1-20 OF 66 RESULTS FOR

Chikoi

Results shown limited to content with bounding coordinates.
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 1999
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (1999) 40 (4): 566–575.
...I. V. Gordienko; V. D. Bayanov; V. S. Klimuk; V. A. Ponomarchuk; A. V. Travin According to 39 Ar/ 40 Ar dating and Sr isotope ratios, the Late Mesozoic volcanites (trachybasalt-shoshonite-Iatite) of the Chikoi-Khilok continental rift valley in Transbaikalia are of mantle origin ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Image
Map of sampling sites in the Transbaikalia region. (A) The Chikoy River basin (the Krasnuy Chikoy District); (B) the ‘Lyubov’ mine (the Kyra District); (C) the ‘Baleyzoloto’ mine (the Baley District); (D) the ‘Ksenyevsky’ mine (the Mogocha District); (E) the ‘Tungir’, ‘Uryum’(the Tungir-Olyokma District) mines.
Published: 01 August 2002
Fig. 1 Map of sampling sites in the Transbaikalia region. ( A ) The Chikoy River basin (the Krasnuy Chikoy District); ( B ) the ‘Lyubov’ mine (the Kyra District); ( C ) the ‘Baleyzoloto’ mine (the Baley District); ( D ) the ‘Ksenyevsky’ mine (the Mogocha District); ( E ) the ‘Tungir’, ‘Uryum
Image
Geoelectric section along the Selenga River delta–Krasnyi Chikoi Village profile. a, From the results of inversion; b, model; 1, resistivity isolines; 2, inferred deep faults; 3, magnetotelluric sounding stations.
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 4. Geoelectric section along the Selenga River delta–Krasnyi Chikoi Village profile. a, From the results of inversion; b, model; 1, resistivity isolines; 2, inferred deep faults; 3, magnetotelluric sounding stations.
Image
Correlation between the Khilok–Chikoi basin and the Zagan Uplift. (Sklyarov et al., 1997). K1gs. Gusinoe Ozero Formation; K1hl, Khilok Formation; γPZ3z, Upper Paleozoic granitoids; γPZ1pd, Early Paleozoic granitoids; 1, mylonitization; 2, faults; 3, increased fracture zone; 4, thrust.
Published: 01 January 2017
Fig. 8. Correlation between the Khilok–Chikoi basin and the Zagan Uplift. ( Sklyarov et al., 1997 ). K 1 gs. Gusinoe Ozero Formation; K 1 hl, Khilok Formation; γPZ 3 z, Upper Paleozoic granitoids; γPZ 1 pd, Early Paleozoic granitoids; 1 , mylonitization; 2 , faults; 3 , increased fracture zone
Image
Schematic geologic structure of the Chikoi-Khilok rift, after [24]. 1 — Quaternary deposits; 2 — basaltoids of Ichetui Formation (J3); 3 — sedimentary-volcanogenic rocks of Khilok Formation (K1); 4 — sedimentary and coaliferous deposits of Gusinoozersk Formation (K1); 5 — Cenozoic basaltoids; 6 — Proterozoic-Paleozoic complexes in basement and framework of depression; 7 — faults; 8 — boundaries of discordant bedding of deposits; 9 — sites of sampling for paleomagnetic study: 1 — Beregovaya, 2 — Bichura, 3 — Maleta, 4 — Potanino.
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 2. Schematic geologic structure of the Chikoi-Khilok rift, after [ 24 ]. 1 — Quaternary deposits; 2 — basaltoids of Ichetui Formation (J 3 ); 3 — sedimentary-volcanogenic rocks of Khilok Formation (K 1 ); 4 — sedimentary and coaliferous deposits of Gusinoozersk Formation (K 1 ); 5
Image
Geologic structure of the Chikoi-Khilok rift valley. 1 – Quaternary deposits (Q); 2 – basaltoids of the Ichetui Formation (J3ic); 3 – volcanosedimentary rocks of the Khilok Formation (K1hl); 4 – sedimentary and carbonaceous deposits of the Gusinoozersk Formation (K1); 5 – Cenozoic basaltoids (KZ); 6 – Paleozoic and Proterozoic metamorphic rocks and granitoids (PR-PZ); 7 – faults; 8 – faults hidden under the cover of Quaternary deposits; 9 – boundaries of discordant bedding of deposits; 10 – numbers and localities of samples for Ar/Ar dating. Encircled number 2 is the Motnin uplift.
