1-20 OF 1173 RESULTS FOR

Elliott Bay

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 April 1987
Economic Geology (1987) 82 (2): 267–290.
..., southern part of the Mount Read Volcanics at Elliott Bay has revealed a geologic setting and mineralization styles similar to those in the main part of the volcanic belt between Mount Darwin and Que River. The volcanic pile at Elliott Bay is composed dominantly of rhyolitic pyroclastics and quartz porphyry...
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 April 1987
Economic Geology (1987) 82 (2): 308–327.
... studies can be interpreted in a multistage model to imply an ultimate source for the lead from the Precambrian basement. The ratios of massive sulfide mineralization at Elliott Bay are distinctly less radiogenic than for massive sulfide mineralization farther north in the Mount Read Volcanics at Rosebery...
Image
Maps of Commencement Bay (A) and Elliott Bay (B) showing sample locations. Red stars denote U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund sites. Samples collected in 1978 by Shoreline Community College are designated with an S prefix.
Published: 01 October 2017
Figure 2.  Maps of Commencement Bay (A) and Elliott Bay (B) showing sample locations. Red stars denote U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund sites. Samples collected in 1978 by Shoreline Community College are designated with an S prefix.
Image
Compositions of foraminiferal assemblages in Commencement and Elliott Bay for all study years.
Published: 01 October 2017
Figure 4.  Compositions of foraminiferal assemblages in Commencement and Elliott Bay for all study years.
Image
Seismic profiles 37, 61, and 59 from Elliott Bay, with uninterpreted profiles at the top and interpreted profiles at the bottom. The red dashed lines show the projected location of the axial surface forming the deformation front. Folding associated with the projected location of the deformation front is subtle at best, but there is some evidence for disruption or folding of strata below the prominent reflector (green line) that marks the base of a NW-trending glacial channel beneath Elliott Bay and extending south beneath the Duwamish River valley. Turquoise lines show reflectors that may be disrupted near the deformation front; m—multiples; USGS—U.S. Geological Survey; v.e.—vertical exaggeration.
Published: 01 December 2015
Figure 11. Seismic profiles 37, 61, and 59 from Elliott Bay, with uninterpreted profiles at the top and interpreted profiles at the bottom. The red dashed lines show the projected location of the axial surface forming the deformation front. Folding associated with the projected location
Image
(A) Air photo of Seattle and bathymetric map of Elliott Bay showing the locations of the deformation front (red dashed line; line shifts slightly north as elevations increase because of its south dip), the transit tunnel (turquoise line), and the seawall profile (yellow line) relative to major roads and landmarks. Red rectangle shows location of Interstate 5 geologic map in part C. PPM—Pike Place Market. (B) Cross section drawn along the downtown transit tunnel (Shannon and Wilson, 1986), with the predicted location of the deformation front based on the marine seismic profiles shown as red dashed line. Note that south of the interpreted deformation front, the prominent red unit (glacio-marine drift [GMD]) dips to the north, whereas it is flat north of the deformation front. The older (“Duwamish”) strata present in the hanging wall south of the deformation front presumably lie below the drill holes north of the front. The features are consistent with uplift of material south of the deformation front; v.e.—vertical exaggeration. (C) Geologic map along Interstate 5 (Wegner, 1969) with red dashed line showing the location of the deformation front interpreted from the marine seismic profiles. The contact between the Esperance Sand and older “Duwamish clay” almost precisely aligns with the predicted location of the deformation front. (D) Cross section along the waterfront Seawall constructed from bore holes (Shannon and Wilson, 2012). Note the prominent valley at the location of the deformation front, the rising top surface of the pre-glacial strata to the south, and the upward step (possible fold scarp?) in the Estuarine and beach deposits.
