1-20 OF 94 RESULTS FOR

Glick Field

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Book Chapter

Author(s)
Robert M. Euwer
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 1968
DOI: 10.1306/M9363C107
EISBN: 9781629812311
... Abstract The Glick field, in Kiowa and Comanche Counties, Kansas, produces from the Mississippian (Osage) “Chert.” The gas is trapped stratigraphically. Cumulative production to January 1, 1967, was 180,280 bbls of 60°-gravity condensate and 80.65 billion cu ft of gas. ...
Image
—(A) Structure map, contoured on Kinder-hookian shale, Glick field. (B) Isopach map, top of productive chat reservoir, Glick field. From Rogers et al. (1995).
Published: 01 January 1998
Figure 6. —(A) Structure map, contoured on Kinder-hookian shale, Glick field. (B) Isopach map, top of productive chat reservoir, Glick field. From Rogers et al. (1995) .
Image
—Stratigraphic cross section, Glick field. Datum is top of Kinderhookian shale. Modified from Rogers et al. (1995).
Published: 01 January 1998
Figure 7. —Stratigraphic cross section, Glick field. Datum is top of Kinderhookian shale. Modified from Rogers et al. (1995) .
Image
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photograph of chat sample from Shell 1-36 Robbins in Glick field at 4856 ft (1480 m) showing corroded quartz crystals and microporosity. Scale bar is 10 μm.
Published: 01 January 2001
Figure 9 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photograph of chat sample from Shell 1-36 Robbins in Glick field at 4856 ft (1480 m) showing corroded quartz crystals and microporosity. Scale bar is 10 μm.
Image
—(A) Plot showing bulk water volume, hydrocarbons, and porosity. See text for discussion. Data courtesy Shell Oil Company. (B) Porosity-resistivity (Pfeffer) plot by depth, Shell 1-32 Robbins well, Glick field, showing higher porosity reservoir associated with lowest resistivities.
Published: 01 January 1998
Figure 9 —(A) Plot showing bulk water volume, hydrocarbons, and porosity. See text for discussion. Data courtesy Shell Oil Company. (B) Porosity-resistivity (Pfeffer) plot by depth, Shell 1-32 Robbins well, Glick field, showing higher porosity reservoir associated with lowest resistivities.
Image
—Well log and core data matched against photomicrographs for the productive interval, Shell 1-32 Robbins, Glick field. Completed in 1957, this well had produced approximately 13.3 bcf as of January 1995, when it was still flowing 1 mmcf per day or more. Modified from Colleary et al. (1997).
Published: 01 January 1998
Figure 8. —Well log and core data matched against photomicrographs for the productive interval, Shell 1-32 Robbins, Glick field. Completed in 1957, this well had produced approximately 13.3 bcf as of January 1995, when it was still flowing 1 mmcf per day or more. Modified from Colleary et al
Image
(A) Regional post-late Mississippian tectonic elements, and in green, some of the larger oil or gas fields that produce from Mississippian chert (including chat) and/or spiculite in central Kansas. Bindley, Schaben, and Glick fields are specifically discussed in the text. The subsurface extent of the Cowley Formation is modified from Watney et al. (2001) and Montgomery et al. (1998), and the broad area to the north is the Burlington shelf; the Cowley locally is absent by nondeposition and/or erosion, however, within this extent. Locations of cored wells 18–21 (in Table 1) are shown. (B) Locations of wells used in cross sections in Figure 4A and B.
Published: 01 December 2009
Figure 1 (A) Regional post-late Mississippian tectonic elements, and in green, some of the larger oil or gas fields that produce from Mississippian chert (including chat) and/or spiculite in central Kansas. Bindley, Schaben, and Glick fields are specifically discussed in the text. The subsurface
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 1998
AAPG Bulletin (1998) 82 (1): 187–205.
...Figure 6. —(A) Structure map, contoured on Kinder-hookian shale, Glick field. (B) Isopach map, top of productive chat reservoir, Glick field. From Rogers et al. (1995) . ...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Image
Air permeability vs. porosity for whole core, normalized to plug values by division by 10, and plugs for four chat fields. Fields having chert lie on similar trend, although Glick low porosity samples, evident in logs, were not sampled in core. Field symbols: solid diamond = Glick, open circle = Spivey-Grabs, solid square = Hardtner, open square = Bates. Bates sucrosic dolomites lie off chert trend.
Published: 01 January 2001
Figure 15 Air permeability vs. porosity for whole core, normalized to plug values by division by 10, and plugs for four chat fields. Fields having chert lie on similar trend, although Glick low porosity samples, evident in logs, were not sampled in core. Field symbols: solid diamond = Glick, open
