1-20 OF 20 RESULTS FOR

Grayback Monocline

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 July 2008
GSA Bulletin (2008) 120 (7-8): 877–892.
...Joya Tetreault; Craig H. Jones; Eric Erslev; Scott Larson; Mark Hudson; Steven Holdaway Abstract Significant fold-axis-parallel slip is accommodated in the folded strata of the Grayback monocline, northeastern Front Range, Colorado, without visible large strike-slip displacement on the fold surface...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Paleomagnetic and structural evidence for oblique ...
Second thumbnail for: Paleomagnetic and structural evidence for oblique ...
Third thumbnail for: Paleomagnetic and structural evidence for oblique ...
Image
Study-area map of the Grayback monocline (modified from Braddock et al., 1988). Traces of the anticlinal and synclinal hinge are taken from Braddock et al. (1988). The synclinal hinge (dashed line) is buried under Quaternary deposits, which are not shown as a unit on the map. Structural stations (numbered labels) are marked as black circles, and paleomagnetic localities (three-letter labels) are open squares. Transects A–A′ and B–B′ are shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 2. Study-area map of the Grayback monocline (modified from Braddock et al., 1988 ). Traces of the anticlinal and synclinal hinge are taken from Braddock et al. (1988) . The synclinal hinge (dashed line) is buried under Quaternary deposits, which are not shown as a unit on the map
Image
Unbalanced cross section across the Grayback monocline along profile A–A′, shown in Figure 2. The forelimb, as defined by bedding dips, is ~100 m wide. The dip and placement of the underlying fault is hypothesized from the geometry of the folded strata.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 3. Unbalanced cross section across the Grayback monocline along profile A–A′, shown in Figure 2 . The forelimb, as defined by bedding dips, is ~100 m wide. The dip and placement of the underlying fault is hypothesized from the geometry of the folded strata.
Image
Published: 01 July 2008
TABLE 1. PALEOSTRESS MEAN DIRECTIONS AND DEFLECTIONS FROM THE GRAYBACK MONOCLINE
Image
Topographic map (contour interval, 20 ft) of the Grayback monocline, with mean compressive paleostress orientations (heavy arrows) computed from minor faults. The regional compressional-stress direction for the northeastern Front Range is shown in the large black arrows outside the map. The mean compressive paleostress orientations are deflected from oblique to the fold trend in the anticlinal zone toward nearly perpendicular to the fold trend in the forelimb, with maximum deflections between stations 3.2 and 3.3.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 6. Topographic map (contour interval, 20 ft) of the Grayback monocline, with mean compressive paleostress orientations (heavy arrows) computed from minor faults. The regional compressional-stress direction for the northeastern Front Range is shown in the large black arrows outside the map
Image
Published: 01 July 2008
TABLE 2. PALEOMAGNETIC TILT-CORRECTED RESULTS FROM THE GRAYBACK MONOCLINE
Image
Topographic map (contour interval, 20 ft) of the Grayback monocline with equal-area plots of the tilt-corrected paleomagnetic results from analysis 1. See Figure 6 and caption for explanation of map symbols. Black circles represent lower-hemisphere Fisher locality mean directions, and open circles represent upper-hemisphere mean directions. Large circles around the mean directions represent the 95% circles of confidence. The star represents the expected Permian direction for the Ingleside Formation from Diehl and Shive (1979). Small black asterisks represent the tilt-corrected modern field directions for each locality. Localities in the anticlinal zone, GBM_1, GAC, GAH, and GAB, show no appreciable rotation. However, localities in the forelimb all show clockwise rotations, with the exception of GFL.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 11. Topographic map (contour interval, 20 ft) of the Grayback monocline with equal-area plots of the tilt-corrected paleomagnetic results from analysis 1. See Figure 6 and caption for explanation of map symbols. Black circles represent lower-hemisphere Fisher locality mean directions
Image
Rose diagrams of slickenline trends and ideal σ1 directions from the (A) northeastern Front Range, (B) anticlinal zone of the Grayback monocline, and (C) forelimb of the Grayback monocline. The right-lateral and left-lateral slickenlines show a nice conjugate geometry in the anticlinal zone but are much more scattered in the forelimb.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 5. Rose diagrams of slickenline trends and ideal σ 1 directions from the (A) northeastern Front Range, (B) anticlinal zone of the Grayback monocline, and (C) forelimb of the Grayback monocline. The right-lateral and left-lateral slickenlines show a nice conjugate geometry
Image
Lower-hemisphere, equal-area projection contour plots of structural data collected from this study with cross section B–B′ through the Grayback monocline along U.S. Highway 287 road cut. Fault data and cross section are from Erslev and Selvig (1997). All contour plots were made with the Schmidt method, using 40 nodes. The ideal σ1 directions from the anticlinal zone (B) match well with the regional ideal σ1 directions (A). However, the slickenlines and ideal σ1 directions from the forelimb of the Grayback monocline (C) are deflected clockwise from the regional data. In the cross section, lower-hemisphere equal-area projection of fault planes (great circles) and ideal σ1 directions (open circles) are plotted for stations 4.1–4.4. The compressive paleostress mean directions for each station in the cross section are given below the corresponding equal-area projection.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 4. Lower-hemisphere, equal-area projection contour plots of structural data collected from this study with cross section B–B′ through the Grayback monocline along U.S. Highway 287 road cut. Fault data and cross section are from Erslev and Selvig (1997) . All contour plots were made
Image
Geologic map of the northeastern Front Range. Most of the structures in this region are NNW-trending faults and folds. The Grayback monocline trends northeasterly.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 1. Geologic map of the northeastern Front Range. Most of the structures in this region are NNW-trending faults and folds. The Grayback monocline trends northeasterly.
