1-20 OF 77 RESULTS FOR

Grosmont Aquifer

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
—Hydrogeology of the Grosmont aquifer, (a) Salinity of formation waters and (b) freshwater hydraulic-head distribution.
Published: 11 October 1993
Figure 10 —Hydrogeology of the Grosmont aquifer, (a) Salinity of formation waters and (b) freshwater hydraulic-head distribution.
Image
Hydrogeology of the Camrose and Grosmont aquifers. (a) Distribution of hydraulic head (in meters) showing flow toward the low at the northern edge of the study area. The shaded area indicates the region where DFR is greater than 0.5. Note the different contour intervals used for the Grosmont and Camrose aquifers because of vastly different ranges in hydraulic heads. (b) Salinity distributions (g/L) showing an updip, northeastward decrease in concentration. (c) Bicarbonate distribution (g/L) showing relatively high concentrations in the north and in the southeast.
Published: 01 April 2001
Figure 4 Hydrogeology of the Camrose and Grosmont aquifers. (a) Distribution of hydraulic head (in meters) showing flow toward the low at the northern edge of the study area. The shaded area indicates the region where DFR is greater than 0.5. Note the different contour intervals used
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 2001
AAPG Bulletin (2001) 85 (4): 637–660.
...Figure 4 Hydrogeology of the Camrose and Grosmont aquifers. (a) Distribution of hydraulic head (in meters) showing flow toward the low at the northern edge of the study area. The shaded area indicates the region where DFR is greater than 0.5. Note the different contour intervals used...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1990
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1990) 38A (1): 196–217.
... group lies below the Ireton aquitard and is characterized by regional flow. The flow has been modified where it is affected by drawdown from the Grosmont aquifer, which lies above the Ireton aquitard. Formation water salinity is enhanced near the Lower Devonian aquiclude as a result of salt solution...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 11 October 1993
AAPG Bulletin (1993) 77 (10): 1745–1768.
...Figure 10 —Hydrogeology of the Grosmont aquifer, (a) Salinity of formation waters and (b) freshwater hydraulic-head distribution. ...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2001
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2001) 49 (3): 376–392.
... and at the Stony Mountain upland in the centre of the study area, to discharge along the valleys of the Athabasca, Clearwater and Christina rivers. In the southwest, the flow in the basal McMurray and upper McMurray–Wabiskaw aquifers is drawn toward the basin-scale drain formed by the underlying Devonian Grosmont...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
—Isopach maps of Paleozoic hydrostratigraphic units in northeastern Alberta study area, (a) Contact Rapids-Winnipegosis aquifer system, (b) Beaverhill Lake-Cooking Lake aquifer system, (c) Grosmont aquifer, and (d) Winterbum-Wabamun aquifer system.
Published: 11 October 1993
Figure 5 —Isopach maps of Paleozoic hydrostratigraphic units in northeastern Alberta study area, (a) Contact Rapids-Winnipegosis aquifer system, (b) Beaverhill Lake-Cooking Lake aquifer system, (c) Grosmont aquifer, and (d) Winterbum-Wabamun aquifer system.
Image
Histogram illustrating the DST and core-plug permeability analysis results for Keg River, Waterways, Cooking Lake, and Grosmont aquifers.
Published: 05 August 2016
Figure 11. Histogram illustrating the DST and core-plug permeability analysis results for Keg River, Waterways, Cooking Lake, and Grosmont aquifers.
Image
Diagrammatic representation of the flow of formation waters in the Upper Devonian-Lower Cretaceous strata in the southeastern part of the Alberta basin. The flow is mainly northward along the drain created by weathered Devonian carbonates that subcrop below the Cretaceous Mannville Group strata and by the paleokarsted Grosmont aquifer (shaded area). Recharge by connate waters occurs mainly from the southwest and west, updip along aquifer bedding, and through local breaching of the Ireton aquitard by underlying reefs of the Cooking Lake-Leduc aquifer system. Recharge by fresh meteoric water probably occurs at the outcrop of Devonian and Mississippian aquifers further to the south at the Big Snowy anticlinorium in Montana and downdip from the northeast in the Lower Mannville aquifer. A zone of mixing exists at the sub-Cretaceous unconformity at the confluence of deep brines of connate origin and of fresh meteoric water (approximate location indicated by hatched area).
