1-20 OF 138 RESULTS FOR

Cushing earthquake 2016

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 03 May 2017
Seismological Research Letters (2017) 88 (4): 963–970.
... and over time are of significant interest. We report observations of fluid level changes in two monitoring wells in response to the 3 September 2016 M w 5.8 Pawnee and the 7 November 2016 M w 5.0 Cushing earthquakes. We investigate the relationship between static strain resulting from these events...
FIGURES
Image
Comparison of <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> catalogs (black dots) in the <span class="search-highlight">Cushing</span>, Oklahoma, ar...
Published: 29 May 2019
Figure 4. Comparison of earthquake catalogs (black dots) in the Cushing, Oklahoma, area from (a) the OGS catalog, (b)  Schoenball and Ellsworth (2017) , and (c) this study between 31 August 2014 and 22 November 2016. The location of the 2016 M w  5.0 Cushing earthquake is represented
Journal Article
Published: 20 April 2021
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2021) 111 (4): 1693–1712.
... a 50 km hypocentral distance of at least one of the 2016 M 5.1 Fairview, M 5.8 Pawnee, or M 5.0 Cushing earthquakes to better constrain earthquake ground‐motion modeling in the region. We acquired active‐source seismic data for time‐averaged V S to 30 m depth ( V S 30 ) at 28 seismograph stations near...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Image
Illustration of the doughnut effect for (a) the 7 November <span class="search-highlight">2016</span>  M  5 Cushi...
Published: 06 December 2017
Figure 8. Illustration of the doughnut effect for (a) the 7 November 2016 M  5 Cushing, Oklahoma, earthquake and (b) the 30 October 2016 M  6.6 Norcia, Italy, earthquake. For the Cushing earthquake, the maximum “Did You Feel It?” (DYFI) intensity is of 6.7 at 5.5 km of the epicenter (see Data
Journal Article
Published: 08 January 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (1): 358–371.
... to the location of injection wells. The 2011 M w 5.7 Prague and 2016 M w 5.0 Cushing earthquakes ruptured away from the injection wells, whereas the 2016 M w 5.1 Fairview earthquake ruptured toward the injection. The 2016 M w 5.8 Pawnee earthquake, potentially due to a downward initial rupture, shows weak...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (3A): 1107–1123.
... ; Yeck et al. , 2017 ), involved injection wells and prestressed tectonic faults and featured precursory foreshock activity ( Chen et al. , 2017 ). Shortly after the Pawnee earthquake, an M w  5.0 earthquake occurred on 7 November 2016 near Cushing, Oklahoma, a city with critical oil pipelines...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Image
<span class="search-highlight">Earthquake</span> damage in Shawnee and <span class="search-highlight">Cushing</span>, Oklahoma, from ≥ MW 5.0 <span class="search-highlight">earthquak</span>...
Published: 01 May 2018
Earthquake damage in Shawnee and Cushing, Oklahoma, from ≥ MW 5.0 earthquakes during 2016.
Image
Seismicity and volumetric strain change map associated with the 3 September...
Published: 03 May 2017
Figure 1. Seismicity and volumetric strain change map associated with the 3 September 2016 M w  5.8 Pawnee and 7 November 2016 M w  5.0 Cushing, Oklahoma, earthquakes, computed for a receiver depth of 1.5 km. (a) Seismicity during the three months before (open circles) and after
Image
(a) Pictures of damage to buildings in <span class="search-highlight">Cushing</span>, Oklahoma, from the 6 Novemb...
Published: 01 March 2017
Figure 6. (a) Pictures of damage to buildings in Cushing, Oklahoma, from the 6 November 2016 M  5.0 earthquake. Unreinforced brick and stone masonry buildings and facades are vulnerable to strong shaking. (b) Sand blows were generated by the 3 September 2016 M  5.8 earthquake near Pawnee
Image
Water level in five wells before and after the three     M  w   &gt;  5.0  ...
Published: 03 May 2017
Figure 2. Water level in five wells before and after the three M w > 5.0 earthquakes in Oklahoma in 2016. Bold X indicates cases with no data; vertical lines show the time of the earthquakes. For clarity, only panels with coseismic changes of water level that are also discussed
Image
Comparison of the SKW19 relocated <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> catalog (black pluses) for the...
