1-20 OF 1023 RESULTS FOR

EBSD data

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 30 July 2019
Mineralogical Magazine (2019) 83 (5): 639–644.
... light; ( b ) enlarged part of ( a ), Re L α X-ray map, circles show μXRD analyses; ( c ) and ( d ) EBSD data (1.5 µm step): ( c ) phase map showing the distribution of 2 H and 3 R polytypes; ( d ) inverse-pole figure map showing different orientations in colours relative to the X 0 direction...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2017
American Mineralogist (2017) 102 (9): 1843–1855.
...Katharina Marquardt; Marc De Graef; Saransh Singh; Hauke Marquardt; Anja Rosenthal; Sanae Koizuimi Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data yield plentiful information on microstructure and texture of natural as well as experimentally produced mineral and rock samples. For instance...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 March 2016
American Mineralogist (2016) 101 (3): 690–705.
... of analyses. This paper uses EBSD to study host–inclusion CORs in an inclusion-rich Permian metapegmatite garnet (Koralpe region, Eastern Alps, Austria), demonstrating the importance of large data sets and of EBSD in particular for the analysis of CORs. The distribution of measured orientations reflects host...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2015
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2015) 86 (1): 5–8.
...Manish A. Mamtani; A. R. Renjith Abstract Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) data of quartz are presented from two quartzite samples of the Lunavada Group (Aravalli Mountain Belt, India). The two samples lie at a distance of 4 km and 30 km from the eastern margin of Godhra granite, which...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2014
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2014) 83 (5): 479–482.
... not only provides the possibility of textural mapping of an area of a sample (thin section/rock slice) automatically, but also gives detailed crystallographic data - e.g. in quartz it gives orientations of c - and a -axes. Also, EBSD data provide the possibility of analyzing the LPO of different domains...
FIGURES
Image
Maps derived from EBSD data for (a) EBSD Map 1, (b) EBSD Map 2, and (c) EBSD Map 3, shown in Figure 2. In each map, part (i) is a map of EBSP band contrast. In these maps, the variations in band contrast depict inter- and intragrain boundaries; (ii) is a grain map colored for grain size (long axis length of fitted ellipse). Domains of poor band contrast that could not be indexed are shown in white. The boundaries between misoriented pixels of 5–15° and >15° are shown as thin and thick solid lines, respectively. >15° boundaries define large, elongate grains oriented at a high angle to the trace of the agitator substrate. The 5–15° boundaries show intragrain misorientation substructure. The labeled grains a–c in (a, ii) are shown in detail in Figure 7.
Published: 01 August 2009
F igure 4. Maps derived from EBSD data for ( a ) EBSD Map 1, ( b ) EBSD Map 2, and ( c ) EBSD Map 3, shown in Figure 2 . In each map, part (i) is a map of EBSP band contrast. In these maps, the variations in band contrast depict inter- and intragrain boundaries; (ii) is a grain map colored
Image
Identification of region of interest (ROI) from SEM-EBSD data (modified after Mamtani et al., 2020). (a) Inverse pole figure map of magnetite shown in the boxed area in figure 4d. I-II marks the profile line across a subgrain boundary within magnetite. Misorien-tation profile of magnetite along I-II is shown in (b). A misorientation of 6o is recorded indicating the presence of a low angle grain boundary (LAGB). This is shown in SEM image in (c) along with a biotite (Bi) grain. Thin film of magnetite for TEM study was extracted from the dashed area in (c), which is the Region of Interest (ROI). Note that the SEM image is in the XZ reference frame of the schist.
Published: 01 January 2025
Fig.5. Identification of region of interest (ROI) from SEM-EBSD data (modified after Mamtani et al., 2020 ). (a) Inverse pole figure map of magnetite shown in the boxed area in figure 4d. I-II marks the profile line across a subgrain boundary within magnetite. Misorien-tation profile
Image
EBSD data of three occurrences of chladniite [(a) area A, (b) area A, (c) area B] and its associated mineral assemblages with forward scattered electron diode (FSD), phase overlay, and inverse pole (IPF) images along with the Kikuchi patterns, Kikuchi bands, and Kikuchi solutions as well as pole figures {0001}, {1010}, and {1120}.
