1-20 OF 4211 RESULTS FOR

Cox fault zone

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 October 1982
AAPG Bulletin (1982) 66 (10): 1693–1694.
... the deposition of the Monterey Formation. Specifically, the Cox fault zone and South Cuyama anticline show evidence of such movement, beginning in the early Miocene, which affected the distribution of the formation. These relationships reflect an episode of structural deformation preceding the late Neogene...
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1984
AAPG Bulletin (1984) 68 (5): 610–627.
...) within this borderland. The formation is lithologically and stratigraphically complex, as illustrated by regional cross sections and stratigraphic maps. It varies widely in thickness, up to 4,500 ft (1,400 m), over anticlines and the Cox fault zone suggests structural movement occurred contemporaneously...
FIGURES | View All (23)
Image
—Location of samples and major tectonic elements. MA = Monroe arch, JD = Jackson dome, PFZ = Pickens fault zone, GFZ = Gilbertown fault zone, PdFZ = Pollard fault zone, MG = Mobile Graben, 1 = Chevron 1 Cox, 2 = Shell 2 Martin, 3 = Shell 5A Cox et al, 4 = Shell 1 Stevens et al, 5 = Union 1 Maples, 6 = Getty 1 Hatters Est., 7 = Getty 1 Radcliff. Fields for wells listed in Table 1. Modified from Martin (1978).
Published: 01 September 1987
Figure 1 —Location of samples and major tectonic elements. MA = Monroe arch, JD = Jackson dome, PFZ = Pickens fault zone, GFZ = Gilbertown fault zone, PdFZ = Pollard fault zone, MG = Mobile Graben, 1 = Chevron 1 Cox, 2 = Shell 2 Martin, 3 = Shell 5A Cox et al, 4 = Shell 1 Stevens et al, 5 = Union
Image
Structural elements of the southern Mississippi Embayment. Open circles, epicenters (historical and instrumental events through 2003, NCEER, ANSS, NEIC, and CERI earthquake catalogs). Epicenter clusters are indicated by NMSZ, New Madrid seismic zone; ES, Enola swarm; UFI, earthquakes induced by underground fluid injection (Cox, 1991). Liquefaction fields (stippling shows more than 1% of surface covered by sand blows): AC, Ashley County; DC, Desha County; NMSZ liquefaction field (according to Obermeier, 1989; Tuttle et al., 1998). Ellipses around AC and DC include outlying sand blows. SRFZ, Saline River fault zone; ARFZ, Arkansas River fault zone (Cox 1994; Cox et al., 2000b). Star shows location of an anticline in late-Holocene sediments discussed in the text.
Published: 01 June 2004
blows. SRFZ, Saline River fault zone; ARFZ, Arkansas River fault zone ( Cox 1994 ; Cox et al., 2000b ). Star shows location of an anticline in late-Holocene sediments discussed in the text.
Image
Published: 01 August 2004
F ig . 18. Model for the development of the Magdala and Wonga gold lodes. Figure 18 was developed from the models of Sibson et al.(1988) , Cox et al. (1991b) , Cox et al. (1995) , Robert et al. (1995) , and Sibson and Scott (1998) . The Magdala lode system of steeply dipping reverse faults
Image
(A) Location of the study area within the midcontinent. The lower map marks the location of part (A) within the United States. (B) Basement faults or lineaments in the study area, after Cox (2009) and used with permission of Elsevier. The boxed area marks the location of Figure 3. AA′ marks the location of the cross section in Figure 9. BMFZ = Bolivar–Mansfield Fault Zone; CHFZ = Chesapeake Fault Zone; DCFZ = Drake’s Creek Fault Zone; FFZ = Fayetteville Fault Zone; MJFZ = Mount Jude Fault Zone; SFZ = Seneca Fault Zone.
Published: 01 October 2017
Figure 1. (A) Location of the study area within the midcontinent. The lower map marks the location of part (A) within the United States. (B) Basement faults or lineaments in the study area, after Cox (2009) and used with permission of Elsevier. The boxed area marks the location of Figure 3
Image
Logic tree for the Saline River fault‐zone polygon source. Source geometry from Thompson Jobe et al. (2022a,b) based on Cox et al. (2012, 2013, 2014). RLME magnitude and recurrence data based on CEUS‐SSCn Project methodology (U.S. Department of Energy, Electric Power Research Institute, and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2012) and Randel Cox (The University of Memphis, oral comm., June 2022). This is a new source for the 2023 NSHM.
