1-20 OF 167 RESULTS FOR

Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 28 March 2023
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2023) 29 (2): 73–91.
...Thomas O'Shea; Samantha Farmer; Arpita Nandi; Eric Bilderback; Ingrid Luffman; Andrew Joyner Abstract An important first step in the geotechnical asset management of Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GRSM) is the creation of an unstable slope inventory along major transportation corridors. Slope...
Journal Article
Published: 21 February 2022
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2022) 28 (1): 93–111.
...Arpita Mandal; Arpita Nandi; Abdul Shakoor; Jeffrey Keaton ABSTRACT Debris flows occur frequently in remote areas of Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee. Rainfall gauges are not adequate for modeling infiltration required for triggering debris flows. Weather radar, providing frequently...
Image
Figure 1. Geologic map of Great Smoky Mountains National Park illustrating the major faults, rock units, and metamorphic grade (modified from Kohn and Malloy, 2004; cross section after King et al., 1968). Metamorphic grade increases to the southeast. Numbers refer to sample number. GSF—Great Smoky fault; GF—Greenbrier fault; MS—Murphy syncline; Bt—biotite isograd; Grt—garnet isograd; St—staurolite isograd; Ky—kyanite isograd.
Published: 01 July 2007
Figure 1. Geologic map of Great Smoky Mountains National Park illustrating the major faults, rock units, and metamorphic grade (modified from Kohn and Malloy, 2004 ; cross section after King et al., 1968 ). Metamorphic grade increases to the southeast. Numbers refer to sample number. GSF—Great
Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 29 March 2018
DOI: 10.1130/2018.0050(03)
EISBN: 9780813756509
... ABSTRACT The geology of Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GRSM) in Tennessee and North Carolina is dominated by siliciclastics and metamorphic strata. However, in the western portion of GRSM, a series of carbonate fensters (windows) expose the Lower Ordovician–age section of the Knox Group...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 21 February 2022
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2022) 28 (1): 55–71.
...Jeffrey R. Keaton ABSTRACT A storm on August 5, 2012, triggered a soil slip that mobilized into a debris flow in a relatively remote part of Great Smoky Mountains National Park, 2 km southwest of Mt. LeConte, TN. A rain gauge at Mt. LeConte Resort, recorded manually at 07:00 Eastern Time each day...
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 1999
Clays and Clay Minerals (1999) 47 (1): 1–11.
...Donald R. Peacor; Roland C. Rouse; T. Dennis Coskren; Eric J. Essene Abstract A new occurrence of destinezite (diadochite), ideally Fe 2 (PO 4 )(SO 4 )(OH).6H 2 O, is described from Alum Cave Bluff, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee, where it occurs in soil and in a weathered...
Image
(A) Generalized geologic map of the western Blue Ridge–Talladega belt in Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, and North Carolina. (B) Distribution of the three western Blue Ridge thrust sheets in Georgia, Tennessee, and North Carolina that are the focus of this study. (C) Distribution of units previously correlated with the Walden Creek Group by King et al. (1958) and later authors. Location of Great Smoky Mountains National Park is shown.
Published: 20 February 2020
previously correlated with the Walden Creek Group by King et al. (1958) and later authors. Location of Great Smoky Mountains National Park is shown.
Image
Figure 2. Drainage system of Great Smoky Mountains with outlet river sampling locations marked by solid circles. Numbers below sample names are model rates of erosion (m/m.y.). Samples were collected at or near Great Smoky Mountains National Park boundary to ensure that drainage basins studied have not been disturbed by contemporary land-use practices and to avoid sampling low-relief areas where sediment might be stored for considerable periods of time. Within two shaded drainage systems (Raven Fork and Oconaluftee River), we sampled larger tributaries feeding main channel (see Fig. 3). Sediment was sampled from within channels or from active sandbars. Little River gaging station is located outside limits of figure, ∼20 km northwest of X. G—Gatlinburg, Tennessee. BC—Bryson City, North Carolina. OB—Oconaluftee River basin. RFB—Raven Fork basin.
