1-20 OF 3347 RESULTS FOR

Curtis Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 18 November 2019
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2019) 89 (11): 1075–1095.
..., separating the Middle Jurassic Entrada Sandstone from the Upper Jurassic Curtis Formation (and laterally equivalent units) in east-central Utah (USA), is laterally variable, generated by either erosion-related processes such as eolian deflation, and water-induced erosion, or by deformational processes. The J...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1986
GSA Bulletin (1986) 97 (4): 381–387.
...R. D. KREISA; R. J. MOILA Abstract The Curtis Formation in central Utah contains a rich suite of sedimentary structures that provides persuasive evidence for a tidal mode of origin. The most diagnostic of these structures are sigmoidal tidal bundles: sandstone packages deposited during one dominant...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 April 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (4): 497.
... ambiguous than criteria previously used to recognize tidalites. Structures and sequences of structures like those recognized in the North Sea can be applied to the rock record, in this case the Curtis Formation (Jurassic), San Rafael swell, Utah, to significantly enhance our ability to interpret tidal...
Image
Published: 18 November 2019
Table 1.— Facies associations for the Entrada Sandstone, Curtis Formation, and Summerville Formation.
Image
Schematic diagram showing the emplacement of sills within the Curtis Formation, with focus on planar bedding (a) and cross-bedding geometry (b). (a) Stage 0, no intrusions. Stage 1, magma propagates as a series of offsets along planar bedding of the host rock. Stage 2, the magmatic bodies begin to inflate and develop a broken bridge. (b) Stage 0, no intrusions. Stage 1, magma propagates along cross-bedding within the host rock. Single splays follow mud drapes, as it is easier for the sill to follow these continuities. Stage 2, the magmatic body starts to inflate, and the sill grows vertically.
Published: 21 October 2022
Fig. 9. Schematic diagram showing the emplacement of sills within the Curtis Formation, with focus on planar bedding ( a ) and cross-bedding geometry ( b ). ( a ) Stage 0, no intrusions. Stage 1, magma propagates as a series of offsets along planar bedding of the host rock. Stage 2, the magmatic
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 1986
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1986) 56 (3): 401–411.
...Terence B. Eschner; Gary Kocurek Abstract The basal marine sandstone of the Upper Jurassic Curtis Formation of northeastern Utah was deposited in a shallow, tide-dominated sea during marine transgression across the Entrada eolian sand sea. Entrada dunes within the study area are interpreted to have...
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 08 March 2024
Geosphere (2024) 20 (2): 621–645.
... records of subsurface flow of reduced fluids between 3 and 4 Ma. The first is precipitation of Mn-oxides along the Moab fault (Utah, USA) at 3.9 ± 0.2 Ma. The second is clay mineralization associated with laterally extensive bleaching in the Curtis Formation, which we dated using K-Ar illite age analysis...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 February 1947
AAPG Bulletin (1947) 31 (2): 227–273.
... Oxfordian in age and correlative with highly glauconitic sandstone and shale farther west, variously called Swift formation, Stump sandstone, Curtis formation, and “Upper Sundance” formation. 1 Manuscript received, August 5,1946. Published by permission of the director of the Geological Survey...
FIGURES
Series: AAPG Special Publication
Published: 01 January 1991
DOI: 10.1306/SP548
EISBN: 9781629811161
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 1981
Journal of Sedimentary Research (1981) 51 (2): 579–595.
... stratification types are found to compose some ancient cross-strata, and their occurrence confirms the eolian interpretations of pans of the Entrada (Jurassic), Navajo (Triassic-Jurassic), and Galesville (Cambrian) Formations, as well as revealing emergent islands in the Curtis Formation (Jurassic), previously...
Image
A) Map displaying how the various types of relief are distributed throughout the study area. B) Diagram showing the relative timing of all the identified processes involved in the shaping of the unconformity. Three time periods are identified here: the Pre-Curtis Formation period corresponds to the period predating the start of the Curtis sea transgression over the study area (t1), the second period corresponds to the time during which the lower Curtis was being deposited, and the third period corresponds to the processes involved in the shaping of the unconformity postdating the major transgression, and accompanying the deposition of the middle Curtis (t2). C) Legend linking the different types of relief to the various processes involved in the making of the J-3 Unconformity.
Published: 18 November 2019
Fig. 6.— A) Map displaying how the various types of relief are distributed throughout the study area. B) Diagram showing the relative timing of all the identified processes involved in the shaping of the unconformity. Three time periods are identified here: the Pre-Curtis Formation period
Image
Outcrop photographs of the studied section of the Moab Member, Curtis Formation. (A) View of entire section. (B) Yellow clay-rich transition zone immediately above the red-bleached boundary. (C and D) Irregular red-bleached boundary cross-cutting stratigraphic features.
