1-20 OF 128 RESULTS FOR

Deadman Canyon

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Image
—Picture taken near mouth at Deadman Canyon looking northeast across Alamo Canyon. The type sections in Deadman Canyon are at the right, up Deadman Canyon.
Published: 01 December 1941
FIG. 20. —Picture taken near mouth at Deadman Canyon looking northeast across Alamo Canyon. The type sections in Deadman Canyon are at the right, up Deadman Canyon.
Image
—Detailed map of Deadman Canyon area showing exact location of type sections. Width of area shown, approximately 14 mile.
Published: 01 December 1941
FIG. 3. —Detailed map of Deadman Canyon area showing exact location of type sections. Width of area shown, approximately 1 4 mile.
Image
—Type section of Caballero formation in Deadman Canyon, Sec. 3, T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Published: 01 December 1941
FIG. 4. —Type section of Caballero formation in Deadman Canyon, Sec. 3 , T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Image
—Type section of upper portion of Alamogordo member in Deadman Canyon, Sec. 3, T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Published: 01 December 1941
FIG. 6. —Type section of upper portion of Alamogordo member in Deadman Canyon, Sec. 3 , T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Image
—Type section of Arcente member of Lake Valley formation in Deadman Canyon, Sec. 3, T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Published: 01 December 1941
FIG. 7. —Type section of Arcente member of Lake Valley formation in Deadman Canyon, Sec. 3 , T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Image
—Type section of Dona Ana member of Lake Valley formation in Deadman Canyon, Sec. 3, T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Published: 01 December 1941
FIG. 8. —Type section of Dona Ana member of Lake Valley formation in Deadman Canyon, Sec. 3 , T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Image
—Deadman Canyon section, SE. 14 of NW. 14 of Sec. 3, T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Published: 01 December 1941
FIG. 18. —Deadman Canyon section, SE. 1 4 of NW. 1 4 of Sec. 3 , T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Image
Price–Helper region of the Book Cliffs showing sample locations (roads and 2250 m contour are indicated). A, Gilson Gulch; B, Magazine Area; C, Peerless Canyon; D, Deadman Canyon #1; E, Deadman Canyon #2; F, Packtrail Canyon; G, Straight Canyon; H, Coal Creek Canyon #2; I, Coal Creek Canyon #1; J, Coal Creek Canyon #3; K, Soldier Creek Canyon; L, South of Soldier Creek; M, Dugout Canyon. Samples from the problematic siltstone unit of the Aberdeen Member are underlined (see Table 2).
Published: 01 January 2005
F igure 3. Price–Helper region of the Book Cliffs showing sample locations (roads and 2250 m contour are indicated). A, Gilson Gulch; B, Magazine Area; C, Peerless Canyon; D, Deadman Canyon #1; E, Deadman Canyon #2; F, Packtrail Canyon; G, Straight Canyon; H, Coal Creek Canyon #2; I, Coal Creek
Image
—Map showing location of measured sections. Marble Canyon section
Published: 01 December 1941
FIG. 14. —Map showing location of measured sections. Marble Canyon section Deadman Canyon section Mule Canyon section San Andreas Canyon section Dog Canyon section Escondido Canyon section Nigger Ed Canyon section
Image
—Type section of lower portion of Alamogordo member of Lake Valley formation in Deadman Canyon, Sec. 3, T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Published: 01 December 1941
FIG. 5. —Type section of lower portion of Alamogordo member of Lake Valley formation in Deadman Canyon, Sec. 3 , T. 17 S., R. 10 E.
Image
—Thin-bedded Hays limestone unconformably overlying massive Carlile sandstone. Deadman’s Canyon, NW. 14, Sec. 11, T. 16 S., R. 67 W., El Paso County, Colorado. Dark line marks contact.
Published: 01 October 1958
Fig. 3. —Thin-bedded Hays limestone unconformably overlying massive Carlile sandstone. Deadman’s Canyon, NW. 1 4 , Sec. 11, T. 16 S., R. 67 W., El Paso County, Colorado. Dark line marks contact.
