1-20 OF 816 RESULTS FOR

GCM

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2005
Geological Magazine (2005) 142 (4): 399–417.
... Ocean sites. These are compared with SST estimates from fossil assemblages for the ‘Time Slab’ 3.29–2.97 Ma and with estimates from a fully coupled ocean–atmosphere General Circulation Model (GCM) for the same time interval. Most SST estimates derived from the δ 18 O data indicate a cooler ocean surface...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1997
Journal of the Geological Society (1997) 154 (5): 769–772.
... made using a General Circulation Model (GCM). The predictions have been compared with the known distribution of these deposits. Such an approach provides a means of identifying and isolating which components of the GCM accurately reflect palaeoclimate. The prediction of peats and bauxites...
... that are smaller than GCM (General Circulation Model) grid spacing, and (3) observational data bases for calibrating modern climate simulations are few. This study, which uses a GCM to depict arid climates of the past and present, is designed to evaluate a variety of simulated hydrologic variables...
Series: SEPM Short Course Notes
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.2110/scn.94.03.0235
EISBN: 9781565762534
Series: SEPM Short Course Notes
Published: 01 January 1994
DOI: 10.2110/scn.94.03.0263
EISBN: 9781565762534
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1992
GSA Bulletin (1992) 104 (5): 543–559.
... (GCM) at the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, include realistic representations of paleocontinental distribution, topography, epeiric seas, and vegetation, in order to facilitate comparisons between model results and paleoclimate data. Three major features of the simulated Early Jurassic climate...
Image
Summary statistics of the 118 inverted events comparing values from the GCMT and this study. We compare (a) magnitude, (b) double‐couple percentage, (c) preferred depth, and (d) the variance reduction. GCMT values are plotted on the x‐axis for all the panels, and the results of this study are plotted on the y‐axis. The red dashed line represents the one‐to‐one line of the two values. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 22 July 2024
Figure 3. Summary statistics of the 118 inverted events comparing values from the GCMT and this study. We compare (a) magnitude, (b) double‐couple percentage, (c) preferred depth, and (d) the variance reduction. GCMT values are plotted on the x ‐axis for all the panels, and the results of this st
Image
General circulation model (GCM)–derived estimates of water discharge and sediment flux. (A, B) Mean annual water discharge in units of m3/s (part A) and m3/yr (part B). (C, D) Mean water discharge during the wettest month of a simulated year in units of m3/s (part C) and m3/yr (part D). (E, F) Mean annual suspended sediment flux in units of m3/s (part E) and m3/yr (part F). Shaded regions indicate the 25th–75th percentiles of estimates.
Published: 26 September 2023
Figure 8. General circulation model (GCM)–derived estimates of water discharge and sediment flux. (A, B) Mean annual water discharge in units of m 3 /s (part A) and m 3 /yr (part B). (C, D) Mean water discharge during the wettest month of a simulated year in units of m 3 /s (part C) and m 3 /yr
Image
Published: 01 February 2023
Table 2. Site period comparison between measured and SASID site periods ( GCM, 2020 ) and seismic zone comparison between the 2004 NTC-DS site period map ( GDF, 2004 ) and a proposed seismic zone according to the results of this study Site Latitude Longitude Measured site
Image
Photographs of well-rounded and poorly sorted conglomerates (Gmm and Gcm; see Table 1) at the Lulehe section (A–F) in the northern QB. The number in the white box is the approximate depth of the conglomerate horizon. Hammer is 33 cm long.
Published: 14 February 2022
Figure 5. Photographs of well-rounded and poorly sorted conglomerates (Gmm and Gcm; see Table 1 ) at the Lulehe section (A–F) in the northern QB. The number in the white box is the approximate depth of the conglomerate horizon. Hammer is 33 cm long.
Image
Abundant cobble-boulder conglomerates (mainly Gcm, Gmm, and Gcmi) in the lower part of the Lulehe Formation at the localities of Lulehe, Yuqia, Dahonggou, and Yinmaxia in the northern Qaidam Basin. See Table 1 for lithofacies codes.
Published: 20 December 2018
Figure 7. Abundant cobble-boulder conglomerates (mainly Gcm, Gmm, and Gcmi) in the lower part of the Lulehe Formation at the localities of Lulehe, Yuqia, Dahonggou, and Yinmaxia in the northern Qaidam Basin. See Table 1 for lithofacies codes.
Image
Published: 06 July 2018
TABLE 2. REGIONAL b VALUE CALCULATIONS BASED ON GLOBAL CENTROID MOMENT TENSOR (GCMT) CATALOG DATA
Image
Synthetic model of the glaciofluvial deposits: Gcm has a thickness of 0.15 m and is composed of fine sands and 85% gravels; Gcm,b has a thickness of 0.65 m and is composed of a bimodal mixing of fine to medium sand and gravel; S-x is composed of well-sorted medium sand without the presence of silt or clay; and Gc-,o mainly consists of poorly to moderately sorted matrix-free gravels with <10% sand. Locations of probes are represented by red dots.