Published: 01 September 2024
Figure 3. EBSD data of three occurrences of chladniite [( a ) area A, ( b ) area A, ( c ) area B] and its associated mineral assemblages with forward scattered electron diode (FSD), phase overlay, and inverse pole (IPF) images along with the Kikuchi patterns, Kikuchi bands, and Kikuchi solutions
Image
EBSD data of ilmenite aggregate, sample CT827a, Zipplingen. (a) Phase map of ilmenite (red), magnetite (blue), and rutile (yellow). (b) Orientation map (all Euler coloring) of a. (c) Grain Reference Orientation Distribution map (GROD) displaying the angular deviation from the average grain orientation. Note the short wavelength misorientation pattern in the core. (d and e) Pole figures of the {0001}, {1120}, and {1011} planes of the (d) coarse grain in the core and (e) polycrystalline ilmenite rim.
Published: 01 June 2024
Figure 4. EBSD data of ilmenite aggregate, sample CT827a, Zipplingen. ( a ) Phase map of ilmenite (red), magnetite (blue), and rutile (yellow). ( b ) Orientation map (all Euler coloring) of a . ( c ) Grain Reference Orientation Distribution map (GROD) displaying the angular deviation from
Image
EBSD data of ilmenite aggregate within sample CT827a, Zipplingen. (a) All Euler orientation map. Note the larger grains with concave grain boundaries indicated by the three arrows as well as the region strongly enriched in TiO2 displayed by the white line. (b) GROD map displaying the angular deviation from the average grain orientation. Note the grains with internal misorientation and irregular grain boundaries indicated by the white arrows. (c–e) Ilmenite pole figures of the {0001}, {1120}, and {1011} planes of (c) grains <5 µm, (d) grains 5–10 µm, (e) grains >10 µm. (f) Orientation of all grains with GROD coloring as displayed in b. Blue circles indicate that the enclosed orientation data are mostly derived from grains with low internal misorientation, whereas red circles indicate that the enclosed orientation data are mostly derived from grains with relatively high internal misorientation.
Published: 01 June 2024
Figure 6. EBSD data of ilmenite aggregate within sample CT827a, Zipplingen. ( a ) All Euler orientation map. Note the larger grains with concave grain boundaries indicated by the three arrows as well as the region strongly enriched in TiO 2 displayed by the white line. ( b ) GROD map displaying
Image
EBSD data collected from heterogeneous Pd-rich pentlandite grains: (a and b) EBSD patterns collected from Pd-rich and Pd-free areas, correspondingly; (c) EDX mapping of the corresponding grain in Ni and Pd characteristic X-rays; (d) diffraction quality map; (e) Euler-colored orientation map and corresponding inverse pole figure, (f) local misorientation map depicting local strains and deformations and local disorientation graph; (g) map of disorientation from average depicting grain modularity and disorientation directions and corresponding coloring legend. (Color online.)
Published: 01 November 2023
Figure 4. EBSD data collected from heterogeneous Pd-rich pentlandite grains: ( a and b ) EBSD patterns collected from Pd-rich and Pd-free areas, correspondingly; ( c ) EDX mapping of the corresponding grain in Ni and Pd characteristic X-rays; ( d ) diffraction quality map; ( e ) Euler-colored
Image
Microstructure and EBSD data of calcite of mylonitic shear zone (Falasarna, sample 020414/7-2). (a) Distribution of crystallographic axes of calcite shown in equal-area upper-hemisphere projection. Asymmetry of texture suggests a dextral sense of shear, which means top-top-the WNW in the field. (b) Misorientation data of calcite mylonite. (c) Scanning Electron Microscopy image of deformed calcite of mylonite (sample section: width 52 µm, height 39 µm, scale 10 µm). For further explanation, see text.
Published: 20 July 2023
Figure 12. Microstructure and EBSD data of calcite of mylonitic shear zone (Falasarna, sample 020414/7-2). (a) Distribution of crystallographic axes of calcite shown in equal-area upper-hemisphere projection. Asymmetry of texture suggests a dextral sense of shear, which means top-top-the WNW
Image
(a) Quartz EBSD data from the analysed samples (for sample locations see Fig. 8). The colours of the example IPF figures on the left and the pole figures are in reference to the Z axis of the finite strain (pole of the main foliation). Black lines are high-angle boundaries (misorientation >10°), fuchsia lines are low-angle boundaries (misorientation 3–10°) and red lines are Dauphiné twin boundaries (misorientation of 60° around the c axis). The orientation in the pole figures data has been plotted as one point per grain. (b) Legend for the quartz IPF map, showing the main quartz crystallographic directions with different colours. (c) Interpreted quartz c-axes <0001> patterns of the studied samples. OA – opening angle; β – angle between the mylonitic foliation and the orthogonal plane of the quartz c-axes central girdle.
