1-20 OF 3445 RESULTS FOR

East Ford Field

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 2003
AAPG Bulletin (2003) 87 (4): 609–627.
...Shirley P. Dutton; William A. Flanders; Mark D. Barton Abstract Deep-water sandstones of the Delaware Mountain Group in west Texas and southeast New Mexico contained an estimated 1.8 billion bbl of original oil in place, but primary recovery from these fields is commonly less than 20%. East Ford...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Image
West–east cross section BB′ of the south end of East Ford field (EFU) (modified from Dutton and Flanders, 2004). Four calcite-cemented layers (labeled 4, 5, 6, and 7) in the lower Ramsey 1 sandstone can be correlated in the 40, 41, and 41R EFU wells. The layer at the base of the Ramsey 1 sandstone (labeled 7) and another near the top of the Ramsey 2 sandstone (labeled 1) occur in all five wells. Location of cross section is shown in Figure 12.
Published: 01 June 2008
Figure 11 West–east cross section BB′ of the south end of East Ford field (EFU) (modified from Dutton and Flanders, 2004 ). Four calcite-cemented layers (labeled 4, 5, 6, and 7) in the lower Ramsey 1 sandstone can be correlated in the 40, 41, and 41R EFU wells. The layer at the base
Image
Map of the percentage of the Ramsey 1 sandstone in East Ford field that is cemented by calcite. Only wells showing values for calcite percent penetrated the entire Ramsey 1 interval with sonic or resistivity logs, or both. Other wells in the field were used to map sand thickness. Cross section BB′ is shown in Figure 11.
Published: 01 June 2008
Figure 12 Map of the percentage of the Ramsey 1 sandstone in East Ford field that is cemented by calcite. Only wells showing values for calcite percent penetrated the entire Ramsey 1 interval with sonic or resistivity logs, or both. Other wells in the field were used to map sand thickness. Cross
Image
Map of the percentage of the Ramsey 2 sandstone in East Ford field that is cemented by calcite. Only wells showing values for calcite percent penetrated the entire Ramsey 2 interval with sonic or resistivity logs, or both. Other wells in the field were used to map sand thickness.
Published: 01 June 2008
Figure 13 Map of the percentage of the Ramsey 2 sandstone in East Ford field that is cemented by calcite. Only wells showing values for calcite percent penetrated the entire Ramsey 2 interval with sonic or resistivity logs, or both. Other wells in the field were used to map sand thickness.
Image
Typical log from East Ford field; well location is shown in Figure 3. Lithology is interpreted on the basis of log response because core was not available from this well. Modified from Dutton and Flanders (2001b) .
Published: 01 April 2003
Figure 5 Typical log from East Ford field; well location is shown in Figure 3 . Lithology is interpreted on the basis of log response because core was not available from this well. Modified from Dutton and Flanders (2001b) .
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2004
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.237.01.16
EISBN: 9781862394858
... and reservoir quality of the sandstones were examined in cores from East Ford field, which is undergoing a CO 2 flood. Porosity and permeability are controlled by calcite cement, mainly concentrated in layers ranging from 5 to 40 cm in thickness. In a new infill well, initial production was of a high gas...
FIGURES
Image
Plot of calcite volume and grain size versus depth in the 41R East Ford unit core, East Ford field. An additional calcite-cemented layer at 2764 ft (842.4 m) is clearly visible on the core photos (Figure 5) but was not sampled by a thin section; this layer is indicated by the dashed line.
Published: 01 June 2008
Figure 15 Plot of calcite volume and grain size versus depth in the 41R East Ford unit core, East Ford field. An additional calcite-cemented layer at 2764 ft (842.4 m) is clearly visible on the core photos ( Figure 5 ) but was not sampled by a thin section; this layer is indicated by the dashed
Image
Possible water temperatures and δ18O compositions that could have precipitated Ramsey sandstone calcite cement. The equation relating temperature, δ18O-water, and δ18O-mineral is 103 ln α = 2.78 × 106T−2 − 2.89 (O'Neil et al., 1969), where α is the fractionation factor and T is temperature. Present water composition and temperature are shown for Ramsey sandstone in Sullivan field (data from Williamson, 1978), located 2 mi (3 km) south of East Ford field. PDB = Peedee belemnite, SMOW = standard mean ocean water.
Published: 01 June 2008
factor and T is temperature. Present water composition and temperature are shown for Ramsey sandstone in Sullivan field (data from Williamson, 1978 ), located 2 mi (3 km) south of East Ford field. PDB = Peedee belemnite, SMOW = standard mean ocean water.
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 2008
AAPG Bulletin (2008) 92 (6): 765–787.
