1-20 OF 450 RESULTS FOR

Duvernay Shale

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 2023
AAPG Bulletin (2023) 107 (9): 1477–1492.
... Shale of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin to investigate the impact of organic porosity on prediction of overpressure due to fluid expansion in gas generation windows. A comparison of formation pressure predictions from the application example in the Duvernay Shale demonstrates that the proposed...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 27 July 2022
Lithosphere (2022) 2022 (Special 12): 5261253.
...Xiangwen Kong; Hongjun Wang; Wei Yu; Ping Wang; Li Liu; Wenjing Zhang Abstract Duvernay shale spans over 6 million acres with a total resource of 440 billion barrels’ oil equivalent in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). The oil recovery factors typically decrease with the decreasing...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 12 May 2021
AAPG Bulletin (2021) 105 (5): 865–881.
... the Duvernay unconventional shale play in western-central Alberta (Canada). Our analysis reveals a high degree of correlation between core-measured mineral components and two wire-line logs: pulsed neutron spectroscopy (PNS) and spectral gamma ray (SGR). In particular, we show that PNS-derived calcium...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 27 February 2017
Interpretation (2017) 5 (2): T185–T197.
.... The oil and gas generation in this shale formation made it the source rock for many oil and gas fields in its vicinity. We attempt to showcase the characterization of Duvernay Formation using 3D multicomponent seismic data and integrating it with the available well log and other relevant data. This has...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 14 July 2022
Interpretation (2022) 10 (3): T555–T566.
... is composed of organic-rich mudrocks and carbonates and has total organic carbon (TOC) values ranging from 3 wt% to 5 wt% ( Preston et al., 2016 ). As a result, since 2011, the Duvernay Formation has been developed as a shale reservoir through horizontal multistage fracturing ( Preston et al., 2016...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 March 2016
AAPG Bulletin (2016) 100 (3): 405–422.
... that organic porosity in the Duvernay Formation ranges greatly from none in immature intervals to >6% in highly mature and organic-rich shale intervals. Scanning electron microscope images of immature and mature organic-rich shale samples of the Duvernay Formation show a progressive increase in organic...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 15 May 2019
AAPG Bulletin (2019) 103 (5): 1017–1044.
...Tian Dong; Nicholas B. Harris; Julia M. McMillan; Cory E. Twemlow; Brent R. Nassichuk; David L. Bish ABSTRACT The influence of thermal maturity on porosity in shale samples from the Upper Devonian Duvernay Formation is examined. The samples span a maturity range from immature to the wet gas window...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1980
Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (1980) 28 (3): 345–410.
...F. A. Stoakes ABSTRACT Within basin-filling shales of the Frasnian Duvernay and Ireton Formations a number of inclined electric log markers indicate the presence of significant submarine topography during deposition. Log markers reflect submarine hardgrounds on the platform and in the basin...
Image
Sonic transit time versus depth for Duvernay Shale from different wells in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. The blue is sonic readings of immature Duvernay Shale, and the red is sonic readings of mature Duvernay Shale.
Published: 01 September 2023
Figure 1. Sonic transit time versus depth for Duvernay Shale from different wells in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. The blue is sonic readings of immature Duvernay Shale, and the red is sonic readings of mature Duvernay Shale.
Image
The distribution of Duvernay Shale in central Alberta, Canada, showing the lateral distribution of Duvernay sediments and core sample sites (well locations) in Alberta (modified from Rokosh et al., 2012). The inset at the upper left corner shows the location of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Scale units are in kilometers.
Published: 01 September 2023
Figure 3. The distribution of Duvernay Shale in central Alberta, Canada, showing the lateral distribution of Duvernay sediments and core sample sites (well locations) in Alberta (modified from Rokosh et al., 2012 ). The inset at the upper left corner shows the location of the Western Canada
Image
Pore diameter distribution of Duvernay shale. Each line denotes sample from various depths of Duvernay shale.
Published: 27 July 2022
Figure 2 Pore diameter distribution of Duvernay shale. Each line denotes sample from various depths of Duvernay shale.
Image
Effect of nanopores on oil phase density in Duvernay shale.
Published: 27 July 2022
Figure 6 Effect of nanopores on oil phase density in Duvernay shale.
Image
Effect of nanopores on oil phase viscosity in Duvernay shale.
Published: 27 July 2022
Figure 7 Effect of nanopores on oil phase viscosity in Duvernay shale.
