1-20 OF 214 RESULTS FOR

Gams Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Schematic section of the upper parts of the Gams Formation showing the distribution of ores and metalliferous host-rocks.
Published: 01 April 2005
F ig . 2. Schematic section of the upper parts of the Gams Formation showing the distribution of ores and metalliferous host-rocks.
Image
Schematic cross-sections through the Gams Formation. (a) Section through the base metal ore body at Gamsberg North. (b) Section through the barite body in the southeastern part of Gamsberg. The ore-equivalent schist pinches out as a pyritic quartz-sillimanite-muscovite schist and underlies the unit of massive to laminated barite. The position of borehole Gam77 is indicated.
Published: 01 March 2005
Figure 4. Schematic cross-sections through the Gams Formation. ( a ) Section through the base metal ore body at Gamsberg North. ( b ) Section through the barite body in the southeastern part of Gamsberg. The ore-equivalent schist pinches out as a pyritic quartz-sillimanite-muscovite schist
Image
Summary of the chemical trends within the Gams Formation. The arrows indicate the direction of increased element concentrations. Elements in parentheses decrease in the direction of the arrows.
Published: 01 March 2005
Figure 10. Summary of the chemical trends within the Gams Formation. The arrows indicate the direction of increased element concentrations. Elements in parentheses decrease in the direction of the arrows.
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2005
The Canadian Mineralogist (2005) 43 (2): 585–599.
...F ig . 2. Schematic section of the upper parts of the Gams Formation showing the distribution of ores and metalliferous host-rocks. ...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2012
South African Journal of Geology (2012) 115 (4): 449–464.
... (the Gams Formation), most detailed studies have in the past been restricted to the disrupted zone. The complete stratigraphic column can however be compiled in the zone of lower strain, where it is apparent that the metasediments may be divided into six units. The units of the Aggeneys Subgroup (mentioned...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1973
Journal of the Geological Society (1973) 129 (5): 481–503.
...BRYAN D. T. LYNAS Abstract The stratigraphy, faulting, mineralization and metamorphism of the Upper Cambrian and Ordovician rocks are described. Newly erected formation names are the Afon Gam Formation (Upper Cambrian), the Carnedd Iago, Serw, Llyn Conwy and Rhiw Bach Formations (Ordovician). Two...
Image
Surface geology of the Gamsberg deposit. The distribution of barite within the Gams Formation is indicated. Sections A-A’ and B-B’ refer to cross-sections depicted in Figure 4.
Published: 01 March 2005
Figure 3. Surface geology of the Gamsberg deposit. The distribution of barite within the Gams Formation is indicated. Sections A-A’ and B-B’ refer to cross-sections depicted in Figure 4 .
Image
Detrital zircon (core) age histograms illustrating the district similarities between patterns obtained for the Koeris Formation of McClung (2006) and the Hotson (Gams) Formation of Cornell et al. (2009). The Wortel and Kouboom Subgroups (McClung, 2006) are included for comparison.
Published: 01 December 2009
F ig . 3. Detrital zircon (core) age histograms illustrating the district similarities between patterns obtained for the Koeris Formation of McClung (2006) and the Hotson (Gams) Formation of Cornell et al. (2009) . The Wortel and Kouboom Subgroups ( McClung, 2006 ) are included for comparison.
Image
Geology of the Black Mountain (Swartberg) region (modified from Strydom et al., 1987). Section A-B illustrates the duplication of the Gams Formation (the host of stratified sulphide bodies) as a series of imbricate structures.
Published: 01 December 2012
Figure. 8 Geology of the Black Mountain (Swartberg) region (modified from Strydom et al., 1987 ). Section A-B illustrates the duplication of the Gams Formation (the host of stratified sulphide bodies) as a series of imbricate structures.
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2012
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2012) 53 (7): 623–635.
... at deposits in different districts of the Lo Gam structure revealed wide variations in trace elements, which distinguish them from typical stratiform deposits and indicate their specific formation conditions. High trace-element contents might be important in the mining of these deposits (Song et al., 1994...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Image
Chemical characteristics of the amphibolite of the Koeris Formation at Gamsberg. (a) N-MORB-normalised trace-element diagram (Sun and McDonough, 1989); (b) N-MORB-normalised immobile trace-element diagram (Sun and McDonough, 1989).
Published: 01 December 2022
Figure 6. Chemical characteristics of the amphibolite of the Koeris Formation at Gamsberg. ( a ) N-MORB-normalised trace-element diagram ( Sun and McDonough, 1989 ); ( b ) N-MORB-normalised immobile trace-element diagram ( Sun and McDonough, 1989 ).
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 December 2009
Economic Geology (2009) 104 (8): 1277–1281.
