1-20 OF 54 RESULTS FOR

Gamagara Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2006
South African Journal of Geology (2006) 109 (1-2): 123–138.
...Kosei E. Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Ohmoto Abstract The occurrence of red shales in Precambrian sedimentary rocks has been used to infer the presence of free O 2 in the atmosphere. Red shale samples from the ~2.2 Ga Gamagara/Mapedi Formation of the Postmasburg Group, South Africa were analyzed...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 28 October 2019
Geology (2020) 48 (1): 44–48.
... laterites, which indicate a highly oxygenated atmosphere and suggest hot and humid climatic conditions. The Mapedi and Gamagara Formations are undated east of the Blackridge thrust but were thought to be lithological correlatives of the ≥1.91 Ga Mapedi red bed sequence to the west. Here, we report a U-Pb...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2020
South African Journal of Geology (2020) 123 (1): 1–18.
... at the base of the ~2.0 Ga red-bed succession of the Gamagara Formation of the Elim Group (Keis Supergroup). Tracking element mobility in the weathered diabase relative to unaltered parent material assists the reconstruction of surface conditions and the nature of pore waters associated with weathering...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2019
South African Journal of Geology (2019) 122 (2): 187–220.
.../Gamagara Formation recognised as the regional unconformity between the Keis supergroup and the underlying rocks of the Transvaal Supergroup in the Griqualand West area. The Keis supergroup is subdivided from the base upwards into the Elim-, Olifantshoek-, Groblershoop - and Wilgenhoutsdrif groups...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Image
The paleolatitudinal setting of the Kaapvaal craton during the development of the Pre-Gamagara Formation unconformity (Evans et al., 2002) against the paleolatitudinal drift of the craton from 2.43 Ga (Gumsley et al., 2017), through 2.06 Ga (Letts et al., 2009), up to 1.93 Ga (Alebouyeh Semami et al., 2016). Note that the paleolatitude of pre-Gamagara Formation weathering is supported either at 2.2 Ga (Option 1) or at 2.0 Ga (Option 2).
Published: 01 March 2020
Figure 11. The paleolatitudinal setting of the Kaapvaal craton during the development of the Pre-Gamagara Formation unconformity ( Evans et al., 2002 ) against the paleolatitudinal drift of the craton from 2.43 Ga ( Gumsley et al., 2017 ), through 2.06 Ga ( Letts et al., 2009 ), up to 1.93 Ga
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 December 1996
Economic Geology (1996) 91 (8): 1435–1454.
... Supergroup. The ferruginous manganese orebodies are irregularly shaped and confined by the karst surface of the Reivilo Formation of the Campbellrand Subgroup. They formed as infill of karst depressions and are conformably overlain by a hematite pebble conglomerate and aluminous shales of the Gamagara...
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 March 1998
Geology (1998) 26 (3): 263–266.
... of the Early Proterozoic Gamagara Formation in paleokarst depressions on the Campbellrand dolomite, Transvaal Supergroup, South Africa. The paleosol profiles are very well preserved and show zoning, relict soil textures, and chemical composition virtually identical to those of modern laterites. The pisolitic...
Image
Stratigraphy of sampled borehole GHEX-59 in the Avontuur deposit and detail of the paleoweathering profile developed below the basal Gamagara Formation of the Elim Group.
Published: 01 March 2020
Figure 2. Stratigraphy of sampled borehole GHEX-59 in the Avontuur deposit and detail of the paleoweathering profile developed below the basal Gamagara Formation of the Elim Group.
Image
Summary of new stratigraphic correlations for the Mapedi and Gamagara Formations in Griqualand West, South Africa. BR—Blackridge; Yellow—sandstone; yellow with black ellipses—conglomerate; green—basalt; dark red to khaki—red beds; red—banded iron formation; black—Mn-rich beds; light blue—carbonate; brown—diamictite.
Published: 28 October 2019
Figure 4. Summary of new stratigraphic correlations for the Mapedi and Gamagara Formations in Griqualand West, South Africa. BR—Blackridge; Yellow—sandstone; yellow with black ellipses—conglomerate; green—basalt; dark red to khaki—red beds; red—banded iron formation; black—Mn-rich beds; light
Image
(a) Photograph of GHEX-59 drill core showing the basal Doornfontein Conglomerate Member (abbreviated Mb.) of the Gamagara Formation developed unconformable against an albitized diabase sill that become progressively less altered with depth. (b) Detail of the Doornfontein Conglomerate Member contact against the altered sill, with a clast of relatively unaltered diabase in the conglomerate.
Published: 01 March 2020
Figure 3. ( a ) Photograph of GHEX-59 drill core showing the basal Doornfontein Conglomerate Member (abbreviated Mb.) of the Gamagara Formation developed unconformable against an albitized diabase sill that become progressively less altered with depth. ( b ) Detail of the Doornfontein
Image
(a) Photomicrograph of the relatively unaltered diabase sampled well below the pre-Gamagara Formation unconformity. (b) and (c). Photomicrographs of incipiently altered diabase in the lower paleosaprolite. (d). Photomicrograph of the upper paleosaprolite. PLG = plagioclase (albite), CPX = clinopyroxene (augite), CHL = chlorite, SER = sericite, MUSC = muscovite. Scale bar = 500 μm.
