1-20 OF 3465 RESULTS FOR

Franklin Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1929
AAPG Bulletin (1929) 13 (10): 1301–1315.
...R. Shrock Robert; A. Malott Clyde Abstract: The West Franklin limestone formation, occurring about 300 feet above Coal V, 900 feet above the base and 350 feet below the top of the Pennsylvanian, in southwestern Indiana, is used in this paper to determine the structural conditions in its outcrop...
FIGURES
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 19 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/SP484-2017-344
EISBN: 9781786204547
... PresRo ® model, however, a good match was achieved between observed and measured data. The predicted petroleum generation is combined with published diagenetic cement data from the Elgin and Franklin fields to produce a composite model for petroleum generation, diagenetic cement and bitumen formation...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2000
Journal of the Geological Society (2000) 157 (1): 221–228.
... formation. The concentrated coal‐ball areas were created by the triggered degassing of CO 2 from partially decomposed peat in the presence of cations from fresh waters; 13 C/ 12 C ratios in these coal balls average −23.9‰. 13 C/ 12 C ratios as low as −34‰ occurring in the most concentrated coal balls...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1987
American Mineralogist (1987) 72 (3-4): 423–428.
...Peter B. Leavens; Pete J. Dunn; Donald M. Burt Abstract Glaucochroite, CaMnSiO 4 , is a member of the olivine group, known primarily from the Zn-Mn-Fe deposit at Franklin, New Jersey. Euhedral crystals occur in a number of assemblages with nasonite, willemite, clinohedrite, hardystonite, diopside...
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 1979
Journal of Paleontology (1979) 53 (3): 587–627.
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1973
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1973) 21 (2): 178–218.
... of Petroleum Geologists 1973 BULLETIN OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM GEOLOG Y VOL . 21, NO . 2 (JUNE 1973), P . 178-21 8 MICROPLANKTON ZONES OF THE SAVIK FORMATION (JURASSIC) , AXEL HEIBERG AND ELLESMERE ISLANDS , DISTRICT OF FRANKLIN' C. D. JOHNSON 2 and L. V . HILLS 3 ABSTRACT Microplankton biostratigraphic zones...
Image
Point-counted data from Franklin Formation sandstones. A) Ankerite versus porosity. Note that primary porosity is almost totally occluded when ankerite contents reach 28 vol.%. B) Ankerite versus dolomite. C) Ankerite versus detrital sand grain size. D) Ankerite versus clay content. Sampling was deliberately biased towards concretions, so the data spread is not representative of the gross sandstone composition.
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 7 Point-counted data from Franklin Formation sandstones. A) Ankerite versus porosity. Note that primary porosity is almost totally occluded when ankerite contents reach 28 vol.%. B) Ankerite versus dolomite. C) Ankerite versus detrital sand grain size. D) Ankerite versus clay
Image
Compositional data for Franklin Formation ankerite cement crystals obtained by EDXA. Field of early diagenetic dolomite compositions is shown for comparison.
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 9 Compositional data for Franklin Formation ankerite cement crystals obtained by EDXA. Field of early diagenetic dolomite compositions is shown for comparison.
Image
A) δ13C-δ18O cross plot of Franklin Formation carbonate samples. Franklin Field samples are subdivided according to analytical procedure; all Elgin Field samples were bulk analyses (see Table 2). Two analyses of ankerite from septarian concretions in the overlying Heather Formation are also plotted. B) Interpretation of petrographic and δ13C data from ankerite in the Franklin sandstone. See Hendry et al. (in press) for discussion of the dolomite isotopic composition.
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 10 A) δ 13 C-δ 18 O cross plot of Franklin Formation carbonate samples. Franklin Field samples are subdivided according to analytical procedure; all Elgin Field samples were bulk analyses (see Table 2 ). Two analyses of ankerite from septarian concretions in the overlying Heather
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1953
GSA Bulletin (1953) 64 (9): 1013–1048.
... units, each a mile or more thick before metamorphism. These appear to thin northeastward from the type locality and southeast across the Adirondacks. In northern New Jersey, however, the Grenville-type marble of the Franklin formation appears to be at least 2000 feet thick. The magnesia content...
Image
Simplified burial and thermal and history for a representative Franklin Formation well. Modified from a 1-D geohistory model created using the GENEX package at Elf Aquitaine Production (Pau).
