1-20 OF 60 RESULTS FOR

Gualala Basin

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2012
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2012) 82 (11): 841–858.
...Amalia C. Doebbert; Alan R. Carroll; Clark Johnson Abstract: Detrital zircon U/Pb ages and Pb isotope compositions of detrital feldspars from the Late Cretaceous–Eocene Gualala Basin in northern California indicate that the basin received sediments from the southern Sierra Nevada...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2001
GSA Bulletin (2001) 113 (7): 870–880.
...Ronald C. Schott; Clark M. Johnson Abstract Eocene conglomerates from the German Rancho Formation, currently exposed in the Gualala basin of coastal northern California, are compositionally distinct from both underlying Upper Cretaceous conglomerates and coeval conglomerates elsewhere...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Geologic setting for the Gualala Basin. Detailed map of the basin (inset) based on the mapping of Wentworth (1966). Sample localities for this study, marked by white triangles, are: GC, Gerstle Cove; GCV, Gerstle Cove Visitor's Center; GP, Gualala Point; SB, Shell Beach; SC, Smuggler's Cove; STU, Stump Beach; WB, Walk on Beach. The regional map is based on the digital geological map of the U.S. (Schruben et al. 1994), with modifications according to Irwin (2003), Irwin and Wooden (1999, 2001), Miller et al. (1995), and Jacobson et al. (2011). Locations of sedimentary samples from Barbeau et al. (2005), Jacobson et al (2011), Lechler and Niemi (2011), and Sharman et al. (2011) used for comparison to this study are marked by white boxes: BL, Ben Lomond Mountains; BU, Butano Formation; other locations: CA, Cambria; E/R, Esalen/Rojo; PP, Pigeon Point; PR, Point of Rocks; PS, Point Sur; PSP, Point San Pedro; SL, Santa Lucia Range; W, Witnet. Mafic conglomerate at the Skyline location (Seiders and Cox 1992) is shown by a black circle (SKY). The locations of Jurassic mafic basement offset by the San Andreas at Eagle's Rest Peak (ERP), Gold Hill (GH), and Logan (L, L2) are also marked (Burnham 2009; Ross 1970), indicated as red boxes. The approximate extent of the eastern Mojave is shown after Wooden and Miller (1990) on the main map. Lane Mountain (LM), Fremont Peak (FP), Opal Mountain (O), and the El Paso Mountains (EPM), which have Permo-Triassic basement ages, are also labeled in the expanded segment of the map showing the Mojave Desert.
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 1 Geologic setting for the Gualala Basin. Detailed map of the basin (inset) based on the mapping of Wentworth (1966) . Sample localities for this study, marked by white triangles, are: GC, Gerstle Cove; GCV, Gerstle Cove Visitor's Center; GP, Gualala Point; SB, Shell Beach; SC, Smuggler's
Image
Simplified stratigraphy of the Gualala Basin after Wentworth (1966) modified from Bymers (2004) showing stratigraphic locations for sandstone samples (this study and Bymers 2004), conglomerate clasts (Schott and Johnson 1998a, 2001, Schott et al. 2004), and clast counts. The stratigraphic range of clast groups KCGR, Cretaceous Continental Granite and Rhyolite; JOGD, Jurassic Oceanic Gabbro and Diorite; GTT, Garnet-bearing Tonalite and Trondhjemite; HBT, Hornblende-bearing Tonalite designated by Schott and Johnson (1998a) is indicated next to the stratigraphy. Paleocurrent data (from Bymers 2004 (B); Wentworth 1966; 1968 (W)) generally indicate sediment sources to the southeast of the basin. Anchor Bay Member paleocurrent data from Bymers (2004) are inconsistent with all other results, and so are filled gray rather than black to indicate that their reliability is suspect. Plagioclase/total feldspar (P/F) ratios and % NOD (non-opaque dense) Minerals (see Appendix Table A3), petrographic parameters that provide distinctions between Gualala Basin sedimentary units, are also shown in stratigraphic context.
