1-20 OF 47 RESULTS FOR

Foraker Limestone

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: PALAIOS
Published: 01 December 2004
PALAIOS (2004) 19 (6): 610–617.
... Triticites ventricosus , indicates both biostratinomy and diagenesis of the assemblage in the Hughes Creek Shale Member of the Foraker Limestone (Pennsylvanian, Virgilian) in east-central Kansas. The excellent preservation of these specimens provides valuable insight into the taphonomic process...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
FIGURE 7—Scanning electron micrographs of specimens of Triticites ventricosus from the Hughes Creek Shale Member of the Foraker Limestone, upper Pennsylvanian, of Kansas, that have been embedded by other fossils by compression. (A) Fusulinid test with embedded fossil fragment, probably an echinoderm spine (KUMIP 2,507,011), 40×. (B) Immature fusulinid embedded into the spirotheca of an adult fusulinid (KUMIP 2,507,012), 120×. (C) Fusulinid embedded by a nondescript fossil fragment, probably an intensely corroded, small fusulinid (KUMIP 2,507,013), 40×
Published: 01 December 2004
FIGURE 7 —Scanning electron micrographs of specimens of Triticites ventricosus from the Hughes Creek Shale Member of the Foraker Limestone, upper Pennsylvanian, of Kansas, that have been embedded by other fossils by compression. (A) Fusulinid test with embedded fossil fragment, probably
Image
FIGURE 6—Scanning electron micrographs of specimens of Triticites ventricosus from the Hughes Creek Shale Member of the Foraker Limestone, upper Pennsylvanian, of Kansas, showing damage due to pressure solution and embedding of other fossils by compression. (A) Fusulinid test with pressure-solution pit caused by the pole of another fusulinid pressed into it (arrow) (KUMIP 2,507,005), 25×. (B) Fusulinid with equatorial region stripped away during predation and with pressure solution pit (KUMIP 2,507,006), 30×. (C) Impression of a brachiopod shell, probably Derbyia crassa, with four ribs compressed into an otherwise nearly undamaged fusulinid (KUMIP 2,507,007), 35×. (D) Fusulinid that was badly distorted by predation and subsequent bioadjustment with a brachiopod fragment either embedded into it or cemented diagenetically (KUMIP 2,507,008), 20×. (E) Thin fragment of a brachiopod shell incised into a fusulinid, cutting through the spirotheca (KUMIP 2,507,009), 30×. (F) Incised brachiopod shell cutting across the fusulinid spirotheca that has been dissolved subsequently, leaving a gaping opening that could be mistaken as the trace of a boring predator (KUMIP 2,507,010), 30×
Published: 01 December 2004
FIGURE 6 —Scanning electron micrographs of specimens of Triticites ventricosus from the Hughes Creek Shale Member of the Foraker Limestone, upper Pennsylvanian, of Kansas, showing damage due to pressure solution and embedding of other fossils by compression. (A) Fusulinid test with pressure
Image
FIGURE 5—Scanning electron micrographs of specimens of Triticites ventricosus from the Hughes Creek Shale Member of the Foraker Limestone, upper Pennsylvanian, of Kansas, showing damage due to encrustation, corrasion, and compaction. (A) Whole, nearly undamaged fusulinid encrusted by the agglutinated foraminifera Tolypammina sp.; seven encrusting foraminifers are visible (arrows 1 to 7) and one has been subsequently removed (arrow 8), (KUMIP 2,507,000), 20×. (B) Enlarged view of a well-preserved Tolypammina sp. from Figure 5A (KUMIP 2,507,000), 70×. (C) Fusulinid in which the septal furrows have been largely obscured by corrasion, arrow A; with a crack that cuts across the septa, arrow B; and a pressure-solution pit, arrow C (KUMIP 2,507,001), 30×. (D) Fusulinid in which the spar-filled interior between volutions of the spirotheca has been exposed by corrasion (KUMIP 2,507,002), 22×. (E) Fusulinid with the equatorial region removed, probably during compaction, arrow A; with a crack in the spirotheca, arrow B; and having the antetheca offset by compaction, C (KUMIP 2,507,003), 20×. (F) Detailed view of fusulinid from which a portion of the spirotheca has popped out, probably during compaction, showing two septa, arrows A and B (KUMIP 2,507,004), 50×
Published: 01 December 2004
FIGURE 5 —Scanning electron micrographs of specimens of Triticites ventricosus from the Hughes Creek Shale Member of the Foraker Limestone, upper Pennsylvanian, of Kansas, showing damage due to encrustation, corrasion, and compaction. (A) Whole, nearly undamaged fusulinid encrusted
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1933
AAPG Bulletin (1933) 17 (3): 241–256.
... and a laboratory study of the dolomitic conglomerates were made under the direction of G. L. Knight, of the department of geology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. A vertical section from the base of the Foraker limestone to the top of the Garber sandstone is shown in Figure 1 . All but the lower...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1924
AAPG Bulletin (1924) 8 (3): 284–300.
... wells throughout the field. The upper sands of this zone carry the gas which supplies the field while the lower sands invariably carry water. Below this series there is about 120 feet of blue shale underlain by a red bed 10 to 40 feet in thickness. This red bed overlies the Foraker limestone which...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1924
AAPG Bulletin (1924) 8 (3): 269–283.
... feet above the base of the Permian (top of the Foraker limestone). The Tonkawa field is located in Townships 24 and 25 North, Range 1 West, in Kay and Noble counties, Oklahoma ( Fig. 1 ). Its location is near the center of the northern Oklahoma district, which includes fields in Kay, Noble, Grant...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1927
AAPG Bulletin (1927) 11 (10): 1087–1096.
