1-20 OF 27 RESULTS FOR

Chon-Kemin-Chilik Fault

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2001
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2001) 42 (10): 1583–1592.
... fault scarps and several tremendous ancient landslides in the Chon-Kemin, Chon-Aksu, and Aksu valleys can be considered as evidence for strong prehistoric earthquakes. The 1911, M s 8.2 Kemin earthquake occurred along the Chon-Kemin-Chilik fault zone, at the interaction between the Kazakhstan...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Image
(a) Topographic map of Asia from the global model ETOPO1 (Amante and Eakins, 2009). White lines represent the plate boundaries, and the dashed rectangle indicates the study area. (b) Seismotectonic map of the northern Tien Shan belt where historical seismicity (before 1964) is indicated by squares and instrumental seismicity (after 1964) is indicated by circles. Symbol size is proportional to magnitude. Events of unknown depth are white. Tectonic structures are from (1) the Kyrgyz Institute of Seismology and digitized by the Active Tectonics Group at Arizona State University; (2) Hager and coworkers at Central Washington University, and Bogdanovich et al. (1914) and digitized by the Active Tectonics Group at Arizona State University. CKCF, Chon‐Kemin–Chilik fault; FB, Ferghana basin; ILI, Ili basin; LIK, Lake Issyk‐Kul; TFF, Talas‐Ferghana fault.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 05 March 2019
) Hager and coworkers at Central Washington University, and Bogdanovich et al. (1914) and digitized by the Active Tectonics Group at Arizona State University. CKCF, ChonKeminChilik fault; FB, Ferghana basin; ILI, Ili basin; LIK, Lake Issyk‐Kul; TFF, Talas‐Ferghana fault.The color version
Image
Surface ruptures of the 1887 Verny and 1911 Kemin earthquakes, compiled from 1:200,000 scale map [4]. 1 – supposed position of seismogenic rupture caused by the 1887 Verny earthquake [4]; 2 – seismogenic ruptures caused by the 1911 Kemin earthquake, after [4] and our data; 3 – supposed position of segments of the 1911 ruptures. 1–6 – different fault segments activated by the 1911 Kemin event: 1 – Dzhil’-Aryk, 2 – Lower Chon-Kemin, left bank, 3 – Lower Chon-Kemin, right bank, 4 – Upper Chon-Kemin-Chilik, 5 – Chon-Aksu, 6 – Aksu.
Published: 01 October 2001
– supposed position of segments of the 1911 ruptures. 1–6 – different fault segments activated by the 1911 Kemin event: 1 – Dzhil’-Aryk, 2 – Lower Chon-Kemin, left bank, 3 – Lower Chon-Kemin, right bank, 4 – Upper Chon-Kemin-Chilik, 5 – Chon-Aksu, 6 – Aksu.
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2017
DOI: 10.1144/SP432.8
EISBN: 9781862399648
... from the Chilik and the 1911 Chon-Kemin earthquakes. Scaling of these historic records confirm a magnitude of about 8 for the 1889 Chilik earthquake, pointing towards a lower crustal contribution to the fault area. At the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the northern Tien-Shan...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Journal Article
Published: 05 March 2019
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2019) 109 (2): 688–715.
...) Hager and coworkers at Central Washington University, and Bogdanovich et al. (1914) and digitized by the Active Tectonics Group at Arizona State University. CKCF, ChonKeminChilik fault; FB, Ferghana basin; ILI, Ili basin; LIK, Lake Issyk‐Kul; TFF, Talas‐Ferghana fault.The color version...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Image
Shadow elevation model of model area, with active faults, modified after (Delvaux et al., 2001; Kalmetieva et al., 2009). 1–4, epicenters of historic and instrumental earthquakes between 250 BC and 2014, after (Kalmetieva et al., 2009), earthquake catalogs NEIC and IRIS: M = 5.0–5.9 (1), M = 6.0–6.9 (2), M = 7.0–7.9 (3), M ≈ 8 Kemin (Kebin) earthquake of 03.01.1911 (4); 5–7, active faults of strike-slip (5), reverse (6), and uncertain (7) geometry. Arabic numerals in squares stand for fault names: 1, northern Chilik-Kemin; 2, southern Chilik-Kemin; 3, Aksu. Arabic numerals in circles stand for names of graben: 1, Chon-Aksu; 2, Kichi-Aksu.
