1-20 OF 188 RESULTS FOR

Cruse Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 28 September 2020
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2020) 90 (8): 938–968.
... Osman et al. in review). 1: First clastic wedge, the Cruse Formation, subdivide into two members the Upper and Lower Cruse. Red dashed line represents Formation subdivision, 2: Second clastic wedge, consisting of the Forest, Moruga and Mayaro formations, 3: Third clastic wedge Lower Morne L'Enfer...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: The arrival of the paleo–Orinoco Delta at Trinidad...
Second thumbnail for: The arrival of the paleo–Orinoco Delta at Trinidad...
Third thumbnail for: The arrival of the paleo–Orinoco Delta at Trinidad...
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2016
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2016) 86 (1): 87–106.
... shelf into deepwater areas for much of the Neogene interval. The early proximal, onshore south Trinidad part of this sediment prism, the late Miocene and early Pliocene Cruse Formation, irregularly outcrops for tens of kilometers along southern Trinidad in a disrupted but near-downdip (shelf to basin...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Upper-slope To Shelf-edge Delta Architecture, Mioc...
Second thumbnail for: Upper-slope To Shelf-edge Delta Architecture, Mioc...
Third thumbnail for: Upper-slope To Shelf-edge Delta Architecture, Mioc...
Journal Article
Published: 03 July 2013
Geological Magazine (2014) 151 (3): 550–558.
...B. WILSON; H. VINCENT Abstract The Upper Miocene Cruse Formation of Trinidad yields predominantly agglutinated foraminifera. The limited assemblage has previously hampered palaeoenvironmental interpretations. Twenty-two samples taken from a basal Cruse section at 0.5 m intervals from Quinam Bay (10...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Benthonic foraminifera in the Upper Miocene <span ...
Second thumbnail for: Benthonic foraminifera in the Upper Miocene <span ...
Third thumbnail for: Benthonic foraminifera in the Upper Miocene <span ...
Image
Well log illustrating the main characteristics of the Cruse Formation and facies associations defined from well logs. The Upper Cruse consists of a sandy topset interval (defined by FA1 and FA2) and Lower Cruse muddy slope (defined by FA3, FA4, and FA5) and bottomset unit (defined by FA4, FA5, and FA6). *After Kugler (2001), the Cruse Formation members have a well log and outcrop definition. In this study, the outcrop definition is utilized – Upper and Lower Cruse members. PS1 well location, Figure 1C, and schematic location of penetrating Upper and Lower Cruse members, Figure 2.
Published: 28 September 2020
Fig. 3.— Well log illustrating the main characteristics of the Cruse Formation and facies associations defined from well logs. The Upper Cruse consists of a sandy topset interval (defined by FA1 and FA2) and Lower Cruse muddy slope (defined by FA3, FA4, and FA5) and bottomset unit (defined by FA4
Image
A) Schematic depositional summary for the Cruse Formation. Note that the study area does not extend to the deepest basin floor. B) The process variability of the modern Orinoco Delta (modified from Chen et al. 2014). The Cruse study area superimposed aligned with the main progradational direction of the modern delta (red-dashed line).
Published: 28 September 2020
Fig. 21.— A) Schematic depositional summary for the Cruse Formation. Note that the study area does not extend to the deepest basin floor. B) The process variability of the modern Orinoco Delta (modified from Chen et al. 2014 ). The Cruse study area superimposed aligned with the main
Image
A–C) Clinoform correlations in the Cruse Formation C10–C24. A) Correlation A–B is located north of the Los Bajos Fault; B) correlation C–D is south of the Los Bajos Fault. Both show the progressive thickening of clinothems generally to the east. C) Correlation E–F is a strike section, which maintains a constant thickness. Note that vertical scale for all correlations is the same. D) Base Map for cross section locations.