Published: 08 March 2024
Figure 4. Outcrop photographs of the studied section of the Moab Member, Curtis Formation. (A) View of entire section. (B) Yellow clay-rich transition zone immediately above the red-bleached boundary. (C and D) Irregular red-bleached boundary cross-cutting stratigraphic features.
Image
Major (A–C and E–G) and minor (C–D and G–H) element data for the bleached section of the Moab Member, Curtis Formation. Panels E–H are zoomed in versions of panels A–D, respectively, showing the red-bleached transition. Most geochemical changes occur in the yellow zone. masl—meters above sea level; Sst—sandstone.
Published: 08 March 2024
Figure 7. Major (A–C and E–G) and minor (C–D and G–H) element data for the bleached section of the Moab Member, Curtis Formation. Panels E–H are zoomed in versions of panels A–D, respectively, showing the red-bleached transition. Most geochemical changes occur in the yellow zone. masl—meters
Image
Trace element data for the bleached section of the Moab Member, Curtis Formation. Eu/Eu* and Ce/Ce* are europium and cerium anomalies, respectively. Panels E–H are zoomed in versions of panels A–D, respectively, showing the red-bleached transition. Note the increase in concentrations of nearly all trace elements in the yellow section compared to the red, tan, and white sections. masl—meters above sea level; Sst—sandstone.
Published: 08 March 2024
Figure 8. Trace element data for the bleached section of the Moab Member, Curtis Formation. Eu/Eu* and Ce/Ce* are europium and cerium anomalies, respectively. Panels E–H are zoomed in versions of panels A–D, respectively, showing the red-bleached transition. Note the increase in concentrations
Image
View looking northeast across Green River at Little Grand Wash fault zone. Inset shows bubbles in river where the river crosses the fault zone. Arrow in inset in lower right shows view location and direction. For sense of scale, river here is approximately 300 ft (∼90 m) wide. Jc = Curtis Formation; Jmb = Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation; Jms = Salt Wash Member, Morrison Formation; Jsmt = Tidwell Member, Morrison Formation, and Summerville Formation; Km = Mancos Shale; Qa = Quaternary (undifferentiated).
Published: 15 August 2019
= Curtis Formation; Jmb = Brushy Basin Member, Morrison Formation; Jms = Salt Wash Member, Morrison Formation; Jsmt = Tidwell Member, Morrison Formation, and Summerville Formation; Km = Mancos Shale; Qa = Quaternary (undifferentiated).
Image
Satellitep-imagery map of the study area showing sample sites (black boxes), major structural features (fault zones—black; fold axes—red), oil and gas reservoirs (green and purple outlines), and regions where the Curtis Formation and Entrada Sandstone crop out (green). Map also shows major river networks (light blue lines), groundwater potentiometric contours (dark blue solid and blue dashed lines), and groundwater flow lines (dark blue arrows).
Published: 08 March 2024
Figure 3. Satellitep-imagery map of the study area showing sample sites (black boxes), major structural features (fault zones—black; fold axes—red), oil and gas reservoirs (green and purple outlines), and regions where the Curtis Formation and Entrada Sandstone crop out (green). Map also shows
Image
Regional stratigraphic relations (thicknesses approximate) of sampled erg eolianites and associated strata of Jurassic Glen Canyon and San Rafael Groups (Colorado Plateau). Solid dots represent stratigraphic positions of samples collected for detrital zircon analysis. Chronostratigraphic correlations (dashed lines) are inferred from limited fossil control. Stratigraphic abbreviations: BL—“Black Ledge” sandstone; CF—Curtis Formation; MT—Moab Tongue; RP/CR—Rock Point–Church Rock interval (Rock Point Formation); RS—Romana Sandstone; SSM—Springdale Sandstone Member (of Moenave Formation or of Kayenta Formation); TC—Temple Cap Sandstone; TF—Todilto Formation. Map key at upper right shows locations of columns A–F. States: AZ—Arizona; CO—Colorado; NM—New Mexico; NV—Nevada; UT—Utah.