Image
Effect of gas injection on P-T diagram in Duvernay shale. Solid lines indicate the phase envelop, and dashed lines connecting to solid lines indicate the equal-gas-liquid mole fraction lines. Solid circles indicate the critical points. The vertical black dashed line indicates the reservoir temperature. The red lines and solid circle indicate the P-T diagram before injection. The other colors of lines indicate P-T diagrams after different gas injection.
Published: 27 July 2022
Figure 8 Effect of gas injection on P-T diagram in Duvernay shale. Solid lines indicate the phase envelop, and dashed lines connecting to solid lines indicate the equal-gas-liquid mole fraction lines. Solid circles indicate the critical points. The vertical black dashed line indicates
Image
Cross-basin demonstration of the SVM approach. Data from the Duvernay Shale Formation and the Barnett Shale Formation are used as the test and training data, respectively. Panels (a-d) show the input logs from the Duvernay Shale Formation: gamma-ray, resistivity, sonic, and density logs, respectively. Panel (e) shows the predicted TOC-rich (green) and TOC-poor (red) layers for the Duvernay Shale Formation. The predictions match with independently measured core-measured TOC values (blue) and TOC predicted by using a revised sonic and density-based model (Wang et al., 2016).
Published: 30 June 2021
Figure 8. Cross-basin demonstration of the SVM approach. Data from the Duvernay Shale Formation and the Barnett Shale Formation are used as the test and training data, respectively. Panels (a-d) show the input logs from the Duvernay Shale Formation: gamma-ray, resistivity, sonic, and density logs
Image
(a) Location of the case study in the Fox Creek area of the Duvernay shale play in central Alberta, Canada, located inside the Duvernay zone defined by the Alberta Energy Regulator to implement a magnitude‐based traffic‐light protocol (TLP; Shipman et al., 2018). Dots show earthquakes reported by the Alberta’s RAVEN seismograph network (Stern et al., 2018), and short lines indicate the measured directions of the maximum horizontal stress (Heidbach et al., 2016). (b) Map view of the study area showing depth to the top of the Duvernay formation obtained from the 3D seismic data (Weir et al., 2018). Hydraulic fracturing of horizontal wells was monitored with 68 borehole three‐component (3C) stations, six surface broadband seismometers, one surface 3C geophone, and one strong‐motion accelerometer. (c,d) Cross sections from the map view of the study area shown in (b), with the gamma‐ray log of the vertical well (shown for reference). (e) Density and dipole sonic logs from the vertical well were used to calibrate the background model. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 03 April 2019
Figure 1. (a) Location of the case study in the Fox Creek area of the Duvernay shale play in central Alberta, Canada, located inside the Duvernay zone defined by the Alberta Energy Regulator to implement a magnitude‐based traffic‐light protocol (TLP; Shipman et al. , 2018 ). Dots show
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 30 June 2021
Interpretation (2021) 9 (3): T735–T745.
...Figure 8. Cross-basin demonstration of the SVM approach. Data from the Duvernay Shale Formation and the Barnett Shale Formation are used as the test and training data, respectively. Panels (a-d) show the input logs from the Duvernay Shale Formation: gamma-ray, resistivity, sonic, and density logs...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 01 November 1989
Geophysics (1989) 54 (11): 1410–1419.
... on the Leduc-Woodbend atoll section; and reflections from the offreef shales (Duvernay and Ireton formations) terminate abruptly against the reef flank.In addition, the amplitude of the underlying Cooking Lake platform reflection varies laterally, depending on the velocity of the overlying formation (Duvernay...
Journal Article
Journal: Geophysics
Published: 04 July 2022
Geophysics (2022) 87 (5): M163–M177.
... TOC estimation is conditioned on the available well-log observations and is further defined by a priori and likelihood distributions. We demonstrate examples of applications of this approach to estimate the TOC content on two real field data sets from the well-known Devonian Duvernay shale of Western...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Image
(A) Plots comparing observed and organic-porosity corrected sonic readings in the 14-16-62-21W5 well. (B) Estimated formation pressure with (red) and without (blue) correction for organic porosity of Duvernay Shale (3250–3290 m) in the 14-16-62-21W5 well. The data points are average values of every 20 m. The red dotted lines are the top and bottom of Duvernay Shale.
Published: 01 September 2023
Figure 8. (A) Plots comparing observed and organic-porosity corrected sonic readings in the 14-16-62-21W5 well. (B) Estimated formation pressure with (red) and without (blue) correction for organic porosity of Duvernay Shale (3250–3290 m) in the 14-16-62-21W5 well. The data points are average