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 2 Simplified stratigraphy of the Gualala Basin after Wentworth (1966) modified from Bymers (2004) showing stratigraphic locations for sandstone samples (this study and Bymers 2004 ), conglomerate clasts ( Schott and Johnson 1998a , 2001 , Schott et al. 2004 ), and clast counts
Image
Published: 01 November 2012
Table 2 Summary of U/Pb age and U-content ranges for Gualala Basin detrital zircon grains from sandstones.
Image
Clast-count histograms from the Gualala Basin, in stratigraphic order from lowest to the highest. Shading is according to stratigraphic unit, as shown in Figure 2. Felsic plutonic (e.g., granite) clasts predominate in the Stewarts Point Member, while Anchor Bay conglomerates are swamped by mafic clasts, and German Rancho Formation clasts show much greater variety than preceding conglomerates.
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 3 Clast-count histograms from the Gualala Basin, in stratigraphic order from lowest to the highest. Shading is according to stratigraphic unit, as shown in Figure 2 . Felsic plutonic (e.g., granite) clasts predominate in the Stewarts Point Member, while Anchor Bay conglomerates are swamped
Image
Histograms (5 Ma bins) representing ages > 300 Ma in the Gualala Basin, compiled by stratigraphic unit. The German Rancho Formation contains a larger number of Precambrian grains (4% of grains analyzed) than the older stratigraphic units.
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 8 Histograms (5 Ma bins) representing ages > 300 Ma in the Gualala Basin, compiled by stratigraphic unit. The German Rancho Formation contains a larger number of Precambrian grains (4% of grains analyzed) than the older stratigraphic units.
Image
Figure 1. Present-day location of the Gualala basin (GB) in California showing principal faults and the current distribution of Mesozoic batholithic rocks. SAF—San Andreas fault, SGHF—San Gregorio−Hosgri fault, RRF—Reliz-Rinconada fault, SNF—Sur-Nacimiento fault, GF—Garlock fault. SF—San Francisco, FR—Fresno, BK—Bakersfield, LA—Los Angeles, SD—San Diego
Published: 01 July 2001
Figure 1. Present-day location of the Gualala basin (GB) in California showing principal faults and the current distribution of Mesozoic batholithic rocks. SAF—San Andreas fault, SGHF—San Gregorio−Hosgri fault, RRF—Reliz-Rinconada fault, SNF—Sur-Nacimiento fault, GF—Garlock fault. SF—San Francisco
Image
Figure 2. Schematic stratigraphic section of the southern Gualala basin (south limb of the Black Point anticline; modified from Wentworth et al., 1998). Conglomerates analyzed in this study are from channelized inner fan deposits in the Salt Point section. Foraminifera indicate deposition at bathyal depths (∼500–1000 m) during early Eocene time (McDougall, 1998)
Published: 01 July 2001
Figure 2. Schematic stratigraphic section of the southern Gualala basin (south limb of the Black Point anticline; modified from Wentworth et al., 1998 ). Conglomerates analyzed in this study are from channelized inner fan deposits in the Salt Point section. Foraminifera indicate deposition
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1994
GSA Bulletin (1994) 106 (7): 915–931.
...KAREN B. LOOMIS; JAMES C. INGLE, JR. Abstract Cretaceous-Paleocene deposits of the Gualala basin and overlying deposits of the Neogene Point Arena basin record the complex tectonic and depositional history of the California continental margin as it changed from a convergent tectonic regime...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 April 1998
Geology (1998) 26 (4): 327–330.
...Ronald C. Schott; Clark M. Johnson Abstract Upper Cretaceous conglomerates in the Gualala basin, California, contain rhyolite and granite clasts that have been previously hypothesized to have disparate terranes of origin. New geochemical, age, and isotopic analyses of these conglomerate clasts...
