1-20 OF 1517 RESULTS FOR

Diamond Creek Sandstone

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1949
AAPG Bulletin (1949) 33 (7): 1161–1197.
... by the Oquirrh, Kirkman, Diamond Creek, and Park City formations. The black shale of the Manning Canyon intergrades with the limestone at the base of the Oquirrh formation. The Oquirrh formation, about 25,000 feet thick, is mainly quartzitic sandstone with some interbedded limestone. Fusulinids of Atoka, Des...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 April 1996
Economic Geology (1996) 91 (2): 273–288.
...Ricardo D. Presnell; W. T. Parry Abstract Barneys Canyon is a sediment-hosted, disseminated gold deposit located 7 km from the large, gold-rich, Bingham porphyry copper deposit. Host rocks for gold mineralization are the Permian Park City dolomite and siltstone and the Kirkman-Diamond Creek...
Image
Normalized detrital-zircon plot for fluvial and eolian Cutler units in the Castle Valley, Utah, and White Rim Sandstone in Canyonlands National Park and at Hite, Utah. Explanation: Cutler fluvial-facies samples 11CT01 from NE flank of Castle Valley and 11CVC01 from along Castle Creek at northwest end of Castle Valley. Castle Valley Sandstone samples are arranged in stratigraphic order. Lower two samples have slightly greater influence of local sources than higher samples, indicated by narrow color bars indicating subpopulations D′ and C′. White Rim Sandstone samples are from Hite, Utah (11WRB), and Shafer Trail in Canyonlands National Park (11WRA). Sample of correlative Diamond Creek Sandstone is from southeastern flank of Oquirrh basin in north-central Utah (Lawton et al., 2010).
Published: 01 October 2015
(11WRB), and Shafer Trail in Canyonlands National Park (11WRA). Sample of correlative Diamond Creek Sandstone is from southeastern flank of Oquirrh basin in north-central Utah ( Lawton et al., 2010 ).
Image
Published: 01 June 2004
Diamond Creek sandstone shows through a window in the West fault that down-drops the rocks in the foreground. The Barneys Canyon mine produced more than 15 tonnes of Au.
Image
—Composite diagram comparing stratigraphic sections along south flank of Uinta Mountains with section in southern Wasatch and Oquirrh mountains. P. C., Park City formation; D. C., Diamond Creek sandstone; K., Kirkman limestone; O., Oquirrh formation; W., Weber formation; M., Morgan formation; M. C., Manning Canyon shale; G. B., Great Blue limestone; H., Humbug formation; M. D., Madison limestone and Deseret limestone; J., Jefferson(?) dolomite; O., Ophir formation; T., Tintic quartzite.
Published: 01 July 1949
Fig. 8. —Composite diagram comparing stratigraphic sections along south flank of Uinta Mountains with section in southern Wasatch and Oquirrh mountains. P. C., Park City formation; D. C., Diamond Creek sandstone; K., Kirkman limestone; O., Oquirrh formation; W., Weber formation; M., Morgan
Image
(A) Reconstruction of White Rim erg during Kungurian (late Leonardian, ca. 273 Ma) time. Black arrows are average estimated wind directions from White Rim Sandstone foresets discussed in text. Red arrow is average foreset dip direction of Huntoon and Chan (1987). Violet arrows are wind directions estimated from dominant foreset dip in lower member of Castle Valley Sandstone. Dashed black arrow near shoreline is estimated direction of longshore drift driven by NNW winds. Thin arrows are sediment transport directions estimated from fluvial cross-bed data of the undifferentiated Cutler Formation (Buller, 2009; Venus et al., 2015) and Organ Rock Formation (arrow east of confluence of Green and Colorado rivers; Mountney and Jagger, 2004) and provenance data described in this paper. Thin black lines near confluence of Green and Colorado rivers are linear topographic features on upper surface of White Rim Sandstone (Baars and Seager, 1970), here interpreted as remnant topography created by large linear dunes. They appear short on the map because they are only exposed on the surface of the White Rim Sandstone and are buried to the northwest beneath the Moenkopi Formation. Shoreline position from 275 Ma map in Blakey (2009). Position of Diamond Creek Sandstone sample (DC) adjusted 30 km westward to accommodate eastward translation during Late Cretaceous shortening (Kwon and Mitra, 2004). Other locations: CR—Capitol Reef shoreline location (Kamola and Chan, 1988); ND—Nokai Dome, where 7 m of White Rim Sandstone is interpreted to overlie a separate erg deposit, the De Chelly Sandstone (Irwin, 1971). (B) Modern Namib sand sea (note north orientation), illustrating dominant south-southwesterly zonal trade wind direction (black arrows) and orographic berg wind direction (violet arrow). Wind directions from Glennie (1987); base map from GoogleEarth. Thin black lines are prominent linear dunes in central part of erg; thin black arrows indicate fluvial dispersal directions.
Published: 01 October 2015
. Shoreline position from 275 Ma map in Blakey (2009) . Position of Diamond Creek Sandstone sample (DC) adjusted 30 km westward to accommodate eastward translation during Late Cretaceous shortening ( Kwon and Mitra, 2004 ). Other locations: CR—Capitol Reef shoreline location ( Kamola and Chan, 1988 ); ND
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1970
AAPG Bulletin (1970) 54 (2): 285–312.