Published: 01 December 2015
Figure 12. (A) Air photo of Seattle and bathymetric map of Elliott Bay showing the locations of the deformation front (red dashed line; line shifts slightly north as elevations increase because of its south dip), the transit tunnel (turquoise line), and the seawall profile (yellow line) relative
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2017
Journal of Foraminiferal Research (2017) 47 (4): 372–388.
...Figure 2.  Maps of Commencement Bay (A) and Elliott Bay (B) showing sample locations. Red stars denote U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund sites. Samples collected in 1978 by Shoreline Community College are designated with an S prefix. ...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 April 1987
Economic Geology (1987) 82 (2): 291–307.
...., Renison Bell, Queen Hill, Spray mine, Farrell lodes). The differences in lead isotope signatures allow discrimination of the two contrasting styles of mineralization in both surface material and drill core; the isotopic signatures have been utilized in an exploration program at Elliott Bay which...
Image
Box plots of statistical parameters. Foraminiferal density measured as the number of individuals in one gram dry sediment, (A) Commencement Bay and (B) Elliott Bay; species richness, (C) Commencement Bay and (D) Elliott Bay; Shannon Index, (E) Commencement Bay and (F) Elliott Bay. Note that y axes are different for individual charts. In Elliott Bay, one sample (sample 194) was removed because its density value was an extreme outlier.
Published: 01 October 2017
Figure 6.  Box plots of statistical parameters. Foraminiferal density measured as the number of individuals in one gram dry sediment, (A) Commencement Bay and (B) Elliott Bay; species richness, (C) Commencement Bay and (D) Elliott Bay; Shannon Index, (E) Commencement Bay and (F) Elliott Bay. Note
Image
Percent of agglutinated taxa recorded each year; (A) Commencement Bay, (B) Elliott Bay.
Published: 01 October 2017
Figure 5.  Percent of agglutinated taxa recorded each year; (A) Commencement Bay, (B) Elliott Bay.
Image
Geographical distribution of foraminiferal diversity and density in Elliott Bay for all years studied.
Published: 01 October 2017
Figure 8.  Geographical distribution of foraminiferal diversity and density in Elliott Bay for all years studied.
Image
Regression analyses comparing foraminiferal species richness to measured pollutants in Commencement and Elliott Bays.
Published: 01 October 2017
Figure 10.  Regression analyses comparing foraminiferal species richness to measured pollutants in Commencement and Elliott Bays.
Image
Published: 01 October 2017
Table 1.  Locations of stations from which sediment samples were collected, and for which depth, salinity, water temperature and TOC were recorded: A Commencement Bay. B Elliott Bay. ND signifies no data available.
Image
Published: 01 October 2017
Table 2.  Concentrations (mg/kg) of the metal pollutants and total PAH, Shannon Index, Species Richness, Foraminiferal Density and percent of calcareous tests showing dissolution effects in samples studied: A Commencement Bay, B Elliott Bay. ND signifies no data available.
Image
Box plots showing concentrations of measured pollutants in Commencement and Elliott Bays for years studied. Pollutants measured were arsenic, cadmium, copper, mercury, lead, zinc, and total PAH. In Commencement Bay, 1978 (SCC) samples are not included here because measurements of pollutants were not made for those samples.
Published: 01 October 2017
Figure 9.  Box plots showing concentrations of measured pollutants in Commencement and Elliott Bays for years studied. Pollutants measured were arsenic, cadmium, copper, mercury, lead, zinc, and total PAH. In Commencement Bay, 1978 (SCC) samples are not included here because measurements
Image
High-resolution seismic profiles P53, P31, and P55 from the east side of Puget Sound near the entrance to Elliott Bay. See Figure 4 for locations. Turquoise lines mark prominent reflectors in the Quaternary and Tertiary strata, and the green line is the unconformity at the base of latest Pleistocene and Holocene deposits. Red dashed lines show the approximate position of the axial surface forming the deformation front as interpreted from the change from predominantly north-dipping reflector segments on the south to predominantly flat reflector segments on the north. Black dots indicate estimated boundary between Tertiary and Quaternary strata (Johnson et al., 1999). Black triangles are the location of the deformation front in Blakely et al. (2002).
