1-20 OF 157 RESULTS FOR

Falher Member

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2003
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2003) 51 (3): 275–303.
...Jennifer Wadsworth; Ron Boyd; Claus Diessel; Dale Leckie Abstract The Lower Cretaceous Falher Member and Gates Formation of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin provide an opportunity to investigate high resolution stratigraphic correlation in non-marine to marginal marine rocks. This is due...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1997
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1997) 45 (2): 218–238.
...Jhonny E. Casas; Roger G. Walker ABSTRACT Units C and D of the Falher Member, Spirit River Formation, have been studied in the area of Townships 66-73, Ranges 7-13W6. In both Units, the traditional interpretation of one northward-prograding shoreface is shown to be a major oversimplification...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (8): 1044–1054.
...Douglas J. Cant; Valerie G. Ethier ABSTRACT Conglomerates in the Falher Member of the Lower Cretaceous Spirit River Formation of Alberta are the reservoir rocks for the giant (2-3 Tcf or 5-8 × 10 10 m 3 ) Elmworth gas field. Three types of conglomerates are present: (a) unimodal—granules or pebbles...
FIGURES | View All (19)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2004
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2004) 52 (1): 4–22.
...E. Matthew Caddel; Thomas F. Moslow Abstract The Falher C lithostratigraphic sub-Member of the Spirit River Formation in northeastern British Columbia is a product of deposition by wave- and storm-processes along a gravelly, wave-dominated strandplain. The oldest and southernmost outcropping...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Image
Conglomeratic facies of the Falher Member shorefaces. A) Interstratified sandstone and conglomerate at the upper shoreface to foreshore transition, with isolated Macaronichnus segregatis (arrows). Falher A. Well 06-05-70-10W6, depth 1914.9 m. B) Pebble-bearing sandstone of the upper shoreface to foreshore transition with Macaronichnus (arrows). Falher D. Well 11-07-68-12W6, depth 2509.4 m. C) Pebbly and granule-bearing sandstone within storm-dominated middle shoreface or upper shoreface, with Rosselia (arrows). Falher C. Well 11-07-68-12W6, depth 2481.8 m.
Published: 01 March 2004
Fig. 13. Conglomeratic facies of the Falher Member shorefaces. A) Interstratified sandstone and conglomerate at the upper shoreface to foreshore transition, with isolated Macaronichnus segregatis (arrows). Falher A. Well 06-05-70-10W6, depth 1914.9 m. B) Pebble-bearing sandstone
Image
Coarsening up cycles within the Falher Member in 10-01-070-11W6. TS1–TS11 represent transgressive surfaces used for correlation, with the four sequences marked S1 to S4 (Lithostratigraphy modified from Smith et al., 1984).
Published: 01 June 2005
Fig. 7. Coarsening up cycles within the Falher Member in 10-01-070-11W6. TS1–TS11 represent transgressive surfaces used for correlation, with the four sequences marked S1 to S4 (Lithostratigraphy modified from Smith et al., 1984 ).
Image
Graphic lithological log of the Falher Member, cycle C. Well 11-07-68-12W6. Refer to Figure 2 for legend of symbols.
Published: 01 March 2004
Fig. 12. Graphic lithological log of the Falher Member, cycle C. Well 11-07-68-12W6. Refer to Figure 2 for legend of symbols.
Image
Regional cross-section of the Gates Formation and Falher Member (modifed from Carmichael, 1988). Location is shown in Figure 4. The southern part of the section is based on core and outcrop data in Carmichael (1983). The northern part of the section is based on data in Leckie (1986a). The Gates Formation and Falher Member are time equivalent, and generally refer to the non-marine component and marine component of the stratigraphy, respectively.
Published: 01 September 2003
Fig. 3. Regional cross-section of the Gates Formation and Falher Member (modifed from Carmichael, 1988 ). Location is shown in Figure 4 . The southern part of the section is based on core and outcrop data in Carmichael (1983) . The northern part of the section is based on data in Leckie
Image
Schematic cross-section of the Falher Member based on 40 wireline logs. South (S) is landward and north (N) is basinward. Falher A to F are indicated by arrows. Traditionally the base of the overlying shoreface succession, representing a transgressive surface of erosion, has been used as the upper bounding surface for individual Falher cycles. This may or may not be equivalent to a parasequence boundary (see text for discussion). Boxes indicate well locations that have been used to construct the detailed core cross-section in Figure 8.
Published: 01 September 2003
Fig. 7. Schematic cross-section of the Falher Member based on 40 wireline logs. South (S) is landward and north (N) is basinward. Falher A to F are indicated by arrows. Traditionally the base of the overlying shoreface succession, representing a transgressive surface of erosion, has been used
Image
—(a) Aqueous inclusion in quartz druse from Falher Member. This inclusion homogenizes to liquid phase at 188°C. Its melting temperature is –1.8°C. Length of inclusion is 15 μm. Sample 237 (93-P-1, b-28-L, 2,348.1 m). (b) and (c) Two inclusions from same crystal of quartz druse, sample 385 (6–30–69–13 W6, 2,314.8 m). (b) aqueous inclusion with Th >170°C and Tm = – 0.5 °C. (c) Methane-rich inclusion with critical temperature of – 63.2°C. Dark patch in upper left corner of inclusion may be trapped hydrocarbons. Magnification same as (a). (d) Two-phase inclusion with methane bubble in quartz druse. Vapor was identified as methane by Raman spectroscopy (see Figure 7). Sample 394 (7–23–69–13 W6, 2,252.5 m). Magnification same as (a). (e) Large hydrocarbon inclusion in calcite cement. This inclusion has homogenization temperature of approximately – 33°C to vapor phase. Sample 400 (11–30–70–12 W6, 2,022 m). Magnification same as (a).
Published: 01 October 1989
Figure 6 —(a) Aqueous inclusion in quartz druse from Falher Member. This inclusion homogenizes to liquid phase at 188°C. Its melting temperature is –1.8°C. Length of inclusion is 15 μ m. Sample 237 (93-P-1, b-28-L, 2,348.1 m). (b) and (c) Two inclusions from same crystal of quartz druse
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 1985
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1985) 33 (1): 39–51.
... island system, representing the leading edge of a northerly prograding, low-relief coastal plain. The basal Notikewin is a thin, pebbly transgressive lag deposit above carbonaceous nonmarine shale, sandstone and, locally, conglomerate of the lower Gates (Falher Member equivalent). Overlying...
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2004
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2004) 52 (1): 23–38.
...John-Paul Zonneveld; Thomas F. Moslow Abstract The lower Cretaceous Falher Member shoreface conglomerate trends are the most prolific natural gas reservoirs of the Alberta and British Columbia Deep Basin. Individual pools can be in excess of 100BCF with discovery wells yielding AOFs of more than...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Book Chapter

