1-20 OF 24 RESULTS FOR

Cosoltepec Formation

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
... The Cosoltepec Formation consists of unfossiliferous phyllites and psammites with tectonic slices of basalt and forms a major part of the Acatlán Complex of southern México. It has traditionally been interpreted as part of either a Cambro-Ordovician accretionary prism or a passive margin...
... to preserve a tectonostratigraphic record linked to that of the Appalachian orogen: (1) Cambro-Ordovician deposition of a trench or forearc sequence (the Petlalcingo Group: the Magdalena, Chazumba, and Cosoltepec Formations) and an oceanic assemblage (the Piaxtla Group), (2) polyphase Late Ordovician–Early...
... closely match those recorded from the Cosoltepec Formation of the Acatlán Complex and support correlation of the two units, which are both interpreted to be vestiges of the southern margin of the Rheic Ocean. INTRODUCTION In the southernmost Sierra Madre terrane (Fig. 1) , immediately west...
Image
 Comparison of detrital zircon ages from the Asís Lithodeme with the Cosoltepec Formation (Keppie et al. 2006), and potential source regions (modified after Murphy et al. 1999).
Published: 01 July 2006
Fig. 16.  Comparison of detrital zircon ages from the Asís Lithodeme with the Cosoltepec Formation ( Keppie et al . 2006 ), and potential source regions (modified after Murphy et al . 1999).
Journal Article
Journal: Geology
Published: 01 October 2006
Geology (2006) 34 (10): 857–860.
...., Yañez et al., 1991 ; Ortega-Gutiérrez et al., 1999 ). The Petlalcingo Group has been traditionally subdivided into (1) an upper Cosoltepec Formation comprising greenschist facies phyllite, quartzite, and minor mafic volcanic rocks, (2) a middle Chazumba Formation comprising polydeformed, amphibolite...
FIGURES
Image
Time span of basement ages of early Paleozoic continents compared with relative probability plots of detrital zircon U/Pb ages of Paleozoic Maya Mountain samples and of formations in terranes that were potentially connected with the Maya block: (A–D) Baldy Formation; (E) Macal Formation; (F–G) Santa Rosa Group of Chiapas, southern Mexico (Weber et al., 2006); (H) Cosoltepec Formation of Mixteca terrane (Keppie et al., 2006); (I) Tiñú Formation of Oaxaquia (Gillis et al., 2005); (J) Ediacaran-Cambrian formations of NW Iberia (Gutiérrez-Alonso et al., 2003; Gutiérrez-Alonso et al., 2005); and (K) Suwannee basin of Florida (Opdyke et al., 1987; Dallmeyer, 1987; Mueller et al., 1994). Scales for histograms and probability plots are shown on the right side of boxes. (†) Horizontal bars with white fill are U/Pb ages of Maya Mountain granites (Steiner and Walker, 1996), Bladen rhyolite (this study), and Rb/Sr age of rhyolite in northern Yucatan Peninsula (López-Ramos, 1975). (‡) Horizontal bars with white fill are ages of main igneous suites of the Oaxaquian Complex (Keppie et al., 2003).
Published: 01 May 2010
; (F–G) Santa Rosa Group of Chiapas, southern Mexico ( Weber et al., 2006 ); (H) Cosoltepec Formation of Mixteca terrane ( Keppie et al., 2006 ); (I) Tiñú Formation of Oaxaquia ( Gillis et al., 2005 ); (J) Ediacaran-Cambrian formations of NW Iberia ( Gutiérrez-Alonso et al., 2003 ; Gutiérrez-Alonso et
Journal Article
Published: 31 January 2001
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences (2003) 40 (1): 27–44.