Image
Cartoon depicting oblique-slip deformation in the folded strata of the Grayback monocline during the Laramide orogeny. The compressive paleostress and paleomagnetic rotations (depicted as arrows) are concentrated in the forelimb and increase with bedding dip. The regional shortening direction (large open arrows) is oblique to the fold trend.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 14. Cartoon depicting oblique-slip deformation in the folded strata of the Grayback monocline during the Laramide orogeny. The compressive paleostress and paleomagnetic rotations (depicted as arrows) are concentrated in the forelimb and increase with bedding dip. The regional shortening
Image
Examples of thermal demagnetization of three-component isothermal remanent magnetizations (IRMs) on samples gathered from the anticlinal zone and forelimb of the Grayback monocline. The soft (0.3 T), medium (1.0 T), and hard (3.0 T) components are fully unblocked by temperatures >600 °C. The soft and medium components also exhibit slight removal of magnetization between 500 °C and 600 °C, indicating the presence of magnetite.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 7. Examples of thermal demagnetization of three-component isothermal remanent magnetizations (IRMs) on samples gathered from the anticlinal zone and forelimb of the Grayback monocline. The soft (0.3 T), medium (1.0 T), and hard (3.0 T) components are fully unblocked by temperatures >600
Image
Typical orthographic plots of types A, B, and C demagnetization paths from the Grayback monocline. The top figure is an example of a Type A demagnetization path, where a primary remanence is clearly defined and converges to the origin with a maximum angular deviation (MAD) of <10° for the line fit. Type B demagnetization paths also have an identifiable primary magnetization; however, they do not necessarily converge to the origin. Type C line fits are poorly defined, with a MAD anchored to the origin typically >15°. NRM—natural remanent magnetization.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 8. Typical orthographic plots of types A, B, and C demagnetization paths from the Grayback monocline. The top figure is an example of a Type A demagnetization path, where a primary remanence is clearly defined and converges to the origin with a maximum angular deviation (MAD) of <10
Image
Equal-area plot demonstrating the effect of a partially removed modern field overprint on a Permian direction for rocks in the Grayback monocline. (1) The Permian direction (shown as an open square for upper hemisphere direction; Decl. = 149°, Incl. = −12.7°) is folded 20° about a horizontal axis trending N45°E. (2) Overprinting by the modern field (black asterisk) results in a new direction, lying along the great circle between the modern field and the tilted Permian direction. (3) Tilt-correcting this new direction based on local bedding attitude yields a counterclockwise, steeper direction, relative to the original primary Permian direction.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 12. Equal-area plot demonstrating the effect of a partially removed modern field overprint on a Permian direction for rocks in the Grayback monocline. (1) The Permian direction (shown as an open square for upper hemisphere direction; Decl. = 149°, Incl. = −12.7°) is folded 20° about
Image
Tilt-corrected equal-area projections of all locality mean directions using analysis 1 (A) and analysis 2 (B). Closed and open circles represent lower- and upper-hemisphere locality mean directions, respectively, for localities in the forelimb. Closed and open squares represent lower-and upper-hemisphere locality mean directions for localities in the anticlinal zone. The star represents the tilt-corrected Permian Ingleside Formation reference direction (1979). Using only type A and B line fits, the 95% confidence estimates in analysis 2 are less constrained. Localities GBM_2, GFR, GSH, and GEI are all in the forelimb of the Grayback monocline. In analysis 1 (A), these mean directions show statistically significant rotation from the expected Ingleside Formation direction. In analysis 2 (B), GBM_2 and GFR still exhibit statistically significant paleomagnetic rotations. GEI and GSH lack declination rotations in analysis 2 in comparison with analysis 1.