...Figure 11 West–east cross section BB′ of the south end of East Ford field (EFU) (modified from Dutton and Flanders, 2004 ). Four calcite-cemented layers (labeled 4, 5, 6, and 7) in the lower Ramsey 1 sandstone can be correlated in the 40, 41, and 41R EFU wells. The layer at the base...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
West–east cross section AA′ of the north end of Geraldine Ford field (modified from Dutton et al., 1999). Calcite-cemented intervals were identified in cores. Location of cross section is shown in Figure 9. GR = gamma ray.
Published: 01 June 2008
Figure 8 West–east cross section AA′ of the north end of Geraldine Ford field (modified from Dutton et al., 1999 ). Calcite-cemented intervals were identified in cores. Location of cross section is shown in Figure 9 . GR = gamma ray.
Image
Plot of monthly oil production from the East Ford unit since the field was discovered in 1960. The field was on primary production until a CO2 flood was begun in July 1995.
Published: 01 April 2003
Figure 12 Plot of monthly oil production from the East Ford unit since the field was discovered in 1960. The field was on primary production until a CO 2 flood was begun in July 1995.
Image
Location map of East Ford and Geraldine Ford fields in the Delaware Basin and paleogeographic setting during the Late Permian (modified from Dutton et al., 1999).
Published: 01 June 2008
Figure 1 Location map of East Ford and Geraldine Ford fields in the Delaware Basin and paleogeographic setting during the Late Permian (modified from Dutton et al., 1999 ).
Series: SEPM Short Course Notes
Published: 01 January 1985
DOI: 10.2110/scn.85.13.0503
EISBN: 9781565762428
... Abstract This paper reviews studies of Woodbine--Eagle Ford reservoir sandstones from the subsurface of East Texas and evaluates shelf sand depositional models in the light of recent studies of fluid and sediment dynamics on modern shelves. The application of fluid and sediment dynamical...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 August 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (8): 1042–1054.
.... These eroded Woodbine sediments were redeposited as reworked Woodbine beds in Texas, and they were probably, in part, a source of Eagle Ford sands in Texas and of Tuscaloosa sands in Louisiana . At the end of Early Cretaceous deposition, the East Texas field region was structurally higher than the Texas...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Series: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Publications
Published: 01 January 2014
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.14.33.0148
EISBN: 978-0-9836097-9-0
... and laterally extensive Type II(S)/III shales and carbonates of the Lower Cretaceous Basal Carbonates ( sensu lato ) and Upper Cretaceous Villeta/Gachetá/La Luna/Navay formations, the latter group being broadly coeval with the Eagle Ford Formation of North America. Unlike the Eagle Ford, however, the Colombian...
Series: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Publications
Published: 01 December 1993
DOI: 10.5724/gcs.93.14.0019
EISBN: 978-0-9836097-4-2
... attributes been well documented, the shales of the Eagle Ford Group are considered the source for the approximately 6 billion barrels of oil-in-place in the East Texas Field ( Halbouty et al. 1970 ; Magoon 1988 ). Previous work by Surles (1987) has clearly documented that at least limited portions...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 June 1947
AAPG Bulletin (1947) 31 (6): 1059–1070.
... County. Oil production in the sub-Clarksville sand of the upper Eagle Ford was also discovered in the Norman Paul field. Production in the South Flynn field in Leon County is considered to be from an undifferentiated Woodbine-Eagle Ford section. Two of the new oil discoveries produce from the Paluxy...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 1968
AAPG Bulletin (1968) 52 (3): 532–533.
... are the Eagle Ford Shale and the Austin Chalk. In most of the field, the Austin Chalk is in direct contact with the truncated and updip edge of the Woodbine. Beneath the reservoir sandstone is shale of the Lower Cretaceous Washita Group. Just east of the field, the Austin Chalk overlies the Washita directly...
Book Chapter

Series: AAPG Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1942
DOI: 10.1306/SV12343C12
EISBN: 9781629812496
... Abstract In East Texas much oil is found around the margins of a deep basin of Cretaceous rocks. The center of this basin lies about 75 miles southeast of Dallas. This area is noted for the East Texas field, on the east edge of the basin, and for the fault-line fields south of Dallas...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1946
AAPG Bulletin (1946) 30 (11): 1830–1856.
... designated East Hawkins and contains about 15 per cent of the producnig area of the field. The remaining 85 per cent lying west of this fault segment has been designated West Hawkins. Sub-Clarksville .—The thin sub-Clarksville sands which occur in the upper part of the Eagle Ford formation...
FIGURES | View All (11)