1-20 OF 1329 RESULTS FOR

Darwin Basin

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 12 April 2023
GSA Bulletin (2024) 136 (1-2): 234–260.
...Lochlan W. Vaughn; Ryan J. Leary; Michael T. Read Abstract The Darwin Basin, eastern California, USA, represents a key sedimentary record of tectonics along the southwestern margin of Laurentia for the late Pennsylvanian and Cisuralian (Early Permian). The basin formed when the subsidence rate...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1989
GSA Bulletin (1989) 101 (5): 652–662.
...EUGENE S. SCHWEIG, III Abstract The Darwin Plateau, in the southwestern Great Basin of California, is underlain by upper Cenozoic basalt flows, pyroclastic rocks, and alluvial deposits. Many of the volcanic units are laterally extensive and can be correlated across the study area, using hand-sample...
Image
Chronostratigraphic chart of the Darwin Basin with color- or pattern-coded lithofacies interpretations is shown. Abbreviations: SRSRF—Sedimentary rocks of Santa Rosa Flat. Unit age control is tenuous where marked with a question mark. See Figure 2 for column locations. Stratigraphic information was compiled from: Lee (1975); Stone et al. (1987, 1991, 2014); Stone and Stevens (1987); Magginetti et al. (1988); Stevens and Stone (2007); Wrucke et al. (2007, updated 2008); Stevens et al. (2015a, 2015b, 2015c); and new data from this study. White Top–Dry Bone Stock age is from Snow et al. (1991). Time scale is from Gradstein and Ogg (2020).
Published: 12 April 2023
Figure 3. Chronostratigraphic chart of the Darwin Basin with color- or pattern-coded lithofacies interpretations is shown. Abbreviations: SRSRF—Sedimentary rocks of Santa Rosa Flat. Unit age control is tenuous where marked with a question mark. See Figure 2 for column locations. Stratigraphic
Image
Fence diagram shows the Darwin Basin along the line indicated in the inset map (Fig. 2). Note the pronounced changes in thickness of the Osborne Canyon Formation across short distances and the absence of the unit in the Darwin Hills. Contact between tectonostratigraphic units α and β (see text discussion below) is indicated by a horizontal black line at the contact of the Darwin Canyon Formation with underlying units. Abbreviations: Fm.—Formation; Ls.—Limestone.
Published: 12 April 2023
Figure 8. Fence diagram shows the Darwin Basin along the line indicated in the inset map ( Fig. 2 ). Note the pronounced changes in thickness of the Osborne Canyon Formation across short distances and the absence of the unit in the Darwin Hills. Contact between tectonostratigraphic units α and β
Image
(A) Tectonic subsidence analysis of the Darwin Basin. The three curves were constructed assuming no change in paleobathymetry at three sections within the Darwin Basin; see Figure 2 for section locations. The area shaded in gray represents the entire range of possible subsidence histories for the Darwin Basin. The “true” tectonic subsidence curve for the Darwin Basin must lie somewhere in the gray envelope and must mimic the geometry of the three plotted curves. See File S1 (see text footnote 1) for additional discussion. Unconformities are represented by wavy lines. Tectonostratigraphic units α and β are marked on the plot. (B) Tectonic subsidence curves for basins that represent typical examples of strike-slip and foreland basins as well as modeled subduction zone initiation-induced dynamic subsidence curves. These curves are shown for comparison with the Darwin Basin curves and are plotted at the same vertical and horizontal scale (at a constant, but arbitrary time scale) as in panel A. Note that long periods of gradual subsidence have been truncated from the left end of the foreland basin curves. 1—Chuckanut Basin; 2—Modern Death Valley pull-apart basin; 3—Green River Basin; 4—Hoback Basin; 5 and 6—subduction zone initiation-induced dynamic topography, assuming 45° and 20° slab dips (1–4 from Xie and Heller, 2009; 5–6 from Burgess and Moresi, 1999). Abbreviations: Ks.—Kasimovian, Gzh.—Gzhelian, Sak.—Sakmarian, Kg.—Kungurian, m.y.—million years, SZI—subduction zone initiation.