Published: 31 January 2024
Figure A11. Logic tree for the Saline River faultzone polygon source. Source geometry from Thompson Jobe et al. (2022a , b) based on Cox et al. (2012 , 2013 , 2014) . RLME magnitude and recurrence data based on CEUS‐SSCn Project methodology ( U.S. Department of Energy, Electric Power
Image
Schematic illustration of a hypothetical eastern Tennessee seismic zone master basement fault displaying restraining and releasing bends (Cox et al., 2018). D, downthrown block; U, upthrown block.
Published: 11 January 2022
Figure 15. Schematic illustration of a hypothetical eastern Tennessee seismic zone master basement fault displaying restraining and releasing bends ( Cox et al. , 2018 ). D, downthrown block; U, upthrown block.
Image
Little River site. (a) Geologic map of the area around the Little River site, illustrating the SW–NE tectonic grain (Southworth et al., 2012). Red circle marks the Little River exposure north of Brakebill Island. (c) Uninterpreted and (d) interpreted structure from motion (SfM) photomosaics of the Little River exposure. Numbers mark units described and interpreted in the field; Table 1 provides unit descriptions. Yellow circle marks location of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) sample H from Cox et al. (2022), which yielded an age of 10,310 ± 895 yr. Light blue corners mark extent of exposure shown in Cox et al. (2022). White box marks extent shown in panel (b). (b) Detailed photograph (oblique view) of the previously interpreted fault zone, with alternative observations and interpretations, to more clearly show the flat bedrock strath surface of the Nolichucky Shale of the Conasauga Group. Red arrows mark the location of the thrust fault interpreted by Cox et al. (2022). Legend for unit numbers in panel (d). Uninterpreted photo of Figure 7b is available in the supplemental material, and the SfM model is available in Thompson Jobe et al. (2024).
Published: 25 March 2024
mark extent of exposure shown in Cox et al. (2022) . White box marks extent shown in panel (b). (b) Detailed photograph (oblique view) of the previously interpreted fault zone, with alternative observations and interpretations, to more clearly show the flat bedrock strath surface of the Nolichucky
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 1988
Seismological Research Letters (1988) 59 (4): 312.
... (Ramelli and Slemmons, in press). At least four fault zones in other parts of CEUS indicate that the Meers faulting event is not unique, including: (1) New Madrid epicentral region with three events of about M S = 8 in 1811 and 1812 with surface faulting and deformation (Russ, 1982), (2) Washita Valley...
Image
Figure 1. Regional tectonic elements of the southwestern Mississippi embayment. Open circles are historic and instrumental epicenters (from Center for Earthquake Research and Information catalog, Memphis, Tennessee); NMSZ—New Madrid seismic zone; SAFZ—South Arkansas fault zone; PGFZ—Pickens-Gilberttown fault zone; ES—Enola swarm cluster of epicenters; T—cluster of epicenters of seismicity triggered by underground fluid injection. Ball on surface faults shows downthrown block. Broad gray lines are approximate positions of fault zones controlling the positions of the Arkansas, Saline, and Ouachita Rivers (from Cox, 1994). Thin dashed lines are rivers. Star is location of a liquefaction field on late Holocene alluvial deposits
Published: 01 November 2000
Figure 1. Regional tectonic elements of the southwestern Mississippi embayment. Open circles are historic and instrumental epicenters (from Center for Earthquake Research and Information catalog, Memphis, Tennessee); NMSZ—New Madrid seismic zone; SAFZ—South Arkansas fault zone; PGFZ—Pickens
Series: Society of Exploration Geophysicists Distinguished Instructor Series
Published: 01 January 1998
EISBN: 9781560801849
... Abstract Cox and Perkins and DDD Energy were partners in an exploration project in the Wilcox trend, onshore Texas, and had difficulty deciding where to locate an exploratory well. The play was in a heavily faulted zone below a high-velocity layer associated with the Wilcox, where two high...