Image
Normalized detrital age spectra (probability density plots) and histograms for detrital zircon ages less than 300 Ma from the Gualala Basin and selected published age data from Cretaceous–Eocene Salinian block samples (Barbeau et al. 2005; Jacobson et al. 2011), and basement ages in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains (Irwin 2003). Gray bars highlight major Gualala zircon populations in order to make visual similarities between Gualala Basin and Salinian distributions more apparent. Also included at left are the P/F ratios associated with detrital zircon samples from our study and Barbeau et al. 2005 (data provided by personal communication with D. Barbeau 2010).
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 10 Normalized detrital age spectra (probability density plots) and histograms for detrital zircon ages less than 300 Ma from the Gualala Basin and selected published age data from Cretaceous–Eocene Salinian block samples ( Barbeau et al. 2005 ; Jacobson et al. 2011 ), and basement
Image
Cartoon representation of paleogeographic reconstruction and drainage evolution of the region supplying sediment to the Gualala Basin, adapted from Schott and Johnson (2001). Reconstruction, lithology, and age data from James (1992), Miller et al. (1995), Powell (1993), Schott and Johnson (2001), Schott et al. (2004), Schruben et al. (1994), and Jacobson et al. (2011). The area with vertical fill lines (EM) shows approximate limits for the eastern Mojave Paleozoic basement associated with high 208Pb/204Pb ratios estimated from Wooden and Miller (1990). During deposition of the German Rancho Formation, the drainage network expanded to cover a larger area, and in particular incorporated (predominantly sand-sized) sediment from farther to the east than previously. The basin remains in proximity to the Mojave block throughout deposition. Labeled locations shown on the figure, listed according to regional features they associate with, are: ERP, Eagles Rest Peak; L, Logan (Offset Gabbro Bodies); EM, Eastern Mojave; EPM, El Paso Mountains; LM, Lane Mountain; O, Opal Mountain; W, Witnet (Mojave block); BH, Bodega Head; BL, Ben Lomond; FP, Fremont Peak; GR, Gabilan Range; PR, Point Reyes; MM, Montara Mountain; SL, Santa Lucia Range (Salinian block); SNB, Sierra Nevada Batholith; GB, Gualala Basin.
Published: 01 November 2012
Fig. 11 Cartoon representation of paleogeographic reconstruction and drainage evolution of the region supplying sediment to the Gualala Basin, adapted from Schott and Johnson (2001) . Reconstruction, lithology, and age data from James (1992) , Miller et al. (1995) , Powell (1993) , Schott
Image
Ternary plots of petrographic data for Gualala sandstone samples, parameters as defined in Dickinson (1985). QtFL  =  total quartz/total feldspar/unstable lithic fragments, QmPK  =  monocrystalline quartz/plagioclase/K-feldspar, QmFLt  =  monocrystalline quartz/total feldspar/total lithic fragments, QpLvLs  =  polycrystalline quartz/volcanic lithics/sedimentary lithics. Labeled sample WB05 is the stratigraphically lowest German Rancho Formation Sample, and is distinct from other samples in the German Rancho Formation based on lower 208Pb/204Pb and relatively less quartz and K-feldspar. Anchor Bay Member (Gualala Formation) samples are subdivided into low P/F, and high P/F, which can also be distinguished by their Pb isotope ratios. The fields outlined with dashed lines represent the range of Eocene Butano Sandstone petrographic modes as reported by Critelli and Nilsen (1996). Note that they overlap compositions of the Gualala Basin samples, particularly those from the German Rancho Formation.
Published: 01 November 2012
) . Note that they overlap compositions of the Gualala Basin samples, particularly those from the German Rancho Formation.
