1-20 OF 685 RESULTS FOR

Cottonwood Fault

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Journal: AAPG Bulletin
Published: 01 May 1985
AAPG Bulletin (1985) 69 (5): 855–856.
... that occurred between emplacement of the early thrust and emplacement of the Keystone thrust. The results of this study indicate that there was not an early thrust event nor was there high-angle faulting prior to the Sevier deformational event. The Cottonwood fault and the Contact thrust in the Spring Mountains...
Journal Article
Published: 25 October 2016
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2016) 106 (6): 2674–2685.
... of the northeast‐striking Cottonwood Grove and Ridgely strike‐slip faults with the Reelfoot fault. We use seismic reflection and geologic mapping to locate and determine the history of the Reelfoot South fault across this boundary zone. One reflection profile revealed a southwest‐dipping (81°) Reelfoot South...
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1988
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1988) 78 (2): 838–854.
...John L. Sexton; Paul B. Jones Abstract The Cottonwood Grove fault is located within a portion of the New Madrid seismic zone in northwestern Tennessee. Focal mechanism studies indicate that this area is a seismic transition zone. To the southwest is a southwest-northeast seismic trend in which...
Series: DNAG, Centennial Field Guides
Published: 01 January 1987
DOI: 10.1130/0-8137-5401-1.191
EISBN: 9780813754079
... Abstract The Banning fault site is located at the mouth of Cottonwood Canyon, at the eastern end of San Gorgonio Pass. San Gorgonio Pass is the low divide separating the high steep terrain of the Peninsular Ranges Province to the south, from the higher but less steep Transverse Ranges Province...
Journal Article
Published: 20 June 2017
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2017) 107 (4): 1704–1723.
... and for the East Bench and Cottonwood faults. Response spectral accelerations (SA; 1.5–10 s; 5% damping) were measured, and average distance scaling was well fit by a simple functional form that depends on the near‐source intensity level SA 0 ( T ) and a corner distance R c : SA ( R , T ) = SA 0 ( T ) ( 1 + ( R...
FIGURES | View All (23)
Image
(a) Key active faults (red lines) along the Wasatch range front in central Utah (modified from DuRoss et al., 2016). Black lines show other Quaternary active faults. Black box represents the study area. (b) Bouguer gravity map for the Salt Lake basin showing northwest‐trending depth‐to‐bedrock contours (compiled by Roten et al., 2011) that support a linkage between the East Bench fault (EBF) and Warm Springs fault (WSF). Black box represents Figure 2 region. The green star represents the 2020 Magna earthquake epicenter. Historical seismicity (red circles) shows a focus on the west side of the valley. CF, Cottonwood fault.
Published: 03 June 2021
side of the valley. CF, Cottonwood fault.
Image
Shaded relief map of southern California showing faults (narrow black lines, dashed where buried), shotpoints (black circles with gray or white fill), and seismographic receiver locations (small black dots) for the LARSE II profile. Locations of shotpoints for shot gathers plotted in Figure 2 are shown with white fill. Epicenters of the 1971 San Fernando and 1994 Northridge earthquakes are shown as stars with attached magnitudes. The white box in the upper-left inset shows the location of the map within California. Basins shown in the lower-right inset are: RB: Ridge basin, SB: Soledad basin, and EVB: East Ventura basin. Fault abbreviations: CF: Clearwater fault, CWF: Cottonwood fault, GF: Garlock fault, MCF: Malibu coast fault, MHF: Mission Hills fault, NHF: Northridge Hills fault, PF: Pelona fault, SAF: San Andreas fault, SFF: San Francisquito fault, SGF: San Gabriel fault, SMF: Santa Monica fault, SMFZ: Sierra Madre fault zone, SSF: Santa Susana fault, QF: unnamed Quaternary fault, WWF: White Wolf fault, and WSF: Willow Springs fault.
Published: 01 December 2010
: Soledad basin, and EVB: East Ventura basin. Fault abbreviations: CF: Clearwater fault, CWF: Cottonwood fault, GF: Garlock fault, MCF: Malibu coast fault, MHF: Mission Hills fault, NHF: Northridge Hills fault, PF: Pelona fault, SAF: San Andreas fault, SFF: San Francisquito fault, SGF: San Gabriel fault
Published: 01 January 1990
DOI: 10.1130/MEM176-p413
... The structure of the northern Cottonwood Mountains, located in the Death Valley region of southeastern California, is dominated by a faulted, east-facing, monoclinal flexure developed in Paleozoic strata of the Cordilleran miogeocline. We interpret this flexure as a rollover or fault-bend fold...
