1-20 OF 71 RESULTS FOR

Haisborough Group

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
(A) Top <span class="search-highlight">Haisborough</span> <span class="search-highlight">Group</span> seismic variance map over the 47&#x2F;03-CS1 structure...
Published: 01 September 2022
Figure 12. (A) Top Haisborough Group seismic variance map over the 47/03-CS1 structure. The horizon corresponds to the top of the seal to the potential Bunter Sandstone Formation CO 2 storage site below. (B) Corresponding top of the Haisborough Group depth structure map with interpreted faults
Journal Article
Published: 25 February 2014
Petroleum Geoscience (2014) 20 (2): 155–167.
..., the Haisborough Group and the Speeton Clay, can seal gas columns of up to 128 and 104 m respectively, despite the presence of faults with small displacements above the field gas–water contacts. The observed gas columns are equivalent to CO 2 columns of up to around 100 m in height. Simple geomechanical modelling...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
Thickness maps. Isopach maps depicting the major variations in stratigraphi...
Published: 16 April 2020
Fig. 10. Thickness maps. Isopach maps depicting the major variations in stratigraphic thickness of: ( a ) the Zechstein Supergroup; ( b ) the Bacton Group; ( c ) the Lower Cretaceous–base Haisborough Group interval; and ( d ) the Chalk Group within the Breagh–Lochran area. Fault patterns
Image
A series of maps illustrating the thickness of six key <span class="search-highlight">groups</span> and formation...
Published: 01 September 2022
Figure 7. A series of maps illustrating the thickness of six key groups and formations across the East Midlands shelf. The maps are presented in meters of thickness, with contouring every 50 m. (A) Chalk Group, (B) Kimmeridge Clay Formation, (C) Lias Group, (D) Haisborough Group, (E) Bacton Group
Image
A series of maps depicting the structural characteristics of six key seismi...
Published: 01 September 2022
Figure 6. A series of maps depicting the structural characteristics of six key seismic horizons across the East Midlands shelf. The maps are presented in true vertical depth subsea (TVDSS), with contouring every 50 m. (A) Base-Cretaceous unconformity, (B) Lias Group, (C) Haisborough Group, (D
Image
Top structure maps (in ms two-way travel time; TWT) for the following six k...
Published: 01 November 2009
Triassic Haisborough Group); ( e ) base Chalk Group (top Cromer Knoll Group); ( f ) top Chalk Group.
Image
Top depth–structure maps (in m) for: ( a ) top Bacton <span class="search-highlight">Group</span> (Lower Triassic...
Published: 16 December 2019
Fig. 14. Top depth–structure maps (in m) for: ( a ) top Bacton Group (Lower Triassic); ( b ) top Triassic (Penarth–Haisborough Group); ( c ) top Corallian Formation (near Middle Jurassic); and ( d ) base Chalk Group (top Comer Knoll Group, Lower Cretaceous). Simplified horizon intersecting fault
Image
General stratigraphy derived from wells in the immediate study area showing...
Published: 01 November 2009
, Haisborough Group; DDF, Dowsing Dolomite Formation.
Image
General stratigraphy of the study area showing the main lithostratigraphic ...
Published: 01 July 2008
of the Zechstein Supergroup, a component part of the Permian–Triassic seismic megasequence. HG = Haisborough Group; DDF = Dowsing Dolomitic Formation; Bunter Sst. Fm. = Bunter Sandstone Formation.
Image
Uninterpreted and interpreted seismic section (from the 3D volume) through ...
Published: 01 May 2011
case juxtaposition would be against downthrown Bunter Shale Formation. HG, Haisborough Group.
Image
Uninterpreted and interpreted seismic section (from the 3D volume) through ...
Published: 01 May 2011
Fault. The approximate gas–water contact (GWC) in the well is marked. (Note that the well is down-flank of the trap crest). The upthrown Rotliegend interval is juxtaposed against the uppermost part of the Zechstein interval on the downthrown side (white arrow). HG, Haisborough Group.
Image
Isochron maps depicting the major variations in sedimentary thicknesses in ...
Published: 01 November 2009
Fig. 11 Isochron maps depicting the major variations in sedimentary thicknesses in the study area (in ms TWT). ( a ) Zechstein Supergroup and Brockelschiefer Formation; ( b ) Bacton Group; ( c ) Haisborough Group highlighting the presence of the Brown Graben and illustrating the main extensional
Image
Isopach maps depicting the major variations in sedimentary thickness within...
Published: 16 December 2019
grabens. ( b ) Haisborough Group (including Penarth Group, Upper–Middle Triassic). ( c ) Lias Group (Lower Jurassic), depicting active extensional faulting and synsedimentary growth within the graben. ( d ) Base Chalk to top Corallian Formation (Cromer Knoll and Humber Groups, top Lower Cretaceous–base
Image
Uninterpreted and interpreted SW–NE-striking seismic dip-line through explo...
Published: 01 November 2009
reactivation. In both cases, thinning of, and listric faulting within, the Chalk Group above the reactivated normal faults demonstrates that positive inversion took place during the Late Cretaceous. The position of the seismic section is shown on Figure 2 . RG, Rotliegend; HG, Haisborough Group; ZS, Zechstein
Image
Uninterpreted and interpreted SW–NE-striking seismic dip-line through explo...
Published: 01 November 2009
the 50/26b–5 well was probably intended to be a test of the Bunter Sandstone Formation (BSF) contained within the structurally inverted pop-up defined by reactivated conjugate normal faults, work undertaken during this study has shown that it only drilled into the Upper Triassic, Haisborough Group
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 2022
AAPG Bulletin (2022) 106 (9): 1827–1853.
...Figure 12. (A) Top Haisborough Group seismic variance map over the 47/03-CS1 structure. The horizon corresponds to the top of the seal to the potential Bunter Sandstone Formation CO 2 storage site below. (B) Corresponding top of the Haisborough Group depth structure map with interpreted faults...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Uninterpreted and interpreted WNW–ESE-striking seismic line through the Wis...
Published: 01 November 2010
Chalk interval above these faults, allowing tectonic inversion on the faults to be dated as such. The Wissey Field structural high is significantly elongated in the WNW–ESE orientation. HG, Haisborough Group; P-B, top Plattendolomit Formation to top Brockelschiefer Member. Faults showing evidence
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 2022
AAPG Bulletin (2022) 106 (9): 1791–1825.
... (Lower Jurassic) Diffuse, moderate amplitude trough Major increase in GR due to abundance of mudstones Penarth Group (Upper Triassic) Discrete, high to moderate amplitude Occasionally shows a minor reduction in AI from Lias Group but no distinct difference Haisborough Group, Triton Anhydritic...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Image
Uninterpreted and interpreted north–south-striking seismic dip-line through...
Published: 01 November 2010
structures within Triassic stratigraphy; inversion monoclines at BCU level and above; and thinning of the Top Cromer Knoll to Top Campanian interval above the inverted faults. The Wissey Field exists as a narrow ( c . 1 km wide) inverted structure. HG, Haisborough Group. P-B, top Plattendolomit Formation
Journal Article
Published: 16 December 2019
Petroleum Geoscience (2021) 27 (1): petgeo2018-064.
...Fig. 14. Top depth–structure maps (in m) for: ( a ) top Bacton Group (Lower Triassic); ( b ) top Triassic (Penarth–Haisborough Group); ( c ) top Corallian Formation (near Middle Jurassic); and ( d ) base Chalk Group (top Comer Knoll Group, Lower Cretaceous). Simplified horizon intersecting fault...
FIGURES | View All (22)