Published: 12 April 2023
Figure 10. (A) Tectonic subsidence analysis of the Darwin Basin. The three curves were constructed assuming no change in paleobathymetry at three sections within the Darwin Basin; see Figure 2 for section locations. The area shaded in gray represents the entire range of possible subsidence
Image
Paleogeography of the Darwin Basin system is shown. Pennsylvanian (Pre-Gzhelian): the Bird Spring Shelf is flanked by the Tihvipah Ramp and the Keeler Basin. Gzhelian: the Darwin Basin forms after the southwestern portion of the Tihvipah Ramp subsides (Stevens et al., 2015c). The boundary between the Keeler Basin and Darwin Basin is defined by the former Mississippian shelf edge, where rocks of the Darwin Basin overlie Mississippian shelf carbonates and rocks of the Keeler Basin overlie Mississippian basinal rocks (Stevens et al., 2015b). Sakmarian: further subsidence of the Tihvipah Ramp and the Bird Spring Shelf leads to areal expansion of the Darwin Basin and retrogradation of the carbonate apron depositional system onto the shelf and slope. Emplacement of the Last Chance Allochthon by the Last Chance Thrust (LCT) to the northwest forms a bathymetric high referred to as the Conglomerate Mesa Uplift (CMU), which represents the toe of this allochthon. The Keeler Basin was succeeded by the Lone Pine Basin during this time (Stone et al., 2000; Stevens et al., 2001; Stevens et al., 2015b). Artinskian: basin-plain facies of the Darwin Canyon and Lone Pine formations prevail across the entire region after complete subsidence of the Bird Spring Shelf and Tihvipah Ramp in this area (Stevens et al., 2015b). Adapted from Stevens et al. (2015a).
Published: 12 April 2023
Figure 11. Paleogeography of the Darwin Basin system is shown. Pennsylvanian (Pre-Gzhelian): the Bird Spring Shelf is flanked by the Tihvipah Ramp and the Keeler Basin. Gzhelian: the Darwin Basin forms after the southwestern portion of the Tihvipah Ramp subsides ( Stevens et al., 2015c
Image
Schematic and speculative cross section of the Darwin Basin system is shown at three times in the evolution of the basin. Gzhelian–Asselian: flexural loading on the Last Chance Thrust begins to affect eastern California. Transient uplift from an inboard-migrating forebulge causes uplift, probably accommodated by minor forebulge faulting, of the Tihvipah Limestone and eventually the seaward margin of the Bird Spring Formation, resulting in submarine erosion, channelization, and the formation of a basin-wide, time-transgressive unconformity. Backbulge subsidence permits continuous deposition of shelf facies of the Bird Spring Formation on the eastern and southeastern margins of the basin. Sediment derived from submarine erosion of the Tihvipah Limestone, fault scarp, slump scars, slope collapses, and from the Bird Spring Shelf itself is mobilized downslope by sediment gravity flows and deposited in carbonate slope-apron depositional environments of the nascent Darwin Basin. These deposits are preserved today as the four lower members of the Darwin Hills Sequence and the unnamed turbidites in the Santa Rosa Hills. Dotted line denotes approximate sea level (S.L.) in all panels. Sakmarian: the Last Chance Allochthon (LCA) is emplaced on the northwestern margin of the basin by the Last Chance Thrust. Carbonate slope-apron facies of the Osborne Canyon Formation are deposited in the resulting foredeep, while unit 1 of the sedimentary rocks of Santa Rosa Flat (SRSRF) is deposited in a wedge-top setting, onlapping the Conglomerate Mesa Uplift (southeastern margin of Last Chance Allochthon). Paleocurrent data from the Osborne Canyon Formation in the Argus Range indicate that sediment was transported W–NW toward the axis of the basin and the Last Chance Allochthon. Abrupt lateral thickness and facies changes in the Osborne Canyon Formation are explained by onlapping of the previously uplifted forebulge and/or deposition on complex basin-floor bathymetry related to foreland faulting. Artinskian: slip on the Last Chance Thrust has ended, although subsidence and deposition within the Darwin Basin continue through at least this time. The entire basin system, from the Last Chance Allochthon to the coeval shelf edge exposed at Warm Spring Canyon, is buried under a minimum of 1.6 km of turbidites deposited in deep-marine basin-plain or submarine fan depositional environments. Paleocurrent data (Stevens et al., 1989) indicate that sediment gravity flows were directed to the southwest, toward the continental margin bounded by the California-Coahuila transform. Note tectonostratigraphic units α and β denoted on the Artinskian–Roadian panel. All strata depicted in the upper two panels belong to unit α.
