1-20 OF 138 RESULTS FOR

Hansel Valley

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 16 May 2017
GSA Bulletin (2017) 129 (9-10): 1227–1240.
...Pier Paolo G. Bruno; Christopher B. DuRoss; Sotirios Kokkalas Abstract The 1934 Ms 6.6 Hansel Valley, Utah, earthquake produced an 8-km-long by 3-km-wide zone of north-south–trending surface deformation in an extensional basin within the easternmost Basin and Range Province. Less than 0.5 m...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Simplified geological map of the <span class="search-highlight">Hansel</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span> (modified from  Hintze et al...
Published: 16 May 2017
Figure 3. Simplified geological map of the Hansel Valley (modified from Hintze et al., 2000 ) plotted over the digital elevation model (DEM) map of the valley at the spatial resolution of 1 arc-second (∼30 m) from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Elevation Data set (coordinate system
Image
HISTORICAL <span class="search-highlight">HANSEL</span> <span class="search-highlight">VALLEY</span> EARTHQUAKES
Published: 16 May 2017
TABLE 1. HISTORICAL HANSEL VALLEY EARTHQUAKES
Image
(A) <span class="search-highlight">Hansel</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span> final poststack, depth-migrated profile plotted in variab...
Published: 16 May 2017
Figure 7. (A) Hansel Valley final poststack, depth-migrated profile plotted in variable area (positive amplitudes are filled in black). (B) Seismic interpretation of the poststack migrated seismic profile. Symbols: Ql—Quaternary Lake Bonneville deposits; Qlb—older Lake Bonneville deposits; PP
Image
DISPLACEMENT OF <span class="search-highlight">HANSEL</span> <span class="search-highlight">VALLEY</span> UNCONFORMITIES
Published: 16 May 2017
TABLE 2. DISPLACEMENT OF HANSEL VALLEY UNCONFORMITIES
Image
The 12 March 1934 <span class="search-highlight">Hansel</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span>,  Utah, mainshock (event 4).  mmi  intensit...
Published: 01 December 2006
Figure 3. The 12 March 1934 Hansel Valley, Utah, mainshock (event 4). mmi intensity assignments are circles, the epicenter (Epic.) is a red star, and the intensity center I C is a green triangle. The contours of M I (dashed red lines) are the best estimates of M from the mmi
Image
The 12 March 1934 <span class="search-highlight">Hansel</span> <span class="search-highlight">Valley</span>,  Utah, aftershock (event 5). See legend to...
Published: 01 December 2006
Figure 4. The 12 March 1934 Hansel Valley, Utah, aftershock (event 5). See legend to Figure 3 for definition of symbols and contours.
Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.1130/2005.fld006(19)
EISBN: 9780813756066
... the Stansbury sand, and 24,900 14C yr B.P. on fine-grained CaCO3 from the lower marl ( Green and Currey, 1988 ). This is Figure 10 from Oviatt and Miller, 1997 ; used with permission. Field Trip Day 2—Brigham City Delta, Public Shooting Grounds, and Hansel Valley Directions to Stop 2.1 Gilbert...
FIGURES | View All (28)
Image
Digital elevation model (DEM) map of northern Utah at the spatial resolutio...
Published: 16 May 2017
the relationship of Hansel Valley to selected geological and seismological information, such as: (1) faults that are considered to be sources of M >6 earthquakes during the Quaternary ( Hecker, 1993 ; Frankel et al., 1996 ); (2) regional seismicity since 1975 (from the USGS Advanced National Seismic System
Image
Earthquakes of the central and southern ISB (1962-1996). Three historical s...
Published: 01 June 2002
Figure 1. Earthquakes of the central and southern ISB (1962-1996). Three historical surface-faulting earthquakes are shown: HV, M s 6.6, 1934 Hansel Valley, Utah; HL, M s 7.5, 1959 Hebgen Lake, Montana; BP, M s 7.3, 1983 Borah Peak, Idaho. Yellow rectangles indicate cities in the Wasatch
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1938
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1938) 28 (2): 65–70.
