1-20 OF 86 RESULTS FOR

Gangpur Group

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2020
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2020) 96 (4): 337–348.
...Nilima Dash; Bibhuranjan Nayak; Birendra Kumar Mohapatra Abstract Manganese mineralization in the Precambrian Gangpur Group of rocks in Sundargarh district of Odisha occur as pockets or small ore bodies associated with metapelites and metapsamites. Different varieties of hypogene metamorphic...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2015
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2015) 85 (5): 547–550.
...Nilima Dash; B. K. Mohapatra Abstract: Shirozulite, ideally KMn 3 (AlSi 3 ) O 10 (OH) 2 , is recorded for the first time in metamorphosed manganese formation of Gangpur group in eastern India. It is associated with spessartine, jacobsite, calcite, rhodochrosite and muscovite which seemingly formed...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1998
Mineralogical Magazine (1998) 62 (6): 847–856.
...B. R. Nayak; B. K. Mohapatra Abstract Pyrophanite is widely distributed in metamorphic, Mn-rich rock assemblages of the Gangpur Group, India. It occurs in two distinct habits: as an independent phase, and as an exsolved phase within hematite. The well developed large sized crystals coexist...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1998
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1998) 51 (4): 509–516.
...B. K. Mohapatra; B. R. Nayak Abstract Manganite ?-MnOOH, in the manganese-rich rocks of Precambrian Gangpur Group, Sundargarh district, Orissa, shows dissimilar fabrics and belongs to three generations but has more or less similar chemical composition. It occurs as patchy inclusions, accicular...
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1997
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1997) 49 (3): 331–336.
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1983
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1983) 24 (10): 522–532.
...A. K. Chaudhuri; A. B. Pal Abstract Gangpur Group, an important Precambrian metasedimentary sequence near Rourkela in eastern India shows an easterly antiformal closure, but the northerly younging towards the core shown by cross beds in the southern limb proves large scale inversion. Three...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1980
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1980) 21 (12): 617–622.
...A. K. Chaudhuri; A. B. Pal; A. Roy Abstract Three phases of folding have been detected in a large exposure along the Sapai lladi near Amaidegri (22°01': 84°08') in the Ghoriajhor manganese belt in the western part of the Gangpur Group. Reclined to inclined folds (F 1 ) plunging SSE have been...
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1980
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1980) 21 (10): 492–496.
...A. K. Chaudhuri; A. B. Pal Abstract Shape analysis of a large number of pebbles from a 60 km stretch of the basal Raghunathpalli conglomerate in the Gangpur Group in eastern India, indicates that a flattening strain on originally constricted pebbles during the earliest folding episode gave rise...
Image
Tourmaline compositions from the Upper Bonai and Gangpur Group granitoids plotted in (a, b) triangular diagrams after Hawthorne & Henry (1999) and (c, d) the Al–Fe–Mg triangular diagrams.
Published: 05 April 2021
Fig. 5. Tourmaline compositions from the Upper Bonai and Gangpur Group granitoids plotted in (a, b) triangular diagrams after Hawthorne & Henry ( 1999 ) and (c, d) the Al–Fe–Mg triangular diagrams.
Journal Article
Published: 05 April 2021
Geological Magazine (2021) 158 (9): 1657–1670.
...Fig. 5. Tourmaline compositions from the Upper Bonai and Gangpur Group granitoids plotted in (a, b) triangular diagrams after Hawthorne & Henry ( 1999 ) and (c, d) the Al–Fe–Mg triangular diagrams. ...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Major-element plots for tourmalines from (a, c, e, g) Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite and (b, d, f, h) Gangpur Group granitoids. (a) The Mg concentration increases and X-site vacancy decreases in the type 2 tourmaline rim. (b) In the Gangpur Group the Mg concentration is lowest in the tourmalines from the pegmatite. (c, d) The variation in Fe and Mg concentration obtained from the granitoid tourmalines in Upper Bonai and Gangpur Group, respectively. (e, f) Al(T)+Al(Y) versus Mg+Si for the tourmalines in the granitoids from Upper Bonai and Gangpur Group. (g, h) Mg versus Ti for the granitoid tourmalines from Upper Bonai and Gangpur Group.