Published: 01 February 2016
= 5.0–5.9 ( 1 ), M = 6.0–6.9 ( 2 ), M = 7.0–7.9 ( 3 ), M ≈ 8 Kemin (Kebin) earthquake of 03.01.1911 ( 4 ); 5 – 7 , active faults of strike-slip ( 5 ), reverse ( 6 ), and uncertain ( 7 ) geometry. Arabic numerals in squares stand for fault names: 1, northern Chilik-Kemin; 2, southern Chilik-Kemin
Image
(a) Location of Kyrgyzstan. (b) Map showing the morphology of the central-eastern Tien Shan, the central part of the Talas Fergana fault, and the Chilik-Kemin and Chon Aksu faults. Epicenters of instrumental and historical earthquakes in a magnitude range between 5 and 8.3 are indicated by a circle.
Published: 01 December 2002
Figure 1. (a) Location of Kyrgyzstan. (b) Map showing the morphology of the central-eastern Tien Shan, the central part of the Talas Fergana fault, and the Chilik-Kemin and Chon Aksu faults. Epicenters of instrumental and historical earthquakes in a magnitude range between 5 and 8.3 are indicated
Image
Isoseismals for the 1889 Chilik (Mushketov, 1891) and 1911 Chon‐Kemin (Bogdanovich et al., 1914) earthquakes are indicated in gray and black lines, respectively. See Figure 2 for details on epicenters (solid circles) and fault ruptures (solid and dashed lines) of the two earthquakes.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 05 March 2019
Figure 3. Isoseismals for the 1889 Chilik ( Mushketov, 1891 ) and 1911 ChonKemin ( Bogdanovich et al. , 1914 ) earthquakes are indicated in gray and black lines, respectively. See Figure  2 for details on epicenters (solid circles) and fault ruptures (solid and dashed lines) of the two
Image
Distribution of Medvedev–Sponheuer–Karnik‐64 (MSK‐64) intensity for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. The white star indicates the city of Almaty. The white dot and the white line describe the epicenter and the fault rupture, respectively.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 05 March 2019
Figure 5. Distribution of Medvedev–Sponheuer–Karnik‐64 (MSK‐64) intensity for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 ChonKemin earthquake. The white star indicates the city of Almaty. The white dot and the white line describe the epicenter and the fault
Image
Epicentral location (solid circles) and fault ruptures (solid lines) of the three scenario earthquakes considered in this study. Dashed lines indicate the fault segments mapped by Abdrakhmatov et al. (2016) that potentially ruptured during the 1889 Chilik earthquake. Irregular lines indicate the surface rupture mapped by Arrowsmith et al. (2016) for the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. See Figure 1 for details on the tectonic structures.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 05 March 2019
Figure 2. Epicentral location (solid circles) and fault ruptures (solid lines) of the three scenario earthquakes considered in this study. Dashed lines indicate the fault segments mapped by Abdrakhmatov et al. (2016) that potentially ruptured during the 1889 Chilik earthquake. Irregular lines
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2016
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2016) 57 (2): 337–343.