Published: 12 April 2023
Figure 12. Schematic and speculative cross section of the Darwin Basin system is shown at three times in the evolution of the basin. Gzhelian–Asselian: flexural loading on the Last Chance Thrust begins to affect eastern California. Transient uplift from an inboard-migrating forebulge causes
Image
Individual stratigraphic sections. (a) Darwin Basin stratigraphic section I including units Ps7 (full), Ps8 (full), Ps9 (full), and Ps11 (partial); (b) Darwin Basin stratigraphic section II, of units Psg3 (partial), Ps9s (full), Ps9 (full), Ps11 (full), and Ps12a (partial); (c) Darwin Basin stratigraphic section III, of units Ps9 (partial), Ps10 (full), and Ps11 (partial); (d) Darwin Basin stratigraphic section IV, of units Ps11 (partial), Ps12a (full), Pcb (full), and Trcc (partial); (e) Lone Pine Basin Lucky Slim North stratigraphic section, including units Plc (full) and Pld (full); (f) Lone Pine Basin Lucky Slim South stratigraphic section, including units Plba (partial) and Plc (full); (g) Lone Pine Basin Coyote Springs area stratigraphic section, including units Plba (full), Plc (full), and Pldl (partial); (h) Lone Pine Basin Reward area stratigraphic section, including units Plc (partial), Pld (full), and Reward Conglomerate (full). The key for symbols and patterns is the same as in Figure 5, and the x-axis denotes grain size subdivisions. ∗Detrital zircon sample in the Darwin Basin, area III stratigraphic section is stratigraphically equivalent, but ~1 km to the south.
Published: 16 December 2020
Figure 4 Individual stratigraphic sections. (a) Darwin Basin stratigraphic section I including units Ps7 (full), Ps8 (full), Ps9 (full), and Ps11 (partial); (b) Darwin Basin stratigraphic section II, of units Psg3 (partial), Ps9s (full), Ps9 (full), Ps11 (full), and Ps12a (partial); (c) Darwin
Image
Summary stratigraphic sections of the Lone Pine and Darwin Basins. Black vertical lines indicate detailed sections (see Figure 4). The x-axis denotes grain size subdivisions. Plba was not measured in its entirety, as the base was covered.
Published: 16 December 2020
Figure 5 Summary stratigraphic sections of the Lone Pine and Darwin Basins. Black vertical lines indicate detailed sections (see Figure 4 ). The x -axis denotes grain size subdivisions. Plba was not measured in its entirety, as the base was covered.
... (within Fusulinid Zone 4), emplacement of the Last Chance allochthon was complete, and subsidence caused by thrust loading had resulted in development of a new turbidite basin (Darwin Basin) along the former western part of the Bird Spring Shelf. At the same time, farther east into the craton, paralic...
Image
Schematic cross-section of the study area, showing the Conglomerate Mesa Uplift and the Lone Pine and Darwin Basins. First detrital zircon evidence of Cordilleran magmatic arc activity is shown by a zircon symbol in the Reward Conglomerate and Conglomerate Mesa Formation in the Lone Pine Basin, and in the Conglomerate Mesa Formation unit in the Darwin Basin. The fault drawn as a dashed line is not observed at the surface but rather is a hypothesized fault inferred to be related to the Last Chance thrust system. This figure is not to scale. Modified from Stone et al. [17].
Published: 16 December 2020
Figure 3 Schematic cross-section of the study area, showing the Conglomerate Mesa Uplift and the Lone Pine and Darwin Basins. First detrital zircon evidence of Cordilleran magmatic arc activity is shown by a zircon symbol in the Reward Conglomerate and Conglomerate Mesa Formation in the Lone Pine
Image
Shoaling and deepening patterns in the Inyo Mountains (Lone Pine and Darwin Basins) and the El Paso Mountains (from [40]). Patterns are compared to the global sea level curve from Haq and Schutter [80]. Shoaling and deepening patterns in the Inyo Mountains and El Paso Mountains are out of phase with global sea level variation and thus interpreted to be a consequence of tectonic uplift and subsidence. In the Darwin Basin, this diagram indicates deepening during deposition of unit 10: although this unit is interpreted to have been deposited in shallow water, it is a minor deposit interpreted to have been a reef or island surrounded by deeper deposits.
Published: 16 December 2020
Figure 10 Shoaling and deepening patterns in the Inyo Mountains (Lone Pine and Darwin Basins) and the El Paso Mountains (from [ 40 ]). Patterns are compared to the global sea level curve from Haq and Schutter [ 80 ]. Shoaling and deepening patterns in the Inyo Mountains and El Paso Mountains
Image
Location and tectonic setting of the Inyo Mountains showing major tectonic elements and Paleozoic facies belts. Most features are shown in their present location; the California-Coahuila transform (CCT) is shown in its reconstructed Pennsylvanian-Permian position with two parallel strands. Inset: map of the Inyo Mountains showing the Lone Pine Basin and Darwin Basin field areas with locations of measured sections and detrital zircon samples, the approximate extent of strands of the Last Chance thrust system (LCT) east and west of the field area, and the approximate location of the Conglomerate Mesa Uplift (CMU) that separated the Lone Pine and Darwin Basins. SAF = San Andreas Fault; CA = California; AZ = Arizona; BC = Baja California, Mexico; SO = Sonora, Mexico; LA = Los Angeles. Adapted from Dickinson [8], Dickinson and Lawton [36], Stevens and Stone [42], Arvizu et al. [10], Chapman et al. [82], and Cecil et al. [12].
