Narrow, discontinuous bands of high-grade subophiolitic metamorphic rocks, comprising predominantly amphibolite facies metabasites with rare metasediments, are observed at the contact between the complexes and subjacent mélanges of the Mesohellenic Ophiolite exposed in northwestern Greece. Both conventional and pseudosection thermobarometry have been used to yield estimated peak pressure-temperature (P-T) conditions of these tectonic sheets. Toward the leading edge of the ophiolite, subophiolitic rocks of the Vourinos Complex record peak metamorphic temperatures of 770 ± 100 °C. Pressures of 4 ± 1 kbar beneath the Vourinos are estimated on the basis of hornblende composition and are similar to the expected pressures from ophiolitic overburden. Beneath the exposed Dramala Complex, at the trailing edge of the ophiolitic body southwest of the Vourinos, estimated temperatures reached 800 ± 40 °C and 12.00 ± 1.27 kbar at the top of an apparent inverted metamorphic gradient imposed by discrete phases of accretion. High pressure assemblages beneath ophiolitic bodies imply exhumation relative to the overlying ophiolite. Estimated homologous temperatures in the upper plate are similar to those inferred for channeled exhumation during continental collision. Mineral assemblages lower in the Dramala sole indicate reduced temperatures and peak pressures. Similar pressures obtained within lower temperature sole rocks beneath Vourinos and Pindos suggest that a shallowly dipping thrust may have been responsible for obduction. Peak temperatures and pressures are in agreement with those estimated for secondary thrust propagation beneath a proto-arc after subduction in an intra-oceanic setting.

Abstract The Eocene–Miocene Mesohellenic Trough is an elongate sediment-filled tectonic basin trending NW across central Greece and into Albania. Neotethyan oceanic rocks, including Triassic–Jurassic rift-related volcanic rocks and deep-sea sediments, accretionary mélange and ophiolitic complexes, crop out along its margins. These units were tectonically emplaced onto the Pelagonian microcontinent to the east and the Apulian–African continental margin to the west. In northern Greece, the mid-Jurassic Vourinos ophiolite on the eastern margin of the trough is geographically separated from the synchronous Pindos ophiolite along the western margin by a minimum c. 20 km distance. The sedimentary fill of the trough obscures their presumed subsurface continuation, although magnetic surveys identify thick ‘ophiolitic’ rocks beneath the basin. We interpret these ophiolites as parts of the same oceanic slab, two parts of a single larger oceanic complex we now term the Mesohellenic ophiolite. Comparable ophiolitic complexes to the south (the Koziakas and Othris) and the ophiolites of the Mirdita complex to the north in Albania are considered as members of this same complex. Geological and petrological data from the Vourinos and Pindos ophiolites define intra-slab heterogeneity. Vourinos essentially is a ‘Penrose-style’ ophiolite with ‘supra-subduction’ compositions; the less continuous Pindos ophiolite shows coexisting mid-ocean ridge basalt and island arc characteristics. Ophiolitic rocks that seem to represent geographical overlap between these characteristic associations crop out along their northern (Dotsikos strip) and southern (Mesovouni) margins. Variations in mantle strain conditions across the ophiolitic slab have been mapped, and demonstrate a single orientation of deformation; this is explained by variable strain kinematics that persisted across the ductile–brittle boundary. A continuity from ductile to brittle emplacement structures spans the Mesohellenic Trough, independent of petrological association, and indicates the original relative positions of these ophiolites within the oceanic slab. These structures illustrate tectonic ‘steps’ of obduction from the ridge crest onto the Pelagonian margin to the east, and can be relatively timed by the overlap of magmatism with ductile deformation in different parts of the slab. Hence, rotations of original horizontality are dated to the period preceding cessation of ductile field deformation, while still in the oceanic environment. The morphology defined by these structures and the horizontal rotation of stratigraphy are analogous to a spoon- or scoop-shaped nappe originating in the ductile field at its base, and crossing into the brittle field rapidly at its leading edge (Vourinos), whereas the mylonitic deformation characterizes the ‘trailing’ end (Pindos). Age relations require that geochemical variation between the two complexes must be explained within a model of synchronous generation, possibly with apparent ‘supra-subduction zone’ rifting of originally heterogeneous mantle, or an overlapping series of diverse processes of magma generation in an initially homogeneous mantle. Indications of the original ridge crest directions suggest the operation of several simultaneous spreading centres, separated by transform faults or ‘pseudofaults’. A palinspastic reconstruction of the slab constrains applicable oceanic models and provides the basis of future research.

Abstract The Eastern Mediterranean region is characterized by one of the largest concentrations of ophiolites anywhere in the world. Many of these ophiolites are fragmentary or highly deformed, such that their initial mode of tectonic emplacement cannot easily be inferred from the local held relations. The emplacement of many of these ophiolites can usefully be compared with the intact Oman ophiolite, one of the largest and best-studied ophiolites in the world. The Oman ophiolite is commonly believed to have been created in Late Cretaceous time ( c . 95 Ma) above an oceanward-dipping, intra-oceanic subduction zone. This was followed by collision of the subduction zone with the downflexed Arabian passive margin, facilitating the emplacement of the ophiolite onto the continental margin. A less likely alternative is that the Oman ophiolite formed at a mid-ocean ridge that then collapsed, initiating the emplacement of the ophiolite. An Oman-type model is applicable to many of the Mid-Jurassic and the Late Cretaceous ophiolites of the Eastern Mediterranean region that were thrust over former passive continental margins. These ophiolites are again mainly of suprasubductionzone type. Such ophiolites include many of the Jurassic ophiolites of Greece, Albania and former Yugoslavia, and also the Late Cretaceous ophiolites of Turkey and northern Syria. These ophiolites were emplaced from both more northerly and southerly Neotethyan ocean basins. In contrast, the opposing (northerly) margins of these oceanic basins experienced a history of subduction-accretion, marginal arc volcanism and back-arc basin formation (‘Cordilleran-type’ ophiolites). Ophiolites that were emplaced associated with active margin settings range from large accreted thrust sheets to small slices within accretionary prisms and back-arc basins. Examples include the Late Cretaceous ophiolites that are related both to the northern margin of the southern Neotethys and to the northern margin of the northern Neotethys in Turkey. Not all ophiolites were emplaced in response to large-scale horizontal tectonic transport (e.g. Jurassic Guevgueli ophiolite, northern Greece), and several ophiolites experienced dominantly strike-slip or transpression (e.g. the Late Cretaceous Antalya ophiolites, SW Turkey). In general, the mode of ophiolite emplacement, especially the direction of emplacement relative to the orientation of the adjacent continental margin was influenced by the regional palaeogeographical setting.