... and ultramafic rocks affected by an amphibolite-facies metamorphism ( Ortega-Gutierrez 1974 ). The metamorphism of the Chazumba Formation has been dated as 429 Ma (Sm/Nd single-garnet whole-rock pair isochrone, Yañez et al. 1991 ). The widespread Cosoltepec Formation represents almost 70% of the Acatlan Complex...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
a–e, Age probability and histogram plots of detrital zircon ages (all histograms show number of analyses within each 100-Ma interval) from Chiapas Massif Complex (CMC) Group I metasediments (a, top; samples CB44 and CB54); the Santa Rosa Formation in Chiapas (a, bottom; data from Weber et al. 2006 and forthcoming); metasedimentary rocks from the Acatlán Complex with mainly Pan-African–Brasiliano zircons (b): Carboniferous units (top; Cosoltepec Formation, Salada and Coatlaco units; data from Talavera-Mendoza et al. 2005; Keppie et al. 2006; Grodzicki et al. 2008; Morales-Gámez et al. 2008) and pre-Silurian units (bottom; Las Minas and Mal Paso units; data from Keppie et al. 2008b); CMC Group II metasediments (c, top three plots; data from Weber et al. 2007 and this work); the Maya series from the Maya Mountains in Belize (c, bottom; data from U. Martens, pers. comm.); metasedimentary rocks from the Acatlán Complex with mainly mid-Proterozoic ages (d): post-Ordovician units (top; Tecomate Formation and Canoas Unit; data from Sanchez-Zavala et al. 2004; Grodzicki et al. 2008) and metasedimentary units intruded by Ordovician granites (bottom; Tecomate and Xayacatlán formations, Esperanza Suite, and Amate Unit; data from Sánchez-Zavala et al. 2004; Talevera-Mendoza et al. 2005; Vega-Granillo et al. 2007; Morales-Gámez et al. 2008); and Paleozoic sedimentary rocks, overlaying the mid-Proterozoic Oaxacan complex (Oaxaquia Terrane) (e; data from Gillis et al. 2005). f, Simplified revised pre-Mesozoic stratigraphy of the Maya Block, comparing Chiapas (this work, revised from Hernandez-García 1973 and considering information from Salazar-Juárez et al. 2007), Guatemala (revised from Clemons and Burkart 1971 and considering information from Ortega-Gutiérrez et al. 2007; Ortega-Obregón et al. 2008; and Solari et al., forthcoming), and Belize (revised from Dixon 1956 but including information from Martens et al. 2006; U. Martens, B. Weber, and V. Valencia, unpub. manuscript). Additional columns of comparable units are from the Mixteca Terrane (e.g., Keppie et al. 2008a) and from Oaxaquia (Gillis et al. 2005).
Published: 01 November 2008
; data from Weber et al. 2006 and forthcoming ); metasedimentary rocks from the Acatlán Complex with mainly Pan-African–Brasiliano zircons ( b ): Carboniferous units ( top ; Cosoltepec Formation, Salada and Coatlaco units; data from Talavera-Mendoza et al. 2005 ; Keppie et al. 2006 ; Grodzicki et al
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2006
Journal of the Geological Society (2006) 163 (4): 683–695.
...Fig. 16.  Comparison of detrital zircon ages from the Asís Lithodeme with the Cosoltepec Formation ( Keppie et al . 2006 ), and potential source regions (modified after Murphy et al . 1999). ...
FIGURES | View All (17)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 May 2010
GSA Bulletin (2010) 122 (5-6): 815–829.
...; (F–G) Santa Rosa Group of Chiapas, southern Mexico ( Weber et al., 2006 ); (H) Cosoltepec Formation of Mixteca terrane ( Keppie et al., 2006 ); (I) Tiñú Formation of Oaxaquia ( Gillis et al., 2005 ); (J) Ediacaran-Cambrian formations of NW Iberia ( Gutiérrez-Alonso et al., 2003 ; Gutiérrez-Alonso et...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2009
DOI: 10.1144/SP327.12
EISBN: 9781862395756
...-grade metasedimentary rocks that include phyllite, quartzite and minor mafic volcanic rocks (Cosoltepec Formation, Salida and Coatlaco units), the deposition of which was coeval with exhumation of the high pressure rocks ( Grodzicki et al. 2008 ; Morales-Gámez et al. 2008 ); (4) Carboniferous...