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 2001
AAPG Bulletin (2001) 85 (1): 1–5.
... on Dollarhide field's chert reservoirs in west Texas. Another interesting article is our work on the spiculitic Mississippian "chat" reservoir at Glick field in Kansas ( Rogers et al., 1995 ). The unusual spicule-rich cherts that form the reservoir for the 400 bcf Glick field helped provide a catalyst...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 2001
AAPG Bulletin (2001) 85 (1): 85–113.
...Figure 9 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photograph of chat sample from Shell 1-36 Robbins in Glick field at 4856 ft (1480 m) showing corroded quartz crystals and microporosity. Scale bar is 10 μm. ...
FIGURES | View All (23)
Image
Modified Pickett crossplots for wells from Spivey-Grabs (A), Hardtner (B), Glick (C), Aetna gas area (D), and Bates (E) fields illustrating patterns in porosity, resistivity, water saturation, and BVW. (C) uses data from a Microresistivity tool; otherwise, resistivities are from deep investigating devices.
Published: 01 January 2001
Figure 22 Modified Pickett crossplots for wells from Spivey-Grabs ( A ), Hardtner ( B ), Glick ( C ), Aetna gas area ( D ), and Bates ( E ) fields illustrating patterns in porosity, resistivity, water saturation, and BVW. ( C ) uses data from a Microresistivity tool; otherwise, resistivities
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 2009
AAPG Bulletin (2009) 93 (12): 1649–1689.
...Figure 1 (A) Regional post-late Mississippian tectonic elements, and in green, some of the larger oil or gas fields that produce from Mississippian chert (including chat) and/or spiculite in central Kansas. Bindley, Schaben, and Glick fields are specifically discussed in the text. The subsurface...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1972
AAPG Bulletin (1972) 56 (11): 1723–1748.
... that the Joachim, Plattin, Kimmswick, and Fernvale formations are all separated, one from another, by unconformities. However, subsequent authors ( McKnight, 1935 ; Frezon and Glick, 1959 ) reported that physical evidence for these breaks is obscure. With additional reading and limited field observations I became...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 January 2001
AAPG Bulletin (2001) 85 (1): 115–129.
... of more highly soluble siliceous organisms, such as sponges, is the most likely source of silica for the chat. Sponge bioherms were prevalent in some Paleozoic seas, and sponge spicules in such bioherms are believed to be the source of silica in the chat at Glick field in Kansas ( Rogers et al., 1995...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1983
AAPG Bulletin (1983) 67 (9): 1455.
...Ernest E. Glick Abstract Prior to about 1974, most of the work in the Mississippi embayment area by members of the U.S. Geological Survey was motivated by interest in the embayment’s paleontologic aspects, stratigraphy, and economic resources, especially ground water. However, an excellent...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 June 2000
Geology (2000) 28 (6): 511–514.
... explanations have been offered for the diverse trends of faults in northern Arkansas. Glick (1997) attributed diverse structural trends to differential solution and compaction over paleotopography in the Precambrian basement. Ancillary to their discussion of foreland flexure in the Arkoma basin, Bradley...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1974
AAPG Bulletin (1974) 58 (4): 685–707.
... of sandstone, limestone, and dolomite ( Fig. 4 ). The formation ranges in thickness from 350 ft in the west to 650 ft in the east. It is divisible into seven members that are lithologically distinctive and objectively definable in the field. Four of these members are “formal” and have been proposed by earlier...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1968
AAPG Bulletin (1968) 52 (2): 282–294.
... for suggesting this problem and for their direction throughout its investigation. The Arkansas Geological Commission provided funds for field expenses. © 1968 American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All rights reserved 1968 American Association of Petroleum Geologists The purpose...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1997
Seismological Research Letters (1997) 68 (5): 785–796.
... relation to seismicity , U.S. Geol. Surv. Misc. Field Studies Map, MF-914 , scale 1:1,000,000. Hildenbrand , T.G. , R.P. Kucks , M.F. Kane , and J.D. Hendricks ( 1979 ). Aeromagnetic map and associated depth map of the upper Mississippi embayment region , U.S. Geol. Surv. Misc...