1-20 OF 243 RESULTS FOR

Chino Hills earthquake 2008

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 July 2014
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2014) 104 (4): 1876–1898.
...Ricardo Taborda; Jacobo Bielak Abstract We present a set of ground‐motion simulations of the 2008 M w 5.4 Chino Hills earthquake using different seismic‐velocity models available for southern California. The simulations are tailored for a maximum frequency of 4 Hz and a minimum shear‐wave velocity...
FIGURES | View All (16)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2013
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2013) 103 (1): 131–156.
...Ricardo Taborda; Jacobo Bielak Abstract We present a simulation of the 2008 M w 5.4 Chino Hills earthquake for a maximum frequency up to 4 Hz and a minimum shear‐wave velocity down to 200 m/s and perform a validation study comparing data obtained from seismic networks with simulation synthetics...
FIGURES | View All (24)
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 2010
Seismological Research Letters (2010) 81 (5): 715–723.
... for the GOF estimate is provided in the electronic supplement. We test the method for BBSs generated for the 2008 M w 5.4 Chino Hills, California, earthquake. Two additional GOF measures ( Anderson 2004 ; Kristekova et al. 2006 ) have been proposed for the purpose of validation and verification...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 November 2008
Seismological Research Letters (2008) 79 (6): 855–866.
... ), indicating a low overall rate. As of August 8, only 26 M ≥ 2 aftershocks had been recorded. © 2008 by the Seismological Society of America 2008 The 29 July 2008 Mw 5.4 Chino Hills earthquake was the largest event to occur within the greater Los Angeles metropolitan region since the Mw 6.7...
FIGURES | View All (10)
Journal Article
Published: 01 August 2012
Earthquake Spectra (2012) 28 (3): 1243–1267.
... it to an existing nine-story building, symmetric in plan. The computer model developed for the building is validated against motions of the building recorded during the Chino Hills earthquake (2008). It is demonstrated that nonlinear response history analysis (RHA) of the building for a small set of records scaled...
FIGURES | View All (20)
Image
Floor accelerations recorded by the sensors shown in Figure 4 during the magnitude 5.4 Chino Hills earthquake (2008).
Published: 01 August 2012
Figure 5. Floor accelerations recorded by the sensors shown in Figure 4 during the magnitude 5.4 Chino Hills earthquake (2008).
Image
Comparison of recorded and computed floor displacements at the sensor locations (Figure 4). Recorded data is from the Chino Hills earthquake (2008).
Published: 01 August 2012
Figure 7. Comparison of recorded and computed floor displacements at the sensor locations ( Figure 4 ). Recorded data is from the Chino Hills earthquake (2008).
Image
Epicenter location and focal mechanisms of the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake, the 1994 Northridge earthquake, and five other moderate‐size sequences occurred in the vicinity of the Los Angeles metropolitan area. The 1987 Whittier Narrows earthquake caused three fatalities and about $360 million in damages and property losses, while the 1994 Northridge earthquake caused over 50 direct fatalities and over $40 billion in damages and property losses. The 2008 Chino Hills earthquake caused no fatalities and no significant damages. The highlighted area corresponds to the region of interest for this study. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 01 February 2013
Figure 1. Epicenter location and focal mechanisms of the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake, the 1994 Northridge earthquake, and five other moderate‐size sequences occurred in the vicinity of the Los Angeles metropolitan area. The 1987 Whittier Narrows earthquake caused three fatalities and about $360
Image
(a) Locations of the 29 July 2008 Chino Hills earthquake (star) and stations (triangles) used in this study, along with (b) a sample of CAP inversions. The five stations used in this sample CAP inversion are highlighted by circles in (a). In (b), the station names are expressed in three letters with their distances in kilometers above the letters. The numbers below the letters state the azimuth in degrees. Results in matching Pnl and surface waves are given on the right with data in solid lines and fits in dashed lines. The numbers below the segments state the timing shifts and the cross correlations. Positive time shifts indicate that the synthetic needs to be shifted back or that the data arrives late. Note that the Rayleigh wave is 4.6 s late, while the Love wave is 1.9 s for station SHO. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 01 June 2011
Figure 1. (a) Locations of the 29 July 2008 Chino Hills earthquake (star) and stations (triangles) used in this study, along with (b) a sample of CAP inversions. The five stations used in this sample CAP inversion are highlighted by circles in (a). In (b), the station names are expressed
Journal Article
Published: 03 November 2015
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2015) 105 (6): 3129–3142.
... a bandwidth of two decades. We compare the effects of different power-law exponents using a finite-fault source model of the 2008 M w 5.4 Chino Hills, California, earthquake and find that Q ( f ) models generally better fit the strong-motion data than the constant Q models for frequencies above 1 Hz. Online...