... contain thick Permian miogeosynclinal sediments which accumulated in the eastern Oquirrh basin. The upper 9,000–10,000 ft (2,745–3,048 m) of the Oquirrh Formation is of early to early-medial Wolfcampian age. It is overlain by the Kirkman Limestone (medial to late Wolfcampian), Diamond Creek Sandstone...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1940
AAPG Bulletin (1940) 24 (4): 617–635.
.... A gray or buff to red, fine to coarse-grained cross-bedded sandstone, in large part lime-cemented and friable but locally with a siliceous cement, conformably underlies the Park City formation and is 600–1,000 feet or more thick. It is here named the Diamond Creek sandstone from outcrops in Sec. 22, T. 8...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Image
Disconformities are evident above some coal beds, as is this one northwest of Diamond Creek, which is directly overlain by sandstone containing rip-up coal clasts (possibly pieces of material from the small stump beneath).
Published: 01 January 2005
Text-Figure 5. Disconformities are evident above some coal beds, as is this one northwest of Diamond Creek, which is directly overlain by sandstone containing rip-up coal clasts (possibly pieces of material from the small stump beneath).
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1952
AAPG Bulletin (1952) 36 (9): 1777–1801.
... of the district. The Paint Creek is one of the most variable Chester formations both in lithologic character and thickness. The thickness ranges from 0 to 63 feet; the thickest sections are in the northwest and southeast parts of the district. It is almost entirely interbedded thin shale and sandstone layers...
FIGURES | View All (18)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1963
AAPG Bulletin (1963) 47 (2): 350–351.
..., and Leppy Range of western Utah, and in the Cherry Creek Mountains, Butte Mountains, Pequop Mountains, Diamond Range, and Pancake Range of Nevada. Ferguson Mountain Formation (Wolfcampian) of northeastern Nevada and part of adjacent Utah is approximately 2,000 feet of alternating reefoid, bioclastic matrix...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 November 1953
AAPG Bulletin (1953) 37 (11): 2612.
... are the Logan-Milligen sub-basin of early Chesterian time, the main basin in Wolfcampian time, and the Diamond Creek and Lower Park City sub-basins of late Wolfcampian and early Leonardian time. In the latter, dolomite, red and buff sandstone, and anhydrite were deposited to notable thicknesses. The eastern...
Image
Close-up photos of prodelta mudstones of the Tununk Shale Member and lower Ferron Sandstone Member. A) Close-up photo of centimeter-scale, normally graded siltstone to claystone beds. Inverse grading can be seen in uppermost beds. The bed immediately below the inversely graded bed shows lamination and scour. Triangles indicate normal grading, inverted triangles indicate inverse grading, diamonds indicate beds that show inverse grading at the base with normally graded tops. Ferron Notom delta, near Hanksville, Utah. B) Close-up photo of normal grading. Lower bed shows erosional scour and faint internal lamination. Also note the complete lack of burrowing. Ferron Notom delta, near Hanksville. C) Complex heterolithic unit showing inverse and normal grading (triangles and diamonds) overlying rippled sandstones. Photo of Parasequence 2c, entrance to Muddy Creek. Note the lack of bioturbation in all examples. All scales are 3 cm.
Published: 01 April 2009
scour and faint internal lamination. Also note the complete lack of burrowing. Ferron Notom delta, near Hanksville. C) Complex heterolithic unit showing inverse and normal grading (triangles and diamonds) overlying rippled sandstones. Photo of Parasequence 2c, entrance to Muddy Creek. Note the lack
Image
Published: 01 July 2002
diamond represents Pb-Pb ages of galena in epigenetic Au deposits (from Huston et al., 2002 ). 1 = volcanic rocks, 2 = shale and banded iron-formation, 3 = sandstone, 4 = conglomerate, 5 = inherited and detrital zircons, 6 = granites, 7 = deformation event—age known, 8
Image
Oxygen isotopic and elemental composition of carbonates from the Uinta Basin. Filled symbols denote lacustrine samples, and open symbols denote fluvial samples. Note the different time span on the y-axes of panels (A) and (B). Panel (A) shows samples from lacustrine rocks of the Green River Formation cropping out in the Willow Creek–Indian Canyon section: squares denote Main Body samples, circles denote Saline Facies samples, and diamonds denote Sandstone and Limestone Facies samples. Panel (B) shows a composite of samples from the mostly fluvial rocks of the Uinta and Duchesne River Formations that are exposed in five different sections (see Fig. 1): triangles denote samples of the Wagonhound Member, circles denote samples of the Myton Member, diamonds denote samples of the Brennan Basin Member, crosses denote samples of the Dry Gulch Creek Member, and squares denote samples of the Lapoint Member. Available age constraints for all units sampled are shown along the y-axis and listed in Table DR2 (see footnote 1). Gray shading indicates the maximum expected variation in oxygen isotopic values of calcite owing to terrestrial temperature changes inferred from paleobotanical analyses of Wolfe (1994). Dashed line labeled MZ indicates the lake highstand of the Mahogany Zone at 48.6 Ma.