Published: 01 February 2003
Figure 2. Drainage system of Great Smoky Mountains with outlet river sampling locations marked by solid circles. Numbers below sample names are model rates of erosion (m/m.y.). Samples were collected at or near Great Smoky Mountains National Park boundary to ensure that drainage basins studied have
Image
Oxygen isotope variation between sulfate and water associated with the oxidation of pyrite. Modified from Taylor and Wheeler (1994). Dashed isopleths mark mixtures between Reactions (20) (0%) and (21) (100%) as described by Equation (23). Fields for mine drainage sites are indicated by the abbreviations:
Published: 01 January 2000
by the abbreviations: L Leviathan; A Argo Tunnel; WS West Shasta district; SM mines in Great Smoky Mountains National Park; CB Cabin Branch mine; S Sulfur mine; and PM Penn mine. Data from Taylor and Wheeler (1994) , Seal and Wandless (1997) , and Hamlin and Alpers (1996
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2009
GSA Bulletin (2009) 121 (7-8): 1108–1122.
... with the type Taconian foreland in the northern Appalachians (thin imbricated thrust sheets of slope-rise sediments). We present new structural and petrologic data on the Great Smoky and Snowbird Groups in the vicinity of Great Smoky Mountains National Park bearing on the viability of the premetamorphic...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 July 2007
Geology (2007) 35 (7): 627–630.
...Figure 1. Geologic map of Great Smoky Mountains National Park illustrating the major faults, rock units, and metamorphic grade (modified from Kohn and Malloy, 2004 ; cross section after King et al., 1968 ). Metamorphic grade increases to the southeast. Numbers refer to sample number. GSF—Great...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 February 2003
Geology (2003) 31 (2): 155–158.
...Figure 2. Drainage system of Great Smoky Mountains with outlet river sampling locations marked by solid circles. Numbers below sample names are model rates of erosion (m/m.y.). Samples were collected at or near Great Smoky Mountains National Park boundary to ensure that drainage basins studied have...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2023
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2023) 60 (6): 583–615.
... Blue Ridge. They are part of the belt of exposures of Mesoproterozoic rocks that extends from Canada to Georgia ( Figs. 1A and 1B ). Outcrops of Ocoee Supergroup rocks occur in the vicinity of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee ( Fig. 2A ; Keith...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2000
GSA Bulletin (2000) 112 (7): 982–996.
... ) forms the hanging wall and the Chilhowee Group forms the footwall of a major thrust fault—the Miller Cove fault ( King, 1964 ; Neuman and Nelson, 1965 ; Costello and Hatcher, 1991 ). King et al. (1968) mapped the Great Smoky Mountains National Park between the Pigeon River and the Little Tennessee...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 20 February 2020
GSA Bulletin (2020) 132 (9-10): 2105–2118.
... previously correlated with the Walden Creek Group by King et al. (1958) and later authors. Location of Great Smoky Mountains National Park is shown. ...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Book Chapter

Series: GSA Field Guide
Published: 29 March 2018
DOI: 10.1130/2018.0050(00)
EISBN: 9780813756509
... and the arts. Chapter 3 by Miller et al. describes the regional karst landscape, focusing on the caves and karst hydrology of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park and nearby Tuckaleechee Cove, including the beautiful Tuckaleechee Caverns. The field trip outlined in Chapter 4 by Keenan et al. centers...
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 01 April 2011
Geosphere (2011) 7 (2): 494–512.
.... Southworth S. Kunk M.J. , 2007 , SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology of zircon and titanite and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar of hornblende and muscovite from Mesoproterozoic rocks of the western Blue Ridge, Great Smoky Mountains National Park area, TN and NC : Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs , v. 39...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2017
Earth Sciences History (2017) 36 (2): 318–336.
... National Park CA Great Smoky Mountains National Park TN/NC Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve AK Guadalupe Mountains National Park TX     In twenty-three parks, at least 1,379 erosion caves have been documented ( Table 3 ). Erosion caves form from the mechanical scouring of moving...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2012
GSA Bulletin (2012) 124 (7-8): 1278–1292.
... – 146 , doi:10.1007/s00710-005-0076-6 . Southworth S. Schultz A. Denenny D. , 2005 , Geologic Map of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region, Tennessee and North Carolina : U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005–1225 , 112 p . Stacey J.S. Kramers J.D...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Published: 11 September 2017
DOI: 10.1130/2017.1213(04)
EISBN: 9780813782133
...., 2016 ). Figure 6. Cross sections across the western Blue Ridge near the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Positions of section lines are shown in Figure 2 . Depth to Laurentian basement was derived from basement depth compilation maps of seismic reflection data from Costain et al. (1989...