1-20 OF 54 RESULTS FOR

Goliat Field

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 27 September 2024
Geophysics (2024) 89 (6): D301–D314.
... assimilation of extra-deep electromagnetic data while accounting for the model errors in the approximate DNN model. We demonstrate our workflow on historic well-log data from the Goliat Field (Barents Sea). The median of our probabilistic estimation is on par with proprietary inversion regardless of the number...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 27 June 2017
Interpretation (2017) 5 (3): SL69–SL87.
... and petrophysical well logs within the Lower Triassic Havert Formation in the Goliat field, Southwest Barents Sea. A rock-physics feasibility study revealed the optimum petrofacies discriminating ability of extended elastic impedance (EEI) tuned for PHIE and V sh . We then combined model-based prestack inversion...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 27 February 2017
Interpretation (2017) 5 (2): SE75–SE96.
... provinces have been identified in the Western Barents Shelf ( Faleide et al., 2008 ), each of which is separated by major fault zones (Figure  2 ). One of these fault zones is the Troms-Finnmark Fault Complex (TFFC). The Goliat Field is structurally located in a restraining bend in the TFFC and forms...
FIGURES | View All (19)
Image
The deep EM real-time data from the <span class="search-highlight">Goliat</span> <span class="search-highlight">Field</span> compared with the logs mod...
Published: 27 September 2024
Figure B-1. The deep EM real-time data from the Goliat Field compared with the logs modeled by DNN from a reference inversion model presented in Larsen et al. (2015) . All curves are rescaled to 0.5–1.5.
Image
The extra-deep EM (EDAR) real-time data from the <span class="search-highlight">Goliat</span> <span class="search-highlight">Field</span> compared with...
Published: 27 September 2024
Figure B-2. The extra-deep EM (EDAR) real-time data from the Goliat Field compared with the logs modeled by DNN from a reference inversion model presented in Larsen et al. (2015) . All curves are rescaled to 0.5–1.5.
Image
(a) Location of the <span class="search-highlight">Goliat</span> <span class="search-highlight">field</span> (adapted from NPD FactMaps) in the Norwegi...
Published: 27 June 2017
Figure 1. (a) Location of the Goliat field (adapted from NPD FactMaps) in the Norwegian sector of the Barents Sea. The field is cut by the Troms-Finnmark Fault Complex (TFFC). The red dots show the position of other discoveries close to the Goliat field. (b) The time structure map for the base
Image
Location map for the <span class="search-highlight">Goliat</span> <span class="search-highlight">Field</span> (adapted from NPD factMaps) in the Norweg...
Published: 27 February 2017
Figure 1. Location map for the Goliat Field (adapted from NPD factMaps) in the Norwegian sector of the Barents Sea. The field is cut by the Troms-Finnmark Fault Complex within blocks 7122/7 and 7122/8.
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 13 May 2021
Geophysics (2021) 86 (3): E269–E281.
... case and a section of a published historical operation from the Goliat field. The observed average evaluation time of 0.15 ms per logging position makes it also suitable for future use as part of evaluation-hungry statistical and/or Monte Carlo inversion algorithms within geosteering workflows...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
Comparison of six logs using a commercial EM simulator versus its ML approx...
Published: 13 May 2021
Figure 15. Comparison of six logs using a commercial EM simulator versus its ML approximation when applied to the section of the “Goliat Field example” described in Figure  14 . The mnemonics are summarized in Table  1 .
Image
Chronostratigraphy of the Norwegian Barents Sea ( Glørstad-Clark et al., 20...
Published: 27 February 2017
. The shallower Nordmela and Stø Formations are absent in the Goliat Field. Other hydrocarbon-bearing intervals, such as the Snadd, Kobbe, and Klappmys Formations, were also deposited during the Triassic period.
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 21 April 2017
Interpretation (2017) 5 (2): SEi.
... permeability and posthydraulic fracture initial gas production. Yenwongfai et al. show the application of simultaneous prestack inversion for petrofacies prediction within the compartmentalized Realgrunnen reservoir in the Goliat field, southwest Barents Sea. The derived facies probability maps are used...
Image
Halpern C 7  (A) star correlation diagram and (B) transformation diagram. (...
Published: 01 September 2008
Figure 18 Halpern C 7 (A) star correlation diagram and (B) transformation diagram. (A) The Goliat 7122/7-1 condensate fraction plots similar to that of the biodegraded Norwegian standard oil from the Oseberg field, North Sea (NSO1), which also has an Upper Jurassic, marine anoxic shale as source
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 April 2021
The Leading Edge (2021) 40 (4): 254–260.
... AS Norway. Yenwongfai , H. D. , N. H. Mondol , J. I. Faleide , and I. Lecomte , 2017a , Prestack simultaneous inversion to predict lithology and pore fluid in the Realgrunnen Subgroup of the Goliat Field, southwestern Barents Sea : Interpretation , 5 , no. 2 , SE75 – SE96...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 19 July 2017
Interpretation (2017) 5 (3): SLi–SLii.
... and well-log data. The authors submit that this requires an integrated geophysical and petrophysical approach. This approach has been applied to Goliat Field in Barent Sea to infer a point-sourced depositional model for the Havert Formation. ...
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 03 September 2022
DOI: 10.1144/SP495-2018-176
EISBN: 9781786205230
... aquifer. Fig. 20. Logs and pressure plots from the reservoir zones in the Hammerfest Basin and Goliat Field with gas, oil and water zones (red, green and blue gradient lines, respectively, in the pressure plot). The Realgrunnen Subgroup consists of the Stø, Nordmela, Tubåen and Fruholmen...
FIGURES | View All (25)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 2016
AAPG Bulletin (2016) 100 (2): 165–190.
... of the Hammerfest Basin led to the discovery of the Snøhvit field in 1984 ( Berglund et al., 1986 ; Linjordet and Grung Olsen, 1992 ). For many years, the Barents Sea was considered a gas-prone area ( Stewart et al., 1995 ), until the oil discoveries of the Goliat field in 2000, the Nucula oil field in 2007, Johan...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2018
DOI: 10.1144/SP465.18
EISBN: 9781786203656
... fields in production, Snøhvit and Goliat, and several in the evaluation phase. The main exploration challenges in the Barents Sea are the Tertiary uplift and erosion of Jurassic and Cretaceous rocks, and the maturation of the source rocks due to the uplift. The discoveries Gotha and Alta in 2013–15...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 2008
AAPG Bulletin (2008) 92 (9): 1191–1223.
...Figure 18 Halpern C 7 (A) star correlation diagram and (B) transformation diagram. (A) The Goliat 7122/7-1 condensate fraction plots similar to that of the biodegraded Norwegian standard oil from the Oseberg field, North Sea (NSO1), which also has an Upper Jurassic, marine anoxic shale as source...
FIGURES | View All (23)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 03 September 2022
DOI: 10.1144/SP495-2018-165
EISBN: 9781786205230
... Abstract The most prolific reservoir package in the SW Barents Sea is currently the Upper Triassic–Middle Jurassic Realgrunnen Subgroup, comprising the main hydrocarbon accumulations in the Goliat, Snøhvit and Johan Castberg fields and the Wisting discovery. The interval continues...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
Uninterpreted and interpreted seismic line showing the major anticline asso...
Published: 22 November 2016
Fig. 7. Uninterpreted and interpreted seismic line showing the major anticline associated with the Goliat hydrocarbon field. The minor folds on the crest of the anticline and the onlap geometry (inset) should be noted. Small arrows indicate onlap. Names of seismic reflections are given along