ...
Published: 03 January 2023
Figure 1. Secular variations of 176 Lu/ 177 Hf and δ 18 O isotopes in zircons. Each data point represents filtered 0.1 b.y. bins in a worldwide data set ( 176 Lu/ 177 Hf: n = 124,476; δ 18 O: n = 6294). Error bars are 2 standard errors of values within each bin. Orange bars represent
Image
Geochemical controls on  <span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> proxy. (A) Correlation between calc...
Published: 03 January 2023
Figure 3. Geochemical controls on 176 Lu/ 177 Hf proxy. (A) Correlation between calculated zircon 176 Lu/ 177 Hf and Yb-Y concentrations for 4472 analyses. Successful partial melting models (i.e., models that overlap natural data) for three sources show coevolution of 176 Lu/ 177 Hf and Yb
Image
<span class="search-highlight">176</span> <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>&#x2F; <span class="search-highlight">177</span> <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span> ratios vs. heavy rare earth element (HREE) contents for meta...
Published: 20 October 2021
Figure 10. 176 Lu/ 177 Hf ratios vs. heavy rare earth element (HREE) contents for metamorphic zircons from the meta-felsic rocks.
Image
Possible evolutionary pathways for       <span class="search-highlight">Lu</span>    <span class="search-highlight">176</span>    &#x2F;    <span class="search-highlight">Hf</span>    <span class="search-highlight">177</span>       ...
Published: 01 May 2019
Figure 1. Possible evolutionary pathways for Lu 176 / Hf 177 superimposed on accepted Lu 176 / Hf 177 estimates for Earth’s Lu-Hf geochemical reservoirs. DM (orange dashed line) = depleted mantle model from Mueller et al. ( 2008 ); CHUR (blue solid