...F ig . 3. Detrital zircon (core) age histograms illustrating the district similarities between patterns obtained for the Koeris Formation of McClung (2006) and the Hotson (Gams) Formation of Cornell et al. (2009) . The Wortel and Kouboom Subgroups ( McClung, 2006 ) are included for comparison. ...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2005
South African Journal of Geology (2005) 108 (1): 35–50.
...Figure 4. Schematic cross-sections through the Gams Formation. ( a ) Section through the base metal ore body at Gamsberg North. ( b ) Section through the barite body in the southeastern part of Gamsberg. The ore-equivalent schist pinches out as a pyritic quartz-sillimanite-muscovite schist...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Stratigraphical features of the five recumbent fold nappes comprising the Aggeneys duplex structure. The thicknesses were measured in the exposed cores of the structures. In the interest of diagrammatic clarity, the positions of the sections have been omitted from the inset map in the lower left corner. The various formations of the Aggeneys Subgroup, of which two feature prominently in this diagram (Hotson and Koeris) have been described in detail by Praekelt and Schoch, 1997 and Praekelt et al., 1992. The Gams and Kouboom formations are regarded as members of the Hotson Formation in the detailed descriptions (op. cit.). Rozendaal (1978) suggested formation status for the Gams.
Published: 01 December 2002
in the lower left corner. The various formations of the Aggeneys Subgroup, of which two feature prominently in this diagram (Hotson and Koeris) have been described in detail by Praekelt and Schoch, 1997 and Praekelt et al. , 1992 . The Gams and Kouboom formations are regarded as members of the Hotson
Image
Sand body prediction of Shaximiao Formation no. 7 in central Sichuan using different models: (a) GAM, (b) RF, (c) SVM, and (d) BRT.
Published: 23 September 2024
Figure 8. Sand body prediction of Shaximiao Formation no. 7 in central Sichuan using different models: (a) GAM, (b) RF, (c) SVM, and (d) BRT.
Image
U-Pb concordia diagram for zircons from Koeris Formation amphibolite (sample Gams-4) from the Gamsberg inselberg.
Published: 01 March 2007
Figure 14. U-Pb concordia diagram for zircons from Koeris Formation amphibolite (sample Gams-4) from the Gamsberg inselberg.
Image
Primaryfeatures preserved in the low strainpressure shadow ofthe Gamsberg sheathfold. (a) Boulder conglomerate with iron formation clasts which unconformably overlies the Gams Member (b) Amygdaloidal amphibolite from the top of the Koeris Formation, (c) Lava flow breccia in the amphibolite unit of the Koeris Formation, (d) Cross bedding in shallow water siliciclastic sediments ofthe same Formation.
Published: 01 March 2017
Figure 20. Primaryfeatures preserved in the low strainpressure shadow ofthe Gamsberg sheathfold. (a) Boulder conglomerate with iron formation clasts which unconformably overlies the Gams Member (b) Amygdaloidal amphibolite from the top of the Koeris Formation, (c) Lava flow breccia
Image
Diagrammatic representation of the lithostratigraphy of the Gams Iron Formation. The main part of Zn-Pb sulphide mineralization is hosted by the North Body, whereas iron formations are best developed by its lateral extensions (Overturned Limb). The graftonite-bearing iron formations are found towards the top of the C1 unit of the Overturned Limb.
Published: 01 December 2002
F ig . 2. Diagrammatic representation of the lithostratigraphy of the Gams Iron Formation. The main part of Zn-Pb sulphide mineralization is hosted by the North Body, whereas iron formations are best developed by its lateral extensions (Overturned Limb). The graftonite-bearing iron formations
Image
Figure 12.
Published: 01 March 2017
Figure 12. (a) The Gamsberg zinc deposit is the type area of the Gams Member, its distribution is shown in a simplified geological map of the Gamsberg basin. The position ofthe main ore bodies are indicated as well as the perimeters ofthe planned open cast mine ( Table 1 ). (b) Verticaland
Image
Variation of gammacerane/C24 tetracyclic terpane (Tet) with gammacerane/αβ C30 hopane (Gam/αβ C30 H) for source-rock samples from the Bozhong subbasin, Bohai Bay basin. E2s1+2 = first and second members of the Shahejie Formation; E2s3 = third member of the Shahejie Formation; E3d3 = third member of the Dongying Formation.
Published: 01 March 2017
Figure 16. Variation of gammacerane/C 24 tetracyclic terpane (Tet) with gammacerane/αβ C 30 hopane (Gam/αβ C 30 H) for source-rock samples from the Bozhong subbasin, Bohai Bay basin. E 2 s 1+2 = first and second members of the Shahejie Formation; E 2 s 3 = third member of the Shahejie