Published: 01 January 2009
River Formation cropping out in the Willow Creek–Indian Canyon section: squares denote Main Body samples, circles denote Saline Facies samples, and diamonds denote Sandstone and Limestone Facies samples. Panel (B) shows a composite of samples from the mostly fluvial rocks of the Uinta and Duchesne River
Image
(A) Study area location in coastal California, USA (orange region). White diamond shows the location of the Mendocino triple junction. (B) Shown is a 10 m Digital Elevation Model (DEM) overlain with the boundaries of the four major drainage basins: the Russian River (RR), the Eel River (ER), the Mad River (MR), and Redwood Creek (RC). (C) Geologic map of the study area after Jennings (1977). Ep—Paleocene sandstones and mudstones; KJf/KJfm—Jurassic to Cretaceous Franciscan mélange; KJfs—Early Cretaceous Franciscan schist; Ku—Late Cretaceous sandstones; Mzv—Jurassic to Cretaceous basalt; P—Miocene to Pleistocene sandstones; Q—Quaternary sediments; TK—Late Cretaceous to Pliocene sandstones and mudstones; um—ultramafic rocks. See text for further description of relevant rock units. (D) Normalized channel steepness indices from Bennett et al. (2016). (E) Local relief calculated in a 1 km moving window. Red points indicate the locations of 986 channel width measurements made in Google Earth. (F) The 38 subcatchments used for analysis of erosion rate-channel steepness relationships by Bennett et al. (2016) are shown, colored by landslide erosion rate. In this study, we used 344 subcatchments of uniform drainage area (10–50 km2) that we delineated following Forte et al. (2016). Here we show those subcatchments colored by (G) proportion of the subcatchment underlain by Franciscan mélange and (H) catchment-averaged channel steepness.
Published: 27 July 2020
(ER), the Mad River (MR), and Redwood Creek (RC). (C) Geologic map of the study area after Jennings (1977) . Ep—Paleocene sandstones and mudstones; KJf/KJfm—Jurassic to Cretaceous Franciscan mélange; KJfs—Early Cretaceous Franciscan schist; Ku—Late Cretaceous sandstones; Mzv—Jurassic to Cretaceous
Series: GSA Memoirs
Published: 27 September 2021
DOI: 10.1130/2021.1217(13)
EISBN: 9780813782171
... Black Diamond Mines Regional Preserve from Somersville site (location shown in Fig. 8 ; photo courtesy of Stephen Edwards). The Markley Creek section of the Nortonville Shale in the valley is overlain by Lower Markley Sandstone forming the hills to the north. The ridge and vale topography...
FIGURES | View All (33)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1952
AAPG Bulletin (1952) 36 (4): 575–634.
... Creek. Where studied, the formation is seen to conformably overlie Wolfcampian Oquirrh and to grade laterally and vertically into the overlying Diamond Creek sandstone which Baker (1947) regards as equivalent to the Permian Coconino sandstone of the San Rafael Swell and adjacent area. Recently...
FIGURES | View All (29)
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 01 October 2015
Geosphere (2015) 11 (5): 1475–1506.
... (11WRB), and Shafer Trail in Canyonlands National Park (11WRA). Sample of correlative Diamond Creek Sandstone is from southeastern flank of Oquirrh basin in north-central Utah ( Lawton et al., 2010 ). ...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Image
Figure 15. Vein-quartz δ18O vs. whole-rock silicate δ18O values. Solid squares—sandstone, open circles—shale, solid diamonds—chert. The regional trend of the vein-quartz vs. whole-rock array is described by the equation δ18Ovein quartz = δ18Owhole rock +  , where     8–0.3(δ18Owhole rock). The insets are vein-quartz vs. whole-rock diagrams from two outcrops that exhibit a range in rock-buffered characteristics typical of the Ouachita Mountains. Both of these outcrops are of comparable lateral extent, ∼300 m. Upper-left inset: Sample location 67 contains chert and siliceous shale from the Polk Creek Shale, Big Fork  Chert, and Womble Shale. The vein vs. whole-rock array is parallel to the zero-fractionation line, and veins and whole rocks have similar compositions. This result indicates that rock buffering occurred on the meter scale. Lower-right inset: Sample location 1 consists of sandstones and shales from the Jackfork Sandstone. The vein vs. whole-rock array is vertical; the veins have a uniform composition, and the whole rock has variable compositions. This result indicates that rock buffering occurred on the outcrop scale, tens to hundreds of meters. Horizontal arrays on the vein vs. whole-rock diagram indicating fluid-dominated vein formation are not present within the Ouachita Mountains. Geologic examples of fluid-dominated vein formation are hydrothermal systems associated with ore deposits and shallow-level pluton emplacement.
Published: 01 November 2002
Figure 15. Vein-quartz δ 18 O vs. whole-rock silicate δ 18 O values. Solid squares—sandstone, open circles—shale, solid diamonds—chert. The regional trend of the vein-quartz vs. whole-rock array is described by the equation δ 18 O vein quartz = δ 18 O whole rock + , where 8–0.3(δ 18 O whole