Image
▴ Profile of Cottonwood Grove fault plane. The k–2 slip distribution is shown in A. This slip model is used for all of the scenarios. A plot of the rise time is shown in B, and the rupture front arrival time of a unilateral scenario is shown in C along with the hypocenter (red star).
Published: 01 March 2010
Figure 4. ▴ Profile of Cottonwood Grove fault plane. The k – 2 slip distribution is shown in A. This slip model is used for all of the scenarios. A plot of the rise time is shown in B, and the rupture front arrival time of a unilateral scenario is shown in C along with the hypocenter (red
Image
▴ Ruptures on the Cottonwood Grove fault. Plots of PHV are shown on the left column while bracketed durations are shown in the right column. The focal mechanism is at the epicenter. A) north-propagating rupture, B) south-propagating-rupture, C) bilateral rupture.
Published: 01 March 2010
Figure 7. ▴ Ruptures on the Cottonwood Grove fault. Plots of PHV are shown on the left column while bracketed durations are shown in the right column. The focal mechanism is at the epicenter. A) north-propagating rupture, B) south-propagating-rupture, C) bilateral rupture.
Image
Figure 8. San Manuel fault in Cottonwood Wash. Location shown in Figure 1. (A) Local geologic map, with squares on hanging wall of low-angle San Manuel normal fault and barbells on hanging wall of Basin and Range high-angle normal fault offsetting San Manuel fault (strike-and-dip symbols denote bedding in San Manuel Formation and arrows denote fault dip). (B) North side of Cottonwood Wash in the northeast corner of Figure 8A (view north), showing tilted Miocene conglomerate (thin white lines, bedding; heavy white lines, fault surfaces) in fault contact (half arrows) with Precambrian granite along San Manuel fault (topographic relief in view is ∼75 m). (C) Close-up of extensional duplex faulting in hanging wall of San Manuel fault (Fig. 8B, center), with bedding in San Manuel Formation inclined downward to right
Published: 01 January 2004
Figure 8. San Manuel fault in Cottonwood Wash. Location shown in Figure 1 . (A) Local geologic map, with squares on hanging wall of low-angle San Manuel normal fault and barbells on hanging wall of Basin and Range high-angle normal fault offsetting San Manuel fault (strike-and-dip symbols denote
Image
Coulomb failure stress change (ΔCFS) due to seasonal crustal unloading for Reelfoot fault (left panel) and Cottonwood Grove fault (right panel). Change in ΔCFS due to seasonal crustal unloading is plotted on a vertical section along a horizontal profile, considering friction coefficient (µ) values of 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6. ΔCFS is resolved on the subsurface fault dipping at 32° for Reelfoot fault and 85° for Cottonwood Grove fault. Model setup for Reelfoot fault and Cottonwood Grove fault is represented in the top left and right corners, respectively. Line load acting on the elastic half-space is distributed over width a. θ1 and θ2 measure the angle downward from the positive x-axis to any point p at depth. τxx, τzz, and τxz are different stress components. Note that ΔCFS is ~0.7–1.4 kPa for Reelfoot fault and 0.3–0.5 kPa for Cottonwood Grove fault at depth of 6–8 km, where maximum seismicity occurred in this region (white circles).
Published: 26 August 2024
Figure 5. Coulomb failure stress change (ΔCFS) due to seasonal crustal unloading for Reelfoot fault (left panel) and Cottonwood Grove fault (right panel). Change in ΔCFS due to seasonal crustal unloading is plotted on a vertical section along a horizontal profile, considering friction coefficient
Image
Schuster spectra for declustered seismicity (magnitude completeness = 1.4) for the Reelfoot fault and the Cottonwood Grove fault from 2000 to 2016. Orange stripe represents annual and multi-annual periodicity, respectively. Note that the Reelfoot fault exhibits a weak annual and significant multi-annual periodicity, whereas such periodicity is lacking in the case of the Cottonwood Grove fault.