Published: 05 April 2021
Fig. 6. Major-element plots for tourmalines from (a, c, e, g) Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite and (b, d, f, h) Gangpur Group granitoids. (a) The Mg concentration increases and X-site vacancy decreases in the type 2 tourmaline rim. (b) In the Gangpur Group the Mg concentration is lowest
Image
Backscattered electron (BSE) images of tourmaline grains documenting microtextural relations in granites and pegmatites, from the (a–c) Upper Bonai and (d–i) Gangpur groups. (a) Type 1 tourmaline grain intergrown with k-feldspar in Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite; note the outer Mg-rich layer and the Fe-rich core. (b) Type 2 tourmaline grain intergrown with k-feldspar and quartz in Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite. (c) Type 2 tourmaline with concentric zoned rim in Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite. (d, e) Tourmaline intergrown with k-feldspar and quartz in Gangpur Group pegmatite. (f, g) Oscillatory zoned tourmaline crystals in the Gangpur Group granite. (h, i) Tourmalines in the Gangpur Group pegmatite showing oscillatory zoning and compositional variation from core to rim.
Published: 05 April 2021
Fig. 3. Backscattered electron (BSE) images of tourmaline grains documenting microtextural relations in granites and pegmatites, from the (a–c) Upper Bonai and (d–i) Gangpur groups. (a) Type 1 tourmaline grain intergrown with k-feldspar in Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite; note the outer Mg
Image
Photographs illustrating field relations and mesoscopic structures in the S-type granites and pegmatites from the Upper Bonai and Gangpur Group granite and pegmatite: (a, b) Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite; (c) Gangpur Group pegmatite, hosted in granite (note the graphic intergrowth of quartz and feldspar in the I-zone and the growth of tourmalines perpendicular to the pegmatite wall); and (d) older schist enclave in the Gangpur Group S-type granite.
Published: 05 April 2021
Fig. 2. Photographs illustrating field relations and mesoscopic structures in the S-type granites and pegmatites from the Upper Bonai and Gangpur Group granite and pegmatite: (a, b) Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite; (c) Gangpur Group pegmatite, hosted in granite (note the graphic intergrowth
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2014
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2014) 84 (4): 385–396.
... mineralisation environment. The Precambrian Gangpur basin comprising volcanic free sedimentary sequence is considered as a potential geological setting for hosting uranium mineralisation. The Gangpur basin with metasediments of low to medium metamorphic grade classified as the Gangpur Group are known for hosting...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1972
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (1972) 13 (4): 392–398.
... of the fault zone, para-metamorphites of the Gangpur group are exposed, within which are seen a number of isolated. linear, lensoid and irregular bodies of granite. The present paper deals with the study of fracture patterns in the southern 7 km portion of the fault zone and the surrounding metasediments...
Image
X-ray elemental images, photomicrographs and BSE images showing the variations of δ11B in different textural zones of tourmaline from the (a–c) Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite (GNG-9); (d) Gangpur Group granite (GNG-45, 42); and (e, f) Gangpur Group pegmatite (GNG-11).
Published: 05 April 2021
Fig. 8. X-ray elemental images, photomicrographs and BSE images showing the variations of δ 11 B in different textural zones of tourmaline from the (a–c) Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite (GNG-9); (d) Gangpur Group granite (GNG-45, 42); and (e, f) Gangpur Group pegmatite (GNG-11).
Image
X-ray elemental maps, of the tourmalines from the (a) Upper Bonai Group and (b–d) Gangpur Group.
Published: 05 April 2021
Fig. 4. X-ray elemental maps, of the tourmalines from the (a) Upper Bonai Group and (b–d) Gangpur Group.
Image
Summary of the paragenetic evolution of tourmalines in the Upper Bonai and Gangpur Group granitoids.
Published: 05 April 2021
Fig. 12. Summary of the paragenetic evolution of tourmalines in the Upper Bonai and Gangpur Group granitoids.
Image
Bivariate plots of X-site vacancy versus Mg/(Mg+Fe) for tourmalines in the (a) Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite; and (b) Gangpur Group granite and pegmatite.
Published: 05 April 2021
Fig. 7. Bivariate plots of X-site vacancy versus Mg/(Mg+Fe) for tourmalines in the (a) Upper Bonai Group granite pegmatite; and (b) Gangpur Group granite and pegmatite.
Image
Lithological map of the study area showing disposition of the manganiferous gonditic- and other rock types in part of the Gangpur Group
Published: 01 October 2020
Fig.1. Lithological map of the study area showing disposition of the manganiferous gonditic- and other rock types in part of the Gangpur Group