Published: 16 December 2020
strands. Inset: map of the Inyo Mountains showing the Lone Pine Basin and Darwin Basin field areas with locations of measured sections and detrital zircon samples, the approximate extent of strands of the Last Chance thrust system (LCT) east and west of the field area, and the approximate location
Image
Lone Pine Formation (Lone Pine Basin; a–d) and the sedimentary rocks of Santa Rosa Flat (Darwin Basin; e–i) and sedimentary petrology results. The pencil is 15 cm long. (a) Thin-bedded strata of members A and B, undifferentiated. (b) Member C with planar bedding and ripples. (c) Member D; conglomerate grades into sandstone. (d) Reward Conglomerate; crossbedded sandstone is interbedded with conglomerate. (e) Unit 7 contains bivalve shells aligned along bedding planes. (f) Unit 9; Bouma sequence layers a, b, and c (Bouma, 1962). (g) Intact gastropod shell in Unit 10. (h) Unit 11; high-angle crossbeds in the lower half of the photograph. (i) Unit 12a; sandstone from one of many calcareous sandstone channels in the unit. (j) Photomicrograph from Santa Rosa Flat unit 11 (Darwin Basin), with extensive calcite mineralization along with monocrystalline and polycrystalline quartz (cross-polarized view). (k) Photomicrograph from Lone Pine Formation member D (Lone Pine Basin), with monocrystalline and polycrystalline quartz, secondary tremolite mineralization (outlined in pink), and a lack of calcite grains (cross-polarized view). (l) QmFLt diagram of all point counted samples; modified after Dickinson et al. [59]. (m) Qm-calcite-Chert diagram of point counted samples and reconstructed Lone Pine Basin compositions. Qm = monocrystalline quartz; Ca = calcite; Ch = chert; F = feldspar; Lt = lithic grains, including polycrystalline quartz and chert but not calcite.
Published: 16 December 2020
Figure 6 Lone Pine Formation (Lone Pine Basin; a–d) and the sedimentary rocks of Santa Rosa Flat (Darwin Basin; e–i) and sedimentary petrology results. The pencil is 15 cm long. (a) Thin-bedded strata of members A and B, undifferentiated. (b) Member C with planar bedding and ripples. (c) Member D
Image
Permian timescale with all Permian Inyo Mountain formations, units, and known biostratigraphy. Events significant to deposition of strata are indicated in the far-right column. Permian biostratigraphy in Lone Pine Basin is from Stone [81] and Stone et al. [16] and in the Darwin Basin is from Magginetti et al. [23] and Stone et al. [17]. Uncertainty of biostratigraphic ages is ca. 0.4 Ma, based on Permian composite standard stage-boundary ages from foraminifera, conodonts, and ammonoids in Henderson et al. [83].
Published: 16 December 2020
Figure 2 Permian timescale with all Permian Inyo Mountain formations, units, and known biostratigraphy. Events significant to deposition of strata are indicated in the far-right column. Permian biostratigraphy in Lone Pine Basin is from Stone [ 81 ] and Stone et al. [ 16 ] and in the Darwin Basin
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 16 December 2020
Lithosphere (2020) 2020 (1): 9406113.