Published: 26 August 2024
Figure 2. Schuster spectra for declustered seismicity (magnitude completeness = 1.4) for the Reelfoot fault and the Cottonwood Grove fault from 2000 to 2016. Orange stripe represents annual and multi-annual periodicity, respectively. Note that the Reelfoot fault exhibits a weak annual
Image
(A, B) Seasonal horizontal strain calculated from continuous GPS (cGPS) seasonal displacements between 2000 and 2016 (cGPS sites are marked in Fig. 1A). Principal axes of the nontectonic strain are shown by blue (compressional) and red (extensional) lines. Red line segment shown in the inset box represents scale of the horizontal strain. Background color plot is dilatational strain (A) and horizontal strain (B). Reelfoot and Cottonwood Grove faults are marked by green lines. (C, D) Coulomb failure stress changes (ΔCFS) calculated from seasonal horizontal strain, resolved on the Reelfoot fault (C) and Cottonwood Grove fault (D).
Published: 26 August 2024
in the inset box represents scale of the horizontal strain. Background color plot is dilatational strain (A) and horizontal strain (B). Reelfoot and Cottonwood Grove faults are marked by green lines. (C, D) Coulomb failure stress changes (ΔCFS) calculated from seasonal horizontal strain, resolved
Image
(a) Approximate lead time at some selected target sites for the EEWs within the NMSZ using the mainshock of 16 December 1811–1812 events on the Cottonwood Grove fault or axial fault. (b) Approximate blind zone estimated for the mainshock of the 16 December 1811–1812 events on the Cottonwood Grove fault or axial fault using the common velocity model of 6.1  km/s for P‐wave velocity and 3.55  km/s for S‐wave velocity, with alert time set to 5.1 s after the origin of the earthquake. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 06 March 2019
Figure 10. (a) Approximate lead time at some selected target sites for the EEWs within the NMSZ using the mainshock of 16 December 1811–1812 events on the Cottonwood Grove fault or axial fault. (b) Approximate blind zone estimated for the mainshock of the 16 December 1811–1812 events
Journal Article
Journal: Geosphere
Published: 26 August 2024
Geosphere (2024) 20 (5): 1347–1363.
...Figure 5. Coulomb failure stress change (ΔCFS) due to seasonal crustal unloading for Reelfoot fault (left panel) and Cottonwood Grove fault (right panel). Change in ΔCFS due to seasonal crustal unloading is plotted on a vertical section along a horizontal profile, considering friction coefficient...
FIGURES | View All (9)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 1998
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (1998) 88 (1): 131–139.
... at this location, a 7.5-km-long seismic reflection profile was acquired on roads along the southern margin of Reelfoot Lake. The seismic line reveals a westerly dipping basin bounded on the west by the Reelfoot reverse fault zone, the Ridgely right-lateral transpressive fault zone on the east, and the Cottonwood...
Image
Map of southern Utah showing locations of field sites. 1 = Hillsdale Canyon, located near the Sevier normal fault (SF), the Paunsaugunt normal fault (PF), and the Paunsaugunt thrust faults (PT); 2 = Cottonwood North on the steep, east-dipping limb of the East Kaibab monocline (EKM); 3 = Cottonwood South, also on the East Kaibab monocline; 4 = Surprise Canyon on the Waterpocket fold (WF); 5 = Pulpit arch east of Mount Hillers (MH) in the Henry Mountains; 6 = San Rafael Desert, adjacent to the San Rafael swell (SRS).
Published: 01 February 2006
Figure 2 Map of southern Utah showing locations of field sites. 1 = Hillsdale Canyon, located near the Sevier normal fault (SF), the Paunsaugunt normal fault (PF), and the Paunsaugunt thrust faults (PT); 2 = Cottonwood North on the steep, east-dipping limb of the East Kaibab monocline (EKM); 3
Image
(A) Photograph of quartz lode (white) occupying a fault zone within the Cottonwood graben. Bedrock is Navajo Sandstone. Geologist is Michael Hanna-Wilson. (B) Photograph of fault damage (white cataclasite) within deformation band shear zone in Entrada Sandstone, Kane Springs transverse fault zone. Height of rock exposure is ~6 m.
Published: 23 September 2024
Figure 10. (A) Photograph of quartz lode (white) occupying a fault zone within the Cottonwood graben. Bedrock is Navajo Sandstone. Geologist is Michael Hanna-Wilson. (B) Photograph of fault damage (white cataclasite) within deformation band shear zone in Entrada Sandstone, Kane Springs transverse
Series: Society of Economic Geologists Guidebook Series
Published: 01 January 1998
DOI: 10.5382/GB.29.02
EISBN: 9781934969823
... Abstract Base- and precious-metal deposits in the central Wasatch Mountains southeast of Salt Lake City were mined for more than 100 years beginning in 1868. Deposits present in the Park City, Little Cottonwood, and Big Cottonwood mining districts include Ag-Pb-Zn ± Cu ± Au replacements...