Published: 29 May 2019
Figure 5. Comparison of the SKW19 relocated earthquake catalog (black pluses) for the area around the M w  5.0 Cushing earthquake (Fig.  1 ), the seismogenic fault segments identified by the FaultID algorithm (line segments), and computed focal mechanisms. The S H max arrows
Image
(a) Location map of the <span class="search-highlight">2016</span>     M  w     5.1 Fairview, <span class="search-highlight">2016</span>     M  w     5...
Published: 03 May 2017
Figure 1. (a) Location map of the 2016 M w  5.1 Fairview, 2016 M w  5.8 Pawnee, and 2016 M w  5.0 Cushing earthquakes (circles) in Oklahoma with shaded relief lighting from northwest. Box shows location of Figure  2 . (b) Seismicity in the Pawnee area since December 2012
Image
ETAS model application on the four major <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> sequences: (a) 2011 Pra...
Published: 28 April 2021
Figure 2. ETAS model application on the four major earthquake sequences: (a) 2011 Prague, (b) 2016 Fairview, (c) 2016 Pawnee, and (d) 2016 Cushing earthquakes. (Top row) Selected area for the analysis (shown also in Fig.  1 ). Gray and red colors represent before and after each mainshock
Image
The convergence process in the epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) ana...
Published: 28 April 2021
Figure A1. The convergence process in the epidemic‐type aftershock sequence (ETAS) analysis for the four earthquake sequences presented in Figure  2 and Table  1 . (a) 2011 Prague, (b) 2016 Faireviw, (c) 2016 Pawnee, and (d) 2016 Cushing earthquakes. For the five ETAS parameters, different
Image
Map of Oklahoma region showing 28 sites (square symbols) where multimethod ...
Published: 20 April 2021
 5.0 Cushing earthquakes are shown as stars. Geologic map of region ( Heran et al. , 2003 ) is presented in Figure S1. Inset: Map of contiguous United States with area of the state of Oklahoma shown in gray. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Image
Map showing the four <span class="search-highlight">earthquake</span> sequences used in this study along with the...
Published: 01 May 2018
Figure 1. Map showing the four earthquake sequences used in this study along with the seismicity ( M w  3 + ) in Oklahoma and south Kansas since 2011: the 2011 Prague sequence, filled stars; the 2016 Fairview sequence, filled hexagons; the 2016 Pawnee sequence, filled triangles; the 2016
Image
Spatial variation of stress‐drop estimates for the <span class="search-highlight">2016</span> <span class="search-highlight">Cushing</span> sequence. (...
Published: 01 May 2018
Figure 13. Spatial variation of stress‐drop estimates for the 2016 Cushing sequence. (a) Map view. The symbol sizes are proportional to the earthquake magnitudes. The two profiles ( A – A ′ and B – B ′ ) correspond to the orientation of the mainshock nodal planes. (b) Cross
Image
(a) Schematic of model geometry and boundary conditions assumed in the simu...
Published: 03 May 2017
Figure 4. (a) Schematic of model geometry and boundary conditions assumed in the simulations. (b) Observed (circles) and simulated (curve) increases of water level in well 364821 following the 2016 M w  5.0 earthquake near Cushing, Oklahoma. Time of the earthquake is t = 0
Image
(a) Class II wastewater disposal wells in the 2009–<span class="search-highlight">2016</span> period (squares) an...
Published: 03 May 2017
( McNamara, Hayes, et al. , 2015 ) and 2016 M w max  5.0 Cushing; Pr, 2011 M w max  5.7 Prague ( Keranen et al. , 2013 ). (b) Disposal wells in the area of the 2016 Pawnee earthquake (rectangle in a) are indicated by squares scaled according to the average injection rate in the two months
Journal Article
Published: 05 October 2023
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2024) 114 (2): 895–905.
... December 2016 ( Skoumal et al. , 2016 ). † indicates the location of hydraulic fracturing related events that are then referenced to again in Figure  7 . The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition. We use the earthquake rate equations of Dieterich (1994...
FIGURES | View All (7)