Published: 28 September 2020
Fig. 4.— A–C) Clinoform correlations in the Cruse Formation C10–C24. A) Correlation A–B is located north of the Los Bajos Fault; B) correlation C–D is south of the Los Bajos Fault. Both show the progressive thickening of clinothems generally to the east. C) Correlation E–F is a strike
Image
A paleo-Orinoco outer-shelf/shelf-edge Cruse Formation snapshot with wave-river deltas, shelf-edge collapse, and deep-water slope channels and levees. RD—river dominated. (A) Shelf-edge delta front (e.g., Quinam Bay) with deformed slope mudstones. (B) Shelf-edge channels (e.g., Quinam Bay). (C) Distorted and slumped slope channels and shelf-edge collapse (e.g., Morne Diablo). Facies A, B, and C are stacked together within the shelf-edge to deep-water transit systems. (D) Deep-water channels (e.g., Palo Seco Bay). (E) Levees (e.g., Palo Seco Bay). Grain size: Mu—mud; Si—silt; Vf—very fine sand; Fl—lower fine sand; Fu—upper fine sand; M—medium sand.
Published: 10 August 2017
Figure 13. A paleo-Orinoco outer-shelf/shelf-edge Cruse Formation snapshot with wave-river deltas, shelf-edge collapse, and deep-water slope channels and levees. RD—river dominated. (A) Shelf-edge delta front (e.g., Quinam Bay) with deformed slope mudstones. (B) Shelf-edge channels (e.g., Quinam
Image
Location of Cruse Formation shelf-edge outcrop. The strata young from 0E, 1E, 2E, to 3E, but get old from 3W, 2W, to 1W because of coastal outcrop indentation. See measured sections in Figure 17.
Published: 01 January 2016
Fig. 16.— Location of Cruse Formation shelf-edge outcrop. The strata young from 0E, 1E, 2E, to 3E, but get old from 3W, 2W, to 1W because of coastal outcrop indentation. See measured sections in Figure 17 .
Image
Figure 3.
Published: 03 July 2013
Figure 3. Selected foraminifera from the Cruse Formation. (a) Ammodiscus excertus , (b) Glomospira gordialis , (c) Hyperammina friabilis , (d) Martinotiella pallida , (e) (?) Haplophragmoides aff. narivaensis , (f) Haplophragmoides carinatus , (g
Image
Figure 4.
Published: 03 July 2013
Figure 4. Distribution of statistical measures through the Cruse Formation at Quinam Bay. (a) Number of specimens per sample, N, (b) species richness S, (c) information function H, (d) dominance measured using percentage abundance of dominant species, max
Image
Figure 5.
Published: 03 July 2013
Figure 5. Agglutinated foraminiferal morphotypes in Cruse Formation at Quinam Bay. (a) Morphotype M1, erect epifauna, (b) morphotype M3a, surficial epifauna flattened, (c) morphotype M4a, shallow infauna planispiral, (d) morphotype M4b, deep infauna.
Image
—Sandstone/shale ratio, Miocene Cruse Formation. S, Soldado field; FR, Forest Reserve field; G Galeota field; Sa, Samaan field; T, Teak field.
Published: 01 September 1976
Fig. 5 —Sandstone/shale ratio, Miocene Cruse Formation. S , Soldado field; FR , Forest Reserve field; G Galeota field; Sa , Samaan field; T , Teak field.
Series: AAPG Studies in Geology
Published: 01 January 1987
DOI: 10/1306/St25468C14
EISBN: 9781629811406
... of the Cruse, Forest, and Morne L'Enfer formations. Primary production is obtained from the deeper Cruse Formation whereas the overlying Forest and Lower Morne L'Enfer formations contain heavy oil and tar sands . The Forest 'A' Reservoir represents a delta fringe/barrier bar system containing approximately...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 July 1983
AAPG Bulletin (1983) 67 (7): 1081–1093.
... system with associated east-northeast-oriented anticlines combined with north-northwest-oriented normal faults. Oil was sourced in the late Miocene lower Cruse Formation, whereas gas was derived both from Pliocene-Pleistocene pro-delta shales and as a late high-temperature phase of lower Cruse...
