1-20 OF 1797 RESULTS FOR

Hess River Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
(A) Type section of Hess River Formation (section 6 of Cecile 1982), adapted to demonstrate general lithologies, biostratigraphy, and stratigraphic context; basal contact is present, but covered. This is the previously documented Hess River Formation section that is closest to the study location. (B) Detailed stratigraphy of Hess River Formation at Cecile’s (1982) section 9 (Chevrier and Turner 2013a, 2013b). Carbon isotope stratigraphy from Turner (2015) provides chemostratigraphic context for the largely unfossiliferous succession. Note that basal strata of the Hess River Formation are not exposed at this section, so the carbon isotope curve is incomplete. DICE, Drumian carbon isotope excursion; SPICE, Steptoean positive carbon isotope excursion.
Published: 23 February 2022
Fig. 4. (A) Type section of Hess River Formation (section 6 of Cecile 1982 ), adapted to demonstrate general lithologies, biostratigraphy, and stratigraphic context; basal contact is present, but covered. This is the previously documented Hess River Formation section that is closest to the study
Image
Probable syndepositional normal fault in Hess River Formation in NTS 106-B between study location and section C10 (see Fig. 6). Hess River Formation thickens from approximately 40 to 150 m across a normal fault offsetting strata of the Hess River and Sekwi formations. Overlying Rabbitkettle Formation and younger strata are unaffected. Down-dropped side of fault (southwest) indicated by symbols. DL, Duo Lake Formation; HR, Hess River Formation; R, Rabbitkettle Formation; Sk, Sekwi Formation. Topography from the Canadian Digital Elevation Model (Natural Resources Canada 2015), 20 m resolution, accessed April 2015. Map generated in ArcMap 10.7.1. [Colour online.]
Published: 23 February 2022
Fig. 9. Probable syndepositional normal fault in Hess River Formation in NTS 106-B between study location and section C10 (see Fig. 6 ). Hess River Formation thickens from approximately 40 to 150 m across a normal fault offsetting strata of the Hess River and Sekwi formations. Overlying
Image
(A) Chronology of Sekwi and Hess River formations, based on compilation of the standard genus-based biostratigraphic scheme for lower and middle Cambrian (Fritz 1972; Hollingsworth 2007), time scale of Peng et al. (2020), and global isotope excursions adapted from Geyer (2019). The positions of some biozones and chemostratigraphic excursions against the global time scale are not well established. (B) Sekwi Formation section 4 (Dilliard et al. 2007), showing general lithologies, trilobite biostratigraphy, carbon isotope chemostratigraphy, and sequence stratigraphy. The Cambrian arthropod radiation isotope excursion (CARE), Mingxinsi carbon isotope excursion (MICE), and archaeocyathan extinction isotope excursion (AECE) are evident in the Sekwi Formation curve. The redlichiid–olenellid extinction carbon isotope excursion (ROECE) may be present in either uppermost Sekwi Formation or lowermost Hess River Formation. The Zhujiaqing carbon isotope excursion (ZHUCE), Shiyantou carbon isotope excursion (SHICE), and early Atdabanian/Repinaella Zone excursion (EAREZE) are in Cambrian stages 2 and 3 prior to Sekwi Formation deposition (Geyer 2019). The Drumian carbon isotope excursion (DICE) is in the lower Hess River Formation (Turner 2015). [Colour online.]
Published: 23 February 2022
Fig. 2. (A) Chronology of Sekwi and Hess River formations, based on compilation of the standard genus-based biostratigraphic scheme for lower and middle Cambrian ( Fritz 1972 ; Hollingsworth 2007 ), time scale of Peng et al. (2020) , and global isotope excursions adapted from Geyer (2019
Journal Article
Published: 23 February 2022
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2022) 59 (4): 216–231.