Published: 01 April 2001
strata and by the paleokarsted Grosmont aquifer (shaded area). Recharge by connate waters occurs mainly from the southwest and west, updip along aquifer bedding, and through local breaching of the Ireton aquitard by underlying reefs of the Cooking Lake-Leduc aquifer system. Recharge by fresh meteoric
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1999
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1999) 47 (4): 455–474.
... and Carboniferous strata in Montana to discharge along the Peace River where the Grosmont Formation crops out. Other intermediate- and local-scale flow systems driven by topography are present in the basin, mainly in the northeast. In the southwestern part of the basin, flow in Upper Cretaceous aquifers is driven...
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 05 August 2016
Interpretation (2016) 4 (4): SR19–SR33.
...Figure 11. Histogram illustrating the DST and core-plug permeability analysis results for Keg River, Waterways, Cooking Lake, and Grosmont aquifers. ...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1997
AAPG Bulletin (1997) 81 (5): 712–733.
... of the Waterways, Ireton, and Winterburn shale aquitards), (2) the Grosmont aquifer in the southeastern part of the study area, and (3) the Upper Devonian aquifer system (the aquifers in the Winterburn–Wabamun succession). The distribution of hydraulic heads in this aquifer ( Figure 5 ), based on 1346 DSTs...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Significant geological features in the study area. (a) Location of the reefs of the Leduc Formation underlying the Upper Devonian-Lower Cretaceous succession of interest. (b) Formations subcropping at, and paleorelief on, the sub-Cretaceous unconformity. (c) Local stratigraphic cross section showing direct hydraulic communication across the entire succession between the underlying Cooking Lake-Leduc aquifer system and the Grosmont, Nisku, and Lower Mannville aquifers, as emphasized by the shaded area.
Published: 01 April 2001
section showing direct hydraulic communication across the entire succession between the underlying Cooking Lake-Leduc aquifer system and the Grosmont, Nisku, and Lower Mannville aquifers, as emphasized by the shaded area.
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2016
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2016) 64 (2): 324–353.
... in all Grosmont C cores and the study of image logs. In 2013, Osum, drilled, installed and conducted aquifer testing on two wells in Township 85, Range 20W4M where the Grosmont C is structurally low and the pore space is filled with water, not bitumen. The analysis of the test data interpreted bulk...
FIGURES | View All (25)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1991
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1991) 39 (2): 213.
... plants revealed that all but one exhibited some form of impact on groundwater quality. Common sources of contamination at sour gas plants include evaporation/runoff ponds, process area, sulphur block, and on-site landfills. Contaminants that may be introduced into near-surface aquifers include process...
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1996
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1996) 44 (3): 566–571.
... with the notion that seepage reflux of evaporite brines accounts for some of the Upper Devonian dolomites in the basin, such as the Grosmont Platform in the northeastern part of Alberta (e.g., Machel, 1990; Luo and Machel, 1995) and a few other, much smaller examples (see summary in Mountjoy and Amthor, 1994...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1991
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1991) 39 (2): 213.
...H.M. Hawlander; H.G. Machel Diagenesis, porosity, and bitumen saturation of the Grosmont Formation, as well as the underlying and overlying strata (where cored), have been studied in the area between ranges 16 W4 to 25 W4 and townships 80 to 95. Porosity of some facies has been significantly...
Published: 01 January 2010
DOI: 10.1190/1.9781560802235.ch10
EISBN: 9781560802235
... and thief zones: For the region around the proposed Saleski Pilot and much of the updip portion of the Grosmont trend, there is not an underlying aquifer. Therefore, the only water produced during a SAGD process should be condensed steam. The Grosmont at Saleski also is free of a gas cap or lean bitumen...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2017
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2017) 65 (1): 87–114.
... Formation. The Woodbend–Winterburn succession in Northeast Alberta is of particular importance due to vast bitumen resources therein (greater than 500 billion bbl; AER, 2015 ). The Grosmont, Nisku, and Leduc formations each form significant hosts of bitumen, with the Grosmont Formation in particular...
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1991
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1991) 39 (2): 213.
... plants include evaporation/runoff ponds, process area, sulphur block, and on-site landfills. Contaminants hat may be intro- duced into near-surface aquifers include process waters, sulphur products, process chemicals (sulphinol, amines, glycols), aromatic hydrocarbons (BTEX), and natural gas liquids...