Published: 01 July 2016
Fig. 8. Synthetic model of the glaciofluvial deposits: Gcm has a thickness of 0.15 m and is composed of fine sands and 85% gravels; Gcm,b has a thickness of 0.65 m and is composed of a bimodal mixing of fine to medium sand and gravel; S-x is composed of well-sorted medium sand without
Image
Lambda Rho extraction [GPa*gcm−3] against profile distance (a) and Lambda Rho elastic attribute seismic section (b). Bivariate statistical analysis supports presence of a geobody outboard of three negative standard deviations (–3σ) which correspond to the half-width of a Gaussian distribution.
Published: 11 February 2014
Figure 7. Lambda Rho extraction [ GPa * gcm − 3 ] against profile distance (a) and Lambda Rho elastic attribute seismic section (b). Bivariate statistical analysis supports presence of a geobody outboard of three negative standard deviations (–3σ) which correspond to the half
Image
Orbital parameter regime used in coupled general circulation model (GCM)–ice sheet model simulations. Precession (PR), obliquity (OB), and eccentricity (EC) have sinusoidal periods of 20, 40, and 80 ka, respectively (after Deconto and Pollard, 2003), and their values are based on Plio–Pleistocene maxima and/or minima (Berger and Loutre, 1991). Ice volumes are predicted at 5 ka intervals (as indicated by vertical lines), over four orbital cycles, or 320 ka (for complete methods description, see the Data Repository [see footnote 1]).
Published: 01 August 2009
Figure 1 Orbital parameter regime used in coupled general circulation model (GCM)–ice sheet model simulations. Precession (PR), obliquity (OB), and eccentricity (EC) have sinusoidal periods of 20, 40, and 80 ka, respectively (after Deconto and Pollard, 2003 ), and their values are based on Plio
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2005
Mineralogical Magazine (2005) 69 (5): 677–686.
... a contamination event, and also those that pose the greatest risk. Various gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS) methods are available for the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) but many of these are not suitable for rapid and combined analysis of MTBE and BTEX. Here we describe and validate...
FIGURES
Image
Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of ostracods from the Akasaki Formation. (a–o) GCM-IVP3500, Paijenborchella amakusensis sp. nov.: (a) left lateral, (b) right lateral; (c) ventral; and (d) posterior views of a juvenile carapace. GCM-IVP3501: (e) left lateral; (f) right lateral; and (g) ventral views of a female carapace. (h) GCM-IVP3502: left lateral view of a juvenile carapace. (i–k) GCM-IVP3504: (i) left lateral; (j) right lateral; and (k) ventral views of a male carapace. (l–o) GCM IVP number 05: (l) posterior; (m) left lateral; (n) right lateral; and (o) ventral views of a juvenile carapace. (p) GCM-IVP3505, Propontocypris sp.: left lateral view of a carapace. (q) GCM-IVP3506, Parakrithella sp.: left lateral view of a carapace.
Published: 06 September 2017
Figure 7. Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of ostracods from the Akasaki Formation. (a–o) GCM-IVP3500, Paijenborchella amakusensis sp. nov.: (a) left lateral, (b) right lateral; (c) ventral; and (d) posterior views of a juvenile carapace. GCM-IVP3501: (e) left lateral; (f) right lateral
Image
Paleoclimate interpolations use general circulation models (GCMs) to model the geographic distribution of paleoclimate and the relative changes in stable oxygen isotopes (δ18O) are used to calibrate climate between GCMs. A, GCM of mean annual temperature modeled for the last glacial maximum. B, Benthic foraminifera stable oxygen isotope curve showing multiple time periods that can be used to interpolate between GCMs and modern climate. C, Modern mean annual temperature.
Published: 01 May 2021
Figure 4. Paleoclimate interpolations use general circulation models (GCMs) to model the geographic distribution of paleoclimate and the relative changes in stable oxygen isotopes (δ 18 O) are used to calibrate climate between GCMs. A, GCM of mean annual temperature modeled for the last glacial
Image
Scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) of Neomonoceratina iwasakii sp. nov. from the Akasaki Formation. (a–e) GCM-IVP3495: female carapace from (a) left lateral; (b) right lateral; (c) posterior; (d) dorsal; and (e) ventral views. (f–j) GCM-IVP3496: (f) male carapace from left lateral; (g) right lateral; (h) posterior; (i) dorsal; and (j) ventral views. (k–o) GCM-IVP3497: (k) juvenile carapace from left lateral; (l) right lateral; (m) posterior; (n) dorsal; and (o) ventral views. (p) GCM-IVP3498: internal view of a fragmented female right valve. (q) GCM-IVP3499: internal view of a fragmented female left valve.
Published: 06 September 2017
Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) of Neomonoceratina iwasakii sp. nov. from the Akasaki Formation. (a–e) GCM-IVP3495: female carapace from (a) left lateral; (b) right lateral; (c) posterior; (d) dorsal; and (e) ventral views. (f–j) GCM-IVP3496: (f) male carapace from left lateral
Image
Lithofacies classification of the glaciofluvial deposits at the field site. Lithofacies code used is the one from Table 1. The glaciofluvial deposits are mainly composed of Gcm and Gcm,b lithofacies.
Published: 01 February 2008
F ig . 5. Lithofacies classification of the glaciofluvial deposits at the field site. Lithofacies code used is the one from Table 1 . The glaciofluvial deposits are mainly composed of Gcm and Gcm,b lithofacies.