...Fig. 4. (A) Type section of Hess River Formation (section 6 of Cecile 1982 ), adapted to demonstrate general lithologies, biostratigraphy, and stratigraphic context; basal contact is present, but covered. This is the previously documented Hess River Formation section that is closest to the study...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Image
Representative trilobites from units 1 (Sekwi Formation), 2 (Hess River Formation), and 4 (Hess River Formation) demonstrate that all three units belong to the upper Bonnia–Olenellus Zone. All specimens are identified by a Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) location number (“C-number”) followed by a reference number referring to the national collection of type and figured specimens at the GSC in Ottawa; suffix “a” indicates that the figured material is a cast or mould. (A) Indet. dorypygid Unit 1. GSC location C-625728, GSC 142649. Partial cranidium. Sample U1-F, specimen 1. (B) Ogygopsis sp. Unit 1. GSC location C-625728, GSC 142650. Pygidium. Sample U1-G, specimen 1. (C) Ogygopsis cf. Ogygopsis batis Unit 4, GSC location C-625730, GSC 142651. Cranidium. Sample U4-E, specimen 1. (D) Ogygopsis cf. Ogygopsis batis Unit 4, GSC location C-625730, GSC 142652. Pygidium. Sample U4-G, specimen 1. (E) Kootenia marcoui Unit 2, GSC location C-625729, GSC 142653. Cranidium. Sample U2-H, specimen 3. (F) Kootenia marcoui Unit 2, GSC location C-625729, GSC 142654a. Silicone putty cast of external mould of pygidium. Sample U2-C, specimen 1. (G) Olenellus cf. Olenellus parvofrontatus Unit 2, GSC location C-625729, GSC 142655a. Silicone putty cast of external cephalic mould. Sample U2-O, 1. (H) Zacanthopsis? sp. Unit 2, GSC location C-625729, GSC 142656. Cranidium. Sample U2-C, specimen 7. (I) Zacanthopsis cf. Zacanthopsis expansa Unit 4, GSC location C-625730, GSC 142657a. Silicone putty cast of external mould of cranidium. Sample U4-R, specimen 8. (J) “Syspacephalus” sp. Unit 4, GSC location C-625730, GSC 142658. Sample U4-Q, specimen 4.
Published: 23 February 2022
Fig. 7. Representative trilobites from units 1 (Sekwi Formation), 2 (Hess River Formation), and 4 (Hess River Formation) demonstrate that all three units belong to the upper Bonnia–Olenellus Zone. All specimens are identified by a Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) location number (“C-number
Image
(A) Cross-section of the Misty Creek embayment (MCE; green line A–A′ in Fig. 1) compiled from sections from Fritz (1978) and Cecile (1982). Along the deep-water axis of the MCE, Sekwi – Hess River formational contact is in middle Bonnia–Olenellus Zone, but in southwestern and northeastern MCE areas, the contact is in the upper Bonnia–Olenellus Zone. At the northeastern MCE margin, Sekwi – Hess River contact is unconformable (lowermost Hess River Formation is middle Cambrian). Panel is hung from base of middle Cambrian. (B) Tectonic interpretation of the initiation of MCE deep-water sedimentation in the Cambrian through extension-related normal faulting, depicted along a hypothetical SW–NE cross-section. (0) Sekwi Formation was deposited on a west-facing carbonate ramp during Fallotaspis, Nevadella, and early Bonnia–Olenellus zones. (1) Normal faulting caused subsidence during middle Bonnia–Olenellus Zone, in the area where the contact age is in middle Bonnia–Olenellus Zone and Hess River Formation is thickest (Fig. 4). Deep-water Hess River Formation facies began to accumulate in the narrow, newly deepened axial area, but shallower-water Sekwi Formation deposition continued nearby. (2) Further extension and subsidence occurred more broadly during late Bonnia–Olenellus Zone, causing change to deep-water Hess River Formation depositional environments throughout most of the MCE. Uplift caused erosion of easternmost upper Sekwi Formation. (3) Continued regional subsidence or eustatic sea-level rise led to deposition of Hess River Formation lithofacies in middle Cambrian throughout the entire sub-basin. Sekwi – Hess River contact near embayment margin (Mackenzie–Redstone arch) is unconformable. Configuration of northwestern margin of MCE and northwestern extent of the area of middle Bonnia–Olenellus Zone Sekwi – Hess River contact age are not known owing to exposure constraints. [Colour online.]
Published: 23 February 2022
Fig. 8. (A) Cross-section of the Misty Creek embayment (MCE; green line A–A′ in Fig. 1 ) compiled from sections from Fritz (1978) and Cecile (1982) . Along the deep-water axis of the MCE, Sekwi – Hess River formational contact is in middle Bonnia–Olenellus Zone, but in southwestern
Image
Published: 23 February 2022
Table 1. Locations, age-diagnostic taxa, and age determinations of stratigraphic sections that were used to determine the geographic variability of the Sekwi – Hess River formational contact.