... to the lack of persistent key beds. The Foraker limestone is found 500 feet below the Fort Riley, but it is not easily recognized. The first dependable correlation to be made is on the Tonkawa sand found at a depth of 2,000 feet. The section between the Tonkawa sand and the Layton sand, found at 2,700 feet...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1949
AAPG Bulletin (1949) 33 (2): 131–152.
.... Council Grove group .—The Council Grove group ranges in thickness from 330 feet in well No. 1 to 520 feet in well No. 19, and comprises the rocks from the base of the Wreford limestone to the base of the Foraker limestone. The Cottonwood, Grenola, Red Eagle, and Foraker limestones are differentiated...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1954
AAPG Bulletin (1954) 38 (11): 2382–2394.
... limestone bed below the surface is the 12-foot-thick Cottonwood limestone of Permian age. The depths to this bed range from 85 to 135 feet along the profile. The Neva limestone of Permian age and the Foraker limestone of Pennsylvanian age are at depths of 190 and 300 feet, respectively, below the surface...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1939
AAPG Bulletin (1939) 23 (11): 1694–1711.
..., the base of the Wolfcamp is the base of the Wanette as defined by Darsie A. Green, 16 or the first disconformity below the Foraker limestone. In Kansas and Nebraska, it is the base of the Admire. 17 The Wolfcamp-Leonard disconformity was determined in the Stanolind, Williams No. 1, at the base...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (4): 654–678.
... of these channels may clarify some of the confusion in the subsurface correlation and surface identification of these units. The present study was restricted to the upper 150 feet of Pennsylvanian rocks and the lower 100 feet of Permian rocks (Willard shale up to the base of the Foraker limestone). Wabaunsee...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1956
AAPG Bulletin (1956) 40 (9): 2271–2278.
.... Janesville shale: —The Janesville shale is defined to include strata between the Foraker limestone, above, and the Falls City limestone, below. The name is derived from Janesville Township, Greenwood County, Kansas, and the type section is exposed in a cut on an east-west road in the SW. 1 4 , SE...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1946
AAPG Bulletin (1946) 30 (10): 1756–1763.
... of the sequence is composed of buff to gray fossiliferous limestone and gray shale. This basal marine sequence, 148 feet thick, includes the Grenola and Foraker limestones of Kansas. The Admire shale, 100 feet thick, underlies the undifferentiated Sumner, Chase, and Council Grove groups in well 4...
Image
Correlated cross section of the Foraker Composite Sequence (CS III). See caption to Figure 8 for explanation of cross section. CS III contains thirteen meter-scale cycles. It includes all the rock from the Americus Limestone Member through the lower part of the Johnson Shale Formation. The lowermost cycle is transitional with a stromatolitic carbonate base (Denver and Kaesler 1992) and a condensed siliciclastic cap in Pottawatomie County. North of Cowley County, the maximum flooding surfaces of cycles III-2 and III-3 become amalgamated because of the condensation of the highstand systems tract of III-2 and the lowstand systems tract of III-3. Cycles III-6 and III-9 have fusulinid bioherms in the southern part of the study area. The top four cycles show well-developed paleosols including natric, columnar horizons in cycle III-12 (McCahon and Miller 1997). In addition, the carbonate bases of cycles III-11 and III-12 show well-developed tidal-flat deposits that can be traced from Cowley County to Pottawatomie County. Their great lateral extent indicates that these represent a continuous coastline rather than local emergence. The topmost cycle, III-13, is truncated from above in Pottawatomie and Nemaha Counties.
Published: 01 January 2003
Figure 10 Correlated cross section of the Foraker Composite Sequence (CS III). See caption to Figure 8 for explanation of cross section. CS III contains thirteen meter-scale cycles. It includes all the rock from the Americus Limestone Member through the lower part of the Johnson Shale Formation
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2002
Journal of Paleontology (2002) 76 (1): 181–184.
... the damaged region in approximately 0.3-mm increments and in 0.2-mm increments near the damaged end; specimen shows hasty repair of damage by bioplastering (15×) 06 03 2001 The Paleontological Society 2002 T he abundant fusulinids of the Hughes Creek Shale Member of the Foraker...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1939
AAPG Bulletin (1939) 23 (11): 1673–1678.
... unconformities are shown, one about 100 feet below the Grayhorse limestone and another about 100 feet above the Grayhorse. It now appears that the upper unconformity, which occurs about half way between the base of the Foraker and the top of the Grayhorse, is correlative with the base of the Admire group...
Image
Published: 09 May 2018
the Maubisse Formation or Atahoc and Cribas Formation Yakovlev, 1926 ; Yakovlev, 1927 ; Yakovlev, 1930 ; Yakovlev and Ivanov, 1956 Ural Mountains, Russia Artinskian Div’ya Formation Moore and Plummer, 1940 Texas, United States Wolfcampian Cibolo Limestone Pabian and Strimple, 1974
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1990
AAPG Bulletin (1990) 74 (10B): 110–119.
..., Pennsylvanian Douglas sandstone, Pennsylvanian Oread limestone, Pennsylvanian Topeka limestone, Pennsylvanian Wabaunsee limestone, and Permian Foraker limestones. Oil production in the Nebraska portion of the Forest City basin is mainly from the Devonian “Hunton” dolomite and limestone. Production also...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (11): 1879–1886.
..., Amber Resources completed a Skinner sand oil well flowing 100 BOPD to discover the Northeast Foraker field (19, Fig. 2 ). The North Prairie Center field was discovered in Pawnee County (20, Fig. 2 ) when Shar-Alan Oil Co. completed their Mississippian limestone oil well pumping 98 BOPD...
FIGURES