Image
Oblique view of the Whitewater River system, showing faults (red lines) and stream captures. Light-blue lines show geomorphic features interpreted as ancient drainage systems that predate the incised drainage of the current Whitewater River. Active drainages are shown as dark-blue lines. Faults and fault strands are abbreviated as Banning strand (BS), Cox Ranch fault (CRF), Garnet Hill strand (GHS), Mill Creek strand (MCS), Mission Creek strand (MsCS), Morongo Valley fault (MVF), Pinto Mountain fault (PMF), San Gorgonio Pass fault zone (SGPFZ), and Whitewater fault (WF). Wathier Landing is labeled as WL. Sites 1 and 2 indicate locations where the dips of shears within the crush zone of Whitewater fault have been measured (35° to 65° to the east and 38° to 84° to the east, respectively).
Published: 18 February 2022
. Faults and fault strands are abbreviated as Banning strand (BS), Cox Ranch fault (CRF), Garnet Hill strand (GHS), Mill Creek strand (MCS), Mission Creek strand (MsCS), Morongo Valley fault (MVF), Pinto Mountain fault (PMF), San Gorgonio Pass fault zone (SGPFZ), and Whitewater fault (WF). Wathier Landing
Image
▴ A) Regional setting of this study showing the previously documented areas of seismically induced liquefaction (gray shading), sand blow fields identified in this study (black ellipses), and the proximity of the study area to the New Madrid seismic zone and Wabash Valley liquefaction. Diagonal hatching denotes the region of Wisconsinan and Holocene alluvial valley surveyed by inspection of pre-1952 aerial photography at the National Archives and Records Administration, College Park, MD. NMSZ = New Madrid seismic zone. SRFZ = Saline River fault zone. Area of Figure 1B is denoted by rectangle. B) Map showing Quaternary geology of the study area (simplified after Saucier and Snead 1991 and Saucier 1994) and clusters of sand blows identified by inspection of aerial photography. We interpret distinct circular tonal anomalies as probable sand blows and indistinct circular anomalies as possible sand blows and define six fields of clustered anomalies. Previously investigated sand blow fields are denoted by white ellipses labeled ACF (Ashley County field), DCF (Desha County field), and LJCF (Lincoln-Jefferson counties field)(Cox, Larsen et al. 2004; Cox et al. 2007). Arrowheads point to trench sites of Cox, Larsen et al. (2004); Cox et al. (2007). Sand blow fields investigated in this study are denoted by white ellipses labeled in boldface as BCF (Bradley County field), MPF (Morehouse Parish field), and RPF (Richland Parish field). Excavation sites in this study are Horsehead Island river bank, Gee's Landing trench, Bridewell trench, Tip Pugh trench, and Junior Jones trench.
Published: 01 November 2010
. Diagonal hatching denotes the region of Wisconsinan and Holocene alluvial valley surveyed by inspection of pre-1952 aerial photography at the National Archives and Records Administration, College Park, MD. NMSZ = New Madrid seismic zone. SRFZ = Saline River fault zone. Area of Figure 1B is denoted
Image
A. Model of structural opening formed in a fault jog along a normal fault (from Cox et al., 2001) showing the angular relationship between principal stress axes, fault, extension fracture (ore shoot), and slip vector. The structural opening represents a high-permeability zone along σ2 in which mineral precipitation forms ore shoots. B. Example of a mesoscopic quartz-filled opening in a fault jog along a dextral fault, as an analog for the cross section of a dilational ore shoot; the view is along the σ2 stress axis parallel to the long axis of opening (Akatore region, New Zealand).
Published: 01 August 2006
F ig . 1. A. Model of structural opening formed in a fault jog along a normal fault (from Cox et al., 2001 ) showing the angular relationship between principal stress axes, fault, extension fracture (ore shoot), and slip vector. The structural opening represents a high-permeability zone along σ
Book Chapter

Series: DNAG, Geology of North America
Publisher: Geology of North America
Published: 01 January 1986
DOI: 10.1130/DNAG-GNA-M.351
EISBN: 9780813754642
... plates is preserved in the fabric of sea-floor spreading (SFS) recorded by magnetic lineation and fracture zone (FZ) patterns (Fig. 1) (Vine and Matthews, 1963; Heezen and Tharp, 1965) on both flanks of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Age calibration of the SFS magnetic anomaly pattern (Cox, 1973; Harland...
