1-5 OF 5 RESULTS FOR

Eoprodromites kinderhooki

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
Figure  2 — <b>Eoprodromites</b> <b>kinderhooki</b>  Work, Mapes, and Thompson, 1988  fro...
Published: 01 September 2002
Figure 2 — Eoprodromites kinderhooki Work, Mapes, and Thompson, 1988 from the Hannibal Shale, Ralls County, Missouri. 1, 2, 5, hypotype SUI 62420, ×3.0; 3, 4, juvenile hyptotype SUI 62418, ×4.5
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2002
Journal of Paleontology (2002) 76 (5): 910–912.
...Figure 2 — Eoprodromites kinderhooki Work, Mapes, and Thompson, 1988 from the Hannibal Shale, Ralls County, Missouri. 1, 2, 5, hypotype SUI 62420, ×3.0; 3, 4, juvenile hyptotype SUI 62418, ×4.5 ...
FIGURES
Image
TABLE  1 —Conch dimensions (in mm) and proportions of  <b>Eoprodromites</b> kinder...
Published: 01 September 2002
TABLE 1 —Conch dimensions (in mm) and proportions of Eoprodromites kinderhooki Work, Mapes, and Thompson, 1988
Image
Figure  1 —Diagrammatic representation of cross section and sutural ontogen...
Published: 01 September 2002
Figure 1 —Diagrammatic representation of cross section and sutural ontogeny in Eoprodromites kinderhooki Work, Mapes, and Thompson, 1988 from the Hannibal Shale, Ralls County, Missouri. Cross section [ 1 ] based on hypotype SUI 62421, diameter 26.4 mm. Sutural ontogeny [ 2 - 5 ] based
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2002
Journal of Paleontology (2002) 76 (1): 187–189.
... Genozone by Becker (1993b , p. 126, fig. 7.1) ( Fig. 1 ) on the basis of the ancestral Hannibal prodromitid Eoprodromites kinderhooki Work, Mapes and Thompson, 1988 and preliminary reports by Work et al. (1988) of the ancestral Goniocyclus species described herein as G. hannibalensis n. sp...
FIGURES