Published: 20 April 2020
Fig. 9. (a) Quartz EBSD data from the analysed samples (for sample locations see Fig.  8 ). The colours of the example IPF figures on the left and the pole figures are in reference to the Z axis of the finite strain (pole of the main foliation). Black lines are high-angle boundaries
Image
Structure of the same VPC crystals shown in Figure 2. (a–c) EBSD data, showing band contrast (a) and diffraction pattern indexing (b) to be poor in crystal cores and strong in crystal rims. (c) EBSD Euler images with orientation boundaries outlined. (d) Hyperspectral CL map colored by intensity of luminescence on the ~2.7 eV (459 nm) band that is intrinsic to cristobalite. (e) Laser Raman spectra from positions marked in a on Crystal L10-01 only, compared to characteristic α-cristobalite peak positions at 230 and 417 cm–1 (Kingma and Hemley 1994). Some beam damage is apparent in Crystal L10-01, which was analyzed by EPMA before EBSD and Laser Raman, but concurrently with CL. No beam damage is apparent in Crystal L10-07. (Color online.)
Published: 01 April 2020
Figure 3. Structure of the same VPC crystals shown in Figure 2 . ( a–c ) EBSD data, showing band contrast ( a ) and diffraction pattern indexing ( b ) to be poor in crystal cores and strong in crystal rims. ( c ) EBSD Euler images with orientation boundaries outlined. ( d ) Hyperspectral CL map
Image
EBSD data from the boxed area in Figure 16F; A) inverse pole figure map, crystals orientated along x-direction and colored according to reference triangle at B. Curved diagonal line marks one margin of a bivalve, three crystals cross the shell boundary marked with asterisks. The white area in the center right is a hole in the thin section; B) color reference triangle; C) pole plot of c-axis {0001} orientation; D) pole plots of a-axes {010} orientation. See text for further details.
Published: 28 January 2019
Fig. 17.— EBSD data from the boxed area in Figure 16 F; A) inverse pole figure map, crystals orientated along x-direction and colored according to reference triangle at B. Curved diagonal line marks one margin of a bivalve, three crystals cross the shell boundary marked with asterisks
Image
EBSD data from the boxed area in Figure 16F; A) inverse pole figure map, crystals orientated along x-direction and colored according to reference triangle at B. Curved diagonal line marks one margin of a bivalve, three crystals cross the shell boundary marked with asterisks. The white area in the center right is a hole in the thin section; B) color reference triangle; C) pole plot of c-axis {0001} orientation; D) pole plots of a-axes {010} orientation. See text for further details.
Published: 28 January 2019
Fig. 17.— EBSD data from the boxed area in Figure 16 F; A) inverse pole figure map, crystals orientated along x-direction and colored according to reference triangle at B. Curved diagonal line marks one margin of a bivalve, three crystals cross the shell boundary marked with asterisks
Image
(A) Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data show lattice misorientation within olivine (1–2), amphibole (3), and orthopyroxene (4). Maximum local misorientation from arbitrary point (white cross) varies for each crystal (see respective legend). (B) Pole figure and (C) misorientation axes data from crystal 1. (D–E) Olivine (Ol) low-angle boundary analyses and their respective misorientation axes for boundaries b1 and b2. (F) Amphibole (Amp) low-angle boundary analysis and misorientation axes. (G) Orthopyroxene (Opx) low-angle boundary analysis and misorientation axes.
Published: 12 December 2018
Figure 7. (A) Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data show lattice misorientation within olivine (1–2), amphibole (3), and orthopyroxene (4). Maximum local misorientation from arbitrary point (white cross) varies for each crystal (see respective legend). (B) Pole figure and (C
Image
Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data for granular zircon grains in Australasian Muong Nong–type (MN-type) tektites. A: Maps showing crystallographic orientations in Euler coordinate space. Elliptical areas without data are secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) pits. B: Pole figures showing data from maps in A for (001) and {110}. Angular separations of 90° are shown for {110}. C: Plots showing high-angle (85° to 95°) misorientation axes. Misorientation axes coincide with poles for (001) and {110}. Stereonets are equal area, lower hemisphere projections in sample x-y-z reference frame.
Published: 20 December 2017
Figure 3. Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data for granular zircon grains in Australasian Muong Nong–type (MN-type) tektites. A: Maps showing crystallographic orientations in Euler coordinate space. Elliptical areas without data are secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) pits. B: Pole
Image
Published: 01 February 2017
TABLE 1. MODAL COMPOSITION OF PERIDOTITES (FROM EBSD DATA)
Image
Published: 01 November 2016
TABLE 1. EBSD DATA COLLECTION AND PROCESSING SETTINGS