Published: 01 April 1999
Fig. 1. Geologic structure of the Chikoi-Khilok rift valley. 1 – Quaternary deposits (Q); 2 – basaltoids of the Ichetui Formation (J 3 ic); 3 – volcanosedimentary rocks of the Khilok Formation (K 1 hl); 4 – sedimentary and carbonaceous deposits of the Gusinoozersk Formation (K 1 ); 5
Journal Article
Published: 01 September 1997
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (1997) 38 (9): 1488–1492.
... of these fossils has revealed at least three faunas similar to Western-Transbaikalian ones: Chikoi, Tologoi, and Upper Paleolithic faunal assemblages. The most ancient fauna found in Eastern Transbaikalia is represented by the Late Pliocene Chikoi faunal assemblages with Villanyia and Prosiphneus. The next Early...
FIGURES
Image
The 39Ar/40Ar age spectra and 37ArCa/39ArK values for volcanogenic rocks of the Chikoi-Khilok rift.
Published: 01 April 1999
Fig. 3. The 39 Ar/ 40 Ar age spectra and 37 Ar Ca / 39 Ar K values for volcanogenic rocks of the Chikoi-Khilok rift.
Image
The 39Ar/40Ar age spectra and 37ArCa/39ArK values for volcanogenic rocks of the Chikoi-Khilok rift.
Published: 01 April 1999
Fig. 3. The 39 Ar/ 40 Ar age spectra and 37 Ar Ca / 39 Ar K values for volcanogenic rocks of the Chikoi-Khilok rift.
Image
Typical Zijderveld (a) and k(T) plots (b) of volcanics from the Chikoi-Khilok depression. Hereafter, filled circles on Zijderveld plots designate vector projections on the horizontal plane, and clear ones, on the vertical plane. The plots are tilt-corrected.
Published: 01 December 2004
Fig. 5. Typical Zijderveld ( a ) and k ( T ) plots ( b ) of volcanics from the Chikoi-Khilok depression. Hereafter, filled circles on Zijderveld plots designate vector projections on the horizontal plane, and clear ones, on the vertical plane. The plots are tilt-corrected.
Journal Article
Published: 01 January 2017
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2017) 58 (1): 133–147.
...Fig. 4. Geoelectric section along the Selenga River delta–Krasnyi Chikoi Village profile. a, From the results of inversion; b, model; 1, resistivity isolines; 2, inferred deep faults; 3, magnetotelluric sounding stations. ...
FIGURES | View All (8)
Journal Article
Published: 01 April 2005
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2005) 46 (4): 414–423.
... Pliocene-Holocene section of Western Transbaikalia includes eleven successive mammal assemblages and the Eastern Transbaikalian section includes four faunas of which three are equivalents of the Chikoi, Tologoi, and Upper Paleolithic assemblages from Western Transbaikalia. The correlation among the faunal...
FIGURES
Journal Article
Published: 01 December 2004
Russ. Geol. Geophys. (2004) 45 (12): 1404–1417.
...Fig. 2. Schematic geologic structure of the Chikoi-Khilok rift, after [ 24 ]. 1 — Quaternary deposits; 2 — basaltoids of Ichetui Formation (J 3 ); 3 — sedimentary-volcanogenic rocks of Khilok Formation (K 1 ); 4 — sedimentary and coaliferous deposits of Gusinoozersk Formation (K 1 ); 5...
FIGURES | View All (11)
Journal Article
Published: 01 May 2003
American Mineralogist (2003) 88 (5-6): 830–836.
...-stage pocket mineral in the Sosedka and Mokhovaya pegmatite veins, Malkhan gem tourmaline deposit, Chikoy district, Chita oblast, Russia. Borocookeite proper, as well as boron-rich cookeite, is light grey with a pinkish or yellow hue and occurs as a dense, massive crypto-flaky aggregate or thin crusts...
FIGURES | View All (4)
Image
Schematic structure of Late Mesozoic-Cenozoic West Transbaikalian rift zone, after [21]. 1, 2 — depressions and grabens filled with: 1 — volcanics, 2 — sediments; 3 — rift zone; 4 — rift zone framing. Letters stand for grabens and depressions: MK — Maly Khamar-Daban, B — Borgoi, GO — Gusinoozersk, T — Tugnui, CK — Chikoi-Khilok, U — Uda, I — Il’kin, BD — Badin, V — Vitim.
Published: 01 December 2004
— Borgoi, GO — Gusinoozersk, T — Tugnui, CK — Chikoi-Khilok, U — Uda, I — Il’kin, BD — Badin, V — Vitim.
Image
The location of the Kultuminskoe deposit on the scheme of the main structures of eastern Transbaikalia, simplified after (Zorin et al., 1998; Spiridonov et al., 2006). 1, Siberian continent; 2, Mongol-Chinese continent; 3, Onot island arc terrane; 4, main branch of the Mongol-Okhotsk structure; 5, additional branch of the Mongol-Okhotsk structure (frontal part of the Onot overthrust); 6, faults formed or reactivated during continental collision: CI, Chikoi-Ingoda; GA, Gazimur, UR, Urulyungui.