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 4 Simplified burial and thermal and history for a representative Franklin Formation well. Modified from a 1-D geohistory model created using the GENEX package at Elf Aquitaine Production (Pau).
Image
Paragenetic scheme and schematic overpressure history for the Franklin Formation sandstones in the SCG. Paragenetic relationships were determined in this study and by Wilkinson et al. (1997). The overpressure evolution was supplied by Elf Aquitaine Production (Pau).
Published: 01 January 2000
Figure 5 Paragenetic scheme and schematic overpressure history for the Franklin Formation sandstones in the SCG. Paragenetic relationships were determined in this study and by Wilkinson et al. (1997) . The overpressure evolution was supplied by Elf Aquitaine Production (Pau).
Image
Conodont distribution in the upper part of the Franklin Strait Formation (Christie 1973) at the Pasley Bay section (* represents barren samples) and correlation with the well-established stratigraphic units of the Arctic Islands and the conodont faunas equivalent to those in the North American standard conodont zones (continued from Fig. 3). B. c., Belodina confluens; O. r., Oulodus robustus; O. v., Oulodus velicuspis. Last three species are nonconodonts.
Published: 29 March 2023
Fig. 5. Conodont distribution in the upper part of the Franklin Strait Formation ( Christie 1973 ) at the Pasley Bay section (* represents barren samples) and correlation with the well-established stratigraphic units of the Arctic Islands and the conodont faunas equivalent to those in the North
Image
View of Nainlin Formation (red beds) and the overlying Franklin Mountain Formation (pale-weathering dolostone) in southeast NTS 106A, on the crest of Mackenzie Arch. Nainlin Formation formerly was treated as a basal member of Franklin Mountain Formation in this region but note the strong contrasts in lithology, colour, and weathering character between the two units. View is looking north from 64.344885°N, 128.583843°W. Horizontal distance along ridge-crest between upper contact of Nainlin Formation (centre-left) and the fault at right of photograph is approximately 750 m.
Published: 01 June 2014
Figure 4 View of Nainlin Formation (red beds) and the overlying Franklin Mountain Formation (pale-weathering dolostone) in southeast NTS 106A, on the crest of Mackenzie Arch. Nainlin Formation formerly was treated as a basal member of Franklin Mountain Formation in this region but note the strong
Image
Published: 01 January 2000
Table 1 Summary formation-water compositions for the Franklin and Elgin reservoirs based on two representative DST analyses.
Image
—El Paso formation at section 7, Scenic Drive, southern Franklin Mountains.
Published: 01 October 1959
Fig. 3. —El Paso formation at section 7, Scenic Drive, southern Franklin Mountains.
Image
STRUCTURE MAP Based on exposures of the West Franklin limestone formation (upper Pennsylvanian) in Vanderburg and southern Gibson counties, Indiana By Robert R. Shrock and Clyde R. Malott 1929
Published: 01 October 1929
Fig. 3. STRUCTURE MAP Based on exposures of the West Franklin limestone formation (upper Pennsylvanian) in Vanderburg and southern Gibson counties, Indiana By Robert R. Shrock and Clyde R. Malott 1929
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2000
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2000) 70 (1): 227–239.
...Figure 7 Point-counted data from Franklin Formation sandstones. A) Ankerite versus porosity. Note that primary porosity is almost totally occluded when ankerite contents reach 28 vol.%. B) Ankerite versus dolomite. C) Ankerite versus detrital sand grain size. D) Ankerite versus clay...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Series: Geological Society, London, Memoirs
Published: 30 October 2020
DOI: 10.1144/M52-2018-47
EISBN: 9781786205070
... was licensed in 1980 by Ultramar, who unsuccessfully tested a Paleocene closure (29/5b-2) before Ranger drilled farm-in well 29/5b-4 in 1985, discovering the Franklin Field. Two further wells were drilled to delineate the Fulmar reservoir, appraise the deeper Pentland Formation (29/5b-6) and locate the gas...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: Palynology
Published: 01 January 2002
Palynology (2002) 26 (1): 59–93.
... on the Sagavanirktok River. The top of the Sagwon Member of the Sagavanirktok Formation is shown to be a thin, coaly, apparently nonmarine sequence almost certainly of early Eocene age; the remainder of the member has long been known to be Paleocene in age. The remaining six sections at Franklin Bluffs contain silty...
FIGURES | View All (14)