1-20 OF 144 RESULTS FOR

Decatur Illinois

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 07 May 2024
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (5): 2424–2445.
...Josimar A. Silva; Mansour Khosravi; Hongkyu Yoon; Michael Fehler; Scott Frailey; Ruben Juanes ABSTRACT We numerically investigate the mechanisms that resulted in induced seismicity occurrence associated with CO 2 injection at the Illinois Basin–Decatur Project (IBDP). We build a geologically...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Journal: The Leading Edge
Published: 01 February 2024
The Leading Edge (2024) 43 (2): 125–131.
...Debasis Chaudhuri; Ankur Roy Abstract The Illinois Basin Decatur Project, a carbon capture and sequestration task, was undertaken to sequester 1 million tonnes of CO 2 into a sandstone reservoir. A 3D seismic survey was conducted to characterize the reservoir. A geomodel was developed from seismic...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Published: 14 July 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (5): 2168–2187.
...Nadège Langet; Bettina Goertz‐Allmann; Volker Oye; Robert A. Bauer; Sherilyn Williams‐Stroud; Anna Maria Dichiarante; Sallie E. Greenberg ABSTRACT The three‐year CO 2 injection period at the Illinois Basin ‐ Decatur Project site (Decatur, Illinois, United States) produced a number of microseismic...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Published: 10 June 2015
Seismological Research Letters (2015) 86 (4): 1096–1101.
... seismicity on pre‐existing faults or fractures. If these faults or fractures are large and critically stressed, seismic events can occur with magnitudes large enough to pose a hazard to surface installations and, possibly more critical, the seal integrity of the cap rock. The Decatur, Illinois, carbon...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 28 March 2024
Interpretation (2024) 12 (2): SB19–SB27.
... and costs while ensuring robust and reproducible results. We demonstrated the efficacy of our approach by applying the workflow to the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project site. The automated workflow successfully identified major fractured zones, multiple baffles, and an interbedded layer with a high resolution...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2022
The Journal of Geology (2022) 130 (5): 335–355.
...Jared T. Freiburg; Markus Peltz; Donna C. Willette; Georg H. Grathoff Abstract At the Illinois Basin–Decatur Project, a large-scale CO 2 capture and geologic storage demonstration project in the saline Mount Simon Sandstone in central Illinois, three overlying and laterally continuous shale...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 September 1986
GSA Bulletin (1986) 97 (9): 1098–1105.
... Huron-Erie lobe. The Decatur sublobe formed in a broad pre-Woodfordian lowland between drift-covered bedrock uplands to the northwest in McLean and Livingston Counties and to the southeast in Vermilion and Edgar Counties, Illinois. A coalesced Huron-Erie ice lobe at times deflected flow of the Lake...
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 01 April 2016
Geosphere (2016) 12 (2): 585–606.
... seismic volume, all centered on Decatur (Illinois, USA), provide new insights on the structure and composition of Precambrian basement beneath the Illinois Basin of the central USA midcontinent. The new data reveal a pattern of strong and coherent reflections and associated diffractions deeply buried...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Image
Location of the samples from the wells at the Illinois Basin–Decatur Project (IBDP) in Decatur, Illinois, and detailed stratigraphic column at the IBDP with target reservoir and major sealing units identified. GM2 = Geophysical Monitoring Well 2; VW1 = Verification Well 1; USDW = underground source of drinking water.
Published: 01 September 2022
Figure 1.  Location of the samples from the wells at the Illinois Basin–Decatur Project (IBDP) in Decatur, Illinois, and detailed stratigraphic column at the IBDP with target reservoir and major sealing units identified. GM2 = Geophysical Monitoring Well 2; VW1 = Verification Well 1; USDW
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 04 August 2014
Interpretation (2014) 2 (3): SF125–SF133.
... environment and has a major diagenetic overprint of karst processes. There were vuggy intervals (up to 2.1-m [7-ft] thick) present that have caused lost circulation of drilling fluid to occur when penetrating through these intervals. This article used data from Decatur, Illinois, to illustrate a case study...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Journal: Interpretation
Published: 17 May 2022
Interpretation (2022) 10 (3): SG1–SG9.
... flow velocities of methane within the low-permeability Upper Jurassic Haynesville Formation, (2) defined permeability-based flow units to evaluate saline formations for long-term geologic carbon sequestration, and (3) calculated the migration distance of carbon dioxide plumes at the Decatur, Illinois...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Journal Article
Published: 29 January 2021
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2020) 90 (11): 1614–1641.
...Arnold Jan H. Reesink; Jim Best; Jared T. Freiburg; Nathan D. Webb; Charles C. Monson; Robert W. Ritzi ABSTRACT The Cambrian Mount Simon Sandstone has been the subject of extensive study and multiple industrial-scale carbon storage demonstrations at Decatur, Illinois, USA. The development...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Image
Stratigraphic column of the Lower Mount Simon Sandstone (LMSS) at Decatur, Illinois, USA.
Published: 29 January 2021
Fig. 1.— Stratigraphic column of the Lower Mount Simon Sandstone (LMSS) at Decatur, Illinois, USA.