FIGURES | View All (12)
Image
Evaluation of SSI effects in southern California through regional ground‐motion simulations and reduced order SSI models. (a) The 2008 Mw 5.4 Chino Hills earthquake simulated in (Taborda and Bielak, 2013), (b) 3D building representation, and (c) ROM applied to estimate SSI effects at global scale for the north component of the Chino Hills earthquake. The color version of this figure is available only in the electronic edition.
Published: 26 July 2023
Figure 10. Evaluation of SSI effects in southern California through regional ground‐motion simulations and reduced order SSI models. (a) The 2008 M w  5.4 Chino Hills earthquake simulated in ( Taborda and Bielak, 2013 ), (b) 3D building representation, and (c) ROM applied to estimate SSI
Image
▴ (A) VS real-time performance in southern California during 13 July 2008–9 April 2009. The polygon encloses the SCSN area of responsibility (AOR). (B and C) Evolution of VS epicentral location and magnitude error, respectively, as a function of time for the M 5.4 28 July 2008 Chino Hills earthquake. The VS codes were offline at the time of the event due to a scheduled code upgrade. Results shown were generated using a waveform dataset for the Chino Hills event downloaded from the Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCECDC). (D and E) Evolution of VS epicentral location and magnitude error, respectively, as a function of time for an M 5.1 5 December 2008 earthquake near Barstow, California. Results shown were generated in real time.
Published: 01 September 2009
Hills earthquake. The VS codes were offline at the time of the event due to a scheduled code upgrade. Results shown were generated using a waveform dataset for the Chino Hills event downloaded from the Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCECDC). (D and E) Evolution of VS epicentral location
Journal Article
Published: 07 February 2023
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2023) 113 (3): 1324–1343.
... earthquake, the 2008 M 5.4 Chino Hills earthquake, the 2019 M 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquake, the 2020 M 4.5 South El Monte earthquake, and a synthetic M 7.8 earthquake on the southern San Andreas fault from the ShakeOut scenario, which was the basis of a statewide emergency response exercise. From the test...
FIGURES | View All (15)
Journal Article
Published: 01 February 2011
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2011) 101 (1): 160–175.
... database used in model development. In addition, we perform a blind comparison test using 1060 ground-motion records from seven recent earthquakes recorded in California: the 2003 M 6.5 San Simeon event, 2004 M 6.0 Parkfield event, 2005 M 5.2 Anza event, 2007 M 5.4 Alum Rock event, 2008 M 5.4 Chino Hills...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Journal Article
Published: 01 June 2011
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2011) 101 (3): 1438–1445.
...Figure 1. (a) Locations of the 29 July 2008 Chino Hills earthquake (star) and stations (triangles) used in this study, along with (b) a sample of CAP inversions. The five stations used in this sample CAP inversion are highlighted by circles in (a). In (b), the station names are expressed...
FIGURES | View All (7)
Image
Shear stress-strain hysteresis loops at a depth of 3.95 m for the Corona site during the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake.
Published: 01 May 2017
Figure 1. Shear stress-strain hysteresis loops at a depth of 3.95 m for the Corona site during the 2008 Chino Hills earthquake.
Journal Article
Published: 26 July 2023
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2023) 113 (6): 2557–2573.
...Figure 10. Evaluation of SSI effects in southern California through regional ground‐motion simulations and reduced order SSI models. (a) The 2008 M w  5.4 Chino Hills earthquake simulated in ( Taborda and Bielak, 2013 ), (b) 3D building representation, and (c) ROM applied to estimate SSI...
FIGURES | View All (13)
Image
Comparison of recorded and computed floor displacements; recorded data is from the 2008 (Mw) 5.4 Chino Hills (Southern California) earthquake.
Published: 01 August 2015
Figure 5. Comparison of recorded and computed floor displacements; recorded data is from the 2008 ( M w ) 5.4 Chino Hills (Southern California) earthquake.
Journal Article
Published: 26 June 2018
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2018) 108 (4): 2248–2264.
... the choice of these metrics. In particular, we use a validation dataset of a series of physics‐based ground‐motion simulations done for the 2008 M w 5.4 Chino Hills, California, earthquake. We study the relationships that exist between 11 metrics and carry out a process where these metrics are understood...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Image
Comparison between true (black) and predicted PFA in (a) 1992 Landers, (b) 1992 Big Bear, (c) 1994 Northridge, (d) 2008 Chino Hills, (e) 2019 M6.4 Ridgecrest, and (f) 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest earthquakes.
Published: 01 May 2024
Figure 9. Comparison between true (black) and predicted PFA in (a) 1992 Landers, (b) 1992 Big Bear, (c) 1994 Northridge, (d) 2008 Chino Hills, (e) 2019 M 6.4 Ridgecrest, and (f) 2019 M 7.1 Ridgecrest earthquakes.