Group(s)
Milner
... member Harmon shale member Spirit River formation Notikewin sandstone member Falher member Wilrich member Bluesky formation Bullhead group The Shaftesbury formation is a dark marine shale. The Peace River formation contains fairly distinct units consisting of the Paddy continental sandstone containing...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (5): 557.
...Douglas J. Cant The Spirit River Formation is subdivided into three members in northwest Alberta. The basal Wilrich Member consists of two 50 to 100-m thick upward-coarsening cycles of marine shales, siltstones, and sandstones. The Falher Member consists of nonmarine clastics and coals...
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1994
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1994) 42 (4): 482–498.
... and Falher members quartz may only comprise 40%. Petrographic analysis, including light and heavy minerals and cathodoluminescence colouration of quartz was carried out. Other framework grains include chert and feldspar, generally being 2% or less, with traces of metamorphic and plutonic rock fragments...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1995
AAPG Bulletin (1995) 79 (5): 749–762.
...Douglas J. Cant ABSTRACT In the Falher Member of the Mannville Group (Aptian–Albian) of western Canada, two shoreline successions contain the reservoir conglomerates for the giant Elmworth gas field. The Falher B succession has a basal sheetlike shoreface unit of hummocky cross-stratified sandstone...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 1984
DOI: 10.1306/M38441C6
EISBN: 9781629811604
... Abstract The Falher A Cycle is the youngest progradational, shoreline and nearshore clastic sequence in the Lower Cretaceous Falher Member of northwestern Alberta. In the Elmworth area of the “Deep basin,” this unit averages 25 m (82 ft) in thickness and contains vast amounts of gas reserves...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1954
AAPG Bulletin (1954) 38 (11): 2269–2289.
... of the Cretaceous beds along the foothills, and easterly to northern Alberta. The lower (sandstone and shale) part of the Scatter formation is correlated with the Gates formation and with the lower part of the Falher member of the Spirit River formation. A lower Gastroplites horizon is used as a basis to correlate...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1983
AAPG Bulletin (1983) 67 (4): 1–29.
...Douglas J. Cant ABSTRACT The Spirit River Formation is a prolific gas producer in the Deep Basin of Alberta. The lower Wilrich Member consists of coarsening-upward clastic cycles from 50 to 100 m (165 to 330 ft) thick. In the southern part of the study area, the Falher Member (the major producer...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Image
—Geographic comparison of fluid inclusion temperatures (°C) and calculated maximum burial temperatures. Squares and crosses represent locations where fluid inclusions analyzed were in formations other than Falher Member (see key). Temperature for each symbol is temperature calculated for Falher Member, assuming geothermal gradient of 27°C/km.
Published: 01 October 1989
Figure 12 —Geographic comparison of fluid inclusion temperatures (°C) and calculated maximum burial temperatures. Squares and crosses represent locations where fluid inclusions analyzed were in formations other than Falher Member (see key). Temperature for each symbol is temperature calculated