Published: 01 December 2015
Figure 8. High-resolution seismic profiles P53, P31, and P55 from the east side of Puget Sound near the entrance to Elliott Bay. See Figure 4 for locations. Turquoise lines mark prominent reflectors in the Quaternary and Tertiary strata, and the green line is the unconformity at the base
Image
 Figure 3. Geologic compilation of the area including the Seattle fault zone and Seattle uplift, simplified from Yount and Gower (1991), Frizzell et al. (1984), and Tabor et al. (1993). Seismic-reflection interpretation from Johnson et al. (1999). Uplift data from Atwater and Moore (1992) and R.C. Bucknam (2001, written commun.); values reported as elevation of pre-uplift (or pre-subsidence) shoreline relative to present mean highest high water (MHHW). White dots indicate magnetic contacts interpreted from aeromagnetic data and discussed in text. A—Alki Point, D—Duwamish River, B—Beacon Hill, W—West Seattle, M—Mercer Island, E—Elliott Bay, R— Restoration Point, EH—Eagle Harbor, DI—Dyes Inlet.
Published: 01 February 2002
Hill, W—West Seattle, M—Mercer Island, E—Elliott Bay, R— Restoration Point, EH—Eagle Harbor, DI—Dyes Inlet.
Series: DNAG, Continent-Ocean Transect Series
Published: 01 January 1991
DOI: 10.1130/DNAG-COT-E-4.1
EISBN: 9780813754383
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2017
DOI: 10.1144/SP432.4
EISBN: 9781862399648
..., respectively (e.g. Stover & Coffman 1993 ). Most recently, the M w 7.1 Yutian earthquake in Tibet generated surface offsets of 3–4 m over a rupture length of 45 km ( Elliott et al. 2010 ). However, in contrast with the Egiin Davaa rupture, all of these examples occurred on faults with large cumulative...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Image
Areal distribution and thickness (in cm) of hydrothermal explosion deposits from (A) Elliott’s Crater and (B) Mary Bay explosion craters in Yellowstone Lake area (Wyoming, USA). White stars represent the 2016, 1992, 2017, and Alder Lake piston cores collected from Yellowstone Lake and Cub Creek Pond. Yellowstone River at the north end at Fishing Bridge is the only outlet of the lake. (A) Distribution of the Elliott’s Crater hydrothermal explosion deposit is shown in magenta shading. Black represents crater area of Elliott’s Crater; light magenta is the approximated extent of Elliott’s Crater explosion deposit in Yellowstone Lake. Dashed black lines represent approximated thicknesses (isopleths in cm) of Elliott’s Crater deposit. A medium magenta (~1000-cm-thick) lobe of explosion breccia extends south-southeast from the crater and is interpreted as a later directed blast from the subcrater in the southern portion of the main crater (Fig. 3D). (B) Distribution of the Mary Bay hydrothermal explosion deposit is shown in cyan shading. Black represents the Mary Bay crater, medium cyan represents Mary Bay explosion deposits exposed on land, medium-dark cyan represents the crater rim on land, and light cyan represents approximated distribution of the Mary Bay explosion deposit in the Yellowstone Lake and Cub Creek Pond areas. Isopleths indicate 50, 20, and 10 cm thickness in cores and are used to calculate the volume of Mary Bay deposits in and around the lake. The West Thumb data for YL92-3A are based on seismic-reflection profile interpreted to include a reflector at ca. 13 ka (Tiller, 1995).
Published: 07 June 2022
Figure 16. Areal distribution and thickness (in cm) of hydrothermal explosion deposits from (A) Elliott’s Crater and (B) Mary Bay explosion craters in Yellowstone Lake area (Wyoming, USA). White stars represent the 2016, 1992, 2017, and Alder Lake piston cores collected from Yellowstone Lake