Published: 01 June 2019
-Okhotsk structure; 5 , additional branch of the Mongol-Okhotsk structure (frontal part of the Onot overthrust); 6 , faults formed or reactivated during continental collision: CI, Chikoi-Ingoda; GA, Gazimur, UR, Urulyungui.
Image
Classification SiO2–(Na2O + K2O) diagram (according to Le Maitre, 1989) (a) and REE pattern (b) of volcanites from the Chikoi-Khilok rift valley. Fields: S1 – trachybasalts, S2 – trachyandesite-basalts, S3 – trachyandesites, U1 – tephrites, basanites, U2 – phonotephrites. 1 – trachybasalt; 2 – shoshonite; 3 – latite, 4 – shoshonite-latite; 5 – alkali basalts of continental rifts [17].
Published: 01 April 1999
Fig. 2. Classification SiO 2 –(Na 2 O + K 2 O) diagram (according to Le Maitre, 1989) ( a ) and REE pattern ( b ) of volcanites from the Chikoi-Khilok rift valley. Fields: S 1 – trachybasalts, S 2 – trachyandesite-basalts, S 3 – trachyandesites, U 1 – tephrites, basanites, U 2
Image
Generalized map of gold mineralization density 1-3 density grades (number of gold occurrences per 100 km2): 1 – 1–2 occurrences; 2 – 3–4 occurrences; 3 – 5 and more occurrences; 4 – main branch of the Mongolia-Okhotsk suture; 5 – side branch of the Mongolia-Okhotsk suture (frontal part of the Onon thrust); 6 – limits of tectonic erosion in the Onon allochthon; 7 – faults, newly formed or rejuvenated during collision: CI – Chikoy-Ingoda fault, GA – Gazimur fault, UR – Uruliungui fault.
Published: 01 November 1998
of the Onon thrust); 6 – limits of tectonic erosion in the Onon allochthon; 7 – faults, newly formed or rejuvenated during collision: CI – Chikoy-Ingoda fault, GA – Gazimur fault, UR – Uruliungui fault.
Image
The tectonic structures of southwestern Transbaikalia. 1, Dzhida–Vitim fault according to (Khrenov, 1988); 2, lines delineating the zone of active faults of the Mongol-Okhotsk lineament according to (Nikolaev, 1986); 3, 4,outer core outline (3) and the bottom of (4) the Hentiyn-Daur megadome, according to (Shatalov, 1977); 5, paleoseismogenic structures within the limits of the Hentiyn-Daur megadome: Gusinoe Ozero (1), Orongoi (2), Chikoi (3), Khustai (4), Gunzhin (5), Kerulen (6), Sharkhai (7), Avdar (8).The image is obtained with the use of the 3” SRTM DEM digital relief model. The area shown in Fig. 2 is delineated with the white rectangle.
Published: 01 June 2019
) the Hentiyn-Daur megadome, according to ( Shatalov, 1977 ); 5 , paleoseismogenic structures within the limits of the Hentiyn-Daur megadome: Gusinoe Ozero (1), Orongoi (2), Chikoi (3), Khustai (4), Gunzhin (5), Kerulen (6), Sharkhai (7), Avdar (8).The image is obtained with the use of the 3” SRTM DEM digital
Image
a, Semicharacteristic MT curves of the study area. b, Typical polar diagrams of the impedance tensor: 1, within tectonic depressions; 2, within mountain ranges; 3, in fault zones. 1, transverse MT curves; 2, longitudinal MT curves; 3, GMV curve (Pospeev, 1979; Pospeev and Mikhalevskii, 1981); 4, lines bounding the region of experimental values of ρk; 5, block numbers: 1, Selenga, 2, Khamar-Daban; 3, Tsagan-Daban; 4, Tugnui depression; 5, Zagan Range; 6, Khilok–Chikoi basin; 7, Malkhan Range; 6, principal polar diagrams of the impedance tenzor; 7, additional polar diagrams of the impedance tenzor.
Published: 01 January 2017
and Mikhalevskii, 1981 ); 4 , lines bounding the region of experimental values of ρ k ; 5 , block numbers: 1, Selenga, 2, Khamar-Daban; 3, Tsagan-Daban; 4, Tugnui depression; 5, Zagan Range; 6, Khilok–Chikoi basin; 7, Malkhan Range; 6 , principal polar diagrams of the impedance tenzor; 7 , additional polar