Published: 01 July 2008
, and GEI are all in the forelimb of the Grayback monocline. In analysis 1 (A), these mean directions show statistically significant rotation from the expected Ingleside Formation direction. In analysis 2 (B), GBM_2 and GFR still exhibit statistically significant paleomagnetic rotations. GEI and GSH lack
Image
Vertical-axis rotations of paleomagnetic declinations versus compressive-paleostress deflections for spatially coincident stations and localities in the Grayback monocline. Error bars represent the 95% confidence level for vertical-axis rotation and station compressive paleostress deflection for each locality. A 1:1 trend line is shown for reference. Vertical-axis rotations are calculated relative to the Permian Ingleside Formation's declination of 149° (Diehl and Shive, 1979). Compressive paleostress deflections are calculated with respect to the regional compressional stress direction of N90°E (Erslev and Larson, 2006). Shaded symbols represent those stations or localities that either do not have well-constrained mean directions or do not exactly occupy the same sampling area. The large arrows indicate where we hypothesize these locality-station pairs to actually plot. Station 3.3 is located in steeper beds than paleomagnetic locality GEI, which lies between stations 3.2 and 3.3. Following the trends seen at other structural stations, locality GEI could be associated with a smaller compressive paleostress deflection than the observed deflection at station 3.3, as indicated by the downward-pointing large arrow. Locality GFL has an anomalous counterclockwise vertical-axis rotation, which we suspect to be a result of heavy overprinting (see text for discussion). Locality GBM_1 shows no statistically significant paleomagnetic rotation.
Published: 01 July 2008
Figure 13. Vertical-axis rotations of paleomagnetic declinations versus compressive-paleostress deflections for spatially coincident stations and localities in the Grayback monocline. Error bars represent the 95% confidence level for vertical-axis rotation and station compressive paleostress
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 January 2020
Economic Geology (2020) 115 (1): 153–175.
.... The Kelvin fault is newly named from Nickerson et al. (2010) . Other structures include the Superior monocline ( Davis et al., 1981 ), Tecolote and Romero Wash faults ( Favorito and Seedorff, 2017 ), and Brandenburg and Holy Joe faults (Favorito and Seedorff, 2018). On the basis of data and analysis...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Laramide Uplift near the Ray and Resolution Porphy...
Second thumbnail for: Laramide Uplift near the Ray and Resolution Porphy...
Third thumbnail for: Laramide Uplift near the Ray and Resolution Porphy...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2022
Rocky Mountain Geology (2022) 57 (2): 65–97.
.... , Jones , C.H. , Erslev , E. , and three others, 2008 , Paleomagnetic and structural evidence for oblique slip in a fault-related fold, Grayback monocline, Colorado : Geological Society of America Bulletin , v. 120 , p. 877 – 892 . Thacker , J.O , Karlstrom , K.E. , Kelley...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Laramide crustal detachment in the Rockies: Cordil...
Second thumbnail for: Laramide crustal detachment in the Rockies: Cordil...
Third thumbnail for: Laramide crustal detachment in the Rockies: Cordil...
Series: GSA Field Guides
Published: 04 September 2019
DOI: 10.1130/2019.0055(14)
EISBN: 9780813756554
..., and Examination of Biotitic Alteration and Sodic-Calcic Alteration on Deep Flanks of the System Mile 30.4; WGS84 33.069636°, –111.053802° The Kelvin–Riverside–Red Hills district in the Tortilla Mountains hosts porphyry copper prospects related to the dismembered, steeply east-tilted Tea Cup–Grayback...
Series: GSA Special Papers
Published: 03 May 2022
DOI: 10.1130/2021.2555(06)
EISBN: 9780813795553
... strike ( Erslev, 1986 ; Neely and Erslev, 2009 ) suggest that Laramide fault offsets were not dip-slip but had complex and protracted fault offset histories (Grayback monocline). Our contribution is to add to the calcite strain data presented in van der Pluijm et al. (1997) and Craddock and van der...