Published: 01 March 2009
. Chronostratigraphic correlations (dashed lines) are inferred from limited fossil control. Stratigraphic abbreviations: BL—“Black Ledge” sandstone; CF—Curtis Formation; MT—Moab Tongue; RP/CR—Rock Point–Church Rock interval (Rock Point Formation); RS—Romana Sandstone; SSM—Springdale Sandstone Member (of Moenave
Image
A) Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous lithostratigraphy of Western Canada and the USA. BH. = Buckhorn conglomerate, BB. = Brushy Basin Member, ST. = Saltwash Member, T. = Tidwell Member, SC. = Summerville and Curtis formations, E. = Entrada sandstone, CM. = Carmel Formation, P. = Page sandstone, SW. = Swift Formation, R. = Rierdon Formation, S. = Sawtooth Formation, B. = Bluesky Formation, G. = Gething Formation, C. = Cadomin Formation (modified from Hasiotis, 2004; Turner and Peterson, 2004; Dickinson et al., 2010; and Fuentes et al., 2009). B) Schematic cross-section through the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin emphasizing the Deep Basin gas-charged clastic sedimentary wedges including the Permian to Triassic (passive margin), Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous (foreland basin) and Early–Late Cretaceous (foreland basin; modified from Masters, 1979).
Published: 01 June 2013
Figure 1 A) Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous lithostratigraphy of Western Canada and the USA. BH. = Buckhorn conglomerate, BB. = Brushy Basin Member, ST. = Saltwash Member, T. = Tidwell Member, SC. = Summerville and Curtis formations, E. = Entrada sandstone, CM. = Carmel Formation, P. = Page
Image
Top panel: Burial history (black) and temperature-time (blue, dashed = uncertain) curves of the Paradox Basin (southwestern USA), after Nuccio and Condon (1996) and Murray et al. (2019). Middle panel: Stratigraphic column plotted with location (southwest to northeast) along the y-axis and time on the x-axis (after Thorson, 2018) M—Mississippian; ℙ—Pennsylvanian; P—Permian; —Triassic; J—Jurassic; K—Cretaceous; Pa—Paleocene; E—Eocene; O—Oligocene; M—Miocene. Ml—Leadville Limestone; ℙp—Paradox Formation; ℙh—Honaker Trail Formation; Pc—Cutler Formation; Pk—Kaibab Limestone; Pwr—White Rim Sandstone; m—Moenkopi Formation; c—Chinle Formation; Jw—Wingate Sandstone; Jk—Kayenta Formation; Jn—Navajo Sandstone; Jc—Carmel Formation; Je—Entrada Sandstone; Jct—Curtis Formation; Jsm—Morrison Formation; Kbc—Burro Canyon Formation; Kd—Dakota Group; Kms—Mancos Shale. Blue band is inferred fluid migration interval. Bottom Panel: Geochronologic ages from this and other studies.
Published: 22 November 2021
; Pwr—White Rim Sandstone; m—Moenkopi Formation; c—Chinle Formation; Jw—Wingate Sandstone; Jk—Kayenta Formation; Jn—Navajo Sandstone; Jc—Carmel Formation; Je—Entrada Sandstone; Jct—Curtis Formation; Jsm—Morrison Formation; Kbc—Burro Canyon Formation; Kd—Dakota Group; Kms—Mancos Shale. Blue band
Image
Top panel: Burial history (black) and temperature-time (blue, dashed = uncertain) curves of the Paradox Basin (southwestern USA), after Nuccio and Condon (1996) and Murray et al. (2019). Middle panel: Stratigraphic column plotted with location (southwest to northeast) along the y-axis and time on the x-axis (after Thorson, 2018) M—Mississippian; ℙ—Pennsylvanian; P—Permian; —Triassic; J—Jurassic; K—Cretaceous; Pa—Paleocene; E—Eocene; O—Oligocene; M—Miocene. Ml—Leadville Limestone; ℙp—Paradox Formation; ℙh—Honaker Trail Formation; Pc—Cutler Formation; Pk—Kaibab Limestone; Pwr—White Rim Sandstone; m—Moenkopi Formation; c—Chinle Formation; Jw—Wingate Sandstone; Jk—Kayenta Formation; Jn—Navajo Sandstone; Jc—Carmel Formation; Je—Entrada Sandstone; Jct—Curtis Formation; Jsm—Morrison Formation; Kbc—Burro Canyon Formation; Kd—Dakota Group; Kms—Mancos Shale. Blue band is inferred fluid migration interval. Bottom Panel: Geochronologic ages from this and other studies.
Published: 22 November 2021
; Pwr—White Rim Sandstone; m—Moenkopi Formation; c—Chinle Formation; Jw—Wingate Sandstone; Jk—Kayenta Formation; Jn—Navajo Sandstone; Jc—Carmel Formation; Je—Entrada Sandstone; Jct—Curtis Formation; Jsm—Morrison Formation; Kbc—Burro Canyon Formation; Kd—Dakota Group; Kms—Mancos Shale. Blue band