FIGURES
First thumbnail for: Geology and Hydrocarbon Accumulations, Columbus Ba...
Second thumbnail for: Geology and Hydrocarbon Accumulations, Columbus Ba...
Third thumbnail for: Geology and Hydrocarbon Accumulations, Columbus Ba...
Series: AAPG Memoir
Published: 01 January 2011
DOI: 10.1306/13231308M933418
EISBN: 9781629810089
... 3200 ft (975 m) of the well drilled through interbedded mud volcano layers as confirmed by palynology, paleontology, lithology, well log, and seismic information. Below 3200 ft (975 m), the well drilled primarily country rock deposits of the upper Miocene through Pliocene Cruse Formation. Paleontology...
Image
—Hydrocarbon generation, Columbus basin. Generation levels, based on percent kerogen conversion in lower Cruse Formation, are shown in Figure 10. Maps based on 75 maturation profiles of lower Cruse Formation distributed throughout basin.
Published: 01 July 1983
Fig. 13 —Hydrocarbon generation, Columbus basin. Generation levels, based on percent kerogen conversion in lower Cruse Formation, are shown in Figure 10 . Maps based on 75 maturation profiles of lower Cruse Formation distributed throughout basin.
Image
Regional geologic map of the south coast of Trinidad. The red arrows show the direction of strata from older to younger (Kugler, 1959). Site A is on upper map in Cedros Bay. Sites B is near Erin Bay. Sites C and D are near Palo Seco Bay. Site E is near Quinam Bay. Site F is near Morne Diablo Bay (see Table 1 for more outcrop site information). Lower Cruse Formation is dark blue; Upper Cruse Formation is light blue; Forest Formation is gray/green; and Morne L’Enfer Formation is light green.
Published: 10 August 2017
Diablo Bay (see Table 1 for more outcrop site information). Lower Cruse Formation is dark blue; Upper Cruse Formation is light blue; Forest Formation is gray/green; and Morne L’Enfer Formation is light green.
Image
Progressive migration of the shelf-edge location for Cruse clinothems C10–C24, A) in the study area and B) mapped fourth-order Cruse shelf-edge positions superimposed on longer-term estimated paleo–Orinoco shelf-edge trends from the late Miocene through the Pliocene (after Dixon 2005 and Chen et al. 2017). Note that TP20 represents the Cruse Formation shelf edge.
Published: 28 September 2020
2005 and Chen et al. 2017 ). Note that TP20 represents the Cruse Formation shelf edge.
Image
Schematic stratigraphic chart of the Southern Basin from the late Miocene to Pleistocene with the four main deposited clastic wedges of the paleo–Orinoco Delta and its major intervening transgressive intervals (modified from Osman et al. in review). 1: First clastic wedge, the Cruse Formation, subdivide into two members the Upper and Lower Cruse. Red dashed line represents Formation subdivision, 2: Second clastic wedge, consisting of the Forest, Moruga and Mayaro formations, 3: Third clastic wedge Lower Morne L'Enfer and Palmiste formations, 4: Upper Morne L'Enfer Formation. Well log, PS location is schematic; eustatic sea-level curve after Miller et al. 2005.
Published: 28 September 2020
Formation, subdivide into two members the Upper and Lower Cruse. Red dashed line represents Formation subdivision, 2: Second clastic wedge, consisting of the Forest, Moruga and Mayaro formations, 3: Third clastic wedge Lower Morne L'Enfer and Palmiste formations, 4: Upper Morne L'Enfer Formation. Well log
Image
—Age of peak oil generation and exploration results in Columbus basin. Major oil accumulations (Poui, Samaan, and Teak fields) are located in areas of present-day oil generation from lower Cruse Formation.
Published: 01 July 1983
Fig. 15 —Age of peak oil generation and exploration results in Columbus basin. Major oil accumulations (Poui, Samaan, and Teak fields) are located in areas of present-day oil generation from lower Cruse Formation.