Published: 01 March 2020
Figure 4. ( a ) Photomicrograph of the relatively unaltered diabase sampled well below the pre-Gamagara Formation unconformity. ( b ) and ( c ). Photomicrographs of incipiently altered diabase in the lower paleosaprolite. ( d ). Photomicrograph of the upper paleosaprolite. PLG = plagioclase
Image
Detailed geologic map adjacent to the western margin of the Kaapvaal craton, showing the location of seismic lines KBF03A (A) subcrop map) and KBF01 (B) outcrop map). More than 90% of the surface of A is covered by Kalahari sand of thickness varying from 0 to 180m. The stratigraphic position of the Gamagara Formation (*) is contested, as discussed in the text. Geology simplified from the 1: 1 000 000 Geological Map of South Africa (1984).
Published: 01 June 2002
. The stratigraphic position of the Gamagara Formation (*) is contested, as discussed in the text. Geology simplified from the 1: 1 000 000 Geological Map of South Africa (1984).
Image
A plot of Eu/Eu* vs. Ce/Ce* for shales from the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation. Also shown (open square) are those values for the reworked materials (red shales), laterite, and basalt of the lateritic weathering profile that developed in the Hekpoort Basalt of the Pretoria Group (data are from Yang and Holland, 2003). Error bars indicate ±1σ values. Eu/Eu*PAAS = [Eusample/EuPAAS]/[(Smsample/SmPAAS + Gdsample/GdPAAS)/2] and Ce/Ce*PAAS = [Cesample/CePAAS]/[(Lasample/LaPAAS + Prsample/PrPAAS)/2]. The Eu/Eu* and Ce/Ce* values for PAAS (cross symbols) are 1 by definition.
Published: 01 June 2006
Figure 14. A plot of Eu/Eu* vs. Ce/Ce* for shales from the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation. Also shown (open square) are those values for the reworked materials (red shales), laterite, and basalt of the lateritic weathering profile that developed in the Hekpoort Basalt of the Pretoria Group (data
Series: Reviews in Economic Geology
Published: 01 January 2008
DOI: 10.5382/Rev.15.12
EISBN: 9781629490229
... iron formations, was developed in the basin (Beukes, 1980 ). However, in the Maremane dome area, the Griquatown Iron Formation has been almost entirely removed by erosion along an unconformity separating the banded iron formations from the overlying clastic sediments of the Gamagara Formation. F...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2011
European Journal of Mineralogy (2011) 23 (4): 661–673.
.... Subsequent to the development of these paleo-regolith features, sediments of the Gamagara Formation of the Olifantshoek Supergroup were deposited, followed by tectonic activity related to the ~1800-Ma Kheis orogeny ( Cornell et al. , 1998 ). Thrusting included both the Transvaal-Supergroup basement...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Comparisons of (a) (c) major and (b) (d) minor/trace element compositions between laterite (ferricrete) vs. directly overlying reworked materials (red shales) of the lateritic weathering profile that developed in the Hekpoort Basalt of the Pretoria Group (stratigraphic equivalent of the Ongeluk basalt underlying the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation; see Figure 2; Beukes et al., 2002), and those between the lower section red shales of the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation vs. the reworked materials of said weathering profile. Units used: (a) (c) [weight %] and (b) (d) [ppm]. Error bars indicate ±1σ values. Data of the Hekpoort weathering profile are from Yang and Holland (2003).
Published: 01 June 2006
equivalent of the Ongeluk basalt underlying the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation; see Figure 2 ; Beukes et al. , 2002 ), and those between the lower section red shales of the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation vs. the reworked materials of said weathering profile. Units used: ( a ) ( c ) [weight %] and ( b ) ( d ) [ppm
Image
Comparisons of (a) major (weight %) and (b) minor/ trace element (ppm) compositions between the upper and lower section samples of the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation. Error bars indicate ±1σ values.
Published: 01 June 2006
Figure 3. Comparisons of (a) major (weight %) and (b) minor/ trace element (ppm) compositions between the upper and lower section samples of the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation. Error bars indicate ±1σ values.
Image
Plots of (a) Corg vs. Nbulk contents and (b) Corg contents vs. δ13Corg values of shales from the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation.
Published: 01 June 2006
Figure 6. Plots of (a) C org vs. N bulk contents and (b) C org contents vs. δ 13 C org values of shales from the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation.
Image
A plot of Th/Sc weight ratios vs. Al2O3/TiO2 weight ratios of shales from the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation. A positive correlation exists for the lower section samples (R = 0.99).
Published: 01 June 2006
Figure 8. A plot of Th/Sc weight ratios vs. Al 2 O 3 /TiO 2 weight ratios of shales from the Gamagara/Mapedi Formation. A positive correlation exists for the lower section samples (R = 0.99).
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 02 October 2019
Geology (2019) 47 (12): 1131–1135.
... hematite ore deposits occur below the unconformity in >2.4 Ga iron formations ( Smith and Beukes, 2016 ). Above the unconformity, a basal conglomerate comprising detrital hematite clasts is developed in the base of the Gamagara Formation. Paleomagnetic data indicate that some of the hematite enrichment...
FIGURES | View All (4)