Image
Exposure at study location (64°35′35.178″N, 130°46′19.218″E). Sekwi Formation (unit 1) is in foreground; Hess River Formation (units 2–4 and above) continues up-section into the distance. Graphic log at right shows estimated thicknesses and summary of rock types. [Colour online.]
Published: 23 February 2022
Fig. 5. Exposure at study location (64°35′35.178″N, 130°46′19.218″E). Sekwi Formation (unit 1) is in foreground; Hess River Formation (units 2–4 and above) continues up-section into the distance. Graphic log at right shows estimated thicknesses and summary of rock types. [Colour online.]
Image
Map showing geographic variability in the age of the contact between the Sekwi and Hess River formations in the Misty Creek embayment (MCE), using informal subdivision of the Bonnia–Olenellus Zone. Based on information from Fritz (1976, 1978, 1979), Cecile (1982), and the present study. [Colour online.]
Published: 23 February 2022
Fig. 6. Map showing geographic variability in the age of the contact between the Sekwi and Hess River formations in the Misty Creek embayment (MCE), using informal subdivision of the Bonnia – Olenellus Zone. Based on information from Fritz (1976 , 1978 , 1979 ), Cecile (1982
Image
Wiwaxia sclerites. A: Mount Cap Formation (Colville Hills), late early Cambrian, Northwest Territories, Canada. B: Kaili Formation, early middle Cambrian, Guizhou, China. C: Pika Formation, latest middle Cambrian, Alberta, Canada. D: Mahto Formation, late early Cambrian, Alberta. E: Burgess Shale, middle Cambrian, British Columbia, Canada. F, G: Hess River Formation, early middle Cambrian, Northwest Territories. H, I: Earlie Formation, late middle Cambrian, Saskatchewan, Canada. J: Forteau Formation, late early Cambrian, Newfoundland, Canada.
Published: 01 January 2012
: Burgess Shale, middle Cambrian, British Columbia, Canada. F, G: Hess River Formation, early middle Cambrian, Northwest Territories. H, I: Earlie Formation, late middle Cambrian, Saskatchewan, Canada. J: Forteau Formation, late early Cambrian, Newfoundland, Canada.
Image
(A) Isopach map showing thickness of the Bonnia–Olenellus Zone in the Sekwi Formation, after Chan et al. (2019), with 1:250 000 NTS map-sheet numbers. Red square shows eventual location of Misty Creek embayment (MCE). (B) Isopach map of entire Hess River Formation in MCE, after Cecile (1982). Red square outlines same geographic area as red square in Fig. 3A. Cambrian–Ordovician shallow- to deep-water facies boundary serves as a general outline of the MCE. Area of thickest Sekwi Bonnia–Olenellus Zone in NTS 106B (A) closely corresponds to deep-water axis of the MCE (B). [Colour online.]
Published: 23 February 2022
Fig. 3. (A) Isopach map showing thickness of the Bonnia–Olenellus Zone in the Sekwi Formation, after Chan et al. (2019) , with 1:250 000 NTS map-sheet numbers. Red square shows eventual location of Misty Creek embayment (MCE). (B) Isopach map of entire Hess River Formation in MCE, after
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2014
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2014) 62 (2): 37–67.
... Mountain Formation. It is in part age-equivalent to Hess River and Rockslide Formations, which lie to the west and south, but has not been mapped in continuity with them. The western limit of Nainlin Formation is a zero edge in the footwall of the Plateau Fault in NTS 106A; the formation extends from...
FIGURES | View All (19)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 January 2014
GSA Bulletin (2014) 126 (1-2): 201–218.