Image
Photomicrographs of St. Peter Sandstone core from the Illinois Basin illustrating diagenetic effects of compaction and cementation on porosity. (A) The CCS 1 well in Decatur, Illinois; depth = 1052 m (3450 ft); porosity = 19.6%. (B) The Johnson 1 well in Marion County, Illinois; depth = 1600 m (5249 ft); porosity = 11.6%.
Published: 01 March 2017
Figure 19. Photomicrographs of St. Peter Sandstone core from the Illinois Basin illustrating diagenetic effects of compaction and cementation on porosity. (A) The CCS 1 well in Decatur, Illinois; depth = 1052 m (3450 ft); porosity = 19.6%. (B) The Johnson 1 well in Marion County, Illinois; depth
Image
A) Development of the Laurentian continent and the position of Illinois during the late Precambrian (upper left map), Middle Cambrian (upper middle), and Late Cambrian (upper right) (maps simplified after Blakey 2008). Current north is given next to the outline of Illinois, and paleo-north is given at the top right of the maps. Note the direction of the trade winds and overall transgression during the northward shift of the continent. Note that the continent experiences a longer-term transgression during the Cambrian (Haq and Schutter 2008), whereas the deposits show a (shorter-term) “drying-upward” depositional sequence. B) Thickness of the Mount Simon formation in Illinois and adjoining states (modified from Leetaru and Freiburg 2014; © 2014 University of Illinois Board of Trustees, used by permission of the Illinois State Geological Survey. Gray line indicates the Illinois Basin). C) Location of the wells relative to the topography of the Precambrian basement at Decatur, Illinois (modified from Freiburg et al. 2020). The spacing between the wells is approximately 1 km.
Published: 29 January 2021
the Illinois Basin). C) Location of the wells relative to the topography of the Precambrian basement at Decatur, Illinois (modified from Freiburg et al. 2020 ). The spacing between the wells is approximately 1 km.
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2006
Seismological Research Letters (2006) 77 (3): 403.
... “A Wild Man of the Woods.” was published in the Adams Sentinel (Gettysburg, PA), page 6, column 1, 5 June 1851. “He Is Up a Tree.” was published in the Decatur (Illinois) Daily Dispatch , page 3, column 5, 23 July 1890. Contributed to SRL by Jeffrey W...
FIGURES
Image
Illinois Basin–Decatur Project (IBDP) location, CO2 injection rate and earthquake locations. (a) Location of the IBDP. (b) Injection rate (blue solid line), carbon capture and storage (CCS1) bottomhole pressure (BHP) (red solid line), and earthquake frequency (black histogram). The injection rate and BHP are weekly averages. (c) Plan view of the microseismicity locations with respect to the injection well (CCS1) and the monitoring well (VW1). Events are color coded by occurrence time. The maximum horizontal stress direction is indicated by the black arrows. Example of focal mechanisms calculated by Dichiarante et al. (2021) are shown for clusters 2 and 4. (d) Cross section from south to north showing the microseismicity variation with depth. Cross‐section location is shown by the black dashed line in panel (c). The black solid lines are the different stratigraphic horizons included in our model. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 07 May 2024
Figure 1. Illinois Basin–Decatur Project (IBDP) location, CO 2 injection rate and earthquake locations. (a) Location of the IBDP. (b) Injection rate (blue solid line), carbon capture and storage (CCS1) bottomhole pressure (BHP) (red solid line), and earthquake frequency (black histogram
Image
Location map of the Illinois Basin and Decatur project area. Modified from SINTEFblog.
Published: 01 February 2024
Figure 1.  Location map of the Illinois Basin and Decatur project area. Modified from SINTEFblog.
Image
P‐wave onset time detection results of PPHASEPICKER for vertical‐component broadband velocity records obtained from a small regional event with M 1.1 on 16 September 2013 in Decatur, Illinois. Signals were recorded by six U.S. Geological Survey stations with 200  samples/s: (left) raw signals, and (right) fourth‐pole band‐pass Butterworth‐filtered signals with corner frequencies: high cut = 10 Hz and low cut = 0.5 Hz. The emergent P‐phase onset (P0−) detected by PPHASEPICKER is shown by vertical lines. Manual picks are 12.14, 11.81, 11.63, 11.60, 11.96, and 11.79 s for stations DEC05–DEC12, respectively.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 24 May 2016
Figure 5. P ‐wave onset time detection results of P PHASE P ICKER for vertical‐component broadband velocity records obtained from a small regional event with M  1.1 on 16 September 2013 in Decatur, Illinois. Signals were recorded by six U.S. Geological Survey stations with 200  samples
Journal Article
Published: 18 August 2020
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2020) 110 (5): 2188–2204.
...Sherilyn Williams‐Stroud; Robert Bauer; Hannes Leetaru; Volker Oye; Frantisek Stanek; Sallie Greenberg; Nadege Langet ABSTRACT The results of monitoring of carbon dioxide ( CO 2 ) injection at the Illinois Basin—Decatur Project (IBDP) and the companion Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture...
FIGURES | View All (9)