...Figure 4 Individual stratigraphic sections. (a) Darwin Basin stratigraphic section I including units Ps7 (full), Ps8 (full), Ps9 (full), and Ps11 (partial); (b) Darwin Basin stratigraphic section II, of units Psg3 (partial), Ps9s (full), Ps9 (full), Ps11 (full), and Ps12a (partial); (c) Darwin...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
(A) Map shows modern distribution of Paleozoic and earliest Mesozoic tectonic elements in southwestern North America overlain on political boundaries. Significant Mesozoic and Cenozoic faults that displace these elements are drawn in red. Sri = 0.706 isopleth in Mesozoic and Cenozoic igneous rocks delineating the margin of continental crust marked with dashed line. Question marks indicate faults and terrane boundaries where position is unknown. (B) Pennsylvanian paleogeographic reconstruction of southwestern North America modified from Saleeby and Dunne (2015). Location of Darwin Basin is marked by yellow star. (C) Permo-Triassic paleogeographic reconstruction of southwestern North America modified from Saleeby and Dunne (2015). Inferred distribution of the Permo–Triassic cordilleran arc is outlined in red. Abbreviations: EK—eastern Klamath Terrane; NS—northern Sierra Terrane; FS—Foothills Suture; FO—Foothills Ophiolite Belt (including the northern Sierra Terrane in the north and the Kings-Kaweah Ophiolite in the south); SAf—San Andreas fault; SL—Snow Lake Terrane; KK—Kings-Kaweah Ophiolite; KV—Kernville Terrane; SB—Salinian Block; WWf—White Wolf fault; K/LP—Keeler and successive Lone Pine Basin; GA—Golconda Allochthon; GT—Golconda Thrust; RMA—Roberts Mountains Allochthon; RMT—Roberts Mountains Thrust; DB—Darwin Basin; DVFCf—Death Valley–Furnace Creek fault; EP—El Paso Terrane; Gf—Garlock fault; MVf—Mojave Valley fault; SG—San Gabriel Block; CT—Caborca Terrane; SA—Sonora Allochthon; SN-DV—Sierra Nevada–Death Valley Thrust system; MV—Paleozoic Mojave Thrust system; LCt—Last Chance Thrust; CCT—California-Coahuila transform fault; CA—California; NV—Nevada; WY—Wyoming; UT—Utah; AZ—Arizona; BC—Baja California; SO—Sonora; Pz—Paleozoic. Adapted and compiled from: Kistler and Ross (1990); Stevens et al. (2005); Stevens and Stone (2007, and references therein); Colpron and Nelson (2009); Chapman et al. (2012); Saleeby and Dunne (2015); Lawton et al. (2017); Attia et al. (2018); Levy et al. (2021); Iriondo et al. (2022).
Published: 12 April 2023
and successive Lone Pine Basin; GA—Golconda Allochthon; GT—Golconda Thrust; RMA—Roberts Mountains Allochthon; RMT—Roberts Mountains Thrust; DB—Darwin Basin; DVFCf—Death Valley–Furnace Creek fault; EP—El Paso Terrane; Gf—Garlock fault; MVf—Mojave Valley fault; SG—San Gabriel Block; CT—Caborca Terrane; SA—Sonora
Image
A: Location map of southwestern Laurentia indicating key Southwestern Laurentian Borderland (SLaB) tectonic elements in relation to uplifts and basins of Ancestral Rocky Mountains (ARM) orogen. Orange dashed line and diagonal rule indicate SLaB region as defined herein. Bold numerals indicate column locations of Figure 2. B: Early Mississippian–Early Pennsylvanian (Tournaisian–Bashkirian) paleogeography. Intracratonic ARM deformation, related to Gondwana-Laurentia collision (Kluth and Coney, 1981) rather than SLaB deformation, has not yet begun to affect region of Transcontinental arch. C: Middle Pennsylvanian–early Permian (Moscovian–Sakmarian) paleogeography. D: Early Permian–middle Permian (Artinskian–Wordian?) paleogeography. Abbreviations: Afb/Asb—Antler foreland and successor basins; BS—Bird Spring shelf; DB—Darwin basin; EF—El Fuerte block; ES—Ely shelf; HB—Havallah basin; KB—Keeler basin; KS—Permian Klamath-Sierra arc terrane; MM—Mina México foreland basin; O-M—Ouachita-Marathon suture; RM—Roberts Mountain allochthon; RNB—Rancho Nuevo basin. Locations of equator in B–D are from Blakey (2016).
Published: 19 May 2017
arch. C: Middle Pennsylvanian–early Permian (Moscovian–Sakmarian) paleogeography. D: Early Permian–middle Permian (Artinskian–Wordian?) paleogeography. Abbreviations: Afb/Asb—Antler foreland and successor basins; BS—Bird Spring shelf; DB—Darwin basin; EF—El Fuerte block; ES—Ely shelf; HB—Havallah basin
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 1982
Journal of the Geological Society (1982) 139 (6): 755–761.
...E. P. Nelson Abstract The Cordillera Darwin orogenic core complex is a structural and topographic culmination in the southern Andes, which underwent mid-Cretaceous penetrative deformation and metamorphism associated with the deformation and incipient obduction of a partly ophiolitic back-are basin...
Published: 01 January 2008
DOI: 10.1130/2008.2441(04)
... were deposited within two topographically expressed basins. The larger of the two basins was a trough-shaped basin that extended between the present locations of the Darwin and Amundsen Glaciers. Basement highs surrounded the basins and formed uplands onto which preglacial, glacial, and postglacial...