Image
Figure 4. Maps showing selected tectonic and thermochronometric features in a central part of the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Pale gray zone is inferred location of transition zone at southern end of the central Southern Alps. Triangle indicates location of Mt. Cook. Wiggly gray line is Main Divide of the Southern Alps. Inset in (A) shows digital elevation model of South Island and location of Figures 4A, 4B, and 4C. (A) Selected active faults, earthquake locations, and selected focal mechanisms from New Zealand National Seismograph Network (NZNSN) and South Island Passive Seismic Experiment (SAPSE) (from Leitner et al., 2001), and Bouguer gravity anomaly contours (from Eberhart-Phillips and Bannister, 2002). (B) Contours of zircon fission-track data (Tippett and Kamp, 1993; Batt et al., 2000; and S. Cox and P. Kamp, unpublished data). Outcrop distribution and varying mean strike of brittl-ductile shear arrays are shown with gray zone and dark bars, respectively. Open-cavity filling drusy vein localities are shown with open squares (T. Little and S. Cox, unpublished data; Craw, 1997). (Continued on following page.)
Published: 01 May 2005
-ductile shear arrays are shown with gray zone and dark bars, respectively. Open-cavity filling drusy vein localities are shown with open squares (T. Little and S. Cox, unpublished data; Craw, 1997 ). ( Continued on following page.)
Image
Schematic block diagrams illustrating two competing hypotheses for possible surface deformation in the ETSZ. Cross section is from Whisner (2010), and thin gray lines depict the general northeast–southwest (NE‐SW) structural grain of the Paleozoic fold and thrust belt. Hypothesis A suggests active faults are oriented NE‐SW and are primarily thrust faults with some strike‐slip motion reactivating Paleozoic bedrock faults (after Cox et al., 2018, 2022). Hypothesis B suggests that surface deformation should occur on EW‐trending left‐lateral faults or north–south (NS)‐trending right‐lateral faults (after Chapman et al., 1997; Levandowski et al., 2023), with a broad zone of surface deformation. NS‐trending faults are less favorably oriented (Levandowski et al., 2023). Both the hypotheses would require limited vertical offset of the Paleozoic bedrock faults. NYAL, New York Alabama lineament.
Published: 25 March 2024
A suggests active faults are oriented NE‐SW and are primarily thrust faults with some strike‐slip motion reactivating Paleozoic bedrock faults (after Cox et al. , 2018 , 2022 ). Hypothesis B suggests that surface deformation should occur on EW‐trending left‐lateral faults or north–south (NS)‐trending
Image
Schematic presentation of Gondwana breakup (modified after Cox, 1992). (a) Stage 1 at 180 Ma: Emplacement of continental flood basalts and western Explora (black) in association with lithospheric extension in western Dronning Maud Land and development of Mozambique thinned zone (MTZ), Weddell Sea thinned zone (WTZ), and Jutul-Penck thinned zone (JTZ). (b) Stage 2 at 160 Ma: Emplacement of eastern Explora and Kjakebeinet lamproites in association with early seafloor spreading between Africa and Antarctica and transform faulting within the Mozambique–Weddell Sea thinned zone. Distribution of group II kimberlite fields in Africa (ages indicated) is shown in (b). Reconstruction at 160 Ma is after Lavwer, Gahagan & Coffin (1992).
Published: 01 September 2002
Figure 5. Schematic presentation of Gondwana breakup (modified after Cox, 1992 ). (a) Stage 1 at 180 Ma: Emplacement of continental flood basalts and western Explora (black) in association with lithospheric extension in western Dronning Maud Land and development of Mozambique thinned zone (MTZ
Series: SEPM Special Publication
Published: 01 January 2000
EISBN: 9781565761896
... deposits that cover shelf carbonates Hegenberger (1993) ~ 1.64 Ga Teena Dolomite, Batten Fault Zone, McArthur Basin, Australia peritidal → subtidal → deep subtidal Winefield and McGoldrick, (1998) ; this study ~ 1.64 Ga Vizard Formation, Mt. Birch, Urapunga Fault Zone, McArthur...
FIGURES | View All (11)