... the line of displacement in the Hansel Valley toward Great Salt Lake. The line of sightseers marks the trend of the crack. Detail of a single displacement. Magnitude indicated by size of camera case in foreground. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America VOL. 28 APRIL, 1938 No. 2 LAND SUBSIDENCE...
Image
National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) and Global Centroid Moment Te...
Published: 23 December 2020
traces in orange are from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Quaternary Fault and Fold Database, those in blue from Lewis et al. (2012) . The inset shows the study area with the locations of the 1934 M  6.6 Hansel Valley, Utah, 1983 M  6.9 Borah Peak, Idaho, and 2020 M  6.5 Stanley, Idaho
Image
Geological cross-section A-B (modified from  Hintze et al., 2000 , plate 2)...
Published: 16 May 2017
is longitude in km (coordinate system: North American Datum [NAD] 27, Universal Transverse Mercator [UTM] zone 12N). Vertical exaggeration is ∼2.3. All Quaternary basins developed between Wasatch fault and Hansel Valley fault are inferred to be less than 1 km thick. Simplified description of geological units
Image
Distribution of maximum-reported vertical surface displacements from histor...
Published: 01 December 2010
. Note that displacement in the 1934 Hansel Valley earthquake (0.5 m) was smaller than in prehistoric earthquakes on the fault and thus is not represented in the histogram. The paleoearthquake data set shown in (a) has been subdivided in (b) by number of observations and by perceived reliability: Data
Image
Distribution of maximum-reported vertical surface displacements from histor...
Published: 01 December 2010
. Note that displacement in the 1934 Hansel Valley earthquake (0.5 m) was smaller than in prehistoric earthquakes on the fault and thus is not represented in the histogram. The paleoearthquake data set shown in (a) has been subdivided in (b) by number of observations and by perceived reliability: Data
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 1953
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1953) 43 (3): 191–218.
... Wasatch 1880 Dee. 1 Kelton 1,000 Hansel Valley 1881 M a r . Hebron 2,000 Unassigned 1884 Nov. 16. . . . . . . . . . NE Utah 6,000 Crawford Mountains 1884 Nov. 27 . . . . . . . . . NE Utah 1,000 Crawford Mountains 1884 Nov. 25 . . . . . . . . . NE Utah 1,000 Crawford Mountains 1884 Nov. 10...
Image
Multiple event relocations of the Sulphur Peak swarm at    M  ≥  2    up to...
Published: 23 April 2019
‐plane slip model (green, Fig.  10 ) at the time of the 2 September 2017 M 5.3 mainshock. Profiles A–A′ and B–B′ are those plotted in Figure  3 . Larger scale map shows the study area (yellow box) and the locations and focal mechanisms of the 1934 M 6.6 Hansel Valley earthquake, 1959 M 7.3–7.5 Hebgen
Image
Map of western North America showing the volcanic fields of the Snake River...
Published: 20 July 2023
), Hansel Valley (HV), Ambrose Road (AR), Glentana (G), Scobey (S), Ashfall Fossil Beds (AFB), Smith County (SC), Boswell (BW), Huntington Creek (HC), Stewart Valley (SV), Cobble Cuesta (CC), Aldrich Station (AS), Upper White Basin (UWB), El Paso basin (EPB), Deep Sea Drilling Project Site 173 (DSDP 173
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2006
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2006) 96 (6): 2206–2220.
...Figure 3. The 12 March 1934 Hansel Valley, Utah, mainshock (event 4). mmi intensity assignments are circles, the epicenter (Epic.) is a red star, and the intensity center I C is a green triangle. The contours of M I (dashed red lines) are the best estimates of M from the mmi...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1994
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1994) 84 (2): 466–472.
... in the northern Intermountain seismic belt , Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 79 , 31 - 51 . Doser D. I. (1989b) . Extensional tectonics in northern Utah-southern Idaho, U.S.A., and the 1934 Hansel Valley sequence , Phys. Earth Planet Interiors 48...