FIGURES | View All (14)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 September 2007
GSA Bulletin (2007) 119 (9-10): 1249–1264.
... reveals the existence of a widespread tectonothermal event between 345 and 323 Ma, which may be related to the juxtaposition of the HP-composed block and the Gondwanan-affinity Cosoltepec suite, causing the closure of the Rheic Ocean. The tectonothermal events in the Acatlán Complex coincide in time...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Journal: GSA Bulletin
Published: 01 September 2012
GSA Bulletin (2012) 124 (9-10): 1607–1628.
..., but the unit is inferred to structurally overlie rocks of the Cosoltepec Formation further south ( Malone et al., 2002 ). The Cosoltepec Formation was originally thought to have been deposited in the Cambrian–Ordovician ( Ortega-Gutiérrez, 1978 ), but recent geochronological data indicate...
FIGURES | View All (15)
... (the Magdalena Migmatite and the Chazumba and Cosoltepec Formations) and an upper Piaxtla Group, both of which were assumed to be of early Paleozoic age (Fig. 2) . These units are unconformably overlain by the Tecomate Formation, which, based on poorly preserved fossils, was assumed to be of Devonian age ( Fig...
Journal Article
Journal: Lithosphere
Publisher: GSW
Published: 01 April 2014
Lithosphere (2014) 6 (2): 63–79.
... was previously mapped as the Cosoltepec Formation ( Ortega-Gutiérrez et al., 1999 ), which is now considered to be a composite of both Cambrian–Ordovician and Devonian–Carboniferous units ( Talavera-Mendoza et al., 2005 ; Keppie et al., 2006a , 2008 ; Morales-Gámez et al., 2008 ; Ortega-Obregón et al., 2009...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2016
Journal of Sedimentary Research (2016) 86 (6): 712–733.
... constitutes alluvial-fan deposits in an extensional environment ( Serrano-García et al. 2014 ). The Archean to Paleoproterozoic zircon ages in the Mixteca terrane are restricted to metasedimentary rocks of the Cosoltepec Formation of the Acatlán Complex (e.g., sample ACA55 from Talavera-Mendoza et al...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2024
Jour. Geol. Soc. India (2024) 100 (10): 1373–1384.
... - 455 Ma). Based on LA-ICPMS analysis, the reported depositional ages of the three formations in the Petlalcingo Group are: (i) Magdalena Migmatite protolith ~ 298 - 171 Ma (Permian - Early Jurassic); (ii) Chazumba Formation: ~ 239 - 174 Ma (Middle Triassic - Early Jurassic); and (iii) Cosoltepec...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2009
DOI: 10.1144/SP327.15
EISBN: 9781862395756
... and the amalgamation of Pangaea ( Nance et al. 2007 ), or to subduction erosion followed by high-pressure metamorphism and extrusion into the upper plate ( Keppie et al. 2008 a ). Cosoltopec Formation The Cosoltepec Formation (Fig.  3 b) forms a major part of the Acatlán Complex and consists...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Series: GSA Special Papers
Published: 09 December 2021
DOI: 10.1130/2020.2546(10)
EISBN: 9780813795461
... of the Cosoltepec, Magdalena, and Chazumba formations ( Fig. 14 ; Talavera-Mendoza et al., 2005 ), in the Tecomate Formation ( Kirsch et al., 2012 ), and in sedimentary rocks derived therefrom. Zircon grains with ages from Ordovician to earliest Silurian (population 5 in Table 2 ) are present in Upper Cretaceous...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2008
The Journal of Geology (2008) 116 (6): 619–639.
... ; data from Weber et al. 2006 and forthcoming ); metasedimentary rocks from the Acatlán Complex with mainly Pan-African–Brasiliano zircons ( b ): Carboniferous units ( top ; Cosoltepec Formation, Salada and Coatlaco units; data from Talavera-Mendoza et al. 2005 ; Keppie et al. 2006 ; Grodzicki et al...
FIGURES | View All (9)