1-20 OF 391 RESULTS FOR

GEONET

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 02 February 2016
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2016) 106 (2): 806–811.
... Positioning System ( GPS ) observations from GEONET to reveal the phases of multiple surface waves. Even though multipath effects and common mode errors are not reduced, the wave packages of G 2 / G 3 of Love waves and R 2 / R 3 of Rayleigh waves are clearly identified from the raw GPS displacement time...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Published: 22 April 2014
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2014) 104 (3): 1567–1577.
...S. J. Rastin; C. P. Unsworth; K. R. Gledhill Abstract The New Zealand GeoNet P ‐phase picker’s performance can be significantly improved, by up to 70%, when Mexican hat and Haar wavelet scale thresholding ( WST ) is implemented in the preprocessing stage of manually picked events. In total, 811...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2013
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2013) 103 (4): 2173–2187.
... and noise‐contaminated synthetic data are applied to the GeoNet P and S pickers. The simulation results are validated by comparing the outputs of the GeoNet picking system for the 2008 Matata earthquakes with the synthetic data and matching noise level. We chose to perform the study on year 2008 because...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Series: GSA Special Papers
Published: 01 January 2006
DOI: 10.1130/2006.2397(13)
... for the GeoNet system. The use-case diagram shows a user perspective of the system. The ovals represent the different uses of the system; the stick figures represent the external entities that interact with the system. Figure 3. High-level view of GeoNet. GeoNet's architecture consists of a layered...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Series: DNAG, Geology of North America
Published: 01 January 1988
DOI: 10.1130/DNAG-GNA-O2.177
EISBN: 9780813754673
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1936
Seismological Research Letters (1936) 8 (1-2): 77–80.
Image
MAG‐PHA values versus <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span>  K . (a; inset) Change in normalized <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> we...
Published: 01 March 2017
Figure 4. MAG‐PHA values versus GeoNet K . (a; inset) Change in normalized GeoNet website visits ( K ) versus associated earthquake magnitude ( M L ). (b) Heaviside step function results for normalized GeoNet daily website traffic and corresponding MAG‐PHA values.
Image
▴ The <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> first motion solution ( top ), <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> regional moment tensor (...
Published: 01 May 2011
Figure 4. ▴ The GeoNet first motion solution ( top ), GeoNet regional moment tensor ( middle ), and U.S. Geological Survey centroid moment tensor ( bottom ) focal mechanisms of the Darfield earthquake with some of the key parameters noted: the strike/dip/rake of both nodal planes (NP
Image
Location of depth &amp;lt;40 km events in the 1990–2020 <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> catalog. The red...
Published: 09 February 2022
Figure 2. Location of depth <40 km events in the 1990–2020 GeoNet catalog. The red polygon represents the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability region ( Gerstenberger and Rhoades, 2010 ). Moderate‐to‐large earthquakes ( M w ≥ 6 ) are also highlighted. The color
Image
Magnitude–frequency distribution of the 1990–2020 <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> catalog, for event...
Published: 09 February 2022
Figure 3. Magnitude–frequency distribution of the 1990–2020 GeoNet catalog, for events with depths less than 40 km and M w magnitudes. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
Frequency–magnitude distribution (FMD) of <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> catalog events (red) and d...
Published: 18 May 2021
Figure 6. Frequency–magnitude distribution (FMD) of GeoNet catalog events (red) and detections (blue) found via template matching within the three subregions. The green line shows the enhanced catalog, combining the catalog and the detections. The fitted FMD line is plotted with a gray dashed
Image
Earthquake probability tables and explanatory text shown on the <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> webs...
Published: 02 September 2020
Figure 1. Earthquake probability tables and explanatory text shown on the GeoNet website as at 19 December 2016 ( GeoNet, 2016 ). The aftershock probability forecast area “box” represents a resident population of just over a million people, with 471,000 living in the Wellington region alone
Image
<span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> scenarios after the Kaikōura earthquake, as at 19 December 2016 ( Ge...
Published: 02 September 2020
Figure 2. GeoNet scenarios after the Kaikōura earthquake, as at 19 December 2016 ( GeoNet, 2016 ). The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
(a) Difference in magnitude between the <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> catalog magnitudes and magni...
Published: 19 May 2015
Figure 4. (a) Difference in magnitude between the GeoNet catalog magnitudes and magnitudes estimated by Lawrence et al. (2014) using offline simulation. We use QCN‐determined locations. Estimates are shown for the first (iteration A), second (iteration B), and final (final iteration
Image
The initial  P ‐wave signal from an earthquake (2016p661723 in the <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> c...
Published: 11 December 2018
Figure A2. The initial P ‐wave signal from an earthquake (2016p661723 in the GeoNet catalog) approximately 440 km east of the Auckland volcanic field (AVF), on 1 September 2016. Note the different polarity on the ABAZ EHE and EPAZ EH2 channels in the highlighted band.The color version
Image
Location comparison of the <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> and waveform cross‐correlation locations ...
Published: 18 July 2018
Figure 4. Location comparison of the GeoNet and waveform cross‐correlation locations in the North Island, New Zealand. (a,b) GeoNet location. (c,d) Waveform cross‐correlation relocation starting from the GeoNet location using the L3 norm. Inset map in (b) shows the location of the study area (red
Image
(a) Magnitude versus time from the reviewed <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> catalog. The different c...
Published: 13 June 2018
Figure 1. (a) Magnitude versus time from the reviewed GeoNet catalog. The different colors indicate the sequences of events with M ≥ 5.9 . (b) Map view of the seismic sequence, color coded in agreement with (a). Fault lines are from the New Zealand Active Fault Database, and the thicker
Image
Model 2 landslide hazard and risk model results based on the <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span> Shakema...
Published: 27 March 2018
Figure 5. Model 2 landslide hazard and risk model results based on the GeoNet Shakemap v.1, completed at 12:30 hrs on 16 November UTC ( + 3 days 1 hrs 28 min). (a) Input ground shaking model from GeoNet. The halo of low‐intensity shaking along the entire coastline resulted from an anomaly
Image
Coseismic displacements at the <span class="search-highlight">GEONET</span> and GPSA sites: (a) Horizontal, (b) v...
Published: 01 March 2013
Figure 6. Coseismic displacements at the GEONET and GPSA sites: (a) Horizontal, (b) vertical components. Solid and white arrows show those of GEONET and GPSA sites, respectively. Coordinates of GEONET sites are provided by GSI. Displacements of GPSA sites are taken from Sato et al. (2011
Image
P    onset retrieval by applying the WST waveforms to the <span class="search-highlight">GeoNet</span>  P ‐phase ...
Published: 21 November 2017
Figure 4. P onset retrieval by applying the WST waveforms to the GeoNet P ‐phase picker for events 3080459 and 2974485 recorded by Stations URZ and LIRZ stations, respectively. The Butterworth‐filtered waveforms recorded by Stations (a) URZ and (b) LIRZ, where the onset was not detected