1-20 OF 260 RESULTS FOR

Creighton Mine

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 April 1924
Economic Geology (1924) 19 (3): 275–280.
Image
Geological maps of the Coleman Mine (A) and Creighton Mine (B) areas, highlighting the relationship between the footwall lithologies and SIC melt sheet. Discontinuous zones of Sudbury Breccia are ubiquitous throughout the footwall and are not shown. The outlines of the Cu-Ni-PGE ore zones have been projected to the surface. At Creighton, the distal sample sites Old Creighton Town and South Pump Lake are also shown (modified after Ames et al. 2008). Ore bodies are outlined in red and projected to surface. Faults are depicted by dashed black lines.
Published: 01 September 2017
Figure 4. Geological maps of the Coleman Mine (A) and Creighton Mine (B) areas, highlighting the relationship between the footwall lithologies and SIC melt sheet. Discontinuous zones of Sudbury Breccia are ubiquitous throughout the footwall and are not shown. The outlines of the Cu-Ni-PGE ore
Image
The seismic monitoring system and production drifts of Creighton Mine in (a) top view and (b) lateral view. (c) The spatial distribution of mainshocks and (d) the depth range of microseismic events of Creighton Mine.
Published: 16 August 2022
Figure 1 The seismic monitoring system and production drifts of Creighton Mine in (a) top view and (b) lateral view. (c) The spatial distribution of mainshocks and (d) the depth range of microseismic events of Creighton Mine.
Image
Temporal velocity evolution with mainshock 1, 2, and 4 of Creighton Mine in depth range 2300-2420 m: (a) the first group (June 29 – July 1) before mainshocks; (b) the second group (July 1 – July 6) before mainshocks; (c) the first group (July 10 – July 12) after mainshocks; (d) the second group (July 12 – July 19) after mainshocks.
Published: 16 August 2022
Figure 7 Temporal velocity evolution with mainshock 1, 2, and 4 of Creighton Mine in depth range 2300-2420 m: (a) the first group (June 29 – July 1) before mainshocks; (b) the second group (July 1 – July 6) before mainshocks; (c) the first group (July 10 – July 12) after mainshocks; (d
Image
Temporal velocity evolution with mainshocks of Creighton Mine in depth range 2180-2300 m: (a) the first group (June 29 – July 1) before mainshocks; (b) the second group (July 1 – July 6) before mainshocks; (c) the first group (July 10 – July 12) after mainshocks; (d) the second group (July 12 – July 19) after mainshocks.
Published: 16 August 2022
Figure 8 Temporal velocity evolution with mainshocks of Creighton Mine in depth range 2180-2300 m: (a) the first group (June 29 – July 1) before mainshocks; (b) the second group (July 1 – July 6) before mainshocks; (c) the first group (July 10 – July 12) after mainshocks; (d) the second group
Image
(A) A typical Sudbury breccia outcrop from close to the Creighton Mine exhibiting a dark grey, very fine-grained matrix hosting rounded clasts of locally derived host lithologies. (B) A sharp-walled sulfide vein from the Fraser Mine (adjacent to the Coleman Mine) in the North Range. The vein transitions from type-1 (chalcopyrite-dominant) to type-2 (bornite-dominant). The thin, dark grey-green alteration selvage can be seen adjacent to the vein. The host lithology is felsic gneiss with Sudbury Breccia (yellow arrow). Photo (B) courtesy of Dave Richardson.
Published: 01 September 2017
Figure 2. (A) A typical Sudbury breccia outcrop from close to the Creighton Mine exhibiting a dark grey, very fine-grained matrix hosting rounded clasts of locally derived host lithologies. (B) A sharp-walled sulfide vein from the Fraser Mine (adjacent to the Coleman Mine) in the North Range
Image
Published: 01 September 2017
Table 3. REPRESENTATIVE TITANITE AND BIOTITE COMPOSITIONS FROM THE CREIGHTON MINE
Image
MLA false-color particle bitmaps from the Creighton mine sample for sperrylite (bright blue) (A, B, C: +53 μm, +20 μm, –20 μm fractions) and michenerite (bright pink) (D, E, F: +53 μm, +20 μm, –20 μm fractions).
Published: 01 December 2011
Fig. 5 MLA false-color particle bitmaps from the Creighton mine sample for sperrylite (bright blue) (A, B, C: +53 μm, +20 μm, –20 μm fractions) and michenerite (bright pink) (D, E, F: +53 μm, +20 μm, –20 μm fractions).
Image
MLA false-color particle bitmaps from the Creighton mine sample for hollingworthite (bright green) (A, B, C: +53 μm, +20 μm, –20 μm fractions). Hollingworthite typically occurs in the core of a gersdorffite grain. The hollingworthite– gersdorffite pair is strongly associated with pyrrhotite. Note that photo C has been enlarged to illustrate details of the hollingworthite–gersdorffite intergrowth.
Published: 01 December 2011
Fig. 6 MLA false-color particle bitmaps from the Creighton mine sample for hollingworthite (bright green) (A, B, C: +53 μm, +20 μm, –20 μm fractions). Hollingworthite typically occurs in the core of a gersdorffite grain. The hollingworthite– gersdorffite pair is strongly associated
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2017
The Canadian Mineralogist (2017) 55 (5): 909–943.