Image
Figure 7. Paleogeographic and tectonic model for the origin and evolution of sediment source terrains for the Gualala basin (GB) from Late Cretaceous (K) through Eocene time. (A) Extensional collapse of the Salinian segment of the Cretaceous Cordilleran arc during the latest Cretaceous (ca. 80 Ma) leads to initial Upper Cretaceous conglomerate sedimentation (Gualala Formation). (B) Early Paleogene right-lateral slivering of the northwestern margin of the Salinian block accompanied by localized uplift is responsible for the marked change in conglomerate composition by early Eocene time (ca. 50 Ma, German Rancho Formation). See text for details. SNB—Sierra Nevada batholith, WMD—western Mojave Desert, SB—Salinian block, PRB—Peninsular Ranges batholith. All other abbreviations are as in Figure 1. Palinspastic and rotational reconstructions as discussed in the text
Published: 01 July 2001
Figure 7. Paleogeographic and tectonic model for the origin and evolution of sediment source terrains for the Gualala basin (GB) from Late Cretaceous (K) through Eocene time. (A) Extensional collapse of the Salinian segment of the Cretaceous Cordilleran arc during the latest Cretaceous (ca. 80 Ma
Image
Catchment-mean denudation rates (mm yr–1) (with 1σ uncertainty) from cosmogenic 10Be concentration in fluvial sands. Mo—Moat Creek, SG—Schooner Gulch, A—Alder Creek, G—Garcia River, NFG—North Fork Gualala River, R—Rockpile Creek, B—Buckeye Creek, WFG—Wheatfield Fork Gualala River, Ma—Marshall Creek, SFG—South Fork Gualala River, RG—Russian Gulch, (Ma & SFG) is a from a sample downstream of the confluence of Marshall Creek and South Fork Gualala River. Dashed white line is a drainage divide that has been breached by only some of the drainage basins.
Published: 01 May 2017
, Ma—Marshall Creek, SFG—South Fork Gualala River, RG—Russian Gulch, (Ma & SFG) is a from a sample downstream of the confluence of Marshall Creek and South Fork Gualala River. Dashed white line is a drainage divide that has been breached by only some of the drainage basins.
Image
(A) Map of river channel steepness index (ksn). The values were determined at 10 m contour intervals along channels that drain more than 1 km2. The average value of channel steepness in each subwatershed polygon was used to color the polygons. The location of the main drainage divide adjacent to the San Andreas fault is indicated with a dashed white line. Basins from which we determined denudation rates are outlined in black. Solid white lines indicate the San Andreas fault. A—Alder Creek, G—Garcia River, NFG—North Fork Gualala River, R—Rockpile Creek, B—Buckeye Creek, WFG—Wheatfield Fork Gualala River, Ma—Marshall Creek, SFG—South Fork Gualala River, RG—Russian Gulch. (B) Map of chi values in study area and adjacent drainage basins.
Published: 01 May 2017
divide adjacent to the San Andreas fault is indicated with a dashed white line. Basins from which we determined denudation rates are outlined in black. Solid white lines indicate the San Andreas fault. A—Alder Creek, G—Garcia River, NFG—North Fork Gualala River, R—Rockpile Creek, B—Buckeye Creek, WFG
Series: GSA Special Papers
Published: 01 January 2005
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-2391-4.1
... than at present during early phases of strike slip following fault initiation in late Miocene time. Strike slip took place southward along the California coast from the western fl ank of the San Francisco Peninsula to the Hosgri fault in the offshore Santa Maria basin without significant reduction...
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 May 2017
GSA Bulletin (2017) 129 (5-6): 732–749.
..., Ma—Marshall Creek, SFG—South Fork Gualala River, RG—Russian Gulch, (Ma & SFG) is a from a sample downstream of the confluence of Marshall Creek and South Fork Gualala River. Dashed white line is a drainage divide that has been breached by only some of the drainage basins. ...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 26 March 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (3): 833–854.
... of late Quaternary marine and nonmarine strata. In the northern part of this elongate valley, Holocene fault offset occurred on two fault strands about 740 m apart. The northern transpressional bend is characterized by narrow, elongate, asymmetric basins containing as much as 56 m of inferred latest...
FIGURES | View All (15)