... = 5.0–5.9 ( 1 ), M = 6.0–6.9 ( 2 ), M = 7.0–7.9 ( 3 ), M ≈ 8 Kemin (Kebin) earthquake of 03.01.1911 ( 4 ); 5 – 7 , active faults of strike-slip ( 5 ), reverse ( 6 ), and uncertain ( 7 ) geometry. Arabic numerals in squares stand for fault names: 1, northern Chilik-Kemin; 2, southern Chilik-Kemin...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Distribution of peak ground acceleration (PGA), together with its standard deviation, for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. The mean ground motions and their standard deviations have been computed from 1000 scenarios. The white star indicates the city of Almaty. The white dot and the white line describe the epicenter and the fault rupture, respectively.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 05 March 2019
Figure 4. Distribution of peak ground acceleration (PGA), together with its standard deviation, for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 ChonKemin earthquake. The mean ground motions and their standard deviations have been computed from 1000 scenarios
Image
Distribution of 1.0 s SA, together with its standard deviation, for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. The mean ground motions and their standard deviations have been computed from 1000 scenarios. The white star indicates the city of Almaty. The white dot and the white line describe the epicenter and the fault rupture, respectively.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 05 March 2019
Figure C2. Distribution of 1.0 s SA, together with its standard deviation, for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 ChonKemin earthquake. The mean ground motions and their standard deviations have been computed from 1000 scenarios. The white star
Image
Distribution of 0.2 s spectral acceleration (SA), together with its standard deviation, for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 Chon‐Kemin earthquake. The mean ground motions and their standard deviations have been computed from 1000 scenarios. The white star indicates the city of Almaty. The white dot and the white line describe the epicenter and the fault rupture, respectively.The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 05 March 2019
Figure C1. Distribution of 0.2 s spectral acceleration (SA), together with its standard deviation, for (a) the 1887 Verny earthquake, (b) the 1889 Chilik earthquake, and (c) the 1911 ChonKemin earthquake. The mean ground motions and their standard deviations have been computed from 1000
Journal Article
Published: 01 October 2015
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2015) 56 (10): 1475–1483.
... the M > 8 Kebin earthquake of 1911 and prehistoric events that produced rockslides, landslides, and multiple fault scarps. Rockslides in the Chon-Kyzylsuu basin are located in the hanging wall of the Terskey border thrust fault. The observed deformation results from at least four prehistoric...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2000
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2000) 41 (7): 929–939.
... of the piedmonts ( Fig. 3 ). Southern slope of Kungei Ala-Too . The Kungei recent tectonic uplift is separated in the north from the Chilik-Kemin graben, striking along the Chon-Kemin River, by the Kyrgyz-Kungei fault. The Issyk-Kul’ intermontane basin occurs to the south from the Kungei uplift ( Figs. 1...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 03 March 2021
Seismological Research Letters (2021) 92 (4): 2134–2144.
... ≥ 6.0 earthquakes occurred within the Tian Shan (Fig.  1a ). However, only the two largest (1889 M  8.0 Chilik and the 1911 M w  8.0 Chon Kemin) events produced significant surface‐faulting deformation (surface rupture lengths of > 150    km in Fig.  1a ; e.g., Abdrakhmatov et...
FIGURES | View All (5)
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2002
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2002) 92 (8): 3190–3209.
...Figure 1. (a) Location of Kyrgyzstan. (b) Map showing the morphology of the central-eastern Tien Shan, the central part of the Talas Fergana fault, and the Chilik-Kemin and Chon Aksu faults. Epicenters of instrumental and historical earthquakes in a magnitude range between 5 and 8.3 are indicated...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Journal Article
Published: 26 September 2022
Seismological Research Letters (2023) 94 (1): 87–99.
... report ten >M 7.0 major and great earthquakes in the Tian Shan, including the 1911 M w  7.8–8.0 Kebin (ChonKemin) event, 1889 M 8.0 Nilek event, and the 1889 M w  8.0–8.3 Chilik earthquake ( Bindi et al. , 2014 ; Abdrakhmatov et al. 2016 ; Arrowsmith et al. , 2017 ; Krüger et...
FIGURES | View All (6)
Series: Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published: 01 January 2017
DOI: 10.1144/SP432.10
EISBN: 9781862399648
... of moraine; possible splaying and moraine settling. Low U. ChonKeminChilik 643418 4747240 1 2 Estimate JRA 72605:4 Scarps on north side of river – possibly fluvially modified/fluvial riser enhanced by faulting? Low 646884 4747857 2 3 Estimate JRA 72605:6 May be fluvial risers...
FIGURES | View All (13)