... Formations), and 3) an upper sandstone and shale (Nebo Quartzite, Murray Shale, Hesse Quartzite, and Helenmode, Erwin, and Antietam Formations). Sedimentary analyses show that boundaries of the newly defined facies assemblages transect the named stratigraphic units. Assemblage A consists of fluvial...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Image
Priapulid-like scalids/teeth (A–G) and molluscan radulae (H–N). A, B: Pika Formation (Fm.), Alberta, Canada; note the hexagonal microstructure in B. C: Forteau Fm., Newfoundland. D: Kaili Fm., Guizhou, China. E: Hess River Fm., Northwest Territories, Canada. F: Mahto Fm., Alberta. G: Earlie Fm., Saskatchewan. H: Mahto Fm. I–L: Earlie Fm. M: Mount Cap Fm. (Colville Hills), late early Cambrian, Northwest Territories. N: Bright Angel Shale, middle Cambrian, Arizona.
Published: 01 January 2012
Figure 2. Priapulid-like scalids/teeth (A–G) and molluscan radulae (H–N). A, B: Pika Formation (Fm.), Alberta, Canada; note the hexagonal microstructure in B. C: Forteau Fm., Newfoundland. D: Kaili Fm., Guizhou, China. E: Hess River Fm., Northwest Territories, Canada. F: Mahto Fm., Alberta. G
Image
(a) Topographic map of the Reno area showing the location of the ANSS stations. Average shear-wave velocity measurements to 30 and 100 m (Vs30 and Vs100, respectively) at each station are also shown. Detailed locations and Vs30 and Vs100 values are listed in Tables 1 and 2. The Truckee River is shown as a blue line. Geological units from the NBMG 1:250,000 digital geologic map (Hess and Johnson, 2000) are shown. These geological units are as follows: stream deposits, Qal; landslide deposits, Qls; pre-Lake Lahontan deposits, Qtg; Pliocene sedimentary rocks, Tst; basalt, basaltic, and andesite, Tab; Kate Peak formation, flows, or flow breccia, Tk; Alta Formation, Ta; Peavine Sequence, undifferentiated metavolcanics/metasediments, mvs; and Peavine sequence, metavolcanic rocks, mv. Further description of the geology beneath the stations is given in Tables 2 and A1. The extent of the Central Truckee Meadows is delimited by the extent of the Qal deposits enclosed by the dashed line. (b) Basin-depth model from Abbott and Louie (2000), based on gravity observations. Contours are 100 m.
Published: 01 December 2007
. The Truckee River is shown as a blue line. Geological units from the NBMG 1:250,000 digital geologic map ( Hess and Johnson, 2000 ) are shown. These geological units are as follows: stream deposits, Qal; landslide deposits, Qls; pre-Lake Lahontan deposits, Qtg; Pliocene sedimentary rocks, Tst; basalt
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 January 2012
Geology (2012) 40 (1): 71–74.
...: Burgess Shale, middle Cambrian, British Columbia, Canada. F, G: Hess River Formation, early middle Cambrian, Northwest Territories. H, I: Earlie Formation, late middle Cambrian, Saskatchewan, Canada. J: Forteau Formation, late early Cambrian, Newfoundland, Canada. ...
FIGURES
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 2012
DOI: 10.1306/13331661M983511
EISBN: 9781629810201
... in the Mackenzie Mountains (i.e., west and southwest of the Plateau fault) include the Ingta, Backbone Ranges, Vampire, Sekwi, and Hess River formations. In the Franklin Mountains, Mackenzie Plain, and northeastern Mackenzie Mountains, the Sauk II supersequence may consist of the Saline River Formation (although...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2006
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2006) 54 (1): 85–90.
... by the petroleum industry and reflects the original intent of Hess (1968) , i.e., one that intersects the “typical” Siphon Member of the eastern parts of map-sheet 94A. It is proposed that the Progress et al. Two Rivers 6-9-83-16W6 well between log depths 4207 and 4221 ft (1282.29–1286.56 m) be designated...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (9): 2233–2246.
... beds, but by 1915 (p. 473) he states: As a consequence of Matthew’s correlation, Plummer (1933) listed 10 vertebrate-producing localities from the Oakville formation between the Trinity and Nueces rivers including the localities near Cold Spring, Navasota, and the town of Oakville. Later work...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 21 April 2011
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2011) 48 (4): 719–727.
... of the Peace River Formation record transgression, whereas sandstones of the Cadotte Member of the Peace River Formation record shoreline regression to the north. Abundant hummocky and swaley lamination in the Cadotte sandstone attest to the influence of storms on a shallow shelf. The Cadotte sandstone...
FIGURES | View All (5)