...Figure 4. Geological maps of the Coleman Mine (A) and Creighton Mine (B) areas, highlighting the relationship between the footwall lithologies and SIC melt sheet. Discontinuous zones of Sudbury Breccia are ubiquitous throughout the footwall and are not shown. The outlines of the Cu-Ni-PGE ore...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 May 1997
Economic Geology (1997) 92 (3): 289–307.
... Early Proterozoic sediments, mafic volcanics, and intrusions, and have low Sr, La/Yb, Gd/Yb, La/Sm, and high TiO 2 . These differences may be caused by the assimilation of different country rocks during emplacement of the dike. A strongly mineralized offset dike at the Creighton mine has geochemical...
Journal Article
Journal: Economic Geology
Published: 01 December 2001
Economic Geology (2001) 96 (8): 1855–1875.
... with a Ni/Cu ~1. The formation of the geologically complex and heavily contaminated sublayer is believed to either accompany or postdate offset formation. The sublayer at the Whistle and Creighton mines occupies embayment structures at the base of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, which are directly connected...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Published: 01 September 2017
Table 5. REPRESENTATIVE AMPHIBOLE COMPOSITIONS FROM THE COLEMAN AND CREIGHTON MINES
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1996
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1996) 86 (5): 1627–1633.
...). The appropriateness of the technique for the analysis of induced seismicity was tested by comparing on-line values of seismic moment, seismic energy, and static stress drop with those obtained in the frequency domain (off-line) for an aftershock sequence of events recorded underground at Creighton mine, Ontario. Our...
Image
(A) Calcic amphibole classification scheme from Leake et al. (1997) demonstrating the difference between amphibole cores (blue) and rims (green) and the similarity between the latter and amphiboles in mineralized zones (red) at the Creighton Mine. The grey area represents amphibole from the Coleman Mine. (B) Titanite analyses from the Creighton Mine exhibiting the increased Al + Fe content from distal samples, ∼0.5–1 km from the embayment (blue), to samples within the Creighton Deep zone (red).
Published: 01 September 2017
Figure 9. (A) Calcic amphibole classification scheme from Leake et al . (1997) demonstrating the difference between amphibole cores (blue) and rims (green) and the similarity between the latter and amphiboles in mineralized zones (red) at the Creighton Mine. The grey area represents amphibole
Image
Biotite from Coleman (open circles) and Creighton (filled circles) Mines with proximity to ore from distal to mineralized samples (blue-green-yellow-red). (A) Mg/Fe in chlorite and biotite, displaying the inherited geochemistry of replacement chlorite compared with coexisting biotite. (B) Tl/Rb versus Ni/Cr in biotite shows a relative increase in Tl content in mineralized samples, although the signature is reduced at the Creighton Mine. (C) Ni–Cu–Cr ternary plot demonstrating increased Ni/Cr towards ore, whereas Cu results are more scattered. (D) Whole-rock geochemical data for the Creighton Mine demonstrating the decreasing Rb values with proximity to mineralization that may reflect increasing Tl substitution in biotite over K, Rb, and Ce.
Published: 01 September 2017
Figure 8. Biotite from Coleman (open circles) and Creighton (filled circles) Mines with proximity to ore from distal to mineralized samples (blue-green-yellow-red). (A) Mg/Fe in chlorite and biotite, displaying the inherited geochemistry of replacement chlorite compared with coexisting biotite
Image
The examples of monitoring residual with iterations of velocity inversion of (a) Creighton Mine and (b) Kidd Mine.
Published: 16 August 2022
Figure 6 The examples of monitoring residual with iterations of velocity inversion of (a) Creighton Mine and (b) Kidd Mine.
Image
Cumulative number of events in temporal distribution and mainshocks distribution of (a) Creighton Mine and (b) Kidd Mine.
Published: 16 August 2022
Figure 3 Cumulative number of events in temporal distribution and mainshocks distribution of (a) Creighton Mine and (b) Kidd Mine.
Image
Geological map of the Sudbury Basin showing the location of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Superior Province and Huronian footwall units, and post-impact Whitewater Group. Sample locations are: (1) Coleman Mine and (2) Creighton Mine.
Published: 01 September 2017
Figure 1. Geological map of the Sudbury Basin showing the location of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Superior Province and Huronian footwall units, and post-impact Whitewater Group. Sample locations are: (1) Coleman Mine and (2) Creighton Mine.
Image
Mantle-normalized multielement distribution patterns of (a) disseminated sulfides from the Creighton and Garson mines; (b-d) contact-type massive ore from the Falconbridge mine, contact-type massive ore from the Creighton mine, D1 contact breccia ore from the Garson mine in (b), and D2 deformed contact breccia ore from the Garson mine in (c) and (d); (e) Garson Ramp footwall-type ore, quartz-calcite-sulfide veins at the Garson mine, and calcite vein selvage at the Garson mine; (f) multielement diagram showing the distribution of elements for D1 contact breccia ore, D2 deformed contact breccia ore, and D2 fault-type breccia ore at the Garson mine normalized to the average compositions of Garson disseminated sulfides.
Published: 01 March 2014
Fig 9 Mantle-normalized multielement distribution patterns of (a) disseminated sulfides from the Creighton and Garson mines; (b-d) contact-type massive ore from the Falconbridge mine, contact-type massive ore from the Creighton mine, D 1 contact breccia ore from the Garson mine in (b), and D 2