Image
Figure 8. Comparison of correlation schemes for the Front Range and Mosquito Range. The “traditional view” (e.g., Berg and Ross, 1959) correlates glauconitic and dolomitic deposits along the Front Range (Missouri Gulch, Williams Canyon, Deadman's Canyon) with the Peerless Formation whose type section is exposed at Horseshoe Mountain. Conodonts recovered from the Peerless at the type section indicate a much younger age, and hence the Front Range deposits are correlated with the glauconite-rich middle member of the Sawatch Formation in the “proposed revision.” T.P.—Taylor Pass Member of Manitou Formation; Eoconodontus un.—Eoconodontus unconformity
Published: 01 June 2003
Figure 8. Comparison of correlation schemes for the Front Range and Mosquito Range. The “traditional view” (e.g., Berg and Ross, 1959 ) correlates glauconitic and dolomitic deposits along the Front Range (Missouri Gulch, Williams Canyon, Deadman's Canyon) with the Peerless Formation whose type
Image
 Cross-plots showing the detailed Th–K characteristics of fluvial and fluvio-tidal sandstones (simple gamma-ray <70 API) in the non-marine Blackhawk Formation exposures (Figs 2 and 3). Fluvial and fluvio-tidal channel-fill sandstones are numbered from youngest to oldest at each locality, and localities are arranged from most proximal (Willow Creek; Figs 2 and 3) to most distal (Woodside Canyon No. 2; Figs 2 and 3). The stratigraphic position of each sandstone is shown in Figure 8a (Willow Creek), Figure 8b (Deadman Canyon), Figure 8c (Straight Canyon), Figure 9b (Whitmore Canyon) and Figure 10b (Woodside Canyon No. 2). Summary statistics are given for each group of sandstones, for comparison with the total population of fluvial sandstones in the exposures (Table 1, Fig. 7f).
Published: 01 July 2005
locality, and localities are arranged from most proximal (Willow Creek; Figs 2 and 3 ) to most distal (Woodside Canyon No. 2; Figs 2 and 3 ). The stratigraphic position of each sandstone is shown in Figure 8a (Willow Creek), Figure 8b (Deadman Canyon), Figure 8c (Straight Canyon), Figure 9b
Image
 Detailed spectral gamma-ray data through the non-marine Blackhawk Formation at selected exposed sections: (a) Willow Creek; (b) Deadman Canyon; (c) Straight Canyon. Total gamma-ray, Th/K ratio, K content (% K) and sedimentological logs are shown. Inaccessible parts of the section, where spectral gamma-ray data could not be collected, are shown as gaps in the total gamma-ray, Th/K ratio, and K content (% K) logs. Incised valley fills interpreted in these sections are multistorey fluvial and fluvio-tidal sandstones that are regionally mappable at the exposures and exhibit up to 25 m of basal erosional relief (Howell & Flint 2003). The location and stratigraphic context of the sections are shown in Figures 2 and 3.
Published: 01 July 2005
Fig. 8.  Detailed spectral gamma-ray data through the non-marine Blackhawk Formation at selected exposed sections: ( a ) Willow Creek; ( b ) Deadman Canyon; ( c ) Straight Canyon. Total gamma-ray, Th/K ratio, K content (% K) and sedimentological logs are shown. Inaccessible parts of the section
Image
Outcrop photos and line drawings of folds within the central fold belt (see Plate 1 for locations). (A) Symmetrical, upright detachment folds in Mississippian to Pennsylvanian carbonate rocks (Surrett Canyon, Arco Hills, Bluebird Mountain, and Snaky Canyon formations) of the Lost River Range, viewed looking toward the southeast from Doublespring Pass. Detachment horizon is in the Mississippian McGowan Creek Formation. Photo encompasses ~1 km of topographic relief. (B) Large recumbent folds in overturned Mississippian–Pennsylvanian carbonate rocks (Arco Hills, Bluebird Mountain, and Snaky Canyon Formations) of the southern Lemhi Range, viewed obliquely looking toward the west-southwest. Flat-lying rocks on the summit are upside down. Photo encompasses ~1.3 km of topographic relief. (C) NE-verging overturned syncline in Mississippian carbonate rocks (Scott Peak and overlying Railroad Canyon Formations) of the southern Beaverhead Mountains, viewed obliquely from Deadman Canyon looking toward the west-northwest. Photo encompasses ~200 m of topographic relief in foreground. (D) Folded basal contact of Mississippian Railroad Canyon Formation, within hinge of overturned syncline shown in C. Railroad Canyon Formation acts as a regional detachment horizon. Person for scale in hinge of anticline.
Published: 27 October 2023
Railroad Canyon Formations) of the southern Beaverhead Mountains, viewed obliquely from Deadman Canyon looking toward the west-northwest. Photo encompasses ~200 m of topographic relief in foreground. (D) Folded basal contact of Mississippian Railroad Canyon Formation, within hinge of overturned syncline
Image
Generalized geological map of the Mitchell Intrusive Suite (MIS) and surrounding units in the central Sierra Nevada batholith, California. Inset location map: SF: San Francisco, LA: Los Angeles. Map units include: granitic rocks of the Whitney Intrusive Suite (Kwis), units of the MIS, which are the MPG fine-grained facies (Kmf), MPG coarse-grained facies (Kmc) and the Granodiorite of Castle Creek (Kcc), Cretaceous granitoids (Kpl), granitoids of the Sequoia Intrusive Suite (Ksis), Jurassic–Cretaceous Granite of Lodgepole (KJpl), and Jurassic and Triassic metavolcanic, metasedimentary and plutonic units (JTrmp). Stippled pattern in Kmf indicates domains of abundant stoped blocks that were not mapped separately. Dashed gray line is location of Deadman Canyon. Map modified from Moore & Sisson (1987) and Sisson (1992).
Published: 01 February 2007
and plutonic units (JTrmp). Stippled pattern in Kmf indicates domains of abundant stoped blocks that were not mapped separately. Dashed gray line is location of Deadman Canyon. Map modified from Moore & Sisson (1987) and Sisson (1992) .
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 December 1941
AAPG Bulletin (1941) 25 (12): 2107–2160.
...FIG. 20. —Picture taken near mouth at Deadman Canyon looking northeast across Alamo Canyon. The type sections in Deadman Canyon are at the right, up Deadman Canyon. ...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Mississippian Formations of Sacramento Mountains, ...
Second thumbnail for: Mississippian Formations of Sacramento Mountains, ...
Third thumbnail for: Mississippian Formations of Sacramento Mountains, ...
Image
—Bioherm structure—Lake Valley formation, Deadman Branch, Alamo Canyon, Sacramento Mountains.
Published: 01 December 1941
FIG. 19. —Bioherm structure—Lake Valley formation, Deadman Branch, Alamo Canyon, Sacramento Mountains.
Image
Biofacies VI. A) Biofacies VI model; yellow = sandstone (ss); dark blue = carbonate (preserves microbial mats and aquatic biota); light blue = water; green lines = living microbial mats. B) Asthenopodichnium (arrows) as concave epirelief on bedding plane of ripple-laminated ss (Deadman Point). C) Ostracode values in fine-grained carbonate mudstone (ms) in thin section (Trough Canyon). D) Small aquatic invertebrate burrows (arrows) in bedded, fine-grained carbonate ms (Trough Canyon). E) Abundant Fuersichnus in concave epirelief of a mostly massive, weakly ripple-laminated ss (Deadman Point).
Published: 29 May 2025
(Deadman Point). C ) Ostracode values in fine-grained carbonate mudstone (ms) in thin section (Trough Canyon). D ) Small aquatic invertebrate burrows (arrows) in bedded, fine-grained carbonate ms (Trough Canyon). E ) Abundant Fuersichnus in concave epirelief of a mostly massive, weakly ripple
Image
Figure 8. Photomicrographs showing volcanic quartz phenocrysts as detrital grains in Mazatzal Group quartzite. (A) Deadman Quartzite at Pine Creek. (B) Deadman Quartzite at Shaketree Canyon
Published: 01 December 2002
Figure 8. Photomicrographs showing volcanic quartz phenocrysts as detrital grains in Mazatzal Group quartzite. (A) Deadman Quartzite at Pine Creek. (B) Deadman Quartzite at Shaketree Canyon