Abstract Basin modelling and compaction studies based on sonic data from the Mesozoic succession in 68 Danish wells were used to estimate the amount of section missing due to late Cenozoic erosion. The missing section increases gradually towards the coasts of Norway and Sweden from zero in the North Sea to c. 500 m in most of the Danish Basin, but over a narrow zone it reaches c. 1000 m on the Skagerrak-Kattegat Platform in northernmost Denmark. The increasing amount of erosion matches the increase in the hiatus at the base of the Quaternary, where Neogene and older strata are truncated, and the Mesozoic succession is thus found to have been more deeply buried by c. 500 Paleocene-Miocene sediments in large parts of the area. These observations suggest that the onset of erosion occurred during the Neogene, and that the Skagerrak-Kattegat Platform was affected by tectonic movements prior to glacial erosion. In southern Sweden just east of the Kattegat, the exposed basement of the South Swedish Dome attains altitudes of almost 400 m. The formation of the Dome started in the Late Palaeozoic, but geomorphological investigations have led to the conclusion that a rise of the Dome occurred during the Cenozoic. We find that the pattern of late Cenozoic erosion in Denmark agrees with a Neogene uplift of the South Swedish Dome and of the Southern Scandes in Norway. This suggestion is consistent with major shifts in sediment transport directions during the late Cenozoic observed in the eastern North Sea, and with formation of a new erosion surface as well as re-exposure of sub-Cambrian and sub-Cretaceous surfaces in southern Sweden. The Neogene uplift and erosion of southern Scandinavia appears to have been initiated in two phases, an early phase of ?Miocene age and a better-constrained later phase that began in the Pliocene. Neogene uplift of the South Swedish Dome with adjoining areas in Denmark fits into a pattern of late Cenozoic vertical movements around the North Atlantic.

Abstract This chapter describes uppermost Middle Jurassic–lowermost Cretaceous second-order stratigraphic sequences J40, J50, J60 and J70, and their component third-order sequences J42–J46, J52–J56, J62–J66 and J71–J76. The latest Callovian–Berriasian was an interval of significant tectonism that led to the development of complex stratigraphy and highly variable successions, the elucidation of which is aided by the recognition of the correlation of the J sequences. Marine sedimentation dominated the Callovian–Berriasian interval, with the development of multiple sandstone members comprising reservoir units in many hydrocarbon fields, charged by marine source rocks (e.g. the Kimmeridge Clay Formation). Each of these units is subdivided and correlated by a succession of J sequences. Several sequences are renumbered (e.g. J54, J55, J65 and J66), some sequence definitions are amended or their basal boundaries recalibrated chronostratigraphically (J52, J54, J72, J73, J74 and J76) and new sequence subdivisions are recognized (J64a, J64b, J72a–J72c, J73a and J73b). Significant unconformities are recognized at the bases of the J54, J55, J62, J63, J64, J71 and J73 sequences. The top of J70 (J76) equates to the major ‘Base Cretaceous Unconformity’ seismic sequence boundary.

Abstract The Jurassic System (199.6-145.5 Ma; Gradstein et al. 2004 ), the second of three systems constituting the Mesozoic era, was established in Central Europe about 200 years ago. It takes its name from the Jura Mountains of eastern France and northernmost Switzerland. The term ‘Jura Kalkstein’ was introduced by Alexander von Humboldt as early as 1799 to describe a series of carbonate shelf deposits exposed in the Jura mountains. Alexander Brongniart (1829) first used the term ‘Jurassique', while Leopold von Buch (1839) established a three-fold subdivision for the Jurassic (Lias, Dogger, Malm). This three-fold subdivision (which also uses the terms black Jura, brown Jura, white Jura) remained until recent times as three series (Lower, Middle, Upper Jurassic), although the respective boundaries have been grossly redefined. The immense wealth of fossils, particularly ammonites, in the Jurassic strata of Britain, France, Germany and Switzerland was an inspiration for the development of modern concepts of biostratigraphy, chronostratigraphy, correlation and palaeogeography. In a series of works, Alcide d'Orbigny (1842-51, 1852) distinguished stages of which seven are used today (although none of them has retained its original strati graphic range). Albert Oppel (1856-1858) developed a sequence of such divisions for the entire Jurassic System, crucially using the units in the sense of time divisions. During the nineteenth and twentieth centuries many additional stage names were proposed - more than 120 were listed by Arkell (1956) . It is due to Arkell's influence that most of these have been abandoned and the table of current stages for the Jurassic (comprising 11 internationally accepted stages, grouped into three series) shows only two changes from that used by Arkell: separation of the Aalenian from the lower Bajocian was accepted by international agreement during the second Luxembourg Jurassic Colloquium in 1967, and the Tithonian was accepted as the Global Standard for the uppermost stage in preference to Portlandian and Volgian by vote of the Jurassic Subcommission ( Morton 1974 , 2005 ). As a result, the international